Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

[Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

There a re a number of split screen videos out now of Comey refuting every one 
of her claims as she made them.


  From: "hondosavg...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife]" 
<FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Wednesday, July 6, 2016 7:21 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
   
    
She wanted to use only one single device, so she used several and more than one 
home-brew server. She never sent or resent a classified document and she turned 
over every single one of her email messages. She never deleted any messages 
that contained State Department information. She never compromised security by 
using her cell phone outside of the United States. She had a full staff of IT 
security to insure that none of her email was compromised by hackers.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <hondosavgae2@...> wrote :

We are in he best of hands.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

Oh, damn! Where did I put those nuclear launch codes?


  From: "hondosavgae2@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Tuesday, July 5, 2016 11:47 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
 
 
What could go wrong?
FBI finds John Wilkes Booth "extremely careless" in discharge of firearm.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

Nothing. Nothing different. She's writing her own book. This is one chapter.


  From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Sunday, July 3, 2016 2:38 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

 You don't know what you're talking about. It was the *prosecutor* who pointed 
out that Clinton tried to get out of defending the rapist.
There's nothing new in this Daily News article that Snopes hasn't dealt with.

I note that you have *no* response to what Snopes says about the case or the 
audiotapes. As usual, your claims are devoid of any evidence or even logical 
reasoning.
Just for kicks, how do you think Hillary should have handled the rapist's 
defense? What should she have done that she didn't do, or not done that she did 
do?


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

SNOPES absolutely sanitizes the events. The tape is Hillary in her own words, 
spoken years ago. SNOPES' explanation is recent damage control and an obvious 
attempt to clean up what is heard on the tape in Hillary's own words. So 
complete, that  they, either SNOPES or the Clinton campaign, had to go get a 
judge, no doubt a Clinton supporter, campaign contributor to write something up 
in her defense and explain away what she said on the tape.Old Clinton trick, 
declare *nothing new here*. Well, the snopes attempt to cover for the Clinton's 
*is* new with new sources. The tape is the original.


  From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Sunday, July 3, 2016 12:27 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

 There's nothing "sanitized" about what's on Snopes. The tapes and transcripts 
are the same as what's on the page you link to, and that were provided by the 
original report in the Washington Free Beacon, on which the Daily News story is 
based. Nothing new here, sorry.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

BTW, I'll stick with what I said earlier about Hillary and her rapist 
client.http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/young-hillary-clintBon-heard-laughing-discussing-defense-accused-child-rapist-newly-discovered-audio-tapes-article-1.1832009

 
| 
| 
| 
|  |  |

 |

 |
| 
|   | 
Young Hillary Clinton heard laughing while discussing her defense of an acc...
A young Hillary Clinton callously rejoiced at getting an accused child-rapist 
off the hook even though the then-... |  |

 |

 |

 
SNOPES gets the sanitized version to counter Hillary in her own words.


  From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 8:16 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

 


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

Broderick was dealing with the then Attorney General of Arkansas, William 
Jefferson Clinton, the person she accused of raping her in her own hotel room.
Actually Broaddrick wasn't "dealing with him." But she could have had him 
charged with rape if she wanted to.
She had witnesses of the aftermath, a bloodied, bruised, and swollen upper lip 
which she claims he bit in order to keep her from screaming during the attack.
She screams with her lips?
it would be nice if both took a polygraph, although Hillary says she has lost 
her confidence in them.
You did notice the date of the affidavit regarding Trump and alle

Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

[hondosavg...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife]]

 She wanted to use only one single device, so she used several and more than 
one home-brew server. She never sent or resent a classified document and she 
turned over every single one of her email messages. She never deleted any 
messages that contained State Department information. She never compromised 
security by using her cell phone outside of the United States. She had a full 
staff of IT security to insure that none of her email was compromised by 
hackers.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <hondosavgae2@...> wrote :

 We are in he best of hands. 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 Oh, damn! Where did I put those nuclear launch codes?
 
 


 From: "hondosavgae2@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Tuesday, July 5, 2016 11:47 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
 
 
   

 What could go wrong?
 

 FBI finds John Wilkes Booth "extremely careless" in discharge of firearm.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 Nothing. Nothing different. She's writing her own book. This is one chapter.
 
 


 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Sunday, July 3, 2016 2:38 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

 
   You don't know what you're talking about. It was the *prosecutor* who 
pointed out that Clinton tried to get out of defending the rapist.
 

 There's nothing new in this Daily News article that Snopes hasn't dealt with.
 

 I note that you have *no* response to what Snopes says about the case or the 
audiotapes. As usual, your claims are devoid of any evidence or even logical 
reasoning.
 

 Just for kicks, how do you think Hillary should have handled the rapist's 
defense? What should she have done that she didn't do, or not done that she did 
do?
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 
 SNOPES absolutely sanitizes the events. The tape is Hillary in her own words, 
spoken years ago. SNOPES' explanation is recent damage control and an obvious 
attempt to clean up what is heard on the tape in Hillary's own words. So 
complete, that  they, either SNOPES or the Clinton campaign, had to go get a 
judge, no doubt a Clinton supporter, campaign contributor to write something up 
in her defense and explain away what she said on the tape.
 Old Clinton trick, declare *nothing new here*. Well, the snopes attempt to 
cover for the Clinton's *is* new with new sources. The tape is the original.

 
 


 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Sunday, July 3, 2016 12:27 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

 
   There's nothing "sanitized" about what's on Snopes. The tapes and 
transcripts are the same as what's on the page you link to, and that were 
provided by the original report in the Washington Free Beacon, on which the 
Daily News story is based. Nothing new here, sorry.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 BTW, I'll stick with what I said earlier about Hillary and her rapist 
client.http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/young-hillary-clintBon-heard-laughing-discussing-defense-accused-child-rapist-newly-discovered-audio-tapes-article-1.1832009
 
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/young-hillary-clinton-heard-laughing-discussing-defense-accused-child-rapist-newly-discovered-audio-tapes-article-1.1832009
 

 

 Young Hillary Clinton heard laughing while discussing her defense of an acc... 
A young Hillary Clinton callously rejoiced at getting an accused child-rapist 
off the hook even though the then-... 
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/young-hillary-clinton-heard-laughing-discussing-defense-accused-child-rapist-newly-discovered-audio-tapes-article-1.1832009
 

SNOPES gets the sanitized version to counter Hillary in her own words.
 
 


 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 8:16 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

 
   

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 Broderick was dealing with the then Attorney General of Arkansas, William 
Jefferson Clinton, the person she accused of raping her in her own hotel room.
 

 Actually Broaddrick wasn't "dealing with him." But she could have had him 
charged with rape if she wanted to.
 

 She had witnesses of the aftermath, a bloodied, bruised, and swollen upper lip 
which she claims he bit in order to keep her from screaming during the attack.
 

 She screams with her lips?
 

 it would be nice if both took a polygraph, although Hillary says she has lost 
her confidence in them.

 You did notice the 

Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

[hondosavg...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife]]

We are in he best of hands. 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 Oh, damn! Where did I put those nuclear launch codes?
 
 


 From: "hondosavgae2@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Tuesday, July 5, 2016 11:47 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
 
 
   

 What could go wrong?
 

 FBI finds John Wilkes Booth "extremely careless" in discharge of firearm.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 Nothing. Nothing different. She's writing her own book. This is one chapter.
 
 


 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Sunday, July 3, 2016 2:38 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

 
   You don't know what you're talking about. It was the *prosecutor* who 
pointed out that Clinton tried to get out of defending the rapist.
 

 There's nothing new in this Daily News article that Snopes hasn't dealt with.
 

 I note that you have *no* response to what Snopes says about the case or the 
audiotapes. As usual, your claims are devoid of any evidence or even logical 
reasoning.
 

 Just for kicks, how do you think Hillary should have handled the rapist's 
defense? What should she have done that she didn't do, or not done that she did 
do?
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 
 SNOPES absolutely sanitizes the events. The tape is Hillary in her own words, 
spoken years ago. SNOPES' explanation is recent damage control and an obvious 
attempt to clean up what is heard on the tape in Hillary's own words. So 
complete, that  they, either SNOPES or the Clinton campaign, had to go get a 
judge, no doubt a Clinton supporter, campaign contributor to write something up 
in her defense and explain away what she said on the tape.
 Old Clinton trick, declare *nothing new here*. Well, the snopes attempt to 
cover for the Clinton's *is* new with new sources. The tape is the original.

 
 


 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Sunday, July 3, 2016 12:27 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

 
   There's nothing "sanitized" about what's on Snopes. The tapes and 
transcripts are the same as what's on the page you link to, and that were 
provided by the original report in the Washington Free Beacon, on which the 
Daily News story is based. Nothing new here, sorry.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 BTW, I'll stick with what I said earlier about Hillary and her rapist 
client.http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/young-hillary-clintBon-heard-laughing-discussing-defense-accused-child-rapist-newly-discovered-audio-tapes-article-1.1832009
 
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/young-hillary-clinton-heard-laughing-discussing-defense-accused-child-rapist-newly-discovered-audio-tapes-article-1.1832009
 

 

 Young Hillary Clinton heard laughing while discussing her defense of an acc... 
A young Hillary Clinton callously rejoiced at getting an accused child-rapist 
off the hook even though the then-... 
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/young-hillary-clinton-heard-laughing-discussing-defense-accused-child-rapist-newly-discovered-audio-tapes-article-1.1832009
 

SNOPES gets the sanitized version to counter Hillary in her own words.
 
 


 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 8:16 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

 
   

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 Broderick was dealing with the then Attorney General of Arkansas, William 
Jefferson Clinton, the person she accused of raping her in her own hotel room.
 

 Actually Broaddrick wasn't "dealing with him." But she could have had him 
charged with rape if she wanted to.
 

 She had witnesses of the aftermath, a bloodied, bruised, and swollen upper lip 
which she claims he bit in order to keep her from screaming during the attack.
 

 She screams with her lips?
 

 it would be nice if both took a polygraph, although Hillary says she has lost 
her confidence in them.

 You did notice the date of the affidavit regarding Trump and alleged rape of 
thirteen year old girl, June 18 2016? Does that sound suspicious to you?

 

 Not particularly, no.
 

 The first time Hillary attacked Trump on women, Trump slammed her back with 
Bill's exploits and warned her *never go there* and she backed off. This 
happened a couple of times as I recall.
 

 Um, so she *didn't* back off, she came back and did it again.
 

 The idea of Trump "warning" Hillary about anything is laughable.
 

 Of course there is a lot of talk about Clinton wit

Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

[Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

Oh, damn! Where did I put those nuclear launch codes?


  From: "hondosavg...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife]" 
<FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Tuesday, July 5, 2016 11:47 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
   
    
What could go wrong?
FBI finds John Wilkes Booth "extremely careless" in discharge of firearm.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

Nothing. Nothing different. She's writing her own book. This is one chapter.


  From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Sunday, July 3, 2016 2:38 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
 
 You don't know what you're talking about. It was the *prosecutor* who pointed 
out that Clinton tried to get out of defending the rapist.
There's nothing new in this Daily News article that Snopes hasn't dealt with.

I note that you have *no* response to what Snopes says about the case or the 
audiotapes. As usual, your claims are devoid of any evidence or even logical 
reasoning.
Just for kicks, how do you think Hillary should have handled the rapist's 
defense? What should she have done that she didn't do, or not done that she did 
do?


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

SNOPES absolutely sanitizes the events. The tape is Hillary in her own words, 
spoken years ago. SNOPES' explanation is recent damage control and an obvious 
attempt to clean up what is heard on the tape in Hillary's own words. So 
complete, that  they, either SNOPES or the Clinton campaign, had to go get a 
judge, no doubt a Clinton supporter, campaign contributor to write something up 
in her defense and explain away what she said on the tape.Old Clinton trick, 
declare *nothing new here*. Well, the snopes attempt to cover for the Clinton's 
*is* new with new sources. The tape is the original.


  From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Sunday, July 3, 2016 12:27 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

 There's nothing "sanitized" about what's on Snopes. The tapes and transcripts 
are the same as what's on the page you link to, and that were provided by the 
original report in the Washington Free Beacon, on which the Daily News story is 
based. Nothing new here, sorry.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

BTW, I'll stick with what I said earlier about Hillary and her rapist 
client.http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/young-hillary-clintBon-heard-laughing-discussing-defense-accused-child-rapist-newly-discovered-audio-tapes-article-1.1832009

 
| 
| 
| 
|  |  |

 |

 |
| 
|   | 
Young Hillary Clinton heard laughing while discussing her defense of an acc...
A young Hillary Clinton callously rejoiced at getting an accused child-rapist 
off the hook even though the then-... |  |

 |

 |

 
SNOPES gets the sanitized version to counter Hillary in her own words.


  From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 8:16 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

 


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

Broderick was dealing with the then Attorney General of Arkansas, William 
Jefferson Clinton, the person she accused of raping her in her own hotel room.
Actually Broaddrick wasn't "dealing with him." But she could have had him 
charged with rape if she wanted to.
She had witnesses of the aftermath, a bloodied, bruised, and swollen upper lip 
which she claims he bit in order to keep her from screaming during the attack.
She screams with her lips?
it would be nice if both took a polygraph, although Hillary says she has lost 
her confidence in them.
You did notice the date of the affidavit regarding Trump and alleged rape of 
thirteen year old girl, June 18 2016? Does that sound suspicious to you?

Not particularly, no.
The first time Hillary attacked Trump on women, Trump slammed her back with 
Bill's exploits and warned her *never go there* and she backed off. This 
happened a couple of times as I recall.
Um, so she *didn't* back off, she came back and did it again.
The idea of Trump "warning" Hillary about anything is laughable.
Of course there is a lot of talk about Clinton with under aged girls in the 
Bahamas at wild parties, I believe with Mark Rich.
There's always been a lot of talk about the Clintons. The question is, how much 
of it is true? Look at how badly you screwed up on the ludicrous story about 
Hillary's defense of the accused rapist.
The Clinton's had to *inoculate* themselves from their past and possible 
future, by accusing Trump of something worse first,
Oh, jeez, Mike, can you be any more ridiculous? What have they accused him of 

Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

[hondosavg...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife]]

 What could go wrong?
 

 FBI finds John Wilkes Booth "extremely careless" in discharge of firearm.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 Nothing. Nothing different. She's writing her own book. This is one chapter.
 
 


 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Sunday, July 3, 2016 2:38 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
 
 
   You don't know what you're talking about. It was the *prosecutor* who 
pointed out that Clinton tried to get out of defending the rapist.
 

 There's nothing new in this Daily News article that Snopes hasn't dealt with.
 

