RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Most Educated Countries in the World

2013-10-17 Thread emilymaenot
Yes, I was a high producer of high quality stuff myself, no question.  On one 
of the larger projects I was on, the scheduler would invite me to meetings 
because I would say what needed to be said; everyone else was too scared.  
That's what happens when one can't deliver what one has promised.  Smile.   
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:

 You crack me up, emnot. sounds too much like me, burning another bridge, in 
another meeting, during my working daze. Always got stuff done, though.  

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:

 I have no idea Share what you are talking about.  You are talking gibberish 
based on a knowledge base of death and dying that appears to be zero, based on 
your comments.  That's what I'm saying here.  That's my point.  
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:

 Emily I shared with John that death notices here report blissful and or 
peaceful deaths. Turq brought up about Castanedas. I said the notices I've seen 
have been about unfamous people. What do you think I'm talking about?
 
 On Thu, 10/17/13, emilymaenot@... mailto:emilymaenot@... mailto:emilymaenot@...> wrote:
 
 Subject: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Most Educated Countries in the World
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Thursday, October 17, 2013, 11:46 AM
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Re: "Well
 we're talking about the death notices of plain folks,
 not famous ones."  Share, this is *not* what you
 were talking about.  You continually betray yourself in
 your own posts - why do you do this?  Yet more absurd
 nonsense; words that mean nothing and go nowhere.  Dig
 a little deeper, maybe?   
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
 mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
 
 Well we're talking
 about the death notices of plain folks, not famous ones. I
 would think that families would simply not mention if the
 passing was rough. Actually I have heard of one such rough
 passing of a TMer so there has also been honesty about
 such.
 
 
 
 On Thursday, October
 17, 2013 10:35 AM, TurquoiseB  wrote:
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 --- In
 FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long
  wrote:
 
 >
 
 > Ann, I don't think people are lying about it. Do
 you?
 
 
 
 In this case, I think that Ann's comment, snarky
 
 though it may be, is valid. That's *exactly* what
 
 True Believers do. 
 
 
 
 Case in point: When Carlos Castaneda died (of cancer)
 
 some of his TBs claimed that he "passed
 peacefully."
 
 The real story, according to eyewitnesses, is that he
 
 *literally* died screaming. 
 
 
 
 > On Thursday, October 17, 2013 10:16 AM,
 "awoelflebater@..." 
 wrote:
 
 > 
 
 > ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com,
  wrote:
 
 > 
 
 > > John, just to share that death notices on the
 bulletin 
 
 > board of the coat room in the women's Dome often
 say that 
 
 > the person passed peacefully and or blissfully
 surrounded 
 
 > by friends and family.
 
 > 
 
 > Well, it's highly unlikely that they're going
 to say 
 
 > they went out screaming.
 
 > 







RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Most Educated Countries in the World

2013-10-17 Thread authfriend
Yes, I'm aware of who you were conversing with. And yes, I sure am entitled to 
my opinion about your posting.
 

 Now, let's get back to what I asked you. You wrote to Barry:
 

 "Well we're talking about the death notices of plain folks, not famous ones."
 

 What was your point? That famous folks are more likely to have unpleasant 
deaths than "plain folks," and therefore we should assume that reports of 
peaceful deaths of "plain folks" are always true?
 

 Share wrote:


 > Judy, I was discussing something of interest to me with John and turq. You 
 > are of course
 > entitled to your opinion about my posting. 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:

  I wrote:
 (snip)
 > Again, Share, you have this pathological compulsion to SAY SOMETHING,
 > ANYTHING, just to be saying something, just to see your name as the author 
 > of a > post, whether it makes sense or not, whether it makes a contribution 
 > or not.
 
 

 Just to add: It's as if the only way you know you exist is if you can see your 
words and your name on your computer screen.
 
 
 









RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Most Educated Countries in the World

2013-10-17 Thread sharelong60
Judy, I was discussing something of interest to me with John and turq. You are 
of course entitled to your opinion about my posting. 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:

  I wrote:
 (snip)
 > Again, Share, you have this pathological compulsion to SAY SOMETHING,
 > ANYTHING, just to be saying something, just to see your name as the author 
 > of a > post, whether it makes sense or not, whether it makes a contribution 
 > or not.
 
 

 Just to add: It's as if the only way you know you exist is if you can see your 
words and your name on your computer screen.
 
