subject:"\[FairfieldLife\] Re\: Morning Joe"

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe

2016-07-08 Thread dhamiltony...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

Lord, what a thoughtless wretch was I,
 To mourn, and murmur and repine;
 To see the wicked placed on high,
 In pride and robes of honor shine.
 
 (fugue)
 But oh, their end, their dreadful end,
 Thy sanctuary taught me so,
 On slipp'ry rocks I see them stand, 
 And fiery billows roll below. 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6...@yahoo.com> wrote :

 Splat



---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <dhamiltony...@yahoo.com> wrote :

 Yes, poor Bevan.
 I was appreciating this irony too as Bevan was employed here by example..   I 
hear the term, 'Bevanite' spoken more often now to describe type by camp of 
folks around the middle of TM .  A Bevan seems now to be its own colloquial 
descriptive of meditator type. 

 Re: Bevan and Sainthood: 
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/messages/385444 
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/messages/385444

 ..looking in on the personalities of the people inside TM now,  FFL post 
[377120] can be useful for some perspective between the two characteristic 
sides of TM: 
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/messages/377120 
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/messages/377120 
  


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <awoelfleba...@yahoo.com> wrote :

 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 ROFL. Douglas... I was tying it all together. I could have said Judy was 
Abbott's Costello, Laurel's Hardy, Tom's Dick Smothers etc etc.
 Maharishi's Bevan *seemed* to fit the FairfieldLife  meme better.
  There really must be some hard feelings about Bevan LOL.
  Calling someone a *Bevan*, an insult worthy of discipline? ROFLMAO!

 Poor Bevan.
 

 The bigger they are, the harder they fall. 
 


 From: "dhamiltony2k5@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2016 9:46 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe
 
 
   FFL’s version of Godwin’s Law, corollary: 
 

 ..as FFL discussions grow longer the probability of comparison to fanatical 
TMerTB’ers increases.


 Judy could be Hillary's *Bevan Morris*.

 BTW, that's not meant to be *mean spirited*. In fact, a compliment.

 

 But, the ad hominem is done.. 
 

 FFL hijacked, again? What did Fairfield, TM or anything spiritual have to do 
with the preceding arguing of politics anyway? 
 

 I was appreciating how careful the protagonists here were being to avoid 
personalized incivility in their writing even though the subject thread had 
nothing to do with spirituality. And then, this comparison of character playing 
to the house. 
 In hockey you'd get a penalty timeout for fighting with a cheap shot like 
this. In soccer, maybe a yellow card warning.  This gets a FFL yellow card at 
the least. Go to your corners. Anymore harassment of each other or of the 
referee by anyone gets a red card. Be kind and go forth as per the Yahoo-groups 
guidelines. -JaiGuruYou
 


 




---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <authfriend@...> wrote :

 This (from both of you) is as absurd as Barry claiming I'm a "cult apologist" 
for TM. I don't proselytize for Hillary or for TM. All I've been doing is 
addressing unfair and/or inaccurate accusations and characterizations. I'm 
hardly a True Believer in TM or a fanatical supporter of Hillary, and you both 
know it. 

 You just can't abide it when what you say about Hillary is refuted, so you 
have to "shoot the messenger."
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 Duh! Most dedicated of True Believers. Judy could be Hillary's *Bevan 
Morris*.
 Hillary's *skin boy*. LOL
  BTW, that's not meant to be *mean spirited*. In fact, a compliment.


 From: "Bhairitu noozguru@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2016 11:02 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe

 
   
 Hey Mike, you think that Judy might be a fanatical Hillary supporter? :-D 
 
 On 07/07/2016 06:41 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] 
wrote:

   

 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
<mdixon.6569@...> mailto:mdixon.6569@... wrote :
 
 Actually, I've been saying for at least a month or longer that she would *not* 
be indicted. Not because she didn't do anything wrong but because she would be 
covered and protected by the Obama administration. It just wasn't going to 
happen. The *fix* was in.
 

 Nonsense. That's just wildly paranoid. Comey is one of that rarest of beasts: 
a straight-arrow, incorruptible Republican. He was crystal clear in his 
announcement as to why she wasn't being indicted: the circumstances necessary 
to justify an indictment didn't exist.
 
 
 And it had been decided for some time that Lynch would go along with whatever 
the

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe

2016-07-08 Thread olliesed...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

So much ado about nothing. Here is more on the missing White House emails - 
oops, wrong administration. lol - Pretty funny to watch Trey Gowdy with serious 
egg on his face, sputtering and babbling...politics is quite a circus, and 
these GOP clowns think they can distract from the clueless induhvidual now 
nominated from their own party. Not a chance. This will be a defeat of epic 
proportions.  

 http://www.pbs.org/weta/washingtonweek/web-video/missing-white-house-emails 
http://www.pbs.org/weta/washingtonweek/web-video/missing-white-house-emails
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RbhnaVlczuc 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RbhnaVlczuc 

 

 Megyn Kelly Tears Into Hillary Clinton Email Excuses - " Bunch of Nons... 
7/5/16 - Megyn Kelly Tears Into Hillary Clinton Email Excuses - " Bunch of 
Nonsense " - Fox News https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RbhnaVlczuc
 

 
 


 From: vox_9 <no_re...@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, July 8, 2016 8:28 AM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe
 
 
   

 Yabut, what about the coffee, Mike?

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9QpfrZyQzzg 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9QpfrZyQzzg 

 

 Morning Joe Rips Hillary, Comey, Obama Over Email Fiasco Joe Scarborough and 
Mika Brzezinski rip Hillary Clinton, James Comey and President Obama over the 
email fiasco. ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9QpfrZyQzzg

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe

2016-07-08 Thread dhamiltony...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

Yes, poor Bevan.
 I was appreciating this irony too as Bevan was employed here by example..   I 
hear the term, 'Bevanite' spoken more often now to describe type by camp of 
folks around the middle of TM .  A Bevan seems now to be its own colloquial 
descriptive of meditator type. 

 Re: Bevan and Sainthood: 
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/messages/385444 
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/messages/385444

 ..looking in on the personalities of the people inside TM now,  FFL post 
[377120] can be useful for some perspective between the two characteristic 
sides of TM: 
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/messages/377120 
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/messages/377120 
 



---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <awoelfleba...@yahoo.com> wrote :

 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 ROFL. Douglas... I was tying it all together. I could have said Judy was 
Abbott's Costello, Laurel's Hardy, Tom's Dick Smothers etc etc.
 Maharishi's Bevan *seemed* to fit the FairfieldLife  meme better.
  There really must be some hard feelings about Bevan LOL.
  Calling someone a *Bevan*, an insult worthy of discipline? ROFLMAO!

 Poor Bevan.
 

 The bigger they are, the harder they fall. 
 


 From: "dhamiltony2k5@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2016 9:46 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe
 
 
   FFL’s version of Godwin’s Law, corollary: 
 

 ..as FFL discussions grow longer the probability of someone’s comparison to 
fanatical TMerTB’ers increases.


 Judy could be Hillary's *Bevan Morris*.

 BTW, that's not meant to be *mean spirited*. In fact, a compliment.

 

 But, the ad hominem is done.. 
 

 FFL hijacked, again? What did Fairfield, TM or anything spiritual have to do 
with the preceding arguing of politics anyway? 
 

 I was appreciating how careful the protagonists here were being to avoid 
personalized incivility in their writing even though the subject thread had 
nothing to do with spirituality. And then, this comparison of character playing 
to the house. 
 In hockey you'd get a penalty timeout for fighting with a cheap shot like 
this. In soccer, maybe a yellow card warning.  This gets a FFL yellow card at 
the least. Go to your corners. Anymore harassment of each other or of the 
referee by anyone gets a red card. Be kind and go forth as per the Yahoo-groups 
guidelines. -JaiGuruYou
 


 




---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <authfriend@...> wrote :

 This (from both of you) is as absurd as Barry claiming I'm a "cult apologist" 
for TM. I don't proselytize for Hillary or for TM. All I've been doing is 
addressing unfair and/or inaccurate accusations and characterizations. I'm 
hardly a True Believer in TM or a fanatical supporter of Hillary, and you both 
know it. 

 You just can't abide it when what you say about Hillary is refuted, so you 
have to "shoot the messenger."
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 Duh! Most dedicated of True Believers. Judy could be Hillary's *Bevan 
Morris*.
 Hillary's *skin boy*. LOL
  BTW, that's not meant to be *mean spirited*. In fact, a compliment.


 From: "Bhairitu noozguru@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2016 11:02 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe

 
   
 Hey Mike, you think that Judy might be a fanatical Hillary supporter? :-D 
 
 On 07/07/2016 06:41 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] 
wrote:

   

 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
<mdixon.6569@...> mailto:mdixon.6569@... wrote :
 
 Actually, I've been saying for at least a month or longer that she would *not* 
be indicted. Not because she didn't do anything wrong but because she would be 
covered and protected by the Obama administration. It just wasn't going to 
happen. The *fix* was in.
 

 Nonsense. That's just wildly paranoid. Comey is one of that rarest of beasts: 
a straight-arrow, incorruptible Republican. He was crystal clear in his 
announcement as to why she wasn't being indicted: the circumstances necessary 
to justify an indictment didn't exist.
 
 
 And it had been decided for some time that Lynch would go along with whatever 
the FBI recommended. (BTW, her meeting with Bill Clinton was private but not 
"secret.")
 
 
 Yes, Comey did Hillary considerable damage. He did not, however, accuse her of 
having lied. She certainly wasn't st! raightforward, but I'm not sure she told 
any actual lies.
 
 
 Trump has already f'd it up. His speech last night was bizarre. Instead of 
focusing on what Comey said about Hillary, he attacked Comey himself, and 
veered off tha

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe

2016-07-08 Thread Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RbhnaVlczuc

  
|  
|   
|   
|   ||

   |

  |
|  
||  
Megyn Kelly Tears Into Hillary Clinton Email Excuses - " Bunch of Nons...
 7/5/16 - Megyn Kelly Tears Into Hillary Clinton Email Excuses - " Bunch of 
Nonsense " - Fox News  |   |

  |

  |

 


  From: vox_9 <no_re...@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, July 8, 2016 8:28 AM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe
   
    
Yabut, what about the coffee, Mike?