 I note that you have *no* response to what Snopes says about the case or the 
audiotapes. As usual, your claims are devoid of any evidence or even logical 
reasoning.
 

 Just for kicks, how do you think Hillary should have handled the rapist's 
defense? What should she have done that she didn't do, or not done that she did 
do?
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 
 SNOPES absolutely sanitizes the events. The tape is Hillary in her own words, 
spoken years ago. SNOPES' explanation is recent damage control and an obvious 
attempt to clean up what is heard on the tape in Hillary's own words. So 
complete, that  they, either SNOPES or the Clinton campaign, had to go get a 
judge, no doubt a Clinton supporter, campaign contributor to write something up 
in her defense and explain away what she said on the tape.
 Old Clinton trick, declare *nothing new here*. Well, the snopes attempt to 
cover for the Clinton's *is* new with new sources. The tape is the original.

 
 


 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Sunday, July 3, 2016 12:27 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

 
   There's nothing "sanitized" about what's on Snopes. The tapes and 
transcripts are the same as what's on the page you link to, and that were 
provided by the original report in the Washington Free Beacon, on which the 
Daily News story is based. Nothing new here, sorry.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 BTW, I'll stick with what I said earlier about Hillary and her rapist 
client.http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/young-hillary-clintBon-heard-laughing-discussing-defense-accused-child-rapist-newly-discovered-audio-tapes-article-1.1832009
 
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/young-hillary-clinton-heard-laughing-discussing-defense-accused-child-rapist-newly-discovered-audio-tapes-article-1.1832009
 

 

 Young Hillary Clinton heard laughing while discussing her defense of an acc... 
A young Hillary Clinton callously rejoiced at getting an accused child-rapist 
off the hook even though the then-... 
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/young-hillary-clinton-heard-laughing-discussing-defense-accused-child-rapist-newly-discovered-audio-tapes-article-1.1832009
 

SNOPES gets the sanitized version to counter Hillary in her own words.
 
 


 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 8:16 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

 
   

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 Broderick was dealing with the then Attorney General of Arkansas, William 
Jefferson Clinton, the person she accused of raping her in her own hotel room.
 

 Actually Broaddrick wasn't "dealing with him." But she could have had him 
charged with rape if she wanted to.
 

 She had witnesses of the aftermath, a bloodied, bruised, and swollen upper lip 
which she claims he bit in order to keep her from screaming during the attack.
 

 She screams with her lips?
 

 it would be nice if both took a polygraph, although Hillary says she has lost 
her confidence in them.

 You did notice the date of the affidavit regarding Trump and alleged rape of 
thirteen year old girl, June 18 2016? Does that sound suspicious to you?

 

 Not particularly, no.
 

 The first time Hillary attacked Trump on women, Trump slammed her back with 
Bill's exploits and warned her *never go there* and she backed off. This 
happened a couple of times as I recall.
 

 Um, so she *didn't* back off, she came back and did it again.
 

 The idea of Trump "warning" Hillary about anything is laughable.
 

 Of course there is a lot of talk about Clinton with under aged girls in the 
Bahamas at wild parties, I believe with Mark Rich.
 

 There's always been a lot of talk about the Clintons. The question is, how 
much of it is true? Look at how badly you screwed up on the ludicrous story 
about Hillary's defense of the accused rapist.
 

 The Clinton's had to *inoculate* themselves from their past and possible 
future, by accusing Trump of s

Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

[Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

Nothing. Nothing different. She's writing her own book. This is one chapter.


  From: "authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" 
<FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Sunday, July 3, 2016 2:38 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
   
    You don't know what you're talking about. It was the *prosecutor* who 
pointed out that Clinton tried to get out of defending the rapist.
There's nothing new in this Daily News article that Snopes hasn't dealt with.

I note that you have *no* response to what Snopes says about the case or the 
audiotapes. As usual, your claims are devoid of any evidence or even logical 
reasoning.
Just for kicks, how do you think Hillary should have handled the rapist's 
defense? What should she have done that she didn't do, or not done that she did 
do?


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

SNOPES absolutely sanitizes the events. The tape is Hillary in her own words, 
spoken years ago. SNOPES' explanation is recent damage control and an obvious 
attempt to clean up what is heard on the tape in Hillary's own words. So 
complete, that  they, either SNOPES or the Clinton campaign, had to go get a 
judge, no doubt a Clinton supporter, campaign contributor to write something up 
in her defense and explain away what she said on the tape.Old Clinton trick, 
declare *nothing new here*. Well, the snopes attempt to cover for the Clinton's 
*is* new with new sources. The tape is the original.


  From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Sunday, July 3, 2016 12:27 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
 
 There's nothing "sanitized" about what's on Snopes. The tapes and transcripts 
are the same as what's on the page you link to, and that were provided by the 
original report in the Washington Free Beacon, on which the Daily News story is 
based. Nothing new here, sorry.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

BTW, I'll stick with what I said earlier about Hillary and her rapist 
client.http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/young-hillary-clintBon-heard-laughing-discussing-defense-accused-child-rapist-newly-discovered-audio-tapes-article-1.1832009

 
| 
| 
| 
|  |  |

 |

 |
| 
|   | 
Young Hillary Clinton heard laughing while discussing her defense of an acc...
A young Hillary Clinton callously rejoiced at getting an accused child-rapist 
off the hook even though the then-... |  |

 |

 |

 
SNOPES gets the sanitized version to counter Hillary in her own words.


  From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 8:16 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

 


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

Broderick was dealing with the then Attorney General of Arkansas, William 
Jefferson Clinton, the person she accused of raping her in her own hotel room.
Actually Broaddrick wasn't "dealing with him." But she could have had him 
charged with rape if she wanted to.
She had witnesses of the aftermath, a bloodied, bruised, and swollen upper lip 
which she claims he bit in order to keep her from screaming during the attack.
She screams with her lips?
it would be nice if both took a polygraph, although Hillary says she has lost 
her confidence in them.
You did notice the date of the affidavit regarding Trump and alleged rape of 
thirteen year old girl, June 18 2016? Does that sound suspicious to you?

Not particularly, no.
The first time Hillary attacked Trump on women, Trump slammed her back with 
Bill's exploits and warned her *never go there* and she backed off. This 
happened a couple of times as I recall.
Um, so she *didn't* back off, she came back and did it again.
The idea of Trump "warning" Hillary about anything is laughable.
Of course there is a lot of talk about Clinton with under aged girls in the 
Bahamas at wild parties, I believe with Mark Rich.
There's always been a lot of talk about the Clintons. The question is, how much 
of it is true? Look at how badly you screwed up on the ludicrous story about 
Hillary's defense of the accused rapist.
The Clinton's had to *inoculate* themselves from their past and possible 
future, by accusing Trump of something worse first,
Oh, jeez, Mike, can you be any more ridiculous? What have they accused him of 
besides misogyny? And it's not as if his misogyny wasn't already obvious. 
Hillary's just calling attention to it.
Besides which, if he believes Bill Clinton is a rapist and "one of the worst 
abusers of women" in U.S. history, why did he invite Bill and Hillary to his 
wedding and pose for a photo with them (with Bill's arm around his new wife's 
waist)?
so Hillary may continue with what she originally was going to say in respects

Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

[authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

You don't know what you're talking about. It was the *prosecutor* who pointed 
out that Clinton tried to get out of defending the rapist. 

 There's nothing new in this Daily News article that Snopes hasn't dealt with.
 

 I note that you have *no* response to what Snopes says about the case or the 
audiotapes. As usual, your claims are devoid of any evidence or even logical 
reasoning.
 

 Just for kicks, how do you think Hillary should have handled the rapist's 
defense? What should she have done that she didn't do, or not done that she did 
do?
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 
 SNOPES absolutely sanitizes the events. The tape is Hillary in her own words, 
spoken years ago. SNOPES' explanation is recent damage control and an obvious 
attempt to clean up what is heard on the tape in Hillary's own words. So 
complete, that  they, either SNOPES or the Clinton campaign, had to go get a 
judge, no doubt a Clinton supporter, campaign contributor to write something up 
in her defense and explain away what she said on the tape.
 Old Clinton trick, declare *nothing new here*. Well, the snopes attempt to 
cover for the Clinton's *is* new with new sources. The tape is the original.

 
 


 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Sunday, July 3, 2016 12:27 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
 
 
   There's nothing "sanitized" about what's on Snopes. The tapes and 
transcripts are the same as what's on the page you link to, and that were 
provided by the original report in the Washington Free Beacon, on which the 
Daily News story is based. Nothing new here, sorry.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 BTW, I'll stick with what I said earlier about Hillary and her rapist 
client.http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/young-hillary-clintBon-heard-laughing-discussing-defense-accused-child-rapist-newly-discovered-audio-tapes-article-1.1832009
 
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/young-hillary-clinton-heard-laughing-discussing-defense-accused-child-rapist-newly-discovered-audio-tapes-article-1.1832009
 

 

 Young Hillary Clinton heard laughing while discussing her defense of an acc... 
A young Hillary Clinton callously rejoiced at getting an accused child-rapist 
off the hook even though the then-... 
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/young-hillary-clinton-heard-laughing-discussing-defense-accused-child-rapist-newly-discovered-audio-tapes-article-1.1832009
 

SNOPES gets the sanitized version to counter Hillary in her own words.
 
 


 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 8:16 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

 
   

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 Broderick was dealing with the then Attorney General of Arkansas, William 
Jefferson Clinton, the person she accused of raping her in her own hotel room.
 

 Actually Broaddrick wasn't "dealing with him." But she could have had him 
charged with rape if she wanted to.
 

 She had witnesses of the aftermath, a bloodied, bruised, and swollen upper lip 
which she claims he bit in order to keep her from screaming during the attack.
 

 She screams with her lips?
 

 it would be nice if both took a polygraph, although Hillary says she has lost 
her confidence in them.

 You did notice the date of the affidavit regarding Trump and alleged rape of 
thirteen year old girl, June 18 2016? Does that sound suspicious to you?

 

 Not particularly, no.
 

 The first time Hillary attacked Trump on women, Trump slammed her back with 
Bill's exploits and warned her *never go there* and she backed off. This 
happened a couple of times as I recall.
 

 Um, so she *didn't* back off, she came back and did it again.
 

 The idea of Trump "warning" Hillary about anything is laughable.
 

 Of course there is a lot of talk about Clinton with under aged girls in the 
Bahamas at wild parties, I believe with Mark Rich.
 

 There's always been a lot of talk about the Clintons. The question is, how 
much of it is true? Look at how badly you screwed up on the ludicrous story 
about Hillary's defense of the accused rapist.
 

 The Clinton's had to *inoculate* themselves from their past and possible 
future, by accusing Trump of something worse first,
 

 Oh, jeez, Mike, can you be any more ridiculous? What have they accused him of 
besides misogyny? And it's not as if his misogyny wasn't already obvious. 
Hillary's just calling attention to it.
 

 Besides which, if he believes Bill Clinton is a rapist and "one of the worst 
abusers of women" in U.S. history, why did he invite Bill and Hillary to his 
wedding and pose for a photo with them (with Bill's arm around his new wife's 
waist)?
 

Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

[authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

This is just hallucinatory, Mike. You're living in the fantasyland of your 
Clinton Derangement Syndrome. 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 Of course it's cooked up! Look at all of the dates involved! The supposed 
events took place twenty years ago and the affidavit is signed in the middle of 
June, this year, in the heat of the campaign! Thirteen year old girl lured to 
parties with promises of money and a modeling carrier, violently raped at the 
last party, tied down and repeatedly telling Trump *NO*. Covering all the bases 
here, aren't we.
  How else are the Clinton's going to shut Trump up about all the new 
allegations that could come out about Bill. The Clinton's have always been very 
smart but very sneaky. Trump is playing *hard ball* and has nothing to fear and 
that scares the Clinton's. They are dispirit. This will be Hillary's last shot 
and they're pulling out all the stops, even trying to tamper with the Attorney 
General. At this point , they have nothing to lose. Even Bill is probably going 
to be a target of the FBI investigation into his roll in the Clinton 
Foundation. Are you still convinced that  the FBI isn't investigating Hillary 
but only doing a *security* evaluation of her home sever? Please Judy, I don't 
know if it's you that is that gullible or you just think everybody else is. 

 
 


 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Sunday, July 3, 2016 12:38 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
 
 
   It's not "obviously a Clinton attempt to counter Trump"; the claim that it 
is, is obviously yet another cooked-up right-wing smear attempt. Disgusting.
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 Look at what has happened to the other women that have had to put up with 
Clinton's unwanted sexual advances. I think she felt helpless and thought long 
and hard about going up against the top law enforcement politician in the state.
 

 Each time Hillary started in on Trump about women, Trump brought up Bill and 
she shut up. They had to get something figured out. Took them a while to get 
this crap going about raping a thirteen year old girl. Trump hits back and much 
harder, something the Clinton's aren't used to.
 
As I said, it's not holding water. Nobody is paying attention to it. It's not 
getting any traction. It's obviously a Clinton attempt to counter Trump.

 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 8:16 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

 
   

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 Broderick was dealing with the then Attorney General of Arkansas, William 
Jefferson Clinton, the person she accused of raping her in her own hotel room.
 

 Actually Broaddrick wasn't "dealing with him." But she could have had him 
charged with rape if she wanted to.
 

 She had witnesses of the aftermath, a bloodied, bruised, and swollen upper lip 
which she claims he bit in order to keep her from screaming during the attack.
 

 She screams with her lips?
 

 it would be nice if both took a polygraph, although Hillary says she has lost 
her confidence in them.

 You did notice the date of the affidavit regarding Trump and alleged rape of 
thirteen year old girl, June 18 2016? Does that sound suspicious to you?

 

 Not particularly, no.
 

 The first time Hillary attacked Trump on women, Trump slammed her back with 
Bill's exploits and warned her *never go there* and she backed off. This 
happened a couple of times as I recall.
 

 Um, so she *didn't* back off, she came back and did it again.
 

 The idea of Trump "warning" Hillary about anything is laughable.
 

 Of course there is a lot of talk about Clinton with under aged girls in the 
Bahamas at wild parties, I believe with Mark Rich.
 

 There's always been a lot of talk about the Clintons. The question is, how 
much of it is true? Look at how badly you screwed up on the ludicrous story 
about Hillary's defense of the accused rapist.
 

 The Clinton's had to *inoculate* themselves from their past and possible 
future, by accusing Trump of something worse first,
 

 Oh, jeez, Mike, can you be any more ridiculous? What have they accused him of 
besides misogyny? And it's not as if his misogyny wasn't already obvious. 
Hillary's just calling attention to it.
 

