Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Anklesaria's' position with the TMO

2005-11-06 Thread Peter
--- sparaig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, > "shempmcgurk" > > > <[EMAIL PROT

[FairfieldLife] Re: The Anklesaria's' position with the TMO

2005-11-05 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.co

[FairfieldLife] Re: The Anklesaria's' position with the TMO

2005-11-05 Thread shempmcgurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > --- jim_flanegin <[EMAIL PR

[FairfieldLife] Re: The Anklesaria's' position with the TMO

2005-11-05 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jyouells2000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.c

[FairfieldLife] Re: The Anklesaria's' position with the TMO

2005-11-05 Thread jyouells2000
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > > Farrokh makes some excellent points. > >

[FairfieldLife] Re: The Anklesaria's' position with the TMO

2005-11-05 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > --- jim_flanegin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > And find a picture of Maharishi and shake your > > > fin

[FairfieldLife] Re: The Anklesaria's' position with the TMO

2005-11-05 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > on 11/4/05 11:55 AM, shempmcgurk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > I recently read an article about David Lynch in which

[FairfieldLife] Re: The Anklesaria's' position with the TMO

2005-11-05 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ingegerd" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I think that this letter from Farrokh is representative for most > of > > the Independent TM-Teachers when it says: "If we are

[FairfieldLife] Re: The Anklesaria's' position with the TMO

2005-11-05 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Farrokh makes some excellent points. > > > > > "some"? > > That's all you can concede to the guy, Spare Egg, is "some". > > H

[FairfieldLife] Re: The Anklesaria's' position with the TMO

2005-11-05 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jyouells2000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jyouells2000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups

[FairfieldLife] Re: The Anklesaria's' position with the TMO

2005-11-04 Thread akasha_108
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > --- Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > on 11/4/05 11:55 AM, shempmcgurk at > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > I recently read an article about David Lynch in > > which he is quoted > > > as saying t

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Anklesaria's' position with the TMO

2005-11-04 Thread Peter
--- Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > on 11/4/05 11:55 AM, shempmcgurk at > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > I recently read an article about David Lynch in > which he is quoted > > as saying that he meditates three times a day...he > does an extra one > > at lunch time. And why does he

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Anklesaria's' position with the TMO

2005-11-04 Thread Rick Archer
on 11/4/05 3:01 PM, shempmcgurk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > But your advice above is good and I shouldn't care what MMY does or > says...as I myself often say on this forum: the technique still > works regardless of the TMO or MMY's words or actions. And as far as I can tell, the only univers

[FairfieldLife] Re: The Anklesaria's' position with the TMO

2005-11-04 Thread shempmcgurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > on 11/4/05 11:55 AM, shempmcgu

[FairfieldLife] Re: The Anklesaria's' position with the TMO

2005-11-04 Thread shempmcgurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > --- jim_flanegin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > And find a picture of Maharishi and shake your > > finger at him and > > tell him what a bastard he is, if it makes you feel > > better. > > Then...on to th

[FairfieldLife] Re: The Anklesaria's' position with the TMO

2005-11-04 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > on 11/4/05 11:55 AM, shempmcgurk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > I recently read an article about David Lynch in which

[FairfieldLife] Re: The Anklesaria's' position with the TMO

2005-11-04 Thread shempmcgurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > on 11/4/05 11:55 AM, shempmcgurk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > I recently read an article about David Lynch in which he is quoted > > as saying that he meditates three times a day...he does an extra one > > a

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Anklesaria's' position with the TMO

2005-11-04 Thread Rick Archer
on 11/4/05 11:55 AM, shempmcgurk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I recently read an article about David Lynch in which he is quoted > as saying that he meditates three times a day...he does an extra one > at lunch time. And why does he do the extra one? Because MMY told > him to do it. If you w

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Anklesaria's' position with the TMO

2005-11-04 Thread Peter
--- jim_flanegin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > And find a picture of Maharishi and shake your > finger at him and > tell him what a bastard he is, if it makes you feel > better. > Then...on to the next injustice in the world. Excellent suggestion! Like Guru Dev used to say, don't give me y

[FairfieldLife] Re: The Anklesaria's' position with the TMO

2005-11-04 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ingegerd" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I think that this letter from Farrokh is representative for most > of > > the Independent TM-Teachers when it says: "If we are

[FairfieldLife] Re: The Anklesaria's' position with the TMO

2005-11-04 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > --- jim_flanegin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robert > > Gimbel" > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Perhaps it is a clash of ego's; > > > Or at least one ego? > > >

[FairfieldLife] Re: The Anklesaria's' position with the TMO

2005-11-04 Thread shempmcgurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ingegerd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think that this letter from Farrokh is representative for most of > the Independent TM-Teachers when it says: "If we are teachers > of "supreme knowledge" with the gift to remove suffering, how much > greater is

[FairfieldLife] Re: The Anklesaria's' position with the TMO

2005-11-04 Thread shempmcgurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Farrokh makes some excellent points. "some"? That's all you can concede to the guy, Spare Egg, is "some". How big of you. By using the word "some", you indicate a gap between observing that ALL of what he said is

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Anklesaria's' position with the TMO

2005-11-04 Thread Peter
--- jim_flanegin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robert > Gimbel" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Perhaps it is a clash of ego's; > > Or at least one ego? > > Isn't it the ego, that is constantly concerned > with; > > Money, power and control? > > When o

[FairfieldLife] Re: The Anklesaria's' position with the TMO

2005-11-04 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robert Gimbel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Perhaps it is a clash of ego's; > Or at least one ego? > Isn't it the ego, that is constantly concerned with; > Money, power and control? > When one is fulfilled from within, completely in Bliss; > How could one b

[FairfieldLife] Re: The Anklesaria's' position with the TMO

2005-11-03 Thread Robert Gimbel
Perhaps it is a clash of ego's; Or at least one ego? Isn't it the ego, that is constantly concerned with; Money, power and control? When one is fulfilled from within, completely in Bliss; How could one be concerned with money, power, lust, greed, And control? - In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "

[FairfieldLife] Re: The Anklesaria's' position with the TMO

2005-11-03 Thread jyouells2000
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jyouells2000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > > Farrokh makes some excellent points. I

[FairfieldLife] Re: The Anklesaria's' position with the TMO

2005-11-03 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jyouells2000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Farrokh makes some excellent points. I wonder if MMY is aware of the > > controversy or if Bevan is asserting authority as follo

[FairfieldLife] Re: The Anklesaria's' position with the TMO

2005-11-03 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ingegerd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think that this letter from Farrokh is representative for most of > the Independent TM-Teachers when it says: "If we are teachers > of "supreme knowledge" with the gift to remove suffering, how much > greater is o

[FairfieldLife] Re: The Anklesaria's' position with the TMO

2005-11-03 Thread jyouells2000
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Farrokh makes some excellent points. I wonder if MMY is aware of the > controversy or if Bevan is asserting authority as followup to a long- > time personality conflict... > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, R

[FairfieldLife] Re: The Anklesaria's' position with the TMO

2005-11-03 Thread Ingegerd
I think that this letter from Farrokh is representative for most of the Independent TM-Teachers when it says: "If we are teachers of "supreme knowledge" with the gift to remove suffering, how much greater is our sin if we fail to use our talent for the poor and under-privileged and use it exclu

[FairfieldLife] Re: The Anklesaria's' position with the TMO

2005-11-03 Thread sparaig
Farrokh makes some excellent points. I wonder if MMY is aware of the controversy or if Bevan is asserting authority as followup to a long- time personality conflict... --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > To the many who have expressed their support o