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9QpfrZyQzzg

 
| 
| 
| 
|  |  |

 |

 |
| 
|   | 
Morning Joe Rips Hillary, Comey, Obama Over Email Fiasco
Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski rip Hillary Clinton, James Comey and 
President Obama over the email fiasco. ... |  |

 |

 |

 
  #yiv1820388949 #yiv1820388949 -- #yiv1820388949ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid 
#d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;}#yiv1820388949 
#yiv1820388949ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}#yiv1820388949 
#yiv1820388949ygrp-mkp #yiv1820388949hd 
{color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 
0;}#yiv1820388949 #yiv1820388949ygrp-mkp #yiv1820388949ads 
{margin-bottom:10px;}#yiv1820388949 #yiv1820388949ygrp-mkp .yiv1820388949ad 
{padding:0 0;}#yiv1820388949 #yiv1820388949ygrp-mkp .yiv1820388949ad p 
{margin:0;}#yiv1820388949 #yiv1820388949ygrp-mkp .yiv1820388949ad a 
{color:#ff;text-decoration:none;}#yiv1820388949 #yiv1820388949ygrp-sponsor 
#yiv1820388949ygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;}#yiv1820388949 
#yiv1820388949ygrp-sponsor #yiv1820388949ygrp-lc #yiv1820388949hd {margin:10px 
0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}#yiv1820388949 
#yiv1820388949ygrp-sponsor #yiv1820388949ygrp-lc .yiv1820388949ad 
{margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}#yiv1820388949 #yiv1820388949actions 
{font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;}#yiv1820388949 
#yiv1820388949activity 
{background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;}#yiv1820388949
 #yiv1820388949activity span {font-weight:700;}#yiv1820388949 
#yiv1820388949activity span:first-child 
{text-transform:uppercase;}#yiv1820388949 #yiv1820388949activity span a 
{color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;}#yiv1820388949 #yiv1820388949activity span 
span {color:#ff7900;}#yiv1820388949 #yiv1820388949activity span 
.yiv1820388949underline {text-decoration:underline;}#yiv1820388949 
.yiv1820388949attach 
{clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 
0;width:400px;}#yiv1820388949 .yiv1820388949attach div a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv1820388949 .yiv1820388949attach img 
{border:none;padding-right:5px;}#yiv1820388949 .yiv1820388949attach label 
{display:block;margin-bottom:5px;}#yiv1820388949 .yiv1820388949attach label a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv1820388949 blockquote {margin:0 0 0 
4px;}#yiv1820388949 .yiv1820388949bold 
{font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;}#yiv1820388949 
.yiv1820388949bold a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv1820388949 dd.yiv1820388949last 
p a {font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv1820388949 dd.yiv1820388949last p 
span {margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv1820388949 
dd.yiv1820388949last p span.yiv1820388949yshortcuts 
{margin-right:0;}#yiv1820388949 div.yiv1820388949attach-table div div a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv1820388949 div.yiv1820388949attach-table 
{width:400px;}#yiv1820388949 div.yiv1820388949file-title a, #yiv1820388949 
div.yiv1820388949file-title a:active, #yiv1820388949 
div.yiv1820388949file-title a:hover, #yiv1820388949 div.yiv1820388949file-title 
a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#yiv1820388949 div.yiv1820388949photo-title a, 
#yiv1820388949 div.yiv1820388949photo-title a:active, #yiv1820388949 
div.yiv1820388949photo-title a:hover, #yiv1820388949 
div.yiv1820388949photo-title a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#yiv1820388949 
div#yiv1820388949ygrp-mlmsg #yiv1820388949ygrp-msg p a 
span.yiv1820388949yshortcuts 
{font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;font-weight:normal;}#yiv1820388949 
.yiv1820388949green {color:#628c2a;}#yiv1820388949 .yiv1820388949MsoNormal 
{margin:0 0 0 0;}#yiv1820388949 o {font-size:0;}#yiv1820388949 
#yiv1820388949photos div {float:left;width:72px;}#yiv1820388949 
#yiv1820388949photos div div {border:1px solid 
#66;min-height:62px;overflow:hidden;width:62px;}#yiv1820388949 
#yiv1820388949photos div label 
{color:#66;font-size:10px;overflow:hidden;text-align:center;white-space:nowrap;width:64px;}#yiv1820388949
 #yiv1820388949reco-category {font-size:77%;}#yiv1820388949 
#yiv1820388949reco-desc {font-size:77%;}#yiv1820388949 .yiv1820388949replbq 
{margin:4px;}#yiv1820388949 #yiv1820388949ygrp-actbar div a:first-child 
{margin-right:2px;padding-right:5px;}#yiv1820388949 #yiv1820388949ygrp-mlmsg 
{font-size:13px;font-family:Arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;}#yiv1820388949 
#yiv1820388949ygrp-mlmsg table {font-size:inheri

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe

2016-07-08 Thread Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife]

FFL seemed to be created by Rick to fill the void of what was missing 
with other TM discussion groups who were solely focused on TM itself.  
It was a place to discuss what was going on with folks who were involved 
in TM or once were.  That involves whatever opinions they have of the 
present day even if it involves heated political discussions.


As I've pointed out over the years BBS boards and forums often would 
offer up a "General" or "Off Topic" section for discussion. This was to 
serve a similar person since the forums would often serve as a gathering 
point for a group of people with a specific interest.  Back in the early 
days when I was a computer club president we ran a club BBS for such 
discussion.  On a more national and global level there was CompuServe, 
GEnie and for the geeks BIX (Byte magazine's BBS).


The reason I invited Mike over to FFL2 was the folks he has been arguing 
with are now there carrying on political arguing.  There is no worry 
about ruffling the feathers of the moderator.  Alex is pretty liberal 
about things.  And it is quite a rumble. ;-)


On 07/07/2016 09:00 PM, Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] 
wrote:
ROFL. Douglas... I was tying it all together. I could have said Judy 
was Abbott's Costello, Laurel's Hardy, Tom's Dick Smothers etc etc.

Maharishi's Bevan *seemed* to fit the FairfieldLife meme better.
 There really must be some hard feelings about Bevan LOL.
 Calling someone a *Bevan*, an insult worthy of discipline? ROFLMAO!
Poor Bevan.



*From:* "dhamiltony...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" 
<FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>

*To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
*Sent:* Thursday, July 7, 2016 9:46 PM
*Subject:* Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe

FFL’s version of Godwin’s Law, corollary:
..as FFL discussions grow longer the probability of someone’s 
comparison to fanatical TMerTB’ers increases.


Judy could be Hillary's *Bevan Morris*.
BTW, that's not meant to be *mean spirited*. In fact, a compliment.

But, the ad hominem is done..

FFL hijacked, again? What did Fairfield, TM or anything spiritual have 
to do with the preceding arguing of politics anyway?


I was appreciating how careful the protagonists here were being to 
avoid personalized incivility in their writing even though the subject 
thread had nothing to do with spirituality. And then, this comparison 
of character playing to the house.
In hockey you'd get a penalty timeout for fighting with a cheap shot 
like this. In soccer, maybe a yellow card warning.  This gets a FFL 
yellow card at the least. Go to your corners. Anymore harassment of 
each other or of the referee by anyone gets a red card. Be kind and go 
forth as per the Yahoo-groups guidelines. -JaiGuruYou




---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <authfri...@yahoo.com> wrote :

This (from both of you) is as absurd as Barry claiming I'm a "cult 
apologist" for TM. I don't proselytize for Hillary or for TM. All I've 
been doing is addressing unfair and/or inaccurate accusations and 
characterizations. I'm hardly a True Believer in TM or a fanatical 
supporter of Hillary, and you both know it.


You just can't abide it when what you say about Hillary is refuted, so 
you have to "shoot the messenger."



---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

Duh!
Most dedicated of True Believers. Judy could be Hillary's *Bevan Morris*.
Hillary's *skin boy*. LOL
 BTW, that's not meant to be *mean spirited*. In fact, a compliment.

*From:* "Bhairitu noozguru@... [FairfieldLife]" 
<FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>

*To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
*Sent:* Thursday, July 7, 2016 11:02 AM
*Subject:* Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe

*Hey Mike, you think that Judy might be a fanatical Hillary 
supporter?* :-D


On 07/07/2016 06:41 AM, authfriend@... <mailto:authfriend@...> 
[FairfieldLife] wrote:






---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>, <mdixon.6569@...>
<mailto:mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

Actually, I've been saying for at least a month or longer
that she would *not* be indicted. Not because she didn't do
anything wrong but because she would be covered and protected
by the Obama administration. It just wasn't going to happen.
The *fix* was in.

Nonsense. That's just wildly paranoid. Comey is one of that
rarest of beasts: a straight-arrow, incorruptible Republican.
He was crystal clear in his announcement as to why she wasn't
being indicted: the circumstances necessary to justify an
indictment didn't exist.

And it had been decided for some time that

[FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe

2016-07-08 Thread vox_9


 Yabut, what about the coffee, Mike?

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9QpfrZyQzzg 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9QpfrZyQzzg 

 

 Morning Joe Rips Hillary, Comey, Obama Over Email Fiasco Joe Scarborough and 
Mika Brzezinski rip Hillary Clinton, James Comey and President Obama over the 
email fiasco. ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9QpfrZyQzzg

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe

2016-07-08 Thread Tom Huffman t...@chromapure.com [FairfieldLife]

BTW, here is the one other case in which someone was prosecuted for
gross negligence in mishandling classified material.

http://www.politico.com/blogs/under-the-radar/2016/07/heres-the-other-gross-negligence-case-comey-cited-in-clinton-email-testimony-225266

Quoting Comey:

"I know from 30 years there's no way anybody at the Department of
Justice is bringing a case against John Doe or Hillary Clinton for the
second time in 100 years based on those facts."

and,
"I know a lot of my former friends are out there saying where they
would. I wonder where they were the last 40 years, because I'd like to
see the cases they brought on gross negligence. Nobody would, nobody did."

Tom Huffman t...@chromapure.com [FairfieldLife]
<mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>

Friday, July 8, 2016 7:06 AM

There is no need to paraphrase or speculate about what Comey said
regarding Clinton lying to the public. He was asked explicitly about
this and his answer was "That's a question I am not qualified to
answer." When asked if she had lied to the FBI (doing so is a crime),
he said "We have no basis to conclude that she lied to the FBI." When
asked if she had lied under oath to Congress, he said that they did
not look at that because they had been given no referral by Congress
to investigate this.

To establish that she "lied" you would have to show not merely that
she made statements that were false. It is fairly clear that she did.
You would also have to establish that she KNEW that the statements
were false when she made them. So far, there has been no evidence of
this.

The most often cited example was her claim that she never sent or
received information that was classified at the time. The FBI
determined that there were 110 e-mails that contained classified
information went sent or received. However, this is out of 30,000
e-mails and of the 110 only 3 had classified markings on them and of
those 3 NONE had headers that indicated that they were classified (as
they should have had). It is perfectly possible that she was simply
mistaken when she made the claims about never sending or received
classified material. Being mistaken is not the same as lying.

authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
<mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>

Thursday, July 7, 2016 10:38 PM

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

LOL. Maybe I'm wrong but it seems like just about the only time Judy
makes an appearance in FairflieldLife lately, is to defend Hillary.
Sorry, I don't see that as dedication to *truth* but dedication to
one person.

How about dedication to whatever happens to interest me?

Just in the past couple of days, BTW, I had an exchange with John
about the pope's suggestion that bishops and priests might make
individual exceptions to the church's rules on communion for remarried
people. I guess you missed that completely.

And as I pointed out but you ignored, I haven't been proselytizing for
Hillary.

In one earlier post, I mentioned that Comey said, in so many words,
that Hillary lied to the public, by his denying the truthfulness of
many of her previous statements to the public..
Judy counters with Gowdy asked Comey if she lied to the FBI in which
Comey said *no*. "That's pretty explicit." Inferring Hillary never
lied.. to anyone, the FBI or the public.

That may be your *inference*, but it wasn't my *implication*. (Check
Mr. Dictionary.)

Straw-man argument. Two different alligations.
Hillary lied her @$$ off to the public over the past 15 months but
*may* have told the truth to the FBI. We'll never know because she was
never under oath, nor were her questions and answers recorded to be
examined later.
*From:* "awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife]"
<FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>

*To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
*Sent:* Thursday, July 7, 2016 8:48 PM
*Subject:* Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

Duh!
Most dedicated of True Believers. Judy could be Hillary's *Bevan Morris*.
Hillary's *skin boy*. LOL
BTW, that's not meant to be *mean spirited*. In fact, a compliment.

Oh, you two. Judy does not strike me as a fanatical anything, let
alone a fanatical Hillary supporter. That's sloppy reasoning and
analysis and lazy to boot - it reminds me of the way Mr Wooden Clogs
used to throw accusations around like slop in a pig sty. You guys can
do better.

*From:* "Bhairitu noozguru@... [FairfieldLife]"
<FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>

*To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
*Sent:* Thursday, July 7, 2016 11:02 AM
*Subject:* Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe

*Hey Mike, you think that Judy might be a fanatical Hillary
supporter?* :-D

On 07/07/2016 06:41 AM, authfriend@... <mailt

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe

2016-07-08 Thread Tom Huffman t...@chromapure.com [FairfieldLife]

This is inaccurate. Comey testified before Congress that there was only 
one other case in the 100 years since the statute was adopted that 
someone has been prosecuted for gross negligence in handling classified 
material, and that was an espionage case. All of the other cases that 
have been reported in the media as being just like hers--Bryan 
Nishimura, John Deutch, and General Petraus--were not, according to the 
FBI director.


Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] 
<mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>

Thursday, July 7, 2016 11:01 AM
Nonsense to your *nonsense*. I never said Comey fixed it. Yes, he is a 
straight arrow. However, he's not a prosecutor. He only recommends or 
doesn't. He investigates and  gathers facts.There are plenty of 
prosecutors that would have taken the case and claim that they would 
have had a more than  reasonable chance, if not excellent chance,  to 
win a conviction.
Numerous people have been charged and convicted of the same thing with 
less evidence.
Of course Comey didn't openly pronounce Clinton a *liar*. Very few 
people in public office ever do that. However, he openly countered 
many of the lies she had been telling the public. I'm sure you have to 
have seen them by now, split screen with him and her. She saying one 
thing with the date she said it and Comey saying she did the opposite. 
He exposed her lies to the public.
What Hillary told the FBI in private could be something entirely 
different from what she tells you and me? She can lie to you and me  
about anything she wants and has been doing but lying to the FBI in an 
investigation is another story. She definitely would have been nailed 
for doing that.
Lynch also reserved the right to go by the recommendations of her top 
attorneys, not just by what the FBI recommended. And yes, the meeting 
was intended to be secret. The FBI , that's Comey's FBI,was there and 
as a news team *got wind* of the meeting and approached, they were 
told *No cameras and no recordings*. Of course they were not allowed 
on the plane but not even allowed to photograph from outside. That's 
an attempt at secrecy.
The six pointed *red* star,  not blue or yellow, has had a little 
traction but not much. Nice little rallying cry for Jews that were 
going to vote for Hillary regardless. Far more traction than any 
twenty year old rape allegations of a  13 year old girl that still 
haven't manifested in the mainstream media, which if they carried any 
weight would have run with it by now.
However, I'll admit that there is plenty of time for each candidate to 
screw themselves and each other while everyone watches.
 I guess the big question will come down to "do you want the 
*Smartest* women in the world, who you can't trust to tell you the 
truth, to be president and keep going down the same hole or do you 
want to take a chance for some real change." Some 65% of people polled 
say we are headed in the wrong direction. Do they want Hillary's 
*stability* or do they want Trump to shake things up and chart a new 
course.


*From:* "authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" 
<FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>

*To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
*Sent:* Thursday, July 7, 2016 8:41 AM
*Subject:* Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe




---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

Actually, I've been saying for at least a month or longer that she 
would *not* be indicted. Not because she didn't do anything wrong but 
because she would be covered and protected by the Obama 
administration. It just wasn't going to happen. The *fix* was in.


Nonsense. That's just wildly paranoid. Comey is one of that rarest of 
beasts: a straight-arrow, incorruptible Republican. He was crystal 
clear in his announcement as to why she wasn't being indicted: the 
circumstances necessary to justify an indictment didn't exist.


And it had been decided for some time that Lynch would go along with 
whatever the FBI recommended. (BTW, her meeting with Bill Clinton was 
private but not "secret.")


Yes, Comey did Hillary considerable damage. He did not, however, 
accuse her of having lied. She certainly wasn't straightforward, but 
I'm not sure she told any actual lies.


Trump has already f'd it up. His speech last night was bizarre. 
Instead of focusing on what Comey said about Hillary, he attacked 
Comey himself, and veered off that topic to defend his anti-Semitic 
retweet of the six-pointed star, which came from a white supremacist 
Web site. He said he didn't think it needed to be changed. Talk about 
a fiasco! He's totally losing it.






Obama has been saying in interviews since April, that she never risked 
national security, yada, yada, yada. Comments like that can be *seen* 
as tampering with an investigation. Just like Clinton meeting with the 
AG, in secret, on an airplane.
Quite frankly, I th

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe

2016-07-08 Thread Tom Huffman t...@chromapure.com [FairfieldLife]

There is no need to paraphrase or speculate about what Comey said 
regarding Clinton lying to the public. He was asked explicitly about 
this and his answer was "That's a question I am not qualified to 
answer." When asked if she had lied to the FBI (doing so is a crime), he 
said "We have no basis to conclude that she lied to the FBI." When asked 
if she had lied under oath to Congress, he said that they did not look 
at that because they had been given no referral by Congress to 
investigate this.


To establish that she "lied" you would have to show not merely that she 
made statements that were false. It is fairly clear that she did. You 
would also have to establish that she KNEW that the statements were 
false when she made them. So far, there has been no evidence of this.


The most often cited example was her claim that she never sent or 
received information that was classified at the time. The FBI determined 
that there were 110 e-mails that contained classified information went 
sent or received. However, this is out of 30,000 e-mails and of the 110 
only 3 had classified markings on them and of those 3 NONE had headers 
that indicated that they were classified (as they should have had). It 
is perfectly possible that she was simply mistaken when she made the 
claims about never sending or received classified material. Being 
mistaken is not the same as lying.


authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] 
<mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>

Thursday, July 7, 2016 10:38 PM




---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

LOL. Maybe I'm wrong but it seems like just about the only time Judy 
makes an appearance in FairflieldLife lately, is to defend Hillary.
 Sorry, I don't see that as dedication to *truth* but dedication to 
one person.


How about dedication to whatever happens to interest me?

Just in the past couple of days, BTW, I had an exchange with John 
about the pope's suggestion that bishops and priests might make 
individual exceptions to the church's rules on communion for remarried 
people. I guess you missed that completely.


And as I pointed out but you ignored, I haven't been proselytizing for 
Hillary.


In one earlier post, I mentioned that  Comey said, in so many words, 
that Hillary lied to the public, by his denying the truthfulness of 
many of her previous statements to the public..
Judy counters with Gowdy asked Comey if she lied to the FBI in which 
Comey said *no*. "That's pretty explicit." Inferring Hillary never 
lied.. to anyone, the FBI or the public.


That may be your *inference*, but it wasn't my *implication*. (Check 
Mr. Dictionary.)







Straw-man argument. Two different  alligations.
 Hillary lied her @$$ off to the public over the past 15 months but 
*may* have told the truth to the FBI. We'll never know because she was 
never under oath, nor were her questions and answers recorded to be 
examined later.
*From:* "awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife]" 
<FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>

*To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
*Sent:* Thursday, July 7, 2016 8:48 PM
*Subject:* Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe




---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

Duh!
Most dedicated of True Believers. Judy could be Hillary's *Bevan Morris*.
Hillary's *skin boy*. LOL
 BTW, that's not meant to be *mean spirited*. In fact, a compliment.

Oh, you two. Judy does not strike me as a fanatical anything, let 
alone a fanatical Hillary supporter. That's sloppy reasoning and 
analysis and lazy to boot - it reminds me of the way Mr Wooden Clogs 
used to throw accusations around like slop in a pig sty. You guys can 
do better.


*From:* "Bhairitu noozguru@... [FairfieldLife]" 
<FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>

*To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
*Sent:* Thursday, July 7, 2016 11:02 AM
*Subject:* Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe

*Hey Mike, you think that Judy might be a fanatical Hillary 
supporter?* :-D


On 07/07/2016 06:41 AM, authfriend@... <mailto:authfriend@...> 
[FairfieldLife] wrote:






Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] 
<mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>

Thursday, July 7, 2016 9:39 PM
LOL. Maybe I'm wrong but it seems like just about the only time Judy 
makes an appearance in FairflieldLife lately, is to defend Hillary.
 Sorry, I don't see that as dedication to *truth* but dedication to 
one person.
In one earlier post, I mentioned that  Comey said, in so many words, 
that Hillary lied to the public, by his denying the truthfulness of 
many of her previous statements to the public..
Judy counters with Gowdy asked Comey if she lied to the FBI in which 
Comey said *no*. "That's pretty explicit." Inferring Hillary never 
lied.. to anyone, the FBI or the public.

Straw-man argument. Two different  alligations.
 Hillary lied her @

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe

2016-07-07 Thread Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

Splat

  From: "awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" 
<FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2016 11:08 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

ROFL. Douglas... I was tying it all together. I could have said Judy was 
Abbott's Costello, Laurel's Hardy, Tom's Dick Smothers etc etc.Maharishi's 
Bevan *seemed* to fit the FairfieldLife  meme better. There really must be some 
hard feelings about Bevan LOL. Calling someone a *Bevan*, an insult worthy of 
discipline? ROFLMAO!
Poor Bevan.
The bigger they are, the harder they fall. 

  From: "dhamiltony2k5@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2016 9:46 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe

 FFL’s version of Godwin’s Law, corollary: 
..as FFL discussions grow longer the probability of someone’s comparison to 
fanatical TMerTB’ers increases.

Judy could be Hillary's *Bevan Morris*.
BTW, that's not meant to be *mean spirited*. In fact, a compliment.

But, the ad hominem is done.. 
FFL hijacked, again? What did Fairfield, TM or anything spiritual have to do 
with the preceding arguing of politics anyway? 
I was appreciating how careful the protagonists here were being to avoid 
personalized incivility in their writing even though the subject thread had 
nothing to do with spirituality. And then, this comparison of character playing 
to the house. In hockey you'd get a penalty timeout for fighting with a cheap 
shot like this. In soccer, maybe a yellow card warning.  This gets a FFL yellow 
card at the least. Go to your corners. Anymore harassment of each other or of 
the referee by anyone gets a red card. Be kind and go forth as per the 
Yahoo-groups guidelines. -JaiGuruYou

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <authfriend@...> wrote :

This (from both of you) is as absurd as Barry claiming I'm a "cult apologist" 
for TM. I don't proselytize for Hillary or for TM. All I've been doing is 
addressing unfair and/or inaccurate accusations and characterizations. I'm 
hardly a True Believer in TM or a fanatical supporter of Hillary, and you both 
know it.
You just can't abide it when what you say about Hillary is refuted, so you have 
to "shoot the messenger."

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

Duh!Most dedicated of True Believers. Judy could be Hillary's *Bevan 
Morris*.Hillary's *skin boy*. LOL BTW, that's not meant to be *mean spirited*. 
In fact, a compliment.
  From: "Bhairitu noozguru@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2016 11:02 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe

 Hey Mike, you think that Judymight be a fanatical Hillary supporter?  :-D 

On 07/07/2016 06:41 AM, authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]wrote:

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,<mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

Actually,I've been saying for at least a month or longer thatshe would *not* be 
indicted. Not because she didn'tdo anything wrong but because she would be 
coveredand protected by the Obama administration. It justwasn't going to 
happen. The *fix* was in.
Nonsense. That's just wildly paranoid.Comey is one of that rarest of beasts: 
astraight-arrow, incorruptible Republican. He wascrystal clear in his 
announcement as to why shewasn't being indicted: the circumstances necessaryto 
justify an indictment didn't exist.
And it had been decided for some timethat Lynch would go along with whatever 
the FBIrecommended. (BTW, her meeting with Bill Clintonwas private but not 
"secret.")
Yes, Comey did Hillary considerabledamage. He did not, however, accuse her of 
havinglied. She certainly wasn't st! raightforward, butI'm not sure she told 
any actual lies.
Trump has already f'd it up. His speechlast night was bizarre. Instead of 
focusing onwhat Comey said about Hillary, he attacked Comeyhimself, and veered 
off that topic to defend hisanti-Semitic retweet of the six-pointed star,which 
came from a white supremacist Web site. Hesaid he didn't think it needed to be 
changed. Talkabout a fiasco! He's totally losing it.