 Besides which, if he believes Bill Clinton is a rapist and "one of the worst 
abusers of women" in U.S. history, why did he invite Bill and Hillary to his 
wedding and pose for a photo with them (with Bill's arm around his new wife's 
waist)?
 

 so Hillary may continue with what she originally was going to say in respects 
to Trump and women.

 

 She will if and when she thinks it's called for.
 

Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

[authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

You're seriously misrepresenting my views and putting words in my mouth. 

 To you, every negative story about the Clintons, whether there's any evidence 
for it or not, represents catching them with their pants down. Me, I want to 
see the evidence. (And that goes for negative Trump stories as well as negative 
Clinton stories.)
 

 There's zero evidence the Clintons had anything to do with the Trump rape 
story. But as far as you're concerned, all that claim needs to be classified as 
true is for someone to make it.
 

 FYI, the Trump rape story has been shopped around to bloggers and journalists 
for almost a year; and a civil suit was filed in California in April but was 
thrown out. (Trump, of course, has denied the accusations.)
 

 Now that a federal suit has been filed in New York, however, the story has 
grown major legs; it's all over the Web (Google it), including on MSN.com.
 

 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 ROFLMAO! You're a real, died in the wool, True Believer. Nothing she or Bill 
can do is wrong, if caught doing something shady, then they were forced into 
it. It's always a vast right wing conspiracy with them and only idiots and True 
Believers fall for it.
  Once again, the Clinton's and their TB's are caught with their pants down.

 
 


 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Sunday, July 3, 2016 12:33 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
 
 
   Like I said, you're a real bottom-feeder. Disgusting.
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 Look at what has happened to the other women that have had to put up with 
Clinton's unwanted sexual advances. I think she felt helpless and thought long 
and hard about going up against the top law enforcement politician in the state.
 

 Each time Hillary started in on Trump about women, Trump brought up Bill and 
she shut up. They had to get something figured out. Took them a while to get 
this crap going about raping a thirteen year old girl. Trump hits back and much 
harder, something the Clinton's aren't used to.
 
As I said, it's not holding water. Nobody is paying attention to it. It's not 
getting any traction. It's obviously a Clinton attempt to counter Trump.

 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 8:16 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

 
   

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 Broderick was dealing with the then Attorney General of Arkansas, William 
Jefferson Clinton, the person she accused of raping her in her own hotel room.
 

 Actually Broaddrick wasn't "dealing with him." But she could have had him 
charged with rape if she wanted to.
 

 She had witnesses of the aftermath, a bloodied, bruised, and swollen upper lip 
which she claims he bit in order to keep her from screaming during the attack.
 

 She screams with her lips?
 

 it would be nice if both took a polygraph, although Hillary says she has lost 
her confidence in them.

 You did notice the date of the affidavit regarding Trump and alleged rape of 
thirteen year old girl, June 18 2016? Does that sound suspicious to you?

 

 Not particularly, no.
 

 The first time Hillary attacked Trump on women, Trump slammed her back with 
Bill's exploits and warned her *never go there* and she backed off. This 
happened a couple of times as I recall.
 

 Um, so she *didn't* back off, she came back and did it again.
 

 The idea of Trump "warning" Hillary about anything is laughable.
 

 Of course there is a lot of talk about Clinton with under aged girls in the 
Bahamas at wild parties, I believe with Mark Rich.
 

 There's always been a lot of talk about the Clintons. The question is, how 
much of it is true? Look at how badly you screwed up on the ludicrous story 
about Hillary's defense of the accused rapist.
 

 The Clinton's had to *inoculate* themselves from their past and possible 
future, by accusing Trump of something worse first,
 

 Oh, jeez, Mike, can you be any more ridiculous? What have they accused him of 
besides misogyny? And it's not as if his misogyny wasn't already obvious. 
Hillary's just calling attention to it.
 

 Besides which, if he believes Bill Clinton is a rapist and "one of the worst 
abusers of women" in U.S. history, why did he invite Bill and Hillary to his 
wedding and pose for a photo with them (with Bill's arm around his new wife's 
waist)?
 

 so Hillary may continue with what she originally was going to say in respects 
to Trump and women.

 

 She will if and when she thinks it's called for.
 


 
 So far, it's not holding any water. It sounds like something the Clinton's 
would do.
 

 What would it look like if it were "holding water"? (Wh

Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

[Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

http://www.100percentfedup.com/busted-main-political-fact-checker-for-snopes-is-finally-exposed-as-liberal-hack/

  
|  
|   
|   
|   ||

   |

  |
|  
|   |  
BUSTED! Main Political "Fact" Checker For SNOPES Is FINALLY EXPOS...
 By 100% FED Up Wait until you read this woman's biography and past quotes 
about conservatives!  |   |

  |

  |

 


   

   From: "Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" 
<FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> 
 Sent: Sunday, July 3, 2016 6:55 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
  
    SNOPES absolutely sanitizes the events. The tape is Hillary in her own 
words, spoken years ago. SNOPES' explanation is recent damage control and an 
obvious attempt to clean up what is heard on the tape in Hillary's own words. 
So complete, that  they, either SNOPES or the Clinton campaign, had to go get a 
judge, no doubt a Clinton supporter, campaign contributor to write something up 
in her defense and explain away what she said on the tape.Old Clinton trick, 
declare *nothing new here*. Well, the snopes attempt to cover for the Clinton's 
*is* new with new sources. The tape is the original.


  From: "authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" 
<FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Sunday, July 3, 2016 12:27 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
  
    There's nothing "sanitized" about what's on Snopes. The tapes and 
transcripts are the same as what's on the page you link to, and that were 
provided by the original report in the Washington Free Beacon, on which the 
Daily News story is based. Nothing new here, sorry.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

BTW, I'll stick with what I said earlier about Hillary and her rapist 
client.http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/young-hillary-clintBon-heard-laughing-discussing-defense-accused-child-rapist-newly-discovered-audio-tapes-article-1.1832009

 
| 
| 
| 
|  |  |

 |

 |
| 
|   | 
Young Hillary Clinton heard laughing while discussing her defense of an acc...
A young Hillary Clinton callously rejoiced at getting an accused child-rapist 
off the hook even though the then-... |  |

 |

 |

 
SNOPES gets the sanitized version to counter Hillary in her own words.


  From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 8:16 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
 
 


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

Broderick was dealing with the then Attorney General of Arkansas, William 
Jefferson Clinton, the person she accused of raping her in her own hotel room.
Actually Broaddrick wasn't "dealing with him." But she could have had him 
charged with rape if she wanted to.
She had witnesses of the aftermath, a bloodied, bruised, and swollen upper lip 
which she claims he bit in order to keep her from screaming during the attack.
She screams with her lips?
it would be nice if both took a polygraph, although Hillary says she has lost 
her confidence in them.
You did notice the date of the affidavit regarding Trump and alleged rape of 
thirteen year old girl, June 18 2016? Does that sound suspicious to you?

Not particularly, no.
The first time Hillary attacked Trump on women, Trump slammed her back with 
Bill's exploits and warned her *never go there* and she backed off. This 
happened a couple of times as I recall.
Um, so she *didn't* back off, she came back and did it again.
The idea of Trump "warning" Hillary about anything is laughable.
Of course there is a lot of talk about Clinton with under aged girls in the 
Bahamas at wild parties, I believe with Mark Rich.
There's always been a lot of talk about the Clintons. The question is, how much 
of it is true? Look at how badly you screwed up on the ludicrous story about 
Hillary's defense of the accused rapist.
The Clinton's had to *inoculate* themselves from their past and possible 
future, by accusing Trump of something worse first,
Oh, jeez, Mike, can you be any more ridiculous? What have they accused him of 
besides misogyny? And it's not as if his misogyny wasn't already obvious. 
Hillary's just calling attention to it.
Besides which, if he believes Bill Clinton is a rapist and "one of the worst 
abusers of women" in U.S. history, why did he invite Bill and Hillary to his 
wedding and pose for a photo with them (with Bill's arm around his new wife's 
waist)?
so Hillary may continue with what she originally was going to say in respects 
to Trump and women.

She will if and when she thinks it's called for.
So far, it's not holding any water. It sounds like something the Clinton's 
would do.
What would it look like if it were "holding water"? (What does that even mean?)



   From:

Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

[Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

Of course it's cooked up! Look at all of the dates involved! The supposed 
events took place twenty years ago and the affidavit is signed in the middle of 
June, this year, in the heat of the campaign! Thirteen year old girl lured to 
parties with promises of money and a modeling carrier, violently raped at the 
last party, tied down and repeatedly telling Trump *NO*. Covering all the bases 
here, aren't we. How else are the Clinton's going to shut Trump up about all 
the new allegations that could come out about Bill. The Clinton's have always 
been very smart but very sneaky. Trump is playing *hard ball* and has nothing 
to fear and that scares the Clinton's. They are dispirit. This will be 
Hillary's last shot and they're pulling out all the stops, even trying to 
tamper with the Attorney General. At this point , they have nothing to lose. 
Even Bill is probably going to be a target of the FBI investigation into his 
roll in the Clinton Foundation. Are you still convinced that  the FBI isn't 
investigating Hillary but only doing a *security* evaluation of her home sever? 
Please Judy, I don't know if it's you that is that gullible or you just think 
everybody else is. 


  From: "authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" 
<FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Sunday, July 3, 2016 12:38 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
   
    It's not "obviously a Clinton attempt to counter Trump"; the claim that it 
is, is obviously yet another cooked-up right-wing smear attempt. Disgusting.


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

Look at what has happened to the other women that have had to put up with 
Clinton's unwanted sexual advances. I think she felt helpless and thought long 
and hard about going up against the top law enforcement politician in the state.

Each time Hillary started in on Trump about women, Trump brought up Bill and 
she shut up. They had to get something figured out. Took them a while to get 
this crap going about raping a thirteen year old girl. Trump hits back and much 
harder, something the Clinton's aren't used to.
As I said, it's not holding water. Nobody is paying attention to it. It's not 
getting any traction. It's obviously a Clinton attempt to counter Trump.
  From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 8:16 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
 
 


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

Broderick was dealing with the then Attorney General of Arkansas, William 
Jefferson Clinton, the person she accused of raping her in her own hotel room.
Actually Broaddrick wasn't "dealing with him." But she could have had him 
charged with rape if she wanted to.
She had witnesses of the aftermath, a bloodied, bruised, and swollen upper lip 
which she claims he bit in order to keep her from screaming during the attack.
She screams with her lips?
it would be nice if both took a polygraph, although Hillary says she has lost 
her confidence in them.
You did notice the date of the affidavit regarding Trump and alleged rape of 
thirteen year old girl, June 18 2016? Does that sound suspicious to you?

Not particularly, no.
The first time Hillary attacked Trump on women, Trump slammed her back with 
Bill's exploits and warned her *never go there* and she backed off. This 
happened a couple of times as I recall.
Um, so she *didn't* back off, she came back and did it again.
The idea of Trump "warning" Hillary about anything is laughable.
Of course there is a lot of talk about Clinton with under aged girls in the 
Bahamas at wild parties, I believe with Mark Rich.
There's always been a lot of talk about the Clintons. The question is, how much 
of it is true? Look at how badly you screwed up on the ludicrous story about 
Hillary's defense of the accused rapist.
The Clinton's had to *inoculate* themselves from their past and possible 
future, by accusing Trump of something worse first,
Oh, jeez, Mike, can you be any more ridiculous? What have they accused him of 
besides misogyny? And it's not as if his misogyny wasn't already obvious. 
Hillary's just calling attention to it.
Besides which, if he believes Bill Clinton is a rapist and "one of the worst 
abusers of women" in U.S. history, why did he invite Bill and Hillary to his 
wedding and pose for a photo with them (with Bill's arm around his new wife's 
waist)?
so Hillary may continue with what she originally was going to say in respects 
to Trump and women.

She will if and when she thinks it's called for.
So far, it's not holding any water. It sounds like something the Clinton's 
would do.
What would it look like if it were "holding water"? (What does that even mean?)



   From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.

Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

[Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

ROFLMAO! You're a real, died in the wool, True Believer. Nothing she or Bill 
can do is wrong, if caught doing something shady, then they were forced into 
it. It's always a vast right wing conspiracy with them and only idiots and True 
Believers fall for it. Once again, the Clinton's and their TB's are caught with 
their pants down.


  From: "authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" 
<FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Sunday, July 3, 2016 12:33 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
   
    Like I said, you're a real bottom-feeder. Disgusting.


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

Look at what has happened to the other women that have had to put up with 
Clinton's unwanted sexual advances. I think she felt helpless and thought long 
and hard about going up against the top law enforcement politician in the state.

Each time Hillary started in on Trump about women, Trump brought up Bill and 
she shut up. They had to get something figured out. Took them a while to get 
this crap going about raping a thirteen year old girl. Trump hits back and much 
harder, something the Clinton's aren't used to.
As I said, it's not holding water. Nobody is paying attention to it. It's not 
getting any traction. It's obviously a Clinton attempt to counter Trump.
  From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 8:16 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
 
 


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

Broderick was dealing with the then Attorney General of Arkansas, William 
Jefferson Clinton, the person she accused of raping her in her own hotel room.
Actually Broaddrick wasn't "dealing with him." But she could have had him 
charged with rape if she wanted to.
She had witnesses of the aftermath, a bloodied, bruised, and swollen upper lip 
which she claims he bit in order to keep her from screaming during the attack.
She screams with her lips?
it would be nice if both took a polygraph, although Hillary says she has lost 
her confidence in them.
You did notice the date of the affidavit regarding Trump and alleged rape of 
thirteen year old girl, June 18 2016? Does that sound suspicious to you?

Not particularly, no.
The first time Hillary attacked Trump on women, Trump slammed her back with 
Bill's exploits and warned her *never go there* and she backed off. This 
happened a couple of times as I recall.
Um, so she *didn't* back off, she came back and did it again.
The idea of Trump "warning" Hillary about anything is laughable.
Of course there is a lot of talk about Clinton with under aged girls in the 
Bahamas at wild parties, I believe with Mark Rich.
There's always been a lot of talk about the Clintons. The question is, how much 
of it is true? Look at how badly you screwed up on the ludicrous story about 
Hillary's defense of the accused rapist.
The Clinton's had to *inoculate* themselves from their past and possible 
future, by accusing Trump of something worse first,
Oh, jeez, Mike, can you be any more ridiculous? What have they accused him of 
besides misogyny? And it's not as if his misogyny wasn't already obvious. 
Hillary's just calling attention to it.
Besides which, if he believes Bill Clinton is a rapist and "one of the worst 
abusers of women" in U.S. history, why did he invite Bill and Hillary to his 
wedding and pose for a photo with them (with Bill's arm around his new wife's 
waist)?
so Hillary may continue with what she originally was going to say in respects 
to Trump and women.

