> When are you going to read it, Kirk?
It's a mantra mala. I read it continually.
Kirk wrote:
> Which is which or have you not read Saundarya Lahiri?
>
Yes, I have read it several times and posted excerpts
here and on Usenet on several occasions. Apparently
not a single respondent on this forum - except maybe
Empty Bill, or Billy G - has read the Saundarya Lahiri
or the Anan
Which is which or have you not read Saundarya Lahiri?
- Original Message -
From: "emptybill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2007 9:41 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Shankara on the Two Paths
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "qn
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "qntmpkt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ---thanks, so overall; what are some advantages of Buddhism over
> Shankara, if anything?
>
I think you have been around long enough to know that you must answer
this for yourself.
However, you might also consider
---thanks, so overall; what are some advantages of Buddhism over
Shankara, if anything?
In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, billy jim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Swami Muktananada's "blue pearl" is the title he gave to the nila-
bindu (blue point-essence) experienced at the ajna-chakra. Shanka
Swami Muktananada's "blue pearl" is the title he gave to the nila-bindu (blue
point-essence) experienced at the ajna-chakra. Shankara does not talk about the
nila-bindu although in his Bha.Gita commentary on Bh.G. 8.10 he does discuss
the Ajna-chakra
prayaana-kaale: At the time of death,
---How about the Blue Pearl? What does Shankara say about that?
In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, billy jim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The problem here is in characterizing Shankara's views only in
terms of his commentary on the Brahma Sutras. It is well established
that the Brahma Sutra-s