Obama hasbeen saying in interviews since April, that shenever risked national 
security, yada, yada, yada.Comments like that can be *seen* as tampering withan 
investigation. Just like Clinton meeting with theAG, in secret, on an 
airplane.Quitefrankly, I think Comey may have done something moredangerous for 
the Democrats. While not recommendingindictment, it looked very political, at 
the sametime he ripped her apart and in so many words calledher irresponsibl! e 
and a liar, with the backing ofthe FBI. One of Hillary's weaknesses in the 
pollswas her lack of trustworthiness. Comey just verifiedthat with his speech 
and pa

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe

2016-07-07 Thread awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]


 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 ROFL. Douglas... I was tying it all together. I could have said Judy was 
Abbott's Costello, Laurel's Hardy, Tom's Dick Smothers etc etc.
 Maharishi's Bevan *seemed* to fit the FairfieldLife  meme better.
  There really must be some hard feelings about Bevan LOL.
  Calling someone a *Bevan*, an insult worthy of discipline? ROFLMAO!

 Poor Bevan.
 

 The bigger they are, the harder they fall. 
 


 From: "dhamiltony2k5@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2016 9:46 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe
 
 
   FFL’s version of Godwin’s Law, corollary: 
 

 ..as FFL discussions grow longer the probability of someone’s comparison to 
fanatical TMerTB’ers increases.


 Judy could be Hillary's *Bevan Morris*.

 BTW, that's not meant to be *mean spirited*. In fact, a compliment.

 

 But, the ad hominem is done.. 
 

 FFL hijacked, again? What did Fairfield, TM or anything spiritual have to do 
with the preceding arguing of politics anyway? 
 

 I was appreciating how careful the protagonists here were being to avoid 
personalized incivility in their writing even though the subject thread had 
nothing to do with spirituality. And then, this comparison of character playing 
to the house. 
 In hockey you'd get a penalty timeout for fighting with a cheap shot like 
this. In soccer, maybe a yellow card warning.  This gets a FFL yellow card at 
the least. Go to your corners. Anymore harassment of each other or of the 
referee by anyone gets a red card. Be kind and go forth as per the Yahoo-groups 
guidelines. -JaiGuruYou
 


 




---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <authfriend@...> wrote :

 This (from both of you) is as absurd as Barry claiming I'm a "cult apologist" 
for TM. I don't proselytize for Hillary or for TM. All I've been doing is 
addressing unfair and/or inaccurate accusations and characterizations. I'm 
hardly a True Believer in TM or a fanatical supporter of Hillary, and you both 
know it. 

 You just can't abide it when what you say about Hillary is refuted, so you 
have to "shoot the messenger."
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 Duh! Most dedicated of True Believers. Judy could be Hillary's *Bevan 
Morris*.
 Hillary's *skin boy*. LOL
  BTW, that's not meant to be *mean spirited*. In fact, a compliment.


 From: "Bhairitu noozguru@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2016 11:02 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe

 
   
 Hey Mike, you think that Judy might be a fanatical Hillary supporter? :-D 
 
 On 07/07/2016 06:41 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] 
wrote:

   

 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
<mdixon.6569@...> mailto:mdixon.6569@... wrote :
 
 Actually, I've been saying for at least a month or longer that she would *not* 
be indicted. Not because she didn't do anything wrong but because she would be 
covered and protected by the Obama administration. It just wasn't going to 
happen. The *fix* was in.
 

 Nonsense. That's just wildly paranoid. Comey is one of that rarest of beasts: 
a straight-arrow, incorruptible Republican. He was crystal clear in his 
announcement as to why she wasn't being indicted: the circumstances necessary 
to justify an indictment didn't exist.
 
 
 And it had been decided for some time that Lynch would go along with whatever 
the FBI recommended. (BTW, her meeting with Bill Clinton was private but not 
"secret.")
 
 
 Yes, Comey did Hillary considerable damage. He did not, however, accuse her of 
having lied. She certainly wasn't st! raightforward, but I'm not sure she told 
any actual lies.
 
 
 Trump has already f'd it up. His speech last night was bizarre. Instead of 
focusing on what Comey said about Hillary, he attacked Comey himself, and 
veered off that topic to defend his anti-Semitic retweet of the six-pointed 
star, which came from a white supremacist Web site. He said he didn't think it 
needed to be changed. Talk about a fiasco! He's totally losing it.
 

 

 

 

 

 Obama has been saying in interviews since April, that she never risked 
national security, yada, yada, yada. Comments like that can be *seen* as 
tampering with an investigation. Just like Clinton meeting with the AG, in 
secret, on an airplane.
 Quite frankly, I think Comey may have done something more dangerous for the 
Democrats. While not recommending indictment, it looked very political, at the 
same time he ripped her apart and in so many words called her irresponsibl! e 
and a liar, with the backing of the FBI. One of Hillary's weaknesses in the 
polls was her lack of trustworthiness. Comey just verified that with his speech 
and parts of it will be

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe

2016-07-07 Thread Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

ROFL. Douglas... I was tying it all together. I could have said Judy was 
Abbott's Costello, Laurel's Hardy, Tom's Dick Smothers etc etc.Maharishi's 
Bevan *seemed* to fit the FairfieldLife  meme better. There really must be some 
hard feelings about Bevan LOL. Calling someone a *Bevan*, an insult worthy of 
discipline? ROFLMAO!
Poor Bevan.

  From: "dhamiltony...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" 
<FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2016 9:46 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe

    FFL’s version of Godwin’s Law, corollary: 
..as FFL discussions grow longer the probability of someone’s comparison to 
fanatical TMerTB’ers increases.

Judy could be Hillary's *Bevan Morris*.
BTW, that's not meant to be *mean spirited*. In fact, a compliment.

But, the ad hominem is done.. 
FFL hijacked, again? What did Fairfield, TM or anything spiritual have to do 
with the preceding arguing of politics anyway? 
I was appreciating how careful the protagonists here were being to avoid 
personalized incivility in their writing even though the subject thread had 
nothing to do with spirituality. And then, this comparison of character playing 
to the house. In hockey you'd get a penalty timeout for fighting with a cheap 
shot like this. In soccer, maybe a yellow card warning.  This gets a FFL yellow 
card at the least. Go to your corners. Anymore harassment of each other or of 
the referee by anyone gets a red card. Be kind and go forth as per the 
Yahoo-groups guidelines. -JaiGuruYou

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <authfri...@yahoo.com> wrote :

This (from both of you) is as absurd as Barry claiming I'm a "cult apologist" 
for TM. I don't proselytize for Hillary or for TM. All I've been doing is 
addressing unfair and/or inaccurate accusations and characterizations. I'm 
hardly a True Believer in TM or a fanatical supporter of Hillary, and you both 
know it.
You just can't abide it when what you say about Hillary is refuted, so you have 
to "shoot the messenger."

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

Duh!Most dedicated of True Believers. Judy could be Hillary's *Bevan 
Morris*.Hillary's *skin boy*. LOL BTW, that's not meant to be *mean spirited*. 
In fact, a compliment.
  From: "Bhairitu noozguru@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2016 11:02 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe

 Hey Mike, you think that Judymight be a fanatical Hillary supporter?  :-D 

On 07/07/2016 06:41 AM, authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]wrote:

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,<mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

Actually,I've been saying for at least a month or longer thatshe would *not* be 
indicted. Not because she didn'tdo anything wrong but because she would be 
coveredand protected by the Obama administration. It justwasn't going to 
happen. The *fix* was in.
Nonsense. That's just wildly paranoid.Comey is one of that rarest of beasts: 
astraight-arrow, incorruptible Republican. He wascrystal clear in his 
announcement as to why shewasn't being indicted: the circumstances necessaryto 
justify an indictment didn't exist.
And it had been decided for some timethat Lynch would go along with whatever 
the FBIrecommended. (BTW, her meeting with Bill Clintonwas private but not 
"secret.")
Yes, Comey did Hillary considerabledamage. He did not, however, accuse her of 
havinglied. She certainly wasn't st! raightforward, butI'm not sure she told 
any actual lies.
Trump has already f'd it up. His speechlast night was bizarre. Instead of 
focusing onwhat Comey said about Hillary, he attacked Comeyhimself, and veered 
off that topic to defend hisanti-Semitic retweet of the six-pointed star,which 
came from a white supremacist Web site. Hesaid he didn't think it needed to be 
changed. Talkabout a fiasco! He's totally losing it.

Obama hasbeen saying in interviews since April, that shenever risked national 
security, yada, yada, yada.Comments like that can be *seen* as tampering withan 
investigation. Just like Clinton meeting with theAG, in secret, on an 
airplane.Quitefrankly, I think Comey may have done something moredangerous for 
the Democrats. While not recommendingindictment, it looked very political, at 
the sametime he ripped her apart and in so many words calledher irresponsibl! e 
and a liar, with the backing ofthe FBI. One of Hillary's weaknesses in the 
pollswas her lack of trustworthiness. Comey just verifiedthat with his speech 
and parts of it will be playedover and over again during the rest of the 
campaign.Her lying has been proven by the FBI and sheprojects the image of 
being above the law since shewasn't indicted.Had shebeen indicted and forced to 
resign from hercampaign, Democrats could have drafted Joe or gonewith Bernie. 
Joe would have had an easier time

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe

2016-07-07 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]


 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 LOL. Maybe I'm wrong but it seems like just about the only time Judy makes an 
appearance in FairflieldLife lately, is to defend Hillary.
  Sorry, I don't see that as dedication to *truth* but dedication to one person.

 

 How about dedication to whatever happens to interest me?
 

 Just in the past couple of days, BTW, I had an exchange with John about the 
pope's suggestion that bishops and priests might make individual exceptions to 
the church's rules on communion for remarried people. I guess you missed that 
completely.
 

 And as I pointed out but you ignored, I haven't been proselytizing for Hillary.
 

 
 In one earlier post, I mentioned that  Comey said, in so many words, that 
Hillary lied to the public, by his denying the truthfulness of many of her 
previous statements to the public..

 Judy counters with Gowdy asked Comey if she lied to the FBI in which Comey 
said *no*. "That's pretty explicit." Inferring Hillary never lied.. to anyone, 
the FBI or the public.

 

 That may be your *inference*, but it wasn't my *implication*. (Check Mr. 
Dictionary.)
 

 

 

 

 

 

 Straw-man argument. Two different  alligations.
  Hillary lied her @$$ off to the public over the past 15 months but *may* have 
told the truth to the FBI. We'll never know because she was never under oath, 
nor were her questions and answers recorded to be examined later.


 From: "awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2016 8:48 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe
 
 
   

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 Duh! Most dedicated of True Believers. Judy could be Hillary's *Bevan 
Morris*.
 Hillary's *skin boy*. LOL
  BTW, that's not meant to be *mean spirited*. In fact, a compliment.

 

 Oh, you two. Judy does not strike me as a fanatical anything, let alone a 
fanatical Hillary supporter. That's sloppy reasoning and analysis and lazy to 
boot - it reminds me of the way Mr Wooden Clogs used to throw accusations 
around like slop in a pig sty. You guys can do better.

 From: "Bhairitu noozguru@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2016 11:02 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe

 
   
 Hey Mike, you think that Judy might be a fanatical Hillary supporter? :-D 
 
 On 07/07/2016 06:41 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] 
wrote:

   

 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
<mdixon.6569@...> mailto:mdixon.6569@... wrote :
 
 Actually, I've been saying for at least a month or longer that she would *not* 
be indicted. Not because she didn't do anything wrong but because she would be 
covered and protected by the Obama administration. It just wasn't going to 
happen. The *fix* was in.
 

 Nonsense. That's just wildly paranoid. Comey is one of that rarest of beasts: 
a straight-arrow, incorruptible Republican. He was crystal clear in his 
announcement as to why she wasn't being indicted: the circumstances necessary 
to justify an indictment didn't exist.
 