She will if and when she thinks it's called for.
So far, it's not holding any water. It sounds like something the Clinton's 
would do.
What would it look like if it were "holding water"? (What does that even mean?)



   From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 3:26 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

 Of course. Just wanted to know who you thought the accuser was.
Broaddrick's accusation is hardly straightforward. After untold oodles of 
investigation, it still hasn't been confirmed; it remains he said-she said. She 
never had charges brought against Clinton, and she denied the rape rumors in an 
affidavit to Paula Jones's lawyers, although she later "told all" to NBC and 
the Wall Street Journal editorial page. So we still don't know if her story is 
true.
In any case, my original point was that your claim that the suit against Trump 
makes him "doubly qualified to be president by Democratic standards" is just 
extraordinarily meanspirited nonsense. No Democratic president has ever even 
been accused of raping a 13-year-old girl.


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@..

Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

[Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

SNOPES absolutely sanitizes the events. The tape is Hillary in her own words, 
spoken years ago. SNOPES' explanation is recent damage control and an obvious 
attempt to clean up what is heard on the tape in Hillary's own words. So 
complete, that  they, either SNOPES or the Clinton campaign, had to go get a 
judge, no doubt a Clinton supporter, campaign contributor to write something up 
in her defense and explain away what she said on the tape.Old Clinton trick, 
declare *nothing new here*. Well, the snopes attempt to cover for the Clinton's 
*is* new with new sources. The tape is the original.


  From: "authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" 
<FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Sunday, July 3, 2016 12:27 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
   
    There's nothing "sanitized" about what's on Snopes. The tapes and 
transcripts are the same as what's on the page you link to, and that were 
provided by the original report in the Washington Free Beacon, on which the 
Daily News story is based. Nothing new here, sorry.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

BTW, I'll stick with what I said earlier about Hillary and her rapist 
client.http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/young-hillary-clintBon-heard-laughing-discussing-defense-accused-child-rapist-newly-discovered-audio-tapes-article-1.1832009

 
| 
| 
| 
|  |  |

 |

 |
| 
|   | 
Young Hillary Clinton heard laughing while discussing her defense of an acc...
A young Hillary Clinton callously rejoiced at getting an accused child-rapist 
off the hook even though the then-... |  |

 |

 |

 
SNOPES gets the sanitized version to counter Hillary in her own words.


  From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 8:16 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
 
 


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

Broderick was dealing with the then Attorney General of Arkansas, William 
Jefferson Clinton, the person she accused of raping her in her own hotel room.
Actually Broaddrick wasn't "dealing with him." But she could have had him 
charged with rape if she wanted to.
She had witnesses of the aftermath, a bloodied, bruised, and swollen upper lip 
which she claims he bit in order to keep her from screaming during the attack.
She screams with her lips?
it would be nice if both took a polygraph, although Hillary says she has lost 
her confidence in them.
You did notice the date of the affidavit regarding Trump and alleged rape of 
thirteen year old girl, June 18 2016? Does that sound suspicious to you?

Not particularly, no.
The first time Hillary attacked Trump on women, Trump slammed her back with 
Bill's exploits and warned her *never go there* and she backed off. This 
happened a couple of times as I recall.
Um, so she *didn't* back off, she came back and did it again.
The idea of Trump "warning" Hillary about anything is laughable.
Of course there is a lot of talk about Clinton with under aged girls in the 
Bahamas at wild parties, I believe with Mark Rich.
There's always been a lot of talk about the Clintons. The question is, how much 
of it is true? Look at how badly you screwed up on the ludicrous story about 
Hillary's defense of the accused rapist.
The Clinton's had to *inoculate* themselves from their past and possible 
future, by accusing Trump of something worse first,
Oh, jeez, Mike, can you be any more ridiculous? What have they accused him of 
besides misogyny? And it's not as if his misogyny wasn't already obvious. 
Hillary's just calling attention to it.
Besides which, if he believes Bill Clinton is a rapist and "one of the worst 
abusers of women" in U.S. history, why did he invite Bill and Hillary to his 
wedding and pose for a photo with them (with Bill's arm around his new wife's 
waist)?
so Hillary may continue with what she originally was going to say in respects 
to Trump and women.

She will if and when she thinks it's called for.
So far, it's not holding any water. It sounds like something the Clinton's 
would do.
What would it look like if it were "holding water"? (What does that even mean?)



   From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 3:26 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

 Of course. Just wanted to know who you thought the accuser was.
Broaddrick's accusation is hardly straightforward. After untold oodles of 
investigation, it still hasn't been confirmed; it remains he said-she said. She 
never had charges brought against Clinton, and she denied the rape rumors in an 
affidavit to Paula Jones's lawyers, although she later "told all" to NBC and 
the Wall Street Journal editorial page. So we still don

Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

[authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

It's not "obviously a Clinton attempt to counter Trump"; the claim that it is, 
is obviously yet another cooked-up right-wing smear attempt. Disgusting. 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 Look at what has happened to the other women that have had to put up with 
Clinton's unwanted sexual advances. I think she felt helpless and thought long 
and hard about going up against the top law enforcement politician in the state.
 

 Each time Hillary started in on Trump about women, Trump brought up Bill and 
she shut up. They had to get something figured out. Took them a while to get 
this crap going about raping a thirteen year old girl. Trump hits back and much 
harder, something the Clinton's aren't used to.
 
As I said, it's not holding water. Nobody is paying attention to it. It's not 
getting any traction. It's obviously a Clinton attempt to counter Trump.

 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 8:16 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
 
 
   

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 Broderick was dealing with the then Attorney General of Arkansas, William 
Jefferson Clinton, the person she accused of raping her in her own hotel room.
 

 Actually Broaddrick wasn't "dealing with him." But she could have had him 
charged with rape if she wanted to.
 

 She had witnesses of the aftermath, a bloodied, bruised, and swollen upper lip 
which she claims he bit in order to keep her from screaming during the attack.
 

 She screams with her lips?
 

 it would be nice if both took a polygraph, although Hillary says she has lost 
her confidence in them.

 You did notice the date of the affidavit regarding Trump and alleged rape of 
thirteen year old girl, June 18 2016? Does that sound suspicious to you?

 

 Not particularly, no.
 

 The first time Hillary attacked Trump on women, Trump slammed her back with 
Bill's exploits and warned her *never go there* and she backed off. This 
happened a couple of times as I recall.
 

 Um, so she *didn't* back off, she came back and did it again.
 

 The idea of Trump "warning" Hillary about anything is laughable.
 

 Of course there is a lot of talk about Clinton with under aged girls in the 
Bahamas at wild parties, I believe with Mark Rich.
 

 There's always been a lot of talk about the Clintons. The question is, how 
much of it is true? Look at how badly you screwed up on the ludicrous story 
about Hillary's defense of the accused rapist.
 

 The Clinton's had to *inoculate* themselves from their past and possible 
future, by accusing Trump of something worse first,
 

 Oh, jeez, Mike, can you be any more ridiculous? What have they accused him of 
besides misogyny? And it's not as if his misogyny wasn't already obvious. 
Hillary's just calling attention to it.
 

 Besides which, if he believes Bill Clinton is a rapist and "one of the worst 
abusers of women" in U.S. history, why did he invite Bill and Hillary to his 
wedding and pose for a photo with them (with Bill's arm around his new wife's 
waist)?
 

 so Hillary may continue with what she originally was going to say in respects 
to Trump and women.

 

 She will if and when she thinks it's called for.
 


 
 So far, it's not holding any water. It sounds like something the Clinton's 
would do.
 

 What would it look like if it were "holding water"? (What does that even mean?)
 





 


 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 3:26 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

 
   Of course. Just wanted to know who you thought the accuser was.
 

 Broaddrick's accusation is hardly straightforward. After untold oodles of 
investigation, it still hasn't been confirmed; it remains he said-she said. She 
never had charges brought against Clinton, and she denied the rape rumors in an 
affidavit to Paula Jones's lawyers, although she later "told all" to NBC and 
the Wall Street Journal editorial page. So we still don't know if her story is 
true.
 

 In any case, my original point was that your claim that the suit against Trump 
makes him "doubly qualified to be president by Democratic standards" is just 
extraordinarily meanspirited nonsense. No Democratic president has ever even 
been accused of raping a 13-year-old girl.
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 
 How many rapes?
 Juanita Brodrick
 Hmmm,. sound familiar?


 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 11:02 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

 
   

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6

Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

[authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

Like I said, you're a real bottom-feeder. Disgusting. 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 Look at what has happened to the other women that have had to put up with 
Clinton's unwanted sexual advances. I think she felt helpless and thought long 
and hard about going up against the top law enforcement politician in the state.
 

 Each time Hillary started in on Trump about women, Trump brought up Bill and 
she shut up. They had to get something figured out. Took them a while to get 
this crap going about raping a thirteen year old girl. Trump hits back and much 
harder, something the Clinton's aren't used to.
 
As I said, it's not holding water. Nobody is paying attention to it. It's not 
getting any traction. It's obviously a Clinton attempt to counter Trump.

 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 8:16 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
 
 
   

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 Broderick was dealing with the then Attorney General of Arkansas, William 
Jefferson Clinton, the person she accused of raping her in her own hotel room.
 

 Actually Broaddrick wasn't "dealing with him." But she could have had him 
charged with rape if she wanted to.
 

 She had witnesses of the aftermath, a bloodied, bruised, and swollen upper lip 
which she claims he bit in order to keep her from screaming during the attack.
 

 She screams with her lips?
 

 it would be nice if both took a polygraph, although Hillary says she has lost 
her confidence in them.

 You did notice the date of the affidavit regarding Trump and alleged rape of 
thirteen year old girl, June 18 2016? Does that sound suspicious to you?

 

 Not particularly, no.
 

 The first time Hillary attacked Trump on women, Trump slammed her back with 
Bill's exploits and warned her *never go there* and she backed off. This 
happened a couple of times as I recall.
 

 Um, so she *didn't* back off, she came back and did it again.
 

 The idea of Trump "warning" Hillary about anything is laughable.
 

 Of course there is a lot of talk about Clinton with under aged girls in the 
Bahamas at wild parties, I believe with Mark Rich.
 

 There's always been a lot of talk about the Clintons. The question is, how 
much of it is true? Look at how badly you screwed up on the ludicrous story 
about Hillary's defense of the accused rapist.
 

 The Clinton's had to *inoculate* themselves from their past and possible 
future, by accusing Trump of something worse first,
 

 Oh, jeez, Mike, can you be any more ridiculous? What have they accused him of 
besides misogyny? And it's not as if his misogyny wasn't already obvious. 
Hillary's just calling attention to it.
 

 Besides which, if he believes Bill Clinton is a rapist and "one of the worst 
abusers of women" in U.S. history, why did he invite Bill and Hillary to his 
wedding and pose for a photo with them (with Bill's arm around his new wife's 
waist)?
 

 so Hillary may continue with what she originally was going to say in respects 
to Trump and women.

 

 She will if and when she thinks it's called for.
 


 
 So far, it's not holding any water. It sounds like something the Clinton's 
would do.
 

 What would it look like if it were "holding water"? (What does that even mean?)
 





 


 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 3:26 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

 
   Of course. Just wanted to know who you thought the accuser was.
 

 Broaddrick's accusation is hardly straightforward. After untold oodles of 
investigation, it still hasn't been confirmed; it remains he said-she said. She 
never had charges brought against Clinton, and she denied the rape rumors in an 
affidavit to Paula Jones's lawyers, although she later "told all" to NBC and 
the Wall Street Journal editorial page. So we still don't know if her story is 
true.
 

 In any case, my original point was that your claim that the suit against Trump 
makes him "doubly qualified to be president by Democratic standards" is just 
extraordinarily meanspirited nonsense. No Democratic president has ever even 
been accused of raping a 13-year-old girl.
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 
 How many rapes?
 Juanita Brodrick
 Hmmm,. sound familiar?


 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 11:02 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

 
   

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 How many does it take?
 

 How many does it take to what??
 

 And, again, how many wa

Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

[authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

There's nothing "sanitized" about what's on Snopes. The tapes and transcripts 
are the same as what's on the page you link to, and that were provided by the 
original report in the Washington Free Beacon, on which the Daily News story is 
based. Nothing new here, sorry. 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 BTW, I'll stick with what I said earlier about Hillary and her rapist 
client.http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/young-hillary-clintBon-heard-laughing-discussing-defense-accused-child-rapist-newly-discovered-audio-tapes-article-1.1832009
 
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/young-hillary-clinton-heard-laughing-discussing-defense-accused-child-rapist-newly-discovered-audio-tapes-article-1.1832009
 

 

 Young Hillary Clinton heard laughing while discussing her defense of an acc... 
A young Hillary Clinton callously rejoiced at getting an accused child-rapist 
off the hook even though the then-... 
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/young-hillary-clinton-heard-laughing-discussing-defense-accused-child-rapist-newly-discovered-audio-tapes-article-1.1832009
 

SNOPES gets the sanitized version to counter Hillary in her own words.
 
 


 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 8:16 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
 
 
   

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 Broderick was dealing with the then Attorney General of Arkansas, William 
Jefferson Clinton, the person she accused of raping her in her own hotel room.
 

 Actually Broaddrick wasn't "dealing with him." But she could have had him 
charged with rape if she wanted to.
 

 She had witnesses of the aftermath, a bloodied, bruised, and swollen upper lip 
which she claims he bit in order to keep her from screaming during the attack.
 

 She screams with her lips?
 

 it would be nice if both took a polygraph, although Hillary says she has lost 
her confidence in them.

 You did notice the date of the affidavit regarding Trump and alleged rape of 
thirteen year old girl, June 18 2016? Does that sound suspicious to you?

 

 Not particularly, no.
 

 The first time Hillary attacked Trump on women, Trump slammed her back with 
Bill's exploits and warned her *never go there* and she backed off. This 
happened a couple of times as I recall.
 

 Um, so she *didn't* back off, she came back and did it again.
 

 The idea of Trump "warning" Hillary about anything is laughable.
 

 Of course there is a lot of talk about Clinton with under aged girls in the 
Bahamas at wild parties, I believe with Mark Rich.
 

 There's always been a lot of talk about the Clintons. The question is, how 
much of it is true? Look at how badly you screwed up on the ludicrous story 
about Hillary's defense of the accused rapist.
 

