Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Scientific proof we survive death!

2014-10-08 Thread TurquoiseBee turquoi...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
Agreed. This is sloppy pseudo-science, promoted by people who are desperately 
*hoping* that life doesn't end at death. 


As Curtis says, not one of these subject actually died. We won't have any 
evidence of someone who *has* died still displaying consciousness until 
November 30.  :-)




 From: curtisdeltabl...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] 
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Wednesday, October 8, 2014 12:51 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Scientific proof we survive death!
 


  
Wow, people who are NOT dead, have memories! Who knew.

This is full of medical misunderstandings about brain functions and what 
physical death entails. These Doctors should be ashamed of themselves for such 
an absurd extrapolation from the facts.

At the simplest level we have two things: The state of death and it's 
corresponding physiology which a person does not get  resuscitated from...
and every other state where they are.

They are different. Why is this so hard for people to understand this unsubtle 
distinction? 


[FairfieldLife] Re: Scientific proof we survive death!

2014-10-07 Thread curtisdeltabl...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
Wow, people who are NOT dead, have memories! Who knew. 

 This is full of medical misunderstandings about brain functions and what 
physical death entails. These Doctors should be ashamed of themselves for such 
an absurd extrapolation from the facts.
 

 At the simplest level we have two things: The state of death and it's 
corresponding physiology which a person does not get  resuscitated from...
 and every other state where they are.
 

 They are different. Why is this so hard for people to understand this unsubtle 
distinction? 


[FairfieldLife] Re: Scientific proof we survive death!

2014-10-07 Thread s3raph...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
Did you read the article? The medical profession has always claimed that once 
the heart stops beating then brain shutdown follows almost immediately. This 
new evidence shows that consciousness continues for longer than previously 
thought. Our knowledge of this grey area has therefore been increased and our 
new understanding is, at the very least, suggestive. 

 I recollect that readings from The Tibetan Book of the Dead are continued for 
*49* days after someone dies to offer encouragement during the transition. Do 
those inscrutable Tibetans know something we don't?

 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues@... wrote :

 Wow, people who are NOT dead, have memories! Who knew. 

 This is full of medical misunderstandings about brain functions and what 
physical death entails. These Doctors should be ashamed of themselves for such 
an absurd extrapolation from the facts.
 

 At the simplest level we have two things: The state of death and it's 
corresponding physiology which a person does not get  resuscitated from...
 and every other state where they are.
 

 They are different. Why is this so hard for people to understand this unsubtle 
distinction? 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Scientific proof we survive death!

2014-10-07 Thread curtisdeltabl...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, s3raphita@... wrote :

 Did you read the article? 
 M:yes I did.
 

 The medical profession has always claimed that once the heart stops beating 
then brain shutdown follows almost immediately. 
 

 M: This is a medical fallacy. Real death takes a while and people get revived 
from not dead states every day. They have no way of reliably knowing exactly 
when their experiences occurred, so they don't have a good reason to claim it 
was at any precise moment of the medical crises that was not death.
 

 

 This new evidence shows that consciousness continues for longer than 
previously thought. Our knowledge of this grey area has therefore been 
increased and our new understanding is, at the very least, suggestive.
 

 M: The article is suggesting things that are not medically accurate. Don't you 
care that it is bad science and suggests nothing? Why invoke science at all if 
we ignore its method?
 

 

 I recollect that readings from The Tibetan Book of the Dead are continued for 
*49* days after someone dies to offer encouragement during the transition. Do 
those inscrutable Tibetans know something we don't?

 

 M: Here you will get no argument from me. The T B of the D doesn't pretend to 
be something it is not. If you accept it as authoritative you are off and 
running in that direction. I won't follow you but I can wish you we'll. It all 
sounds made up to me but I may not have read the right translation. Tim Leary 
was a fan, so there is that going for it.
 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues@... wrote :

 Wow, people who are NOT dead, have memories! Who knew. 

 This is full of medical misunderstandings about brain functions and what 
physical death entails. These Doctors should be ashamed of themselves for such 
an absurd extrapolation from the facts.
 

 At the simplest level we have two things: The state of death and it's 
corresponding physiology which a person does not get  resuscitated from...
 and every other state where they are.
 

 They are different. Why is this so hard for people to understand this unsubtle 
distinction? 






[FairfieldLife] Re: Scientific proof we survive death!

2014-10-07 Thread awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues@... wrote :

 Wow, people who are NOT dead, have memories! Who knew. 

 This is full of medical misunderstandings about brain functions and what 
physical death entails. These Doctors should be ashamed of themselves for such 
an absurd extrapolation from the facts.
 

 At the simplest level we have two things: The state of death and it's 
corresponding physiology which a person does not get  resuscitated from...
 and every other state where they are.
 

 They are different. Why is this so hard for people to understand this unsubtle 
distinction? 
 

 Baby steps.




[FairfieldLife] Re: Scientific proof we survive death!

2014-10-07 Thread anartax...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
Results of medical study of the human mind and consciousness at the time of 
death 
http://medicalxpress.com/news/2014-10-results-medical-human-mind-consciousness.html
 
 
 
http://medicalxpress.com/news/2014-10-results-medical-human-mind-consciousness.html
 
 
 Results of medical study of the human mind and conscious... 
http://medicalxpress.com/news/2014-10-results-medical-human-mind-consciousness.html
 The results of a four-year international study of 2060 cardiac arrest cases 
across 15 hospitals published and available now.
 
 
 
 View on medicalxpress.com 
http://medicalxpress.com/news/2014-10-results-medical-human-mind-consciousness.html
 
 Preview by Yahoo 
 
 
  
http://www.resuscitationjournal.com/article/S0300-9572(14)00739-4/abstract 
http://www.resuscitationjournal.com/article/S0300-9572(14)00739-4/abstract