 
 And it had been decided for some time that Lynch would go along with whatever 
the FBI recommended. (BTW, her meeting with Bill Clinton was private but not 
"secret.")
 
 
 Yes, Comey did Hillary considerable damage. He did not, however, accuse her of 
having lied. She certainly wasn't st! raightforward, but I'm not sure she told 
any actual lies.
 
 
 Trump has already f'd it up. His speech last night was bizarre. Instead of 
focusing on what Comey said about Hillary, he attacked Comey himself, and 
veered off that topic to defend his anti-Semitic retweet of the six-pointed 
star, which came from a white supremacist Web site. He said he didn't think it 
needed to be changed. Talk about a fiasco! He's totally losing it.
 

 

 

 

 

 Obama has been saying in interviews since April, that she never risked 
national security, yada, yada, yada. Comments like that can be *seen* as 
tampering with an investigation. Just like Clinton meeting with the AG, in 
secret, on an airplane.
 Quite frankly, I think Comey may have done something more dangerous for the 
Democrats. While not recommending indictment, it looked very political, at the 
same time he ripped her apart and in so many words called her irresponsibl! e 
and a liar, with the backing of the FBI. One of Hillary's weaknesses in the 
polls was her lack of trustworthiness. Comey just verified that with his speech 
and parts of it will be played over and over again during the rest of the 
campaign. Her lying has been proven by the FBI and she projects the image of 
being above the law since she wasn't indicted.
 Had she been indicted and forced to resign from her campaign, Democrats could 
have drafte

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe

2016-07-07 Thread dhamiltony...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

FFL’s version of Godwin’s Law, corollary: 

 ..as FFL discussions grow longer the probability of someone’s comparison to 
fanatical TMerTB’ers increases.


 Judy could be Hillary's *Bevan Morris*.

 BTW, that's not meant to be *mean spirited*. In fact, a compliment.

 

 But, the ad hominem is done.. 
 

 FFL hijacked, again? What did Fairfield, TM or anything spiritual have to do 
with the preceding arguing of politics anyway? 
 

 I was appreciating how careful the protagonists here were being to avoid 
personalized incivility in their writing even though the subject thread had 
nothing to do with spirituality. And then, this comparison of character playing 
to the house. 
 In hockey you'd get a penalty timeout for fighting with a cheap shot like 
this. In soccer, maybe a yellow card warning.  This gets a FFL yellow card at 
the least. Go to your corners. Anymore harassment of each other or of the 
referee by anyone gets a red card. Be kind and go forth as per the Yahoo-groups 
guidelines. -JaiGuruYou
 


 




---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <authfri...@yahoo.com> wrote :

 This (from both of you) is as absurd as Barry claiming I'm a "cult apologist" 
for TM. I don't proselytize for Hillary or for TM. All I've been doing is 
addressing unfair and/or inaccurate accusations and characterizations. I'm 
hardly a True Believer in TM or a fanatical supporter of Hillary, and you both 
know it. 

 You just can't abide it when what you say about Hillary is refuted, so you 
have to "shoot the messenger."
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 Duh! Most dedicated of True Believers. Judy could be Hillary's *Bevan 
Morris*.
 Hillary's *skin boy*. LOL
  BTW, that's not meant to be *mean spirited*. In fact, a compliment.


 From: "Bhairitu noozguru@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2016 11:02 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe
 
 
   
 Hey Mike, you think that Judy might be a fanatical Hillary supporter? :-D 
 
 On 07/07/2016 06:41 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] 
wrote:

   

 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
<mdixon.6569@...> mailto:mdixon.6569@... wrote :
 
 Actually, I've been saying for at least a month or longer that she would *not* 
be indicted. Not because she didn't do anything wrong but because she would be 
covered and protected by the Obama administration. It just wasn't going to 
happen. The *fix* was in.
 

 Nonsense. That's just wildly paranoid. Comey is one of that rarest of beasts: 
a straight-arrow, incorruptible Republican. He was crystal clear in his 
announcement as to why she wasn't being indicted: the circumstances necessary 
to justify an indictment didn't exist.
 
 
 And it had been decided for some time that Lynch would go along with whatever 
the FBI recommended. (BTW, her meeting with Bill Clinton was private but not 
"secret.")
 
 
 Yes, Comey did Hillary considerable damage. He did not, however, accuse her of 
having lied. She certainly wasn't st! raightforward, but I'm not sure she told 
any actual lies.
 
 
 Trump has already f'd it up. His speech last night was bizarre. Instead of 
focusing on what Comey said about Hillary, he attacked Comey himself, and 
veered off that topic to defend his anti-Semitic retweet of the six-pointed 
star, which came from a white supremacist Web site. He said he didn't think it 
needed to be changed. Talk about a fiasco! He's totally losing it.
 

 

 

 

 

 Obama has been saying in interviews since April, that she never risked 
national security, yada, yada, yada. Comments like that can be *seen* as 
tampering with an investigation. Just like Clinton meeting with the AG, in 
secret, on an airplane.
 Quite frankly, I think Comey may have done something more dangerous for the 
Democrats. While not recommending indictment, it looked very political, at the 
same time he ripped her apart and in so many words called her irresponsibl! e 
and a liar, with the backing of the FBI. One of Hillary's weaknesses in the 
polls was her lack of trustworthiness. Comey just verified that with his speech 
and parts of it will be played over and over again during the rest of the 
campaign. Her lying has been proven by the FBI and she projects the image of 
being above the law since she wasn't indicted.
 Had she been indicted and forced to resign from her campaign, Democrats could 
have drafted Joe or gone with Bernie. Joe would have had an easier time 
bringing in pissed Bernie fans.

 Trump has been , almost certainly, handed victory.. if he can keep from *f*ing 
it up.
 
 

 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" mailto:authfriend@...[FairfieldLife] 
<FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.co

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe

2016-07-07 Thread Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

LOL. Maybe I'm wrong but it seems like just about the only time Judy makes an 
appearance in FairflieldLife lately, is to defend Hillary. Sorry, I don't see 
that as dedication to *truth* but dedication to one person.
In one earlier post, I mentioned that  Comey said, in so many words, that 
Hillary lied to the public, by his denying the truthfulness of many of her 
previous statements to the public..
Judy counters with Gowdy asked Comey if she lied to the FBI in which Comey said 
*no*. "That's pretty explicit." Inferring Hillary never lied.. to anyone, the 
FBI or the public.
Straw-man argument. Two different  alligations. Hillary lied her @$$ off to the 
public over the past 15 months but *may* have told the truth to the FBI. We'll 
never know because she was never under oath, nor were her questions and answers 
recorded to be examined later.
From: "awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2016 8:48 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe
   
    


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

Duh!Most dedicated of True Believers. Judy could be Hillary's *Bevan 
Morris*.Hillary's *skin boy*. LOL BTW, that's not meant to be *mean spirited*. 
In fact, a compliment.

Oh, you two. Judy does not strike me as a fanatical anything, let alone a 
fanatical Hillary supporter. That's sloppy reasoning and analysis and lazy to 
boot - it reminds me of the way Mr Wooden Clogs used to throw accusations 
around like slop in a pig sty. You guys can do better.  From: "Bhairitu 
noozguru@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2016 11:02 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe
 
 Hey Mike, you think that Judymight be a fanatical Hillary supporter?  :-D 

On 07/07/2016 06:41 AM, authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]wrote:


  


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,<mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

Actually,I've been saying for at least a month or longer thatshe would *not* be 
indicted. Not because she didn'tdo anything wrong but because she would be 
coveredand protected by the Obama administration. It justwasn't going to 
happen. The *fix* was in.
Nonsense. That's just wildly paranoid.Comey is one of that rarest of beasts: 
astraight-arrow, incorruptible Republican. He wascrystal clear in his 
announcement as to why shewasn't being indicted: the circumstances necessaryto 
justify an indictment didn't exist.
And it had been decided for some timethat Lynch would go along with whatever 
the FBIrecommended. (BTW, her meeting with Bill Clintonwas private but not 
"secret.")
Yes, Comey did Hillary considerabledamage. He did not, however, accuse her of 
havinglied. She certainly wasn't st! raightforward, butI'm not sure she told 
any actual lies.
Trump has already f'd it up. His speechlast night was bizarre. Instead of 
focusing onwhat Comey said about Hillary, he attacked Comeyhimself, and veered 
off that topic to defend hisanti-Semitic retweet of the six-pointed star,which 
came from a white supremacist Web site. Hesaid he didn't think it needed to be 
changed. Talkabout a fiasco! He's totally losing it.




Obama hasbeen saying in interviews since April, that shenever risked national 
security, yada, yada, yada.Comments like that can be *seen* as tampering withan 
investigation. Just like Clinton meeting with theAG, in secret, on an 
airplane.Quitefrankly, I think Comey may have done something moredangerous for 
the Democrats. While not recommendingindictment, it looked very political, at 
the sametime he ripped her apart and in so many words calledher irresponsibl! e 
and a liar, with the backing ofthe FBI. One of Hillary's weaknesses in the 
pollswas her lack of trustworthiness. Comey just verifiedthat with his speech 
and parts of it will be playedover and over again during the rest of the 
campaign.Her lying has been proven by the FBI and sheprojects the image of 
being above the law since shewasn't indicted.Had shebeen indicted and forced to 
resign from hercampaign, Democrats could have drafted Joe or gonewith Bernie. 
Joe would have had an easier timebringing in pissed Bernie fans.
Trumphas been , almost certainly, handed victory.. ifhe can keep from *f*ing it 
up.

  From:"authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]"<FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
To:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent:Wednesday, July 6, 2016 11:20 PM
Subject:[FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe

 Would that be the"fiasco" of the Hillary-haterspredicting confidently 
formonths that she would beindicted, tried, convicted, andjailed?
Youhave one of these, right, Mike?
https://patriotdepot.com/hillary-for-prison-t-shirt/


---infairfieldl...@yahoogroups.com,<mdixon.6569@...> wrote:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9QpfrZyQzzg

 
| 
| 
| 
| 
 | 
 |

 |

 |
| 
|  | 
MorningJo

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe

2016-07-07 Thread vox_9


 So, I sent them a Facebook friends request but I've not heard back from them 
yet. Maybe they got their safe-space invaded or got their feelings hurt, so 
they left to start their own group. Some people just feel better when they have 
someone to talk to. 
 

 We need to realize that for a few, this discussion group is just about all 
their spiritual activity for an entire day. Maybe it's the one thread that 
keeps them from going totally bat-shit crazy. Not me of course.

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 It's been fun pushing buttons over on FFL2 though some members have evacuated 
and are hiding in the corner.  ;-) 
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe

2016-07-07 Thread awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <noozguru@...> wrote :

It's been fun pushing buttons over on FFL2 though some members have evacuated
and are hiding in the corner. ;-)

On 07/07/2016 09:24 AM, Mike Dixon mdixon.6569@... mailto:mdixon.6569@...
[FairfieldLife] wrote:

Duh! Most dedicated of True Believers. Judy could be Hillary's
*Bevan Morris*.
Hillary's *skin boy*. LOL
BTW, that's not meant to be *mean spirited*. In fact, a compliment.

From: "Bhairitu noozguru@... mailto:noozguru@... [FairfieldLife]"
<FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2016 11:02 AM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe

Hey Mike, you think that Judy might be a fanatical Hillary supporter? :-D

On 07/07/2016 06:41 AM, mailto:authfriend@...authfriend@...
mailto:authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] wrote:

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
<mdixon.6569@...> mailto:mdixon.6569@... wrote :

Actually,I've been saying for at least a month or longer that she would *not*
be indicted. Not because she didn't do anything wrong but because she would be
covered and protected by the Obama administration. It just wasn't going to
happen. The *fix* was in.