 The Clinton's had to *inoculate* themselves from their past and possible 
future, by accusing Trump of something worse first,
 

 Oh, jeez, Mike, can you be any more ridiculous? What have they accused him of 
besides misogyny? And it's not as if his misogyny wasn't already obvious. 
Hillary's just calling attention to it.
 

 Besides which, if he believes Bill Clinton is a rapist and "one of the worst 
abusers of women" in U.S. history, why did he invite Bill and Hillary to his 
wedding and pose for a photo with them (with Bill's arm around his new wife's 
waist)?
 

 so Hillary may continue with what she originally was going to say in respects 
to Trump and women.

 

 She will if and when she thinks it's called for.
 


 
 So far, it's not holding any water. It sounds like something the Clinton's 
would do.
 

 What would it look like if it were "holding water"? (What does that even mean?)
 





 


 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 3:26 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

 
   Of course. Just wanted to know who you thought the accuser was.
 

 Broaddrick's accusation is hardly straightforward. After untold oodles of 
investigation, it still hasn't been confirmed; it remains he said-she said. She 
never had charges brought against Clinton, and she denied the rape rumors in an 
affidavit to Paula Jones's lawyers, although she later "told all" to NBC and 
the Wall Street Journal editorial page. So we still don't know if her story is 
true.
 

 In any case, my original point was that your claim that the suit against Trump 
makes him "doubly qualified to be president by Democratic standards" is just 
extraordinarily meanspirited nonsense. No Democratic president has ever even 
been accused of raping a 13-year-old girl.
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 
 How many rapes?
 Juanita Brodr

Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

[Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

BTW, I'll stick with what I said earlier about Hillary and her rapist 
client.http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/young-hillary-clinton-heard-laughing-discussing-defense-accused-child-rapist-newly-discovered-audio-tapes-article-1.1832009

  
|  
|   
|   
|   ||

   |

  |
|  
||  
Young Hillary Clinton heard laughing while discussing her defense of an acc...
 A young Hillary Clinton callously rejoiced at getting an accused child-rapist 
off the hook even though the then-...  |   |

  |

  |

 
SNOPES gets the sanitized version to counter Hillary in her own words.


  From: "authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" 
<FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 8:16 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
   
    


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

Broderick was dealing with the then Attorney General of Arkansas, William 
Jefferson Clinton, the person she accused of raping her in her own hotel room.
Actually Broaddrick wasn't "dealing with him." But she could have had him 
charged with rape if she wanted to.
She had witnesses of the aftermath, a bloodied, bruised, and swollen upper lip 
which she claims he bit in order to keep her from screaming during the attack.
She screams with her lips?
it would be nice if both took a polygraph, although Hillary says she has lost 
her confidence in them.
You did notice the date of the affidavit regarding Trump and alleged rape of 
thirteen year old girl, June 18 2016? Does that sound suspicious to you?

Not particularly, no.
The first time Hillary attacked Trump on women, Trump slammed her back with 
Bill's exploits and warned her *never go there* and she backed off. This 
happened a couple of times as I recall.
Um, so she *didn't* back off, she came back and did it again.
The idea of Trump "warning" Hillary about anything is laughable.
Of course there is a lot of talk about Clinton with under aged girls in the 
Bahamas at wild parties, I believe with Mark Rich.
There's always been a lot of talk about the Clintons. The question is, how much 
of it is true? Look at how badly you screwed up on the ludicrous story about 
Hillary's defense of the accused rapist.
The Clinton's had to *inoculate* themselves from their past and possible 
future, by accusing Trump of something worse first,
Oh, jeez, Mike, can you be any more ridiculous? What have they accused him of 
besides misogyny? And it's not as if his misogyny wasn't already obvious. 
Hillary's just calling attention to it.
Besides which, if he believes Bill Clinton is a rapist and "one of the worst 
abusers of women" in U.S. history, why did he invite Bill and Hillary to his 
wedding and pose for a photo with them (with Bill's arm around his new wife's 
waist)?
so Hillary may continue with what she originally was going to say in respects 
to Trump and women.

She will if and when she thinks it's called for.
So far, it's not holding any water. It sounds like something the Clinton's 
would do.
What would it look like if it were "holding water"? (What does that even mean?)



   From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 3:26 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

 Of course. Just wanted to know who you thought the accuser was.
Broaddrick's accusation is hardly straightforward. After untold oodles of 
investigation, it still hasn't been confirmed; it remains he said-she said. She 
never had charges brought against Clinton, and she denied the rape rumors in an 
affidavit to Paula Jones's lawyers, although she later "told all" to NBC and 
the Wall Street Journal editorial page. So we still don't know if her story is 
true.
In any case, my original point was that your claim that the suit against Trump 
makes him "doubly qualified to be president by Democratic standards" is just 
extraordinarily meanspirited nonsense. No Democratic president has ever even 
been accused of raping a 13-year-old girl.


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

How many rapes?
Juanita BrodrickHmmm,. sound familiar?

  From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 11:02 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

 


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

How many does it take?
How many does it take to what??
And, again, how many was it? Below you refer to "the rape victim," so I gather 
there was only one who accused him of rape. Who was it?
As for the woman accusing Trump, listen to what she has to say and let her have 
her day in court. At least she'll have one.
I'm guessing she won't. Trump is too powerful. I just hope she doesn't meet wih 
a myste

Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

[Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

Look at what has happened to the other women that have had to put up with 
Clinton's unwanted sexual advances. I think she felt helpless and thought long 
and hard about going up against the top law enforcement politician in the state.

Each time Hillary started in on Trump about women, Trump brought up Bill and 
she shut up. They had to get something figured out. Took them a while to get 
this crap going about raping a thirteen year old girl. Trump hits back and much 
harder, something the Clinton's aren't used to.
As I said, it's not holding water. Nobody is paying attention to it. It's not 
getting any traction. It's obviously a Clinton attempt to counter Trump.
  From: "authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" 
<FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 8:16 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
   
    


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

Broderick was dealing with the then Attorney General of Arkansas, William 
Jefferson Clinton, the person she accused of raping her in her own hotel room.
Actually Broaddrick wasn't "dealing with him." But she could have had him 
charged with rape if she wanted to.
She had witnesses of the aftermath, a bloodied, bruised, and swollen upper lip 
which she claims he bit in order to keep her from screaming during the attack.
She screams with her lips?
it would be nice if both took a polygraph, although Hillary says she has lost 
her confidence in them.
You did notice the date of the affidavit regarding Trump and alleged rape of 
thirteen year old girl, June 18 2016? Does that sound suspicious to you?

Not particularly, no.
The first time Hillary attacked Trump on women, Trump slammed her back with 
Bill's exploits and warned her *never go there* and she backed off. This 
happened a couple of times as I recall.
Um, so she *didn't* back off, she came back and did it again.
The idea of Trump "warning" Hillary about anything is laughable.
Of course there is a lot of talk about Clinton with under aged girls in the 
Bahamas at wild parties, I believe with Mark Rich.
There's always been a lot of talk about the Clintons. The question is, how much 
of it is true? Look at how badly you screwed up on the ludicrous story about 
Hillary's defense of the accused rapist.
The Clinton's had to *inoculate* themselves from their past and possible 
future, by accusing Trump of something worse first,
Oh, jeez, Mike, can you be any more ridiculous? What have they accused him of 
besides misogyny? And it's not as if his misogyny wasn't already obvious. 
Hillary's just calling attention to it.
Besides which, if he believes Bill Clinton is a rapist and "one of the worst 
abusers of women" in U.S. history, why did he invite Bill and Hillary to his 
wedding and pose for a photo with them (with Bill's arm around his new wife's 
waist)?
so Hillary may continue with what she originally was going to say in respects 
to Trump and women.

She will if and when she thinks it's called for.
So far, it's not holding any water. It sounds like something the Clinton's 
would do.
What would it look like if it were "holding water"? (What does that even mean?)



   From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 3:26 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

 Of course. Just wanted to know who you thought the accuser was.
Broaddrick's accusation is hardly straightforward. After untold oodles of 
investigation, it still hasn't been confirmed; it remains he said-she said. She 
never had charges brought against Clinton, and she denied the rape rumors in an 
affidavit to Paula Jones's lawyers, although she later "told all" to NBC and 
the Wall Street Journal editorial page. So we still don't know if her story is 
true.
In any case, my original point was that your claim that the suit against Trump 
makes him "doubly qualified to be president by Democratic standards" is just 
extraordinarily meanspirited nonsense. No Democratic president has ever even 
been accused of raping a 13-year-old girl.


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

How many rapes?
Juanita BrodrickHmmm,. sound familiar?

  From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 11:02 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

 


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

How many does it take?
How many does it take to what??
And, again, how many was it? Below you refer to "the rape victim," so I gather 
there was only one who accused him of rape. Who was it?
As for the woman accusing Trump, listen to what she has to say and let her have 
her day in court. At least she'll have one.
I'

Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

[authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 Broderick was dealing with the then Attorney General of Arkansas, William 
Jefferson Clinton, the person she accused of raping her in her own hotel room.
 

 Actually Broaddrick wasn't "dealing with him." But she could have had him 
charged with rape if she wanted to.
 

 She had witnesses of the aftermath, a bloodied, bruised, and swollen upper lip 
which she claims he bit in order to keep her from screaming during the attack.
 

 She screams with her lips?
 

 it would be nice if both took a polygraph, although Hillary says she has lost 
her confidence in them.

 You did notice the date of the affidavit regarding Trump and alleged rape of 
thirteen year old girl, June 18 2016? Does that sound suspicious to you?

 

 Not particularly, no.
 

 The first time Hillary attacked Trump on women, Trump slammed her back with 
Bill's exploits and warned her *never go there* and she backed off. This 
happened a couple of times as I recall.
 

 Um, so she *didn't* back off, she came back and did it again.
 

 The idea of Trump "warning" Hillary about anything is laughable.
 

 Of course there is a lot of talk about Clinton with under aged girls in the 
Bahamas at wild parties, I believe with Mark Rich.
 

 There's always been a lot of talk about the Clintons. The question is, how 
much of it is true? Look at how badly you screwed up on the ludicrous story 
about Hillary's defense of the accused rapist.
 

 The Clinton's had to *inoculate* themselves from their past and possible 
future, by accusing Trump of something worse first,
 

 Oh, jeez, Mike, can you be any more ridiculous? What have they accused him of 
besides misogyny? And it's not as if his misogyny wasn't already obvious. 
Hillary's just calling attention to it.
 

 Besides which, if he believes Bill Clinton is a rapist and "one of the worst 
abusers of women" in U.S. history, why did he invite Bill and Hillary to his 
wedding and pose for a photo with them (with Bill's arm around his new wife's 
waist)?
 

 so Hillary may continue with what she originally was going to say in respects 
to Trump and women.

 

 She will if and when she thinks it's called for.
 


 
 So far, it's not holding any water. It sounds like something the Clinton's 
would do.
 

 What would it look like if it were "holding water"? (What does that even mean?)
 





 


 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 3:26 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

 
   Of course. Just wanted to know who you thought the accuser was.
 

 Broaddrick's accusation is hardly straightforward. After untold oodles of 
investigation, it still hasn't been confirmed; it remains he said-she said. She 
never had charges brought against Clinton, and she denied the rape rumors in an 
affidavit to Paula Jones's lawyers, although she later "told all" to NBC and 
the Wall Street Journal editorial page. So we still don't know if her story is 
true.
 

 In any case, my original point was that your claim that the suit against Trump 
makes him "doubly qualified to be president by Democratic standards" is just 
extraordinarily meanspirited nonsense. No Democratic president has ever even 
been accused of raping a 13-year-old girl.
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 
 How many rapes?
 Juanita Brodrick
 Hmmm,. sound familiar?


 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 11:02 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

 
   

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 How many does it take?
 

 How many does it take to what??
 

 And, again, how many was it? Below you refer to "the rape victim," so I gather 
there was only one who accused him of rape. Who was it?
 
 As for the woman accusing Trump, listen to what she has to say and let her 
have her day in court. At least she'll have one.
 

 I'm guessing she won't. Trump is too powerful. I just hope she doesn't meet 
wih a mysterious fatal "accident." More likely, he'll arrange for her to be 
paid off to withdraw the suit and keep silent.
 

 

 

 Clinton's victims had to deal with the powerful politicians. The rape victim 
had to deal with the attorney general of Arkansas, her rapist.

 


 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 9:11 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

 
   

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 The women's stories  that accused him is good enough for me. There are way too 
many.
 

 How many have accused him of ra

Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

[Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

Broderick was dealing with the then Attorney General of Arkansas, William 
Jefferson Clinton, the person she accused of raping her in her own hotel room. 
She had witnesses of the aftermath, a bloodied, bruised, and swollen upper lip 
which she claims he bit in order to keep her from screaming during the attack. 
it would be nice if both took a polygraph, although Hillary says she has lost 
her confidence in them.You did notice the date of the affidavit regarding Trump 
and alleged rape of thirteen year old girl, June 18 2016? Does that sound 
suspicious to you? 
The first time Hillary attacked Trump on women, Trump slammed her back with 
Bill's exploits and warned her *never go there* and she backed off. This 
happened a couple of times as I recall. Of course there is a lot of talk about 
Clinton with under aged girls in the Bahamas at wild parties, I believe with 
Mark Rich.The Clinton's had to *inoculate* themselves from their past and 
possible future, by accusing Trump of something worse first, so Hillary may 
continue with what she originally was going to say in respects to Trump and 
women.
So far, it's not holding any water. It sounds like something the Clinton's 
would do.

   

   From: "authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 3:26 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
  
    Of course. Just wanted to know who you thought the accuser was.
Broaddrick's accusation is hardly straightforward. After untold oodles of 
investigation, it still hasn't been confirmed; it remains he said-she said. She 
never had charges brought against Clinton, and she denied the rape rumors in an 
affidavit to Paula Jones's lawyers, although she later "told all" to NBC and 
the Wall Street Journal editorial page. So we still don't know if her story is 
true.
In any case, my original point was that your claim that the suit against Trump 
makes him "doubly qualified to be president by Democratic standards" is just 
extraordinarily meanspirited nonsense. No Democratic president has ever even 
been accused of raping a 13-year-old girl.


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

How many rapes?
Juanita BrodrickHmmm,. sound familiar?

