--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung no_re...@... wrote:
Life may be astoundingly abundant out there. Hawking is refusing to see that
life is a gimme -- built into the subtle laws of physics -- and if this is
so, then life isn't so damned insignificant as he's framing it. He'd
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, John jr_...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung no_reply@ wrote:
Life may be astoundingly abundant out there. Hawking is refusing to see
that life is a gimme -- built into the subtle laws of physics -- and if
this is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Hugo fintlewoodle...@... wrote:
Hawking doesn't change views on a dime, he's a scientist.
He proposes explanations and they stand for as long as the
evidence supports them. New evidence, new theories needed.
Perhaps you doubt his credentials because he is
On Jun 10, 2010, at 8:45 AM, Hugo wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung no_re...@... wrote:
Life may be astoundingly abundant out there. Hawking is refusing to see
that life is a gimme -- built into the subtle laws of physics -- and if this
is so, then life isn't so
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_re...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Hugo fintlewoodlewix@ wrote:
This is an example of a new phenomenon, the YouTube
TV series. Very well done and acted, IMO.
And if you've ever *had* a Psycho Girlfriend, you'll dig
Hideous? Hideous?
Dictionary:
1 : offensive to the senses and especially to sight : exceedingly ugly
2 : morally offensive
Hugo you're getting a D- on your commentsee me after class.
Edg
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Hugo fintlewoodle...@... wrote:
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_re...@... wrote:
There is a fundamental difference between religion, which
is based on authority, and science, which is based on
observation and reason. Science will win because it works.
When asked by ABC News' Diane Sawyer about the
Life may be astoundingly abundant out there. Hawking is refusing to see that
life is a gimme -- built into the subtle laws of physics -- and if this is so,
then life isn't so damned insignificant as he's framing it. He'd argue that
even if life is automatic, we're in but one universe where
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung no_re...@... wrote:
Life may be astoundingly abundant out there. Hawking is refusing to see that
life is a gimme -- built into the subtle laws of physics -- and if this is
so, then life isn't so damned insignificant as he's framing it. He'd
