?
On Fri, 4/11/14, salyavin808 no_re...@yahoogroups.com
mailto:no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote:
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Scientifically Validated
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Date: Friday, April 11, 2014, 8:52 PM
OK. Did you think I had been disagreeing with you that the TMO will use
anything to promote its woo woo claims and that another example of same would
convince me or prove me wrong?
Because, see, I've been talking about only this particular case (the morning
sunshine study). You had asked,
These science paywall's are so unfair, you either have to take their word for
it or fork out what could amount to a fortune to get one or two papers from a
journal that wouldn't cost as much for the whole thing by subscription.
But lets take them at their word and assume that morning
Morning sunlight is the basis behind Bright Light Therapy for Seasonal
Affective Disorder, I believe.
The mechanisms by which they work may be similar.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote :
These science paywall's are so unfair, you either have to take
OK, I took another look at the MUMOSA post, and your paean is ridiculous. This
study wasn't TM-related at all; and your guy found NOTHING WHATSOEVER to
indicate it was baloney. The instructor simply copied the published study
abstract for the handout (go look for yourself, as both Salyavin and
will use my reply to blabber and blather on about how wrong I
am - again, I see why Barry dislikes you so very much.
On Fri, 4/11/14, authfri...@yahoo.com authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Scientifically Validated
To: FairfieldLife
Salyavin, we don't know what kind of hay the TMO was trying to make with this
study (the MUMOSA guy doesn't bother to tell us). For all we know, it was
simply that Vastu principles are in accord with current scientific thinking,
nothing woo-woo about it.
Just thinking out loud because
Salyavin, we don't know what kind of hay the TMO was trying to make with this
study (the MUMOSA guy doesn't bother to tell us). For all we know, it was
simply that Vastu principles are in accord with current scientific thinking,
nothing woo-woo about it.
Just thinking out loud because
Rubbish, it wouldn't be the first time they'd picked something irrelevant or
vaguely samey sounding and held it up as vindication. And it was in a classroom
studying vastu, so it's pretty obvious what sort of hay they are trying to make.
Remember all the BS the TMO co-opted about the
Rubbish yourself. It's not at all obvious they were trying to make woo-woo of
it. Vindication, quite possibly, but that's not at all the same thing. And it
might well be relevant to whatever Vastu says about sunlight in the home. From
what I've read, many Vastu principles have nothing to do
Vastu is just common sense from an iron age farmers perspective. Kitchen in the
coolest place, ability to tell the solstices from looking out the front door
etc. Maybe there's a bit of folk wisdom in waking up facing the sun being
better for you.
Where it all goes wrong is when the TMO
wrong I
am - again, I see why Barry dislikes you so very much.
On Fri, 4/11/14, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... authfriend@...
mailto:authfriend@... wrote:
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Scientifically Validated
To: FairfieldLife
And do you remember that forest fire a few years back that didn't affect any
vastu homes? What did the TMO claim about that? Invincibility that's what,
nature won't allow you to be harmed if you live in vastu etc.
I put it to the test and wrote to the journalist who covered the fire story
I never said they wouldn't grasp at any straws etc. We just don't have any
evidence they were grasping at woo-woo straws in this case (or that this
particular straw wasn't perfectly sound). It irritates the hell out of me when
people make mountains out of molehills while ignoring the damn
I do remember that, yes. And so...what? Were you thinking I'd have endorsed
that claim? Did you think it had anything to do with what I was saying about
the morning sun study?
And do you remember that forest fire a few years back that didn't affect any
vastu homes? What did the TMO
those
same fearful people to give the TMO their money. As Edg would say, BAH!
On Fri, 4/11/14, authfri...@yahoo.com authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Scientifically Validated
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Date: Friday, April
...@yahoo.com authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Scientifically Validated
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Date: Friday, April 11, 2014, 8:48 PM
No, you misread me. Of course he was right to
ask
course, those pundits praying
to Agni for you, that perfect vastu home then you are falling apart - which
means, if you need this stuff, TM is ineffective after all.
On Fri, 4/11/14, salyavin808 no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote:
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re
Another excellent TM Movement story I have not heard. Did this happen in the UK?
On Fri, 4/11/14, salyavin808 no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote:
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Scientifically Validated
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Date: Friday, April
!
On Fri, 4/11/14, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... authfriend@...
mailto:authfriend@... wrote:
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Scientifically Validated
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Date: Friday, April 11, 2014, 8:33 PM
Rubbish yourself.
It's
If you cast your mind back, this conversation is about how the TMO will use
anything to promote its woo woo claims. The forest fire was another example.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote :
I do remember that, yes. And so...what? Were you thinking I'd have endorsed
Did he ever check the actual study as the instructor suggested? Or is he just
assuming it didn't include the average hospital stay rather than that it was
left out of the handout he read?
Seems like he didn't really finish the job before drawing his conclusions
about TM-style Vastu in
write him and ask him
On Fri, 4/11/14, authfri...@yahoo.com authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Scientifically Validated
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Date: Friday, April 11, 2014, 1:17 AM
On 4/10/2014 9:34 PM, Michael Jackson wrote:
write him and ask him
OK.
No, you write him and ask him if you want us to give his story any credence.
You don't seem to understand the principle. It's not up to the people you're
trying to convince to vet and validate the story. That's your job.
You didn't even notice the omission, did you? You just swallowed it
25 matches
Mail list logo