  From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 11:02 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
 
 


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

How many does it take?
How many does it take to what??
And, again, how many was it? Below you refer to "the rape victim," so I gather 
there was only one who accused him of rape. Who was it?
As for the woman accusing Trump, listen to what she has to say and let her have 
her day in court. At least she'll have one.
I'm guessing she won't. Trump is too powerful. I just hope she doesn't meet wih 
a mysterious fatal "accident." More likely, he'll arrange for her to be paid 
off to withdraw the suit and keep silent.


Clinton's victims had to deal with the powerful politicians. The rape victim 
had to deal with the attorney general of Arkansas, her rapist.


  From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 9:11 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

 


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

The women's stories  that accused him is good enough for me. There are way too 
many.
How many have accused him of rape?
And those that have made such charges, didn't  exactly give him his reputation. 
I think it was Hillary that said every woman should be believes when they make 
that charge. Except when it involves her or her interests.
So we should believe the woman who is suing Trump for raping her when she was 
13 years old, right?
It's one thing to believe every woman *when they make the charge*. It's quite 
another to continue to believe them when it turns out the evidence for the 
charge is flimsy or nonexistent.
That story has been out  for months and I had already checked SNOPES. They 
don't exactly deny it, although they seriously massage it to make it not sound 
so bad.
Translation: They present the facts, which show that it's the nonfacts parroted 
by right-wingers like you that make it sound so bad.
Did you listen to her taped interview?
Yeah, she laughed when she said the guy passed a polygraph. Made her lose all 
confidence in them she said.
Which questions and answers was she referring to, specifically?
Nowhere did she laugh about the outcome of the case.
Got the guy a reduced sentence because some evidence had been mishandled.

Did you actually read the Snopes page? The girl and her mother pressured the 
prosecutor for a plea deal to avoid the girl having to testify at tri

Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

[authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

Of course. Just wanted to know who you thought the accuser was. 

 Broaddrick's accusation is hardly straightforward. After untold oodles of 
investigation, it still hasn't been confirmed; it remains he said-she said. She 
never had charges brought against Clinton, and she denied the rape rumors in an 
affidavit to Paula Jones's lawyers, although she later "told all" to NBC and 
the Wall Street Journal editorial page. So we still don't know if her story is 
true.
 

 In any case, my original point was that your claim that the suit against Trump 
makes him "doubly qualified to be president by Democratic standards" is just 
extraordinarily meanspirited nonsense. No Democratic president has ever even 
been accused of raping a 13-year-old girl.
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 
 How many rapes?
 Juanita Brodrick
 Hmmm,. sound familiar?


 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 11:02 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
 
 
   

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 How many does it take?
 

 How many does it take to what??
 

 And, again, how many was it? Below you refer to "the rape victim," so I gather 
there was only one who accused him of rape. Who was it?
 
 As for the woman accusing Trump, listen to what she has to say and let her 
have her day in court. At least she'll have one.
 

 I'm guessing she won't. Trump is too powerful. I just hope she doesn't meet 
wih a mysterious fatal "accident." More likely, he'll arrange for her to be 
paid off to withdraw the suit and keep silent.
 

 

 

 Clinton's victims had to deal with the powerful politicians. The rape victim 
had to deal with the attorney general of Arkansas, her rapist.

 


 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 9:11 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

 
   

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 The women's stories  that accused him is good enough for me. There are way too 
many.
 

 How many have accused him of rape?
 

 And those that have made such charges, didn't  exactly give him his 
reputation. I think it was Hillary that said every woman should be believes 
when they make that charge. Except when it involves her or her interests.
 

 So we should believe the woman who is suing Trump for raping her when she was 
13 years old, right?
 

 It's one thing to believe every woman *when they make the charge*. It's quite 
another to continue to believe them when it turns out the evidence for the 
charge is flimsy or nonexistent.
 

 That story has been out  for months and I had already checked SNOPES. They 
don't exactly deny it, although they seriously massage it to make it not sound 
so bad.
 

 Translation: They present the facts, which show that it's the nonfacts 
parroted by right-wingers like you that make it sound so bad.
 

 Did you listen to her taped interview?

 Yeah, she laughed when she said the guy passed a polygraph. Made her lose all 
confidence in them she said.
 

 Which questions and answers was she referring to, specifically?
 

 Nowhere did she laugh about the outcome of the case.
 

 Got the guy a reduced sentence because some evidence had been mishandled.

 

 Did you actually read the Snopes page? The girl and her mother pressured the 
prosecutor for a plea deal to avoid the girl having to testify at trial 
(understandably). The prosecutor reduced the charge, and the judge then reduced 
the sentence.
 

 She had to do it though... as a favor. A *favor* she said in the tape. Sounds 
like one of those sniper stories.

 

 Snopes quotes the *prosecutor* as confirming that she didn't want to take the 
case when the judge appointed her and tried hard to get out of it. But she got 
stuck with it.
 

 Right-wingers like you don't believe in due process (unless they or their 
interests are on trial, of course). You don't think the lawyer for the accused 
has an ethical obligation to do his or her best for the client. You think he or 
she should flout judicial ethics and allow the accused to be convicted and 
punished without making the best possible case.
 

 If you did believe in due process, there would be no way for you to smear 
Hillary with her involvement in this case.


 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 9:16 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

 
   

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 Clinton raped older women and molested them.
 

 And the proof is...? 
 

 Hillary also defended, successfully, a rapist of an eleven or twelve year old 
gir

Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

[Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

How many rapes?
Juanita BrodrickHmmm,. sound familiar?

  From: "authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" 
<FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 11:02 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
   
    


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

How many does it take?
How many does it take to what??
And, again, how many was it? Below you refer to "the rape victim," so I gather 
there was only one who accused him of rape. Who was it?
As for the woman accusing Trump, listen to what she has to say and let her have 
her day in court. At least she'll have one.
I'm guessing she won't. Trump is too powerful. I just hope she doesn't meet wih 
a mysterious fatal "accident." More likely, he'll arrange for her to be paid 
off to withdraw the suit and keep silent.


Clinton's victims had to deal with the powerful politicians. The rape victim 
had to deal with the attorney general of Arkansas, her rapist.


  From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 9:11 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
 
 


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

The women's stories  that accused him is good enough for me. There are way too 
many.
How many have accused him of rape?
And those that have made such charges, didn't  exactly give him his reputation. 
I think it was Hillary that said every woman should be believes when they make 
that charge. Except when it involves her or her interests.
So we should believe the woman who is suing Trump for raping her when she was 
13 years old, right?
It's one thing to believe every woman *when they make the charge*. It's quite 
another to continue to believe them when it turns out the evidence for the 
charge is flimsy or nonexistent.
That story has been out  for months and I had already checked SNOPES. They 
don't exactly deny it, although they seriously massage it to make it not sound 
so bad.
Translation: They present the facts, which show that it's the nonfacts parroted 
by right-wingers like you that make it sound so bad.
Did you listen to her taped interview?
Yeah, she laughed when she said the guy passed a polygraph. Made her lose all 
confidence in them she said.
Which questions and answers was she referring to, specifically?
Nowhere did she laugh about the outcome of the case.
Got the guy a reduced sentence because some evidence had been mishandled.

Did you actually read the Snopes page? The girl and her mother pressured the 
prosecutor for a plea deal to avoid the girl having to testify at trial 
(understandably). The prosecutor reduced the charge, and the judge then reduced 
the sentence.
She had to do it though... as a favor. A *favor* she said in the tape. Sounds 
like one of those sniper stories.

Snopes quotes the *prosecutor* as confirming that she didn't want to take the 
case when the judge appointed her and tried hard to get out of it. But she got 
stuck with it.
Right-wingers like you don't believe in due process (unless they or their 
interests are on trial, of course). You don't think the lawyer for the accused 
has an ethical obligation to do his or her best for the client. You think he or 
she should flout judicial ethics and allow the accused to be convicted and 
punished without making the best possible case.
If you did believe in due process, there would be no way for you to smear 
Hillary with her involvement in this case.
  From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 9:16 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

 


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

Clinton raped older women and molested them.
And the proof is...? 
Hillary also defended, successfully, a rapist of an eleven or twelve year old 
girl, that she knew was guilty... and laughed about it.
You're a real bottom-feeder, aren't you? You just don't care what the facts 
are. It's more important to get your smears in than to tell the truth:
FALSE: Hillary Clinton Freed Child Rapist, Laughed About It
|  |
|  | |  | FALSE: Hillary Clinton Freed Child Rapist, Laughed About... 
Hillary Clinton's role in a 40-year-old rape case became the focal point of a 
viral meme in 2016, but the claims made about it were mostly inaccurate. |  |
| View on www.snopes.com|   Preview by Yahoo  |
|  |

  


  From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 5:34 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

 Oh, really? And which Democratic presidents have been accused of raping 
13-year-old girls?


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

ROFLMAO

Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

[authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

If Snopes and/or PolitiFact report on this at all, the facts they cite will be 
the facts of what Lynch (and anybody else who was present) said about the 
conversation. Neither of them is in a position to report the facts of what was 
said on the plane (unless somebody slips them an audiotape). 

 If they report on this, it will only be because some crazed right-wingers 
start spreading made-up rumors about what was discussed.
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 BTW, undoubtedly Snopes and Politifact will report that there is absolutely no 
truth to anything other than grandchildren and golf being discussed between 
Loretta Lynch and Bill Clinton on an airplane in Phoenix for thirty minutes. 
Those are the facts because that's what Lynch said.
 
 

Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

[authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 How many does it take?
 

 How many does it take to what??
 

 And, again, how many was it? Below you refer to "the rape victim," so I gather 
there was only one who accused him of rape. Who was it?
 
 As for the woman accusing Trump, listen to what she has to say and let her 
have her day in court. At least she'll have one.
 

 I'm guessing she won't. Trump is too powerful. I just hope she doesn't meet 
wih a mysterious fatal "accident." More likely, he'll arrange for her to be 
paid off to withdraw the suit and keep silent.
 

 

 

 Clinton's victims had to deal with the powerful politicians. The rape victim 
had to deal with the attorney general of Arkansas, her rapist.

 


 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 9:11 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
 
 
   

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 The women's stories  that accused him is good enough for me. There are way too 
many.
 

 How many have accused him of rape?
 

 And those that have made such charges, didn't  exactly give him his 
reputation. I think it was Hillary that said every woman should be believes 
when they make that charge. Except when it involves her or her interests.
 

 So we should believe the woman who is suing Trump for raping her when she was 
13 years old, right?
 

 It's one thing to believe every woman *when they make the charge*. It's quite 
another to continue to believe them when it turns out the evidence for the 
charge is flimsy or nonexistent.
 

 That story has been out  for months and I had already checked SNOPES. They 
don't exactly deny it, although they seriously massage it to make it not sound 
so bad.
 

 Translation: They present the facts, which show that it's the nonfacts 
parroted by right-wingers like you that make it sound so bad.
 

 Did you listen to her taped interview?

 Yeah, she laughed when she said the guy passed a polygraph. Made her lose all 
confidence in them she said.
 

 Which questions and answers was she referring to, specifically?
 

 Nowhere did she laugh about the outcome of the case.
 

 Got the guy a reduced sentence because some evidence had been mishandled.

 

 Did you actually read the Snopes page? The girl and her mother pressured the 
prosecutor for a plea deal to avoid the girl having to testify at trial 
(understandably). The prosecutor reduced the charge, and the judge then reduced 
the sentence.
 

 She had to do it though... as a favor. A *favor* she said in the tape. Sounds 
like one of those sniper stories.

 

 Snopes quotes the *prosecutor* as confirming that she didn't want to take the 
case when the judge appointed her and tried hard to get out of it. But she got 
stuck with it.
 

 Right-wingers like you don't believe in due process (unless they or their 
interests are on trial, of course). You don't think the lawyer for the accused 
has an ethical obligation to do his or her best for the client. You think he or 
she should flout judicial ethics and allow the accused to be convicted and 
punished without making the best possible case.
 

 If you did believe in due process, there would be no way for you to smear 
Hillary with her involvement in this case.


 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 9:16 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

 
   

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 Clinton raped older women and molested them.
 

 And the proof is...? 
 

 Hillary also defended, successfully, a rapist of an eleven or twelve year old 
girl, that she knew was guilty... and laughed about it.
 

 You're a real bottom-feeder, aren't you? You just don't care what the facts 
are. It's more important to get your smears in than to tell the truth:
 

 FALSE: Hillary Clinton Freed Child Rapist, Laughed About It 
http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-freed-child-rapist-laughed-about-it/ 
 
 http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-freed-child-rapist-laughed-about-it/
 
 FALSE: Hillary Clinton Freed Child Rapist, Laughed About... 
http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-freed-child-rapist-laughed-about-it/ 
Hillary Clinton's role in a 40-year-old rape case became the focal point of a 
viral meme in 2016, but the claims made about it were mostly inaccurate.


 
 View on www.snopes.com 
http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-freed-child-rapist-laughed-about-it/
 Preview by Yahoo 
 

  

 
 


 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 5:34 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

 
   Oh, really? And which Democratic presidents have been accused of 

Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

[Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

BTW, undoubtedly Snopes and Politifact will report that there is absolutely no 
truth to anything other than grandchildren and golf being discussed between 
Loretta Lynch and Bill Clinton on an airplane in Phoenix for thirty minutes. 
Those are the facts because that's what Lynch said.


  From: "authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" 
<FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 9:11 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
   
    


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

The women's stories  that accused him is good enough for me. There are way too 
many.
How many have accused him of rape?
And those that have made such charges, didn't  exactly give him his reputation. 
I think it was Hillary that said every woman should be believes when they make 
that charge. Except when it involves her or her interests.
So we should believe the woman who is suing Trump for raping her when she was 
13 years old, right?
It's one thing to believe every woman *when they make the charge*. It's quite 
another to continue to believe them when it turns out the evidence for the 
charge is flimsy or nonexistent.
That story has been out  for months and I had already checked SNOPES. They 
don't exactly deny it, although they seriously massage it to make it not sound 
so bad.
Translation: They present the facts, which show that it's the nonfacts parroted 
by right-wingers like you that make it sound so bad.
Did you listen to her taped interview?
Yeah, she laughed when she said the guy passed a polygraph. Made her lose all 
confidence in them she said.
Which questions and answers was she referring to, specifically?
Nowhere did she laugh about the outcome of the case.
Got the guy a reduced sentence because some evidence had been mishandled.

Did you actually read the Snopes page? The girl and her mother pressured the 
prosecutor for a plea deal to avoid the girl having to testify at trial 
(understandably). The prosecutor reduced the charge, and the judge then reduced 
the sentence.
She had to do it though... as a favor. A *favor* she said in the tape. Sounds 
like one of those sniper stories.