Nonsense. That's just wildly paranoid. Comey is one of that rarest of beasts:
a straight-arrow, incorruptible Republican. He was crystal clear in his
announcement as to why she wasn't being indicted: the circumstances necessary
to justify an indictment didn't exist.

And it had been decided for some time that Lynch would go along with whatever
the FBI recommended. (BTW, her meeting with Bill Clinton was private but not
"secret.")

Yes, Comey did Hillary considerable damage. He did not, however, accuse her of
having lied. She certainly wasn't st! raightforward, but I'm not sure she told
any actual lies.

Trump has already f'd it up. His speech last night was bizarre. Instead of
focusing on what Comey said about Hillary, he attacked Comey himself, and
veered off that topic to defend his anti-Semitic retweet of the six-pointed
star, which came from a white supremacist Web site. He said he didn't think it
needed to be changed. Talk about a fiasco! He's totally losing it.

Obama has been saying in interviews since April, that she never risked
national security, yada, yada, yada. Comments like that can be *seen* as
tampering with an investigation. Just like Clinton meeting with the AG, in
secret, on an airplane.
Quite frankly, I think Comey may have done something more dangerous for the
Democrats. While not recommending indictment, it looked very political, at the
same time he ripped her apart and in so many words called her irresponsibl! e
and a liar, with the backing of the FBI. One of Hillary's weaknesses in the
polls was her lack of trustworthiness. Comey just verified that with his speech
and parts of it will be played over and over again during the rest of the
campaign. Her lying has been proven by the FBI and she projects the image of
being above the law since she wasn't indicted.
Had she been indicted and forced to resign from her campaign, Democrats could
have drafted Joe or gone with Bernie. Joe would have had an easier time
bringing in pissed Bernie fans.

Trumphas been , almost certainly, handed victory.. if he can keep from *f*ing
it up.

From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]"
mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com<FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 6, 2016 11:20 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe

Would that be the "fiasco" of the Hillary-haters predicting confidently for
months that she would be indicted, tried, convicted, and jailed?

Youhave one of these, right, Mike?

https://patriotdepot.com/hillary-for-prison-t-shirt/https://patriotdepot.com/hillary-for-prison-t-shirt/
https://patriotdepot.com/hillary-for-prison-t-shirt/

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
mailto:mdixon.6569@...<mdixon.6569@...> mailto:mdixon.6569@... wrote :

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9QpfrZyQzzghttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9QpfrZyQzzg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9QpfrZyQzzg

MorningJoe Rips Hillary, Comey, Obama Over Email Fiasco Joe Scarborough and
Mika Brzezinski rip Hillary Clinton, James Comey and President Obama over the
email fiasco. ...

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe

2016-07-07 Thread awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

Duh! Most dedicated of True Believers. Judy could be Hillary's *Bevan
Morris*.
Hillary's *skin boy*. LOL
BTW, that's not meant to be *mean spirited*. In fact, a compliment.

Oh, you two. Judy does not strike me as a fanatical anything, let alone a
fanatical Hillary supporter. That's sloppy reasoning and analysis and lazy to
boot - it reminds me of the way Mr Wooden Clogs used to throw accusations
around like slop in a pig sty. You guys can do better.

From: "Bhairitu noozguru@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2016 11:02 AM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe

Hey Mike, you think that Judy might be a fanatical Hillary supporter? :-D

On 07/07/2016 06:41 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]
wrote:

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
<mdixon.6569@...> mailto:mdixon.6569@... wrote :

Actually, I've been saying for at least a month or longer that she would *not*
be indicted. Not because she didn't do anything wrong but because she would be
covered and protected by the Obama administration. It just wasn't going to
happen. The *fix* was in.

And it had been decided for some time that Lynch would go along with whatever
the FBI recommended. (BTW, her meeting with Bill Clinton was private but not
"secret.")

Yes, Comey did Hillary considerable damage. He did not, however, accuse her of
having lied. She certainly wasn't st! raightforward, but I'm not sure she told
any actual lies.

Trump has been , almost certainly, handed victory.. if he can keep from *f*ing
it up.

From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" mailto:authfriend@...[FairfieldLife]
<FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 6, 2016 11:20 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe

Would that be the "fiasco" of the Hillary-haters predicting confidently for
months that she would be indicted, tried, convicted, and jailed?

You have one of these, right, Mike?

https://patriotdepot.com/hillary-for-prison-t-shirt/https://patriotdepot.com/hillary-for-prison-t-shirt/
https://patriotdepot.com/hillary-for-prison-t-shirt/

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
<mdixon.6569@...> mailto:mdixon.6569@... wrote :

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9QpfrZyQzzghttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9QpfrZyQzzg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9QpfrZyQzzg

Morning Joe Rips Hillary, Comey, Obama Over Email Fiasco Joe Scarborough and
Mika Brzezinski rip Hillary Clinton, James Comey and President Obama over the
email fiasco. ...

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe

2016-07-07 Thread Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

It's all tied in together.

  From: "dhamiltony...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" 
<FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2016 4:47 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe

    Thanks for taking just a moment to connect this long seemingly insuperable 
political and otherwise non-spiritual private discussion that you are having to 
FFL. FairfieldLife, a spiritual Yahoo-group.Kind Regards,

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6...@yahoo.com> wrote :

To make a forest *green*, each individual tree needs be green.Don't be ruled by 
either the heart or the mind but by a balance between the two.Below the surface 
of the ocean is a whole different world.
Progress without stability is worthless.Three gunas.
  From: "dhamiltony...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" 
<FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2016 6:08 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe

 ..how might you recommend your personal argument here to meditators 
andSpirituality in Fairfield, Iowa?

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6...@yahoo.com> wrote :

Actually, I've been saying for at least a month or longer that she would *not* 
be indicted. Not because she didn't do anything wrong but because she would be 
covered and protected by the Obama administration. It just wasn't going to 
happen. The *fix* was in. Obama has been saying in interviews since April, that 
she never risked national security, yada, yada, yada. Comments like that can be 
*seen* as tampering with an investigation. Just like Clinton meeting with the 
AG, in secret, on an airplane.Quite frankly, I think Comey may have done 
something more dangerous for the Democrats. While not recommending indictment, 
it looked very political, at the same time he ripped her apart and in so many 
words called her irresponsible and a liar, with the backing of the FBI. One of 
Hillary's weaknesses in the polls was her lack of trustworthiness. Comey just 
verified that with his speech and parts of it will be played over and over 
again during the rest of the campaign. Her lying has been proven by the FBI and 
she projects the image of being above the law since she wasn't indicted.Had she 
been indicted and forced to resign from her campaign, Democrats could have 
drafted Joe or gone with Bernie. Joe would have had an easier time bringing in 
pissed Bernie fans.
Trump has been , almost certainly, handed victory.. if he can keep from *f*ing 
it up.

  From: "authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Wednesday, July 6, 2016 11:20 PM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe

 Would that be the "fiasco" of the Hillary-haters predicting confidently for 
months that she would be indicted, tried, convicted, and jailed?
You have one of these, right, Mike?
https://patriotdepot.com/hillary-for-prison-t-shirt/

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9QpfrZyQzzg

| 
| 
| 
|  |  |

 |

 |
| 
|   | 
Morning Joe Rips Hillary, Comey, Obama Over Email Fiasco
Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski rip Hillary Clinton, James Comey and 
President Obama over the email fiasco. ... |  |

 |

 |

  #yiv1618101106 #yiv1618101106 -- #yiv1618101106ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid 
#d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;}#yiv1618101106 
#yiv1618101106ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}#yiv1618101106 
#yiv1618101106ygrp-mkp #yiv1618101106hd 
{color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 
0;}#yiv1618101106 #yiv1618101106ygrp-mkp #yiv1618101106ads 
{margin-bottom:10px;}#yiv1618101106 #yiv1618101106ygrp-mkp .yiv1618101106ad 
{padding:0 0;}#yiv1618101106 #yiv1618101106ygrp-mkp .yiv1618101106ad p 
{margin:0;}#yiv1618101106 #yiv1618101106ygrp-mkp .yiv1618101106ad a 
{color:#ff;text-decoration:none;}#yiv1618101106 #yiv1618101106ygrp-sponsor 
#yiv1618101106ygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;}#yiv1618101106 
#yiv1618101106ygrp-sponsor #yiv1618101106ygrp-lc #yiv1618101106hd {margin:10px 
0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}#yiv1618101106 
#yiv1618101106ygrp-sponsor #yiv1618101106ygrp-lc .yiv1618101106ad 
{margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}#yiv1618101106 #yiv1618101106actions 
{font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;}#yiv1618101106 
#yiv1618101106activity 
{background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;}#yiv1618101106
 #yiv1618101106activity span {font-weight:700;}#yiv1618101106 
#yiv1618101106activity span:first-child 
{text-transform:uppercase;}#yiv1618101106 #yiv1618101106activity span a 
{color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;}#yiv1618101106 #yiv1618101106activity span 
span {color:#ff7900;}#yiv1618101106 #yiv1618101106activity span 
.yiv1618101106underline {text-decoration:und

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe

2016-07-07 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]


 Aggghhh...

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

(snip)

 I just read that he met with Republican congresscritters today. At one point, 
one of them asked him if he would defend Article One of the Constitution. He 
said yes, he would--and Article Two as well, he said, all the way up to Article 
Twelve.
 

 The Constitution has 27 Articles.
 

 Make that seven Articles and 27 Amendments...

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe

2016-07-07 Thread dhamiltony...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

Thanks for taking just a moment to connect this long seemingly insuperable 
political and otherwise non-spiritual private discussion that you are having to 
FFL. FairfieldLife, a spiritual Yahoo-group.
 Kind Regards,
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6...@yahoo.com> wrote :

 To make a forest *green*, each individual tree needs be green.
 Don't be ruled by either the heart or the mind but by a balance between the 
two.
 Below the surface of the ocean is a whole different world.
Progress without stability is worthless.Three gunas.

 From: "dhamiltony...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2016 6:08 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe
 
 
   
 ..how might you recommend your personal argument here to meditators and
 Spirituality in Fairfield, Iowa?

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6...@yahoo.com> wrote :

 Actually, I've been saying for at least a month or longer that she would *not* 
be indicted. Not because she didn't do anything wrong but because she would be 
covered and protected by the Obama administration. It just wasn't going to 
happen. The *fix* was in. Obama has been saying in interviews since April, that 
she never risked national security, yada, yada, yada. Comments like that can be 
*seen* as tampering with an investigation. Just like Clinton meeting with the 
AG, in secret, on an airplane.
 Quite frankly, I think Comey may have done something more dangerous for the 
Democrats. While not recommending indictment, it looked very political, at the 
same time he ripped her apart and in so many words called her irresponsible and 
a liar, with the backing of the FBI. One of Hillary's weaknesses in the polls 
was her lack of trustworthiness. Comey just verified that with his speech and 
parts of it will be played over and over again during the rest of the campaign. 
Her lying has been proven by the FBI and she projects the image of being above 
the law since she wasn't indicted.
 Had she been indicted and forced to resign from her campaign, Democrats could 
have drafted Joe or gone with Bernie. Joe would have had an easier time 
bringing in pissed Bernie fans.

 Trump has been , almost certainly, handed victory.. if he can keep from *f*ing 
it up.
 


 From: "authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Wednesday, July 6, 2016 11:20 PM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe

 
   Would that be the "fiasco" of the Hillary-haters predicting confidently for 
months that she would be indicted, tried, convicted, and jailed?
 

 You have one of these, right, Mike?
 

 https://patriotdepot.com/hillary-for-prison-t-shirt/ 
https://patriotdepot.com/hillary-for-prison-t-shirt/
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9QpfrZyQzzg 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9QpfrZyQzzg 

 

 Morning Joe Rips Hillary, Comey, Obama Over Email Fiasco Joe Scarborough and 
Mika Brzezinski rip Hillary Clinton, James Comey and President Obama over the 
email fiasco. ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9QpfrZyQzzg

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe

2016-07-07 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]


 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 If you looked at it objectively, without *emotion*( thought you would 
appreciate a little sexism), you would see I *compared* you and your devotion 
to Hillary, to Bevan and his devotion to Maharishi. A comparison that  most any 
TMer on FFL could appreciate, a point of reference.
 