Snopes quotes the *prosecutor* as confirming that she didn't want to take the 
case when the judge appointed her and tried hard to get out of it. But she got 
stuck with it.
Right-wingers like you don't believe in due process (unless they or their 
interests are on trial, of course). You don't think the lawyer for the accused 
has an ethical obligation to do his or her best for the client. You think he or 
she should flout judicial ethics and allow the accused to be convicted and 
punished without making the best possible case.
If you did believe in due process, there would be no way for you to smear 
Hillary with her involvement in this case.
  From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 9:16 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
 
 


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

Clinton raped older women and molested them.
And the proof is...? 
Hillary also defended, successfully, a rapist of an eleven or twelve year old 
girl, that she knew was guilty... and laughed about it.
You're a real bottom-feeder, aren't you? You just don't care what the facts 
are. It's more important to get your smears in than to tell the truth:
FALSE: Hillary Clinton Freed Child Rapist, Laughed About It
|  |
|  | |  | FALSE: Hillary Clinton Freed Child Rapist, Laughed About... 
Hillary Clinton's role in a 40-year-old rape case became the focal point of a 
viral meme in 2016, but the claims made about it were mostly inaccurate. |  |
| View on www.snopes.com|   Preview by Yahoo  |
|  |

  


  From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 5:34 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

 Oh, really? And which Democratic presidents have been accused of raping 
13-year-old girls?


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

ROFLMAO! That should make Trump doubly qualified to be president by Democratic 
standards!


  From: "awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 12:48 PM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

 
https://www.scribd.com/doc/316341058/Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-Rape-Lawsuit-and-Affidavits







 
 Oh, really? And which Democratic presidents have been accused of raping 
13-year-old girls?


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

ROFLMAO! That should make Trump doubly qualified to be president by Democratic 
standards!


  From: "awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLi

Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

[Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

How many does it take?
As for the woman accusing Trump, listen to what she has to say and let her have 
her day in court. At least she'll have one. Clinton's victims had to deal with 
the powerful politicians. The rape victim had to deal with the attorney general 
of Arkansas, her rapist.

  From: "authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" 
<FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 9:11 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
   
    


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

The women's stories  that accused him is good enough for me. There are way too 
many.
How many have accused him of rape?
And those that have made such charges, didn't  exactly give him his reputation. 
I think it was Hillary that said every woman should be believes when they make 
that charge. Except when it involves her or her interests.
So we should believe the woman who is suing Trump for raping her when she was 
13 years old, right?
It's one thing to believe every woman *when they make the charge*. It's quite 
another to continue to believe them when it turns out the evidence for the 
charge is flimsy or nonexistent.
That story has been out  for months and I had already checked SNOPES. They 
don't exactly deny it, although they seriously massage it to make it not sound 
so bad.
Translation: They present the facts, which show that it's the nonfacts parroted 
by right-wingers like you that make it sound so bad.
Did you listen to her taped interview?
Yeah, she laughed when she said the guy passed a polygraph. Made her lose all 
confidence in them she said.
Which questions and answers was she referring to, specifically?
Nowhere did she laugh about the outcome of the case.
Got the guy a reduced sentence because some evidence had been mishandled.

Did you actually read the Snopes page? The girl and her mother pressured the 
prosecutor for a plea deal to avoid the girl having to testify at trial 
(understandably). The prosecutor reduced the charge, and the judge then reduced 
the sentence.
She had to do it though... as a favor. A *favor* she said in the tape. Sounds 
like one of those sniper stories.

Snopes quotes the *prosecutor* as confirming that she didn't want to take the 
case when the judge appointed her and tried hard to get out of it. But she got 
stuck with it.
Right-wingers like you don't believe in due process (unless they or their 
interests are on trial, of course). You don't think the lawyer for the accused 
has an ethical obligation to do his or her best for the client. You think he or 
she should flout judicial ethics and allow the accused to be convicted and 
punished without making the best possible case.
If you did believe in due process, there would be no way for you to smear 
Hillary with her involvement in this case.
  From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 9:16 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
 
 


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

Clinton raped older women and molested them.
And the proof is...? 
Hillary also defended, successfully, a rapist of an eleven or twelve year old 
girl, that she knew was guilty... and laughed about it.
You're a real bottom-feeder, aren't you? You just don't care what the facts 
are. It's more important to get your smears in than to tell the truth:
FALSE: Hillary Clinton Freed Child Rapist, Laughed About It
|  |
|  | |  | FALSE: Hillary Clinton Freed Child Rapist, Laughed About... 
Hillary Clinton's role in a 40-year-old rape case became the focal point of a 
viral meme in 2016, but the claims made about it were mostly inaccurate. |  |
| View on www.snopes.com|   Preview by Yahoo  |
|  |

  


  From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 5:34 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

 Oh, really? And which Democratic presidents have been accused of raping 
13-year-old girls?


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

ROFLMAO! That should make Trump doubly qualified to be president by Democratic 
standards!


  From: "awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 12:48 PM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

 
https://www.scribd.com/doc/316341058/Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-Rape-Lawsuit-and-Affidavits







 
 Oh, really? And which Democratic presidents have been accused of raping 
13-year-old girls?


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

ROFLMAO! That should make Trump doubly qualified to be president by Democratic 
standards!


  From: "awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLi

Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

[authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 The women's stories  that accused him is good enough for me. There are way too 
many.
 

 How many have accused him of rape?
 

 And those that have made such charges, didn't  exactly give him his 
reputation. I think it was Hillary that said every woman should be believes 
when they make that charge. Except when it involves her or her interests.
 

 So we should believe the woman who is suing Trump for raping her when she was 
13 years old, right?
 

 It's one thing to believe every woman *when they make the charge*. It's quite 
another to continue to believe them when it turns out the evidence for the 
charge is flimsy or nonexistent.
 

 That story has been out  for months and I had already checked SNOPES. They 
don't exactly deny it, although they seriously massage it to make it not sound 
so bad.
 

 Translation: They present the facts, which show that it's the nonfacts 
parroted by right-wingers like you that make it sound so bad.
 

 Did you listen to her taped interview?

 Yeah, she laughed when she said the guy passed a polygraph. Made her lose all 
confidence in them she said.
 

 Which questions and answers was she referring to, specifically?
 

 Nowhere did she laugh about the outcome of the case.
 

 Got the guy a reduced sentence because some evidence had been mishandled.

 

 Did you actually read the Snopes page? The girl and her mother pressured the 
prosecutor for a plea deal to avoid the girl having to testify at trial 
(understandably). The prosecutor reduced the charge, and the judge then reduced 
the sentence.
 

 She had to do it though... as a favor. A *favor* she said in the tape. Sounds 
like one of those sniper stories.

 

 Snopes quotes the *prosecutor* as confirming that she didn't want to take the 
case when the judge appointed her and tried hard to get out of it. But she got 
stuck with it.
 

 Right-wingers like you don't believe in due process (unless they or their 
interests are on trial, of course). You don't think the lawyer for the accused 
has an ethical obligation to do his or her best for the client. You think he or 
she should flout judicial ethics and allow the accused to be convicted and 
punished without making the best possible case.
 

 If you did believe in due process, there would be no way for you to smear 
Hillary with her involvement in this case.


 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 9:16 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
 
 
   

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 Clinton raped older women and molested them.
 

 And the proof is...? 
 

 Hillary also defended, successfully, a rapist of an eleven or twelve year old 
girl, that she knew was guilty... and laughed about it.
 

 You're a real bottom-feeder, aren't you? You just don't care what the facts 
are. It's more important to get your smears in than to tell the truth:
 

 FALSE: Hillary Clinton Freed Child Rapist, Laughed About It 
http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-freed-child-rapist-laughed-about-it/ 
 
 http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-freed-child-rapist-laughed-about-it/
 
 FALSE: Hillary Clinton Freed Child Rapist, Laughed About... 
http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-freed-child-rapist-laughed-about-it/ 
Hillary Clinton's role in a 40-year-old rape case became the focal point of a 
viral meme in 2016, but the claims made about it were mostly inaccurate.


 
 View on www.snopes.com 
http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-freed-child-rapist-laughed-about-it/
 Preview by Yahoo 
 

  

 
 


 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 5:34 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

 
   Oh, really? And which Democratic presidents have been accused of raping 
13-year-old girls?
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 ROFLMAO! That should make Trump doubly qualified to be president by Democratic 
standards!
 
 


 From: "awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 12:48 PM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

 
   
 
https://www.scribd.com/doc/316341058/Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-Rape-Lawsuit-and-Affidavits
 
https://www.scribd.com/doc/316341058/Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-Rape-Lawsuit-and-Affidavits


 















 











 
 
 


  
 
   Oh, really? And which Democratic presidents have been accused of raping 
13-year-old girls?
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 ROFLMAO! That should make Trump doubly qualified to be president by Democratic 
standards!
 
 


 From: "awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@y

Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

[Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

The women's stories  that accused him is good enough for me. There are way too 
many. And those that have made such charges, didn't  exactly give him his 
reputation. I think it was Hillary that said every woman should be believes 
when they make that charge. Except when it involves her or her interests.
That story has been out  for months and I had already checked SNOPES. They 
don't exactly deny it, although they seriously massage it to make it not sound 
so bad. Did you listen to her taped interview?Yeah, she laughed when she said 
the guy passed a polygraph. Made her lose all confidence in them she said. Got 
the guy a reduced sentence because some evidence had been mishandled. 
 She had to do it though... as a favor. A *favor* she said in the tape. Sounds 
like one of those sniper stories.

  From: "authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" 
<FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 9:16 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
   
    


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

Clinton raped older women and molested them.
And the proof is...? 
Hillary also defended, successfully, a rapist of an eleven or twelve year old 
girl, that she knew was guilty... and laughed about it.
You're a real bottom-feeder, aren't you? You just don't care what the facts 
are. It's more important to get your smears in than to tell the truth:
FALSE: Hillary Clinton Freed Child Rapist, Laughed About It 
||
||||   FALSE: Hillary Clinton Freed Child Rapist, Laughed 
About...  Hillary Clinton's role in a 40-year-old rape case became the focal 
point of a viral meme in 2016, but the claims made about it were mostly 
inaccurate.||
|  View on www.snopes.com  |Preview by Yahoo|
||

   


  From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 5:34 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
 
 Oh, really? And which Democratic presidents have been accused of raping 
13-year-old girls?


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

ROFLMAO! That should make Trump doubly qualified to be president by Democratic 
standards!


  From: "awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 12:48 PM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

 
https://www.scribd.com/doc/316341058/Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-Rape-Lawsuit-and-Affidavits







 
 Oh, really? And which Democratic presidents have been accused of raping 
13-year-old girls?


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

ROFLMAO! That should make Trump doubly qualified to be president by Democratic 
standards!


  From: "awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 12:48 PM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

 
https://www.scribd.com/doc/316341058/Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-Rape-Lawsuit-and-Affidavits




  #yiv8236439652 #yiv8236439652 -- #yiv8236439652ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid 
#d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;}#yiv8236439652 
#yiv8236439652ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}#yiv8236439652 
#yiv8236439652ygrp-mkp #yiv8236439652hd 
{color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 
0;}#yiv8236439652 #yiv8236439652ygrp-mkp #yiv8236439652ads 
{margin-bottom:10px;}#yiv8236439652 #yiv8236439652ygrp-mkp .yiv8236439652ad 
{padding:0 0;}#yiv8236439652 #yiv8236439652ygrp-mkp .yiv8236439652ad p 
{margin:0;}#yiv8236439652 #yiv8236439652ygrp-mkp .yiv8236439652ad a 
{color:#ff;text-decoration:none;}#yiv8236439652 #yiv8236439652ygrp-sponsor 
#yiv8236439652ygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;}#yiv8236439652 
#yiv8236439652ygrp-sponsor #yiv8236439652ygrp-lc #yiv8236439652hd {margin:10px 
0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}#yiv8236439652 
#yiv8236439652ygrp-sponsor #yiv8236439652ygrp-lc .yiv8236439652ad 
{margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}#yiv8236439652 #yiv8236439652actions 
{font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;}#yiv8236439652 
#yiv8236439652activity 
{background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;}#yiv8236439652
 #yiv8236439652activity span {font-weight:700;}#yiv8236439652 
#yiv8236439652activity span:first-child 
{text-transform:uppercase;}#yiv8236439652 #yiv8236439652activity span a 
{color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;}#yiv8236439652 #yiv8236439652activity span 
span {color:#ff7900;}#yiv8236439652 #yiv8236439652activity span 
.yiv8236439652underline {text-decoration:underline;}#yiv8236439652 
.yiv8236439652attach 
{clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 
0;width:400px;}#yiv8236439652 .yiv8236439652attach div a 
{text-decora

Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

[authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 Clinton raped older women and molested them.
 

 And the proof is...? 
 

 Hillary also defended, successfully, a rapist of an eleven or twelve year old 
girl, that she knew was guilty... and laughed about it.
 

 You're a real bottom-feeder, aren't you? You just don't care what the facts 
are. It's more important to get your smears in than to tell the truth:
 

 FALSE: Hillary Clinton Freed Child Rapist, Laughed About It 
http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-freed-child-rapist-laughed-about-it/ 
 
 http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-freed-child-rapist-laughed-about-it/ 
 
 FALSE: Hillary Clinton Freed Child Rapist, Laughed About... 
http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-freed-child-rapist-laughed-about-it/ 
Hillary Clinton's role in a 40-year-old rape case became the focal point of a 
viral meme in 2016, but the claims made about it were mostly inaccurate.
 
 
 
 View on www.snopes.com 
http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-freed-child-rapist-laughed-about-it/ 
 Preview by Yahoo 
 
 
  

 
 


 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 5:34 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
 
 
   Oh, really? And which Democratic presidents have been accused of raping 
13-year-old girls?
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 ROFLMAO! That should make Trump doubly qualified to be president by Democratic 
standards!
 
 


 From: "awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 12:48 PM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

 
   
 
https://www.scribd.com/doc/316341058/Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-Rape-Lawsuit-and-Affidavits
 
https://www.scribd.com/doc/316341058/Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-Rape-Lawsuit-and-Affidavits


 















 


 








 
 
 


  
 
   Oh, really? And which Democratic presidents have been accused of raping 
13-year-old girls?
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 ROFLMAO! That should make Trump doubly qualified to be president by Democratic 
standards!
 
 


 From: "awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 12:48 PM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

 
   
 
https://www.scribd.com/doc/316341058/Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-Rape-Lawsuit-and-Affidavits
 
https://www.scribd.com/doc/316341058/Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-Rape-Lawsuit-and-Affidavits


 















 


 

Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

[Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

Clinton raped older women and molested them. Hillary also defended, 
successfully, a rapist of an eleven or twelve year old girl, that she knew was 
guilty... and laughed about it.


  From: "authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" 
<FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 5:34 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
   
    Oh, really? And which Democratic presidents have been accused of raping 
13-year-old girls?


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

ROFLMAO! That should make Trump doubly qualified to be president by Democratic 
standards!


  From: "awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 12:48 PM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
 
 
https://www.scribd.com/doc/316341058/Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-Rape-Lawsuit-and-Affidavits


  #yiv7765943346 #yiv7765943346 -- #yiv7765943346ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid 
#d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;}#yiv7765943346 
#yiv7765943346ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}#yiv7765943346 
#yiv7765943346ygrp-mkp #yiv7765943346hd 
{color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 
0;}#yiv7765943346 #yiv7765943346ygrp-mkp #yiv7765943346ads 
{margin-bottom:10px;}#yiv7765943346 #yiv7765943346ygrp-mkp .yiv7765943346ad 
{padding:0 0;}#yiv7765943346 #yiv7765943346ygrp-mkp .yiv7765943346ad p 
{margin:0;}#yiv7765943346 #yiv7765943346ygrp-mkp .yiv7765943346ad a 
{color:#ff;text-decoration:none;}#yiv7765943346 #yiv7765943346ygrp-sponsor 
#yiv7765943346ygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;}#yiv7765943346 
#yiv7765943346ygrp-sponsor #yiv7765943346ygrp-lc #yiv7765943346hd {margin:10px 
0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}#yiv7765943346 
#yiv7765943346ygrp-sponsor #yiv7765943346ygrp-lc .yiv7765943346ad 
{margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}#yiv7765943346 #yiv7765943346actions 
{font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;}#yiv7765943346 
#yiv7765943346activity 
{background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;}#yiv7765943346
 #yiv7765943346activity span {font-weight:700;}#yiv7765943346 
#yiv7765943346activity span:first-child 
{text-transform:uppercase;}#yiv7765943346 #yiv7765943346activity span a 
{color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;}#yiv7765943346 #yiv7765943346activity span 
span {color:#ff7900;}#yiv7765943346 #yiv7765943346activity span 
.yiv7765943346underline {text-decoration:underline;}#yiv7765943346 
.yiv7765943346attach 
{clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 
0;width:400px;}#yiv7765943346 .yiv7765943346attach div a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv7765943346 .yiv7765943346attach img 
{border:none;padding-right:5px;}#yiv7765943346 .yiv7765943346attach label 
{display:block;margin-bottom:5px;}#yiv7765943346 .yiv7765943346attach label a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv7765943346 blockquote {margin:0 0 0 
4px;}#yiv7765943346 .yiv7765943346bold 
{font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;}#yiv7765943346 
.yiv7765943346bold a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv7765943346 dd.yiv7765943346last 
p a {font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv7765943346 dd.yiv7765943346last p 
span {margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv7765943346 
dd.yiv7765943346last p span.yiv7765943346yshortcuts 
{margin-right:0;}#yiv7765943346 div.yiv7765943346attach-table div div a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv7765943346 div.yiv7765943346attach-table 
{width:400px;}#yiv7765943346 div.yiv7765943346file-title a, #yiv7765943346 
div.yiv7765943346file-title a:active, #yiv7765943346 
div.yiv7765943346file-title a:hover, #yiv7765943346 div.yiv7765943346file-title 
a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#yiv7765943346 div.yiv7765943346photo-title a, 
#yiv7765943346 div.yiv7765943346photo-title a:active, #yiv7765943346 
div.yiv7765943346photo-title a:hover, #yiv7765943346 
div.yiv7765943346photo-title a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#yiv7765943346 
div#yiv7765943346ygrp-mlmsg #yiv7765943346ygrp-msg p a 
span.yiv7765943346yshortcuts 
{font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;font-weight:normal;}#yiv7765943346 
.yiv7765943346green {color:#628c2a;}#yiv7765943346 .yiv7765943346MsoNormal 
{margin:0 0 0 0;}#yiv7765943346 o {font-size:0;}#yiv7765943346 
#yiv7765943346photos div {float:left;width:72px;}#yiv7765943346 
#yiv7765943346photos div div {border:1px solid 
#66;min-height:62px;overflow:hidden;width:62px;}#yiv7765943346 
#yiv7765943346photos div label 
{color:#66;font-size:10px;overflow:hidden;text-align:center;white-space:nowrap;width:64px;}#yiv7765943346
 #yiv7765943346reco-category {font-size:77%;}#yiv7765943346 
#yiv7765943346reco-desc {font-size:77%;}#yiv7765943346 .yiv7765943346replbq 
{margin:4px;}#yiv7765943346 #yiv7765943346ygrp-actbar div a:first-child 
{margin-right:2px;padding-right:5px;}#yiv7765943346 #yiv7765943346ygrp-mlmsg 
{font-size:13px;fon

Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

[authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

Oh, really? And which Democratic presidents have been accused of raping 
13-year-old girls? 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 ROFLMAO! That should make Trump doubly qualified to be president by Democratic 
standards!
 
 


 From: "awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 12:48 PM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
 
 
   
 
https://www.scribd.com/doc/316341058/Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-Rape-Lawsuit-and-Affidavits
 
https://www.scribd.com/doc/316341058/Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-Rape-Lawsuit-and-Affidavits


 


 

Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

[Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

ROFLMAO! That should make Trump doubly qualified to be president by Democratic 
standards!


  From: "awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" 
<FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 12:48 PM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
   
    
https://www.scribd.com/doc/316341058/Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-Rape-Lawsuit-and-Affidavits
  #yiv4734258183 #yiv4734258183 -- #yiv4734258183ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid 
#d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;}#yiv4734258183 
#yiv4734258183ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}#yiv4734258183 
#yiv4734258183ygrp-mkp #yiv4734258183hd 
{color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 
0;}#yiv4734258183 #yiv4734258183ygrp-mkp #yiv4734258183ads 
{margin-bottom:10px;}#yiv4734258183 #yiv4734258183ygrp-mkp .yiv4734258183ad 
{padding:0 0;}#yiv4734258183 #yiv4734258183ygrp-mkp .yiv4734258183ad p 
{margin:0;}#yiv4734258183 #yiv4734258183ygrp-mkp .yiv4734258183ad a 
{color:#ff;text-decoration:none;}#yiv4734258183 #yiv4734258183ygrp-sponsor 
#yiv4734258183ygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;}#yiv4734258183 
#yiv4734258183ygrp-sponsor #yiv4734258183ygrp-lc #yiv4734258183hd {margin:10px 
0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}#yiv4734258183 
#yiv4734258183ygrp-sponsor #yiv4734258183ygrp-lc .yiv4734258183ad 
{margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}#yiv4734258183 #yiv4734258183actions 
{font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;}#yiv4734258183 
#yiv4734258183activity 
{background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;}#yiv4734258183
 #yiv4734258183activity span {font-weight:700;}#yiv4734258183 
#yiv4734258183activity span:first-child 
{text-transform:uppercase;}#yiv4734258183 #yiv4734258183activity span a 
{color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;}#yiv4734258183 #yiv4734258183activity span 
span {color:#ff7900;}#yiv4734258183 #yiv4734258183activity span 
.yiv4734258183underline {text-decoration:underline;}#yiv4734258183 
.yiv4734258183attach 
{clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 
0;width:400px;}#yiv4734258183 .yiv4734258183attach div a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv4734258183 .yiv4734258183attach img 
{border:none;padding-right:5px;}#yiv4734258183 .yiv4734258183attach label 
{display:block;margin-bottom:5px;}#yiv4734258183 .yiv4734258183attach label a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv4734258183 blockquote {margin:0 0 0 
4px;}#yiv4734258183 .yiv4734258183bold 
{font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;}#yiv4734258183 
.yiv4734258183bold a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv4734258183 dd.yiv4734258183last 
p a {font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv4734258183 dd.yiv4734258183last p 
span {margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv4734258183 
dd.yiv4734258183last p span.yiv4734258183yshortcuts 
{margin-right:0;}#yiv4734258183 div.yiv4734258183attach-table div div a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv4734258183 div.yiv4734258183attach-table 
{width:400px;}#yiv4734258183 div.yiv4734258183file-title a, #yiv4734258183 
div.yiv4734258183file-title a:active, #yiv4734258183 
div.yiv4734258183file-title a:hover, #yiv4734258183 div.yiv4734258183file-title 
a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#yiv4734258183 div.yiv4734258183photo-title a, 
#yiv4734258183 div.yiv4734258183photo-title a:active, #yiv4734258183 
div.yiv4734258183photo-title a:hover, #yiv4734258183 
div.yiv4734258183photo-title a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#yiv4734258183 
div#yiv4734258183ygrp-mlmsg #yiv4734258183ygrp-msg p a 
span.yiv4734258183yshortcuts 
{font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;font-weight:normal;}#yiv4734258183 
.yiv4734258183green {color:#628c2a;}#yiv4734258183 .yiv4734258183MsoNormal 
{margin:0 0 0 0;}#yiv4734258183 o {font-size:0;}#yiv4734258183 
#yiv4734258183photos div {float:left;width:72px;}#yiv4734258183 
#yiv4734258183photos div div {border:1px solid 
#66;min-height:62px;overflow:hidden;width:62px;}#yiv4734258183 
#yiv4734258183photos div label 
{color:#66;font-size:10px;overflow:hidden;text-align:center;white-space:nowrap;width:64px;}#yiv4734258183
 #yiv4734258183reco-category {font-size:77%;}#yiv4734258183 
#yiv4734258183reco-desc {font-size:77%;}#yiv4734258183 .yiv4734258183replbq 
{margin:4px;}#yiv4734258183 #yiv4734258183ygrp-actbar div a:first-child 
{margin-right:2px;padding-right:5px;}#yiv4734258183 #yiv4734258183ygrp-mlmsg 
{font-size:13px;font-family:Arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;}#yiv4734258183 
#yiv4734258183ygrp-mlmsg table {font-size:inherit;font:100%;}#yiv4734258183 
#yiv4734258183ygrp-mlmsg select, #yiv4734258183 input, #yiv4734258183 textarea 
{font:99% Arial, Helvetica, clean, sans-serif;}#yiv4734258183 
#yiv4734258183ygrp-mlmsg pre, #yiv4734258183 code {font:115% 
monospace;}#yiv4734258183 #yiv4734258183ygrp-mlmsg * 
{line-height:1.22em;}#yiv4734258183 #yiv4734258183ygrp-mlmsg #yiv4734258183logo 
{padding-bottom:10px;}#yiv4734258183 #yiv4734258183ygrp-msg p a 
{fon

[FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

[awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

https://www.scribd.com/doc/316341058/Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-Rape-Lawsuit-and-Affidavits
 
https://www.scribd.com/doc/316341058/Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-Rape-Lawsuit-and-Affidavits

[FairfieldLife] The plot thickens...

[he...@hotmail.com [FairfieldLife]]

 Is GcMAF the real reason why holistic doctors are dead? 
http://www.naturalhealth365.com/GcMAF-holistic-doctors-1508.html

 
 
 http://www.naturalhealth365.com/GcMAF-holistic-doctors-1508.html 
 
 Is GcMAF the real reason why holistic doctors are dead? 
http://www.naturalhealth365.com/GcMAF-holistic-doctors-1508.html Why are so 
many holistic doctors dying in the past few weeks? Many suspect it has to do 
with their use of GcMAF - a natural cure for cancer and autism.
 
 
 
 View on www.naturalhealth365... 
http://www.naturalhealth365.com/GcMAF-holistic-doctors-1508.html 
 Preview by Yahoo 
 
 
 

[FairfieldLife] 'The Plot Thickens'

[Robert]

The plot thickens. Ever since January 25 when powerful Pluto entered Capricorn, 
the sign of the builder, you have been examining conditions you have left (or 
are leaving) and have been wondering where you want to put your energy and 
ambitions. What projects do you want to invest in? Where do you want your life 
to take you? These are changing times and you are feeling every bit of it!
  Now, on April 2, Pluto turns retrograde for the first time in its new sign -- 
giving you the opportunity to review the blueprint of your life plan. 
Additionally, Mercury's entrance into Aries on April 2 (new ideas) and Venus' 
transit into the same sign on April 5 (a new love interest?) encourage you to 
be bold, not to shy away from these important new beginnings.
  Now is the time to transform your life. You are embarking on a new chapter of 
a whole new story. The journey ahead is filled with all of the twists and turns 
that make a great novel and, since you are the author, this Pluto review in the 
midst of Aries energy offers you the opportunity to write, re-write and edit 
your amazing life story!

   
-
You rock. That's why Blockbuster's offering you one month of Blockbuster Total 
Access, No Cost.

[FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens -- Cheney Was Libby's Source

[akasha_108]

The notes, taken by Mr. Libby during the conversation, for the first
time place Mr. Cheney in the middle of an effort by the White House to
learn about Ms. Wilson's husband, Joseph C. Wilson IV, who was
questioning the administration's handling of intelligence about Iraq's
nuclear program to justify the war.

Lawyers involved in the case, who described the notes to The New York
Times, said they showed that Mr. Cheney knew that Ms. Wilson worked at
the C.I.A. more than a month before her identity was made public and
her undercover status was disclosed in a syndicated column by Robert
D. Novak on July 14, 2003.

Mr. Libby's notes indicate that Mr. Cheney had gotten his information
about Ms. Wilson from George J. Tenet, the director of central
intelligence, in response to questions from the vice president about
Mr. Wilson. But they contain no suggestion that either Mr. Cheney or
Mr. Libby knew at the time of Ms. Wilson's undercover status or that
her identity was classified. Disclosing a covert agent's identity can
be a crime, but only if the person who discloses it knows the agent's
undercover status.

It would not be illegal for either Mr. Cheney or Mr. Libby, both of
whom are presumably cleared to know the government's deepest secrets,
to discuss a C.I.A. officer or her link to a critic of the
administration. But any effort by Mr. Libby to steer investigators
away from his conversation with Mr. Cheney could be considered by
Patrick J. Fitzgerald, the special counsel in the case, to be an
illegal effort to impede the inquiry.

.


Lawyers involved in the case said they had no indication that Mr.
Fitzgerald was considering charging Mr. Cheney with wrongdoing. Mr.
Cheney was interviewed under oath by Mr. Fitzgerald last year. It is
not known what the vice president told Mr. Fitzgerald about the
conversation with Mr. Libby or when Mr. Fitzgerald first learned of it.







 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/