 Yes, I understood the "comparison." As I said, it's totally wrong; read what I 
wrote again. I'm not at all "devoted" to Hillary. You're confusing support with 
devotion, but the former doesn't imply the latter.
 

 And yes, you do mean it as a putdown; it suggests a lack of objectivity 
regarding Hillary.
 

 BTW, are you insulted to be called a TM true believer?

 

 It isn't a matter of being insulted. It's just totally wrong.
 

 Where Barry's concerned, calling me a "cult apologist" is not just a lie, it's 
intended as an insult. Recently he's taken to calling me a "paid cult 
apologist" and "paid Hillary apologist." Both extremely malicious lies.
 

 All this crap is intended to discredit what I say in the absence of solid 
substantive responses. It's cowardly, to say the least.
 
 


 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2016 1:51 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe
 
 
   I didn't say you did, Mike.
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 Oh c'mon Judy. I'm not calling you a TM or Maharishi TBer. 

 

 
 


 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2016 1:04 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe

 
   This (from both of you) is as absurd as Barry claiming I'm a "cult 
apologist" for TM. I don't proselytize for Hillary or for TM. All I've been 
doing is addressing unfair and/or inaccurate accusations and characterizations. 
I'm hardly a True Believer in TM or a fanatical supporter of Hillary, and you 
both know it.
 

 You just can't abide it when what you say about Hillary is refuted, so you 
have to "shoot the messenger."
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 Duh! Most dedicated of True Believers. Judy could be Hillary's *Bevan 
Morris*.
 Hillary's *skin boy*. LOL
  BTW, that's not meant to be *mean spirited*. In fact, a compliment.


 From: "Bhairitu noozguru@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2016 11:02 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe

 
   
 Hey Mike, you think that Judy might be a fanatical Hillary supporter? :-D 
 
 On 07/07/2016 06:41 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] 
wrote:

   

 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
<mdixon.6569@...> mailto:mdixon.6569@... wrote :
 
 Actually, I've been saying for at least a month or longer that she would *not* 
be indicted. Not because she didn't do anything wrong but because she would be 
covered and protected by the Obama administration. It just wasn't going to 
happen. The *fix* was in.
 

 Nonsense. That's just wildly paranoid. Comey is one of that rarest of beasts: 
a straight-arrow, incorruptible Republican. He was crystal clear in his 
announcement as to why she wasn't being indicted: the circumstances necessary 
to justify an indictment didn't exist.
 
 
 And it had been decided for some time that Lynch would go along with whatever 
the FBI recommended. (BTW, her meeting with Bill Clinton was private but not 
"secret.")
 
 
 Yes, Comey did Hillary considerable damage. He did not, however, accuse her of 
having lied. She certainly wasn't st! raightforward, but I'm not sure she told 
any actual lies.
 
 
 Trump has already f'd it up. His speech last night was bizarre. Instead of 
focusing on what Comey said about Hillary, he attacked Comey himself, and 
veered off that topic to defend his anti-Semitic retweet of the six-pointed 
star, which came from a white supremacist Web site. He said he didn't think it 
needed to be changed. Talk about a fiasco! He's totally losing it.
 

 

 

 

 

 Obama has been saying in interviews since April, that she never risked 
national security, yada, yada, yada. Comments like that can be *seen* as 
tampering with an investigation. Just like Clinton meeting with the AG, in 
secret, on an airplane.
 Quite frankly, I think Comey may have done something more dangerous for the 
Democrats. While not recommending indictment, it looked very political, at the 
same time he ripped her apart and in so many words called her irresponsibl! e 
and a liar, with the backing of the FBI. One of Hillary's weaknesses in the 
polls was her lack of trustworthiness. Comey just verified that with his spee

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe

2016-07-07 Thread jr_...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

Lemme guess who's in the center of controversy over there.  It would include 
Barry, Michael Jackson and Xeno.
 

 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <noozguru@...> wrote :

 It's been fun pushing buttons over on FFL2 though some members have evacuated 
and are hiding in the corner.  ;-) 
 
 On 07/07/2016 09:24 AM, Mike Dixon mdixon.6569@... mailto:mdixon.6569@... 
[FairfieldLife] wrote:

   Duh! Most dedicated of True Believers. Judy could be Hillary's 
*Bevan Morris*.
 Hillary's *skin boy*. LOL
  BTW, that's not meant to be *mean spirited*. In fact, a compliment.


 From: "Bhairitu noozguru@... mailto:noozguru@... [FairfieldLife]" 
<FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2016 11:02 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe
 
 
   
 Hey Mike, you think that Judy might be a fanatical Hillary supporter? :-D 
 
 On 07/07/2016 06:41 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] 
wrote:

   

 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
<mdixon.6569@...> mailto:mdixon.6569@... wrote :
 
 Actually,I've been saying for at least a month or longer that she would *not* 
be indicted. Not because she didn't do anything wrong but because she would be 
covered and protected by the Obama administration. It just wasn't going to 
happen. The *fix* was in.
 

 Nonsense. That's just wildly paranoid. Comey is one of that rarest of beasts: 
a straight-arrow, incorruptible Republican. He was crystal clear in his 
announcement as to why she wasn't being indicted: the circumstances necessary 
to justify an indictment didn't exist.
 
 
 And it had been decided for some time that Lynch would go along with whatever 
the FBI recommended. (BTW, her meeting with Bill Clinton was private but not 
"secret.")
 
 
 Yes, Comey did Hillary considerable damage. He did not, however, accuse her of 
having lied. She certainly wasn't st! raightforward, but I'm not sure she told 
any actual lies.
 
 
 Trump has already f'd it up. His speech last night was bizarre. Instead of 
focusing on what Comey said about Hillary, he attacked Comey himself, and 
veered off that topic to defend his anti-Semitic retweet of the six-pointed 
star, which came from a white supremacist Web site. He said he didn't think it 
needed to be changed. Talk about a fiasco! He's totally losing it.
 

 

 

 

 

 Obama has been saying in interviews since April, that she never risked 
national security, yada, yada, yada. Comments like that can be *seen* as 
tampering with an investigation. Just like Clinton meeting with the AG, in 
secret, on an airplane.
 Quite frankly, I think Comey may have done something more dangerous for the 
Democrats. While not recommending indictment, it looked very political, at the 
same time he ripped her apart and in so many words called her irresponsibl! e 
and a liar, with the backing of the FBI. One of Hillary's weaknesses in the 
polls was her lack of trustworthiness. Comey just verified that with his speech 
and parts of it will be played over and over again during the rest of the 
campaign. Her lying has been proven by the FBI and she projects the image of 
being above the law since she wasn't indicted.
 Had she been indicted and forced to resign from her campaign, Democrats could 
have drafted Joe or gone with Bernie. Joe would have had an easier time 
bringing in pissed Bernie fans.

 Trumphas been , almost certainly, handed victory.. if he can keep from *f*ing 
it up.
 
 

 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> 
mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Wednesday, July 6, 2016 11:20 PM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe

 
   Would that be the "fiasco" of the Hillary-haters predicting confidently for 
months that she would be indicted, tried, convicted, and jailed?
 
 
 Youhave one of these, right, Mike?
 
 
 https://patriotdepot.com/hillary-for-prison-t-shirt/ 
https://patriotdepot.com/hillary-for-prison-t-shirt/
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
<mdixon.6569@...> mailto:mdixon.6569@... wrote :

 
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9QpfrZyQzzg 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9QpfrZyQzzg 

 

 
 
 MorningJoe Rips Hillary, Comey, Obama Over Email Fiasco Joe Scarborough and 
Mika Brzezinski rip Hillary Clinton, James Comey and President Obama over the 
email fiasco. ...

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe

2016-07-07 Thread Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

Hmmm, just heard that Comey needed a referral from congress to question Hillary 
under oath,. They said he'd get it.

  From: "Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" 
<FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> 
 Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2016 2:26 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe

    Of course Gowdy asked Comey if Hillary had lied to the FBI. That would be 
against the law. It's not against the law for Hillary to lie to the general 
public and Comey proved that she did.BTW, Hillary's testimony to the FBI was 
*not* under oath, nor was it recorded. However, I'll grant you that I'm not 
sure that  a lie to the FBI in an investigation while *not under oath* is any 
less serious than a lie under oath. So that could be a moot point.

  From: "authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" 
<FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2016 1:54 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

Nonsense to your *nonsense*. I never said Comey fixed it.
But you're claiming he went along with the fix. Republicans and right-wingers 
were congratulating themselves on having Comey as their investigative champion 
because he's so honest and uncompromising--right up until he delivered a 
decision they didn't like.
Yes, he is a straight arrow. However, he's not a prosecutor. He only recommends 
or doesn't. He investigates and  gathers facts.There are plenty of prosecutors 
that would have taken the case and claim that they would have had a more than  
reasonable chance, if not excellent chance,  to win a conviction.
So they say.
Numerous people have been charged and convicted of the same thing with less 
evidence.

Not true.
Of course Comey didn't openly pronounce Clinton a *liar*. Very few people in 
public office ever do that. However, he openly countered many of the lies she 
had been telling the public.
Gowdy asked him if Clinton had lied to the FBI, and he said no, she had not 
lied. That's pretty explicit. He also said:
"I see evidence of great carelessness, but I do not see evidence that is 
sufficient to establish that Secretary Clinton or those with whom she was 
corresponding both talked about classified information and knew when they did 
it they were doing something that was against the law.”

(Poor Gowdy, having lost badly on Benghazi, is desperate to get his pound of 
flesh somehow.)
I'm sure you have to have seen them by now, split screen with him and her. She 
saying one thing with the date she said it and Comey saying she did the 
opposite. He exposed her lies to the public.What Hillary told the FBI in 
private could be something entirely different from what she tells you and me? 
She can lie to you and me  about anything she wants and has been doing but 
lying to the FBI in an investigation is another story. She definitely would 
have been nailed for doing that.
Lynch also reserved the right to go by the recommendations of her top 
attorneys, not just by what the FBI recommended. And yes, the meeting was 
intended to be secret. The FBI , that's Comey's FBI,was there and as a news 
team *got wind* of the meeting and approached, they were told *No cameras and 
no recordings*. Of course they were not allowed on the plane but not even 
allowed to photograph from outside. That's an attempt at secrecy.
They could have arranged a secret meeting the press wouldn't have found out 
about (not on the airport tarmac), but there was no planning for this one. It 
was ill advised, certainly, because of appearances; but it wasn't secret, and 
there's no evidence it was anything but casual.
The six pointed *red* star,  not blue or yellow, has had a little traction but 
not much. Nice little rallying cry for Jews that were going to vote for Hillary 
regardless.
It's hardly only Jews who are upset by anti-Semitism. In fact, your remark is 
itself anti-Semitic.
It's not that Trump is anti-Semitic, necessarily, but rather that he won't 
speak out to reject anti-Semitism in his followers (or racism, or white 
supremacy in general).
The star business would have faded away quickly if he hadn't deliberately 
revived it last night. He could have made it go away *instantly* if he'd 
apologized and called it a mistake. But no...as far as he's concerned, he never 
makes mistakes. As a result, his mistakes hound him for much longer than they 
have to. Great quality for a president to have, isn't it?
Far more traction than any twenty year old rape allegations of a  13 year old 
girl that still haven't manifested in the mainstream media, which if they 
carried any weight would have run with it by now.
Oh, please. You're really hard up for ammunition if you have go back to that 
nothingburger and pretend it was some kind of scandal. That hasn't "manifested 
in the mai

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe

2016-07-07 Thread Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

Of course Gowdy asked Comey if Hillary had lied to the FBI. That would be 
against the law. It's not against the law for Hillary to lie to the general 
public and Comey proved that she did.BTW, Hillary's testimony to the FBI was 
*not* under oath, nor was it recorded. However, I'll grant you that I'm not 
sure that  a lie to the FBI in an investigation while *not under oath* is any 
less serious than a lie under oath. So that could be a moot point.


  From: "authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" 
<FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2016 1:54 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe
   
    


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

Nonsense to your *nonsense*. I never said Comey fixed it.
But you're claiming he went along with the fix. Republicans and right-wingers 
were congratulating themselves on having Comey as their investigative champion 
because he's so honest and uncompromising--right up until he delivered a 
decision they didn't like.
Yes, he is a straight arrow. However, he's not a prosecutor. He only recommends 
or doesn't. He investigates and  gathers facts.There are plenty of prosecutors 
that would have taken the case and claim that they would have had a more than  
reasonable chance, if not excellent chance,  to win a conviction.
So they say.
Numerous people have been charged and convicted of the same thing with less 
evidence.

Not true.
Of course Comey didn't openly pronounce Clinton a *liar*. Very few people in 
public office ever do that. However, he openly countered many of the lies she 
had been telling the public.
Gowdy asked him if Clinton had lied to the FBI, and he said no, she had not 
lied. That's pretty explicit. He also said:
"I see evidence of great carelessness, but I do not see evidence that is 
sufficient to establish that Secretary Clinton or those with whom she was 
corresponding both talked about classified information and knew when they did 
it they were doing something that was against the law.”

(Poor Gowdy, having lost badly on Benghazi, is desperate to get his pound of 
flesh somehow.)
I'm sure you have to have seen them by now, split screen with him and her. She 
saying one thing with the date she said it and Comey saying she did the 
opposite. He exposed her lies to the public.What Hillary told the FBI in 
private could be something entirely different from what she tells you and me? 
She can lie to you and me  about anything she wants and has been doing but 
lying to the FBI in an investigation is another story. She definitely would 
have been nailed for doing that.
Lynch also reserved the right to go by the recommendations of her top 
attorneys, not just by what the FBI recommended. And yes, the meeting was 
intended to be secret. The FBI , that's Comey's FBI,was there and as a news 
team *got wind* of the meeting and approached, they were told *No cameras and 
no recordings*. Of course they were not allowed on the plane but not even 
allowed to photograph from outside. That's an attempt at secrecy.
They could have arranged a secret meeting the press wouldn't have found out 
about (not on the airport tarmac), but there was no planning for this one. It 
was ill advised, certainly, because of appearances; but it wasn't secret, and 
there's no evidence it was anything but casual.
The six pointed *red* star,  not blue or yellow, has had a little traction but 
not much. Nice little rallying cry for Jews that were going to vote for Hillary 
regardless.
It's hardly only Jews who are upset by anti-Semitism. In fact, your remark is 
itself anti-Semitic.
It's not that Trump is anti-Semitic, necessarily, but rather that he won't 
speak out to reject anti-Semitism in his followers (or racism, or white 
supremacy in general).
The star business would have faded away quickly if he hadn't deliberately 
revived it last night. He could have made it go away *instantly* if he'd 
apologized and called it a mistake. But no...as far as he's concerned, he never 
makes mistakes. As a result, his mistakes hound him for much longer than they 
have to. Great quality for a president to have, isn't it?
Far more traction than any twenty year old rape allegations of a  13 year old 
girl that still haven't manifested in the mainstream media, which if they 
carried any weight would have run with it by now.
Oh, please. You're really hard up for ammunition if you have go back to that 
nothingburger and pretend it was some kind of scandal. That hasn't "manifested 
in the mainstream media" because there isn't anything to it.
However, I'll admit that there is plenty of time for each candidate to screw 
themselves and each other while everyone watches. I guess the big question will 
come down to "do you want the *Smartest* women in the world, who you can't 
trust to tell you the truth, to be president and keep going down the same hole 
or do you want to take a chance

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe

2016-07-07 Thread Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

If you looked at it objectively, without *emotion*( thought you would 
appreciate a little sexism), you would see I *compared* you and your devotion 
to Hillary, to Bevan and his devotion to Maharishi. A comparison that  most any 
TMer on FFL could appreciate, a point of reference.BTW, are you insulted to be 
called a TM true believer?

  From: "authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" 
<FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2016 1:51 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe

    I didn't say you did, Mike.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

Oh c'mon Judy. I'm not calling you a TM or Maharishi TBer. 

  From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2016 1:04 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe

 This (from both of you) is as absurd as Barry claiming I'm a "cult apologist" 
for TM. I don't proselytize for Hillary or for TM. All I've been doing is 
addressing unfair and/or inaccurate accusations and characterizations. I'm 
hardly a True Believer in TM or a fanatical supporter of Hillary, and you both 
know it.
You just can't abide it when what you say about Hillary is refuted, so you have 
to "shoot the messenger."

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

Duh!Most dedicated of True Believers. Judy could be Hillary's *Bevan 
Morris*.Hillary's *skin boy*. LOL BTW, that's not meant to be *mean spirited*. 
In fact, a compliment.
  From: "Bhairitu noozguru@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2016 11:02 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe

 Hey Mike, you think that Judymight be a fanatical Hillary supporter?  :-D 

On 07/07/2016 06:41 AM, authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]wrote:

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,<mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

Actually,I've been saying for at least a month or longer thatshe would *not* be 
indicted. Not because she didn'tdo anything wrong but because she would be 
coveredand protected by the Obama administration. It justwasn't going to 
happen. The *fix* was in.
Nonsense. That's just wildly paranoid.Comey is one of that rarest of beasts: 
astraight-arrow, incorruptible Republican. He wascrystal clear in his 
announcement as to why shewasn't being indicted: the circumstances necessaryto 
justify an indictment didn't exist.
And it had been decided for some timethat Lynch would go along with whatever 
the FBIrecommended. (BTW, her meeting with Bill Clintonwas private but not 
"secret.")
Yes, Comey did Hillary considerabledamage. He did not, however, accuse her of 
havinglied. She certainly wasn't st! raightforward, butI'm not sure she told 
any actual lies.
Trump has already f'd it up. His speechlast night was bizarre. Instead of 
focusing onwhat Comey said about Hillary, he attacked Comeyhimself, and veered 
off that topic to defend hisanti-Semitic retweet of the six-pointed star,which 
came from a white supremacist Web site. Hesaid he didn't think it needed to be 
changed. Talkabout a fiasco! He's totally losing it.

Obama hasbeen saying in interviews since April, that shenever risked national 
security, yada, yada, yada.Comments like that can be *seen* as tampering withan 
investigation. Just like Clinton meeting with theAG, in secret, on an 
airplane.Quitefrankly, I think Comey may have done something moredangerous for 
the Democrats. While not recommendingindictment, it looked very political, at 
the sametime he ripped her apart and in so many words calledher irresponsibl! e 
and a liar, with the backing ofthe FBI. One of Hillary's weaknesses in the 
pollswas her lack of trustworthiness. Comey just verifiedthat with his speech 
and parts of it will be playedover and over again during the rest of the 
campaign.Her lying has been proven by the FBI and sheprojects the image of 
being above the law since shewasn't indicted.Had shebeen indicted and forced to 
resign from hercampaign, Democrats could have drafted Joe or gonewith Bernie. 
Joe would have had an easier timebringing in pissed Bernie fans.
Trumphas been , almost certainly, handed victory.. ifhe can keep from *f*ing it 
up.

  From:"authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]"<FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
To:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent:Wednesday, July 6, 2016 11:20 PM
Subject:[FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe

 Would that be the"fiasco" of the Hillary-haterspredicting confidently 
formonths that she would beindicted, tried, convicted, andjailed?
Youhave one of these, right, Mike?
https://patriotdepot.com/hillary-for-prison-t-shirt/

---infairfieldl...@yahoogroups.com,<mdixon.6569@...> wrote:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9QpfrZyQzzg

| 
| 
| 
| 
 | 
 |

 |

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe

2016-07-07 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

 asked him if he would defend Article One of the Constitution. He 
said yes, he would--and Article Two as well, he said, all the way up to Article 
Twelve.
 

 The Constitution has 27 Articles.
 


 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2016 8:41 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe
 
 
   

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 Actually, I've been saying for at least a month or longer that she would *not* 
be indicted. Not because she didn't do anything wrong but because she would be 
covered and protected by the Obama administration. It just wasn't going to 
happen. The *fix* was in.
 

 Nonsense. That's just wildly paranoid. Comey is one of that rarest of beasts: 
a straight-arrow, incorruptible Republican. He was crystal clear in his 
announcement as to why she wasn't being indicted: the circumstances necessary 
to justify an indictment didn't exist.
 

 And it had been decided for some time that Lynch would go along with whatever 
the FBI recommended. (BTW, her meeting with Bill Clinton was private but not 
"secret.")
 

 Yes, Comey did Hillary considerable damage. He did not, however, accuse her of 
having lied. She certainly wasn't straightforward, but I'm not sure she told 
any actual lies.
 

 Trump has already f'd it up. His speech last night was bizarre. Instead of 
focusing on what Comey said about Hillary, he attacked Comey himself, and 
veered off that topic to defend his anti-Semitic retweet of the six-pointed 
star, which came from a white supremacist Web site. He said he didn't think it 
needed to be changed. Talk about a fiasco! He's totally losing it.
 

 

 

 

 

 Obama has been saying in interviews since April, that she never risked 
national security, yada, yada, yada. Comments like that can be *seen* as 
tampering with an investigation. Just like Clinton meeting with the AG, in 
secret, on an airplane.
 Quite frankly, I think Comey may have done something more dangerous for the 
Democrats. While not recommending indictment, it looked very political, at the 
same time he ripped her apart and in so many words called her irresponsible and 
a liar, with the backing of the FBI. One of Hillary's weaknesses in the polls 
was her lack of trustworthiness. Comey just verified that with his speech and 
parts of it will be played over and over again during the rest of the campaign. 
Her lying has been proven by the FBI and she projects the image of being above 
the law since she wasn't indicted.
 Had she been indicted and forced to resign from her campaign, Democrats could 
have drafted Joe or gone with Bernie. Joe would have had an easier time 
bringing in pissed Bernie fans.

 Trump has been , almost certainly, handed victory.. if he can keep from *f*ing 
it up.
 


 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Wednesday, July 6, 2016 11:20 PM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe

 
   Would that be the "fiasco" of the Hillary-haters predicting confidently for 
months that she would be indicted, tried, convicted, and jailed?
 

 You have one of these, right, Mike?
 

 https://patriotdepot.com/hillary-for-prison-t-shirt/ 
https://patriotdepot.com/hillary-for-prison-t-shirt/
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9QpfrZyQzzg 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9QpfrZyQzzg 

 

 Morning Joe Rips Hillary, Comey, Obama Over Email Fiasco Joe Scarborough and 
Mika Brzezinski rip Hillary Clinton, James Comey and President Obama over the 
email fiasco. ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9QpfrZyQzzg

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe

2016-07-07 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

I didn't say you did, Mike.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

Oh c'mon Judy. I'm not calling you a TM or Maharishi TBer.

From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2016 1:04 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe

This (from both of you) is as absurd as Barry claiming I'm a "cult
apologist" for TM. I don't proselytize for Hillary or for TM. All I've been
doing is addressing unfair and/or inaccurate accusations and characterizations.
I'm hardly a True Believer in TM or a fanatical supporter of Hillary, and you
both know it.

You just can't abide it when what you say about Hillary is refuted, so you
have to "shoot the messenger."