 
 







RE: Re: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Most Educated Countries in the World

2013-10-17 Thread authfriend
Very hollow laughter, Share. You can't even write a coherent sentence.
 

 You've asked those (disingenuous) questions before, and you know what my 
answers are. But you're afraid to even try to answer my questions.
 

 What was the point of your post mentioning Castaneda?

 

Share babbled dishonestly:

 > laughing, Judy, then why do you not only exchange posts with
 > me? Why do you actually butt into my exchanges with others
 > to do so?! And are you even interested in the topic?!
 

 
 
 On Thursday, October 17, 2013 3:00 PM, "authfriend@..."  wrote:
 
   Share, this is not a response to my post. Did you not read it? Or is this 
just one more attempt to avoid dealing with reality? Or is it the compulsion I 
mentioned to say SOMETHING, ANYTHING, even if it isn't the tiniest bit 
responsive, so you can pretend you're interacting with other people?
 

 What was the point of your post mentioning Castaneda?
 
Share wrote:
 
 > Judy, it's true, I trust those death notices I read because I don't see why 
 > people would lie
 > about how the person passed. Others can trust or not as they wish. I was 
 > discussing
 > something of interest to me with John and turq. There are many topics and 
 > posts on FFL
 > that I ignore. 

 

What was the point you thought you were making? That famous people are more 
likely to have unpleasant deaths than people who aren't famous? And therefore 
we should trust reports of peaceful deaths of the not-famous? 

 Makes no sense, Share (not to mention the fact that whatever you were trying 
to say was based on the single example of Castaneda, in which those closest to 
him lied about how he died).
 

 Again, Share, you have this pathological compulsion to SAY SOMETHING, 
ANYTHING, just to be saying something, just to see your name as the author of a 
post, whether it makes sense or not, whether it makes a contribution or not.
 
Share wrote:
 
 > Emily I shared with John that death notices here report blissful and or 
 > peaceful deaths.
 > Turq brought up about Castanedas. I said the notices I've seen have been 
 > about unfamous
 > people. What do you think I'm talking about?

 





 
 

 
 



 
 
 
 





Re: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Most Educated Countries in the World

2013-10-17 Thread Share Long
laughing, Judy, then why do you not only exchange posts with me? Why do you 
actually butt into my exchanges with others to do so?! And are you even 
interested in the topic?!





On Thursday, October 17, 2013 3:00 PM, "authfri...@yahoo.com" 
 wrote:
 
  
Share, this is not a response to my post. Did you not read it? Or is this just 
one more attempt to avoid dealing with reality? Or is it the compulsion I 
mentioned to say SOMETHING, ANYTHING, even if it isn't the tiniest bit 
responsive, so you can pretend you're interacting with other people?

What was the point of your post mentioning Castaneda?

Share wrote:


> Judy, it's true, I trust those death notices I read because I don't see why 
> people would lie
> about how the person passed. Others can trust or not as they wish. I was 
> discussing
> something of interest to me with John and turq. There are many topics and 
> posts on FFL
> that I ignore. 



What was the point you thought you were making? That famous people are more 
likely to have unpleasant deaths than people who aren't famous? And therefore 
we should trust reports of peaceful deaths of the not-famous?


Makes no sense, Share (not to mention the fact that whatever you were trying to 
say was based on the single example of Castaneda, in which those closest to him 
lied about how he died).

Again, Share, you have this pathological compulsion to SAY SOMETHING, ANYTHING, 
just to be saying something, just to see your name as the author of a post, 
whether it makes sense or not, whether it makes a contribution or not.

Share wrote:


> Emily I shared with John that death notices here report blissful and or 
> peaceful deaths.
>>> Turq brought up about Castanedas. I said the notices I've seen have been 
>>> about unfamous
>>> people. What do you think I'm talking about?
>>
>>


RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Most Educated Countries in the World

2013-10-17 Thread authfriend
Share, this is not a response to my post. Did you not read it? Or is this just 
one more attempt to avoid dealing with reality? Or is it the compulsion I 
mentioned to say SOMETHING, ANYTHING, even if it isn't the tiniest bit 
responsive, so you can pretend you're interacting with other people?
 

 What was the point of your post mentioning Castaneda?
 
Share wrote:
 
 > Judy, it's true, I trust those death notices I read because I don't see why 
 > people would lie
 > about how the person passed. Others can trust or not as they wish. I was 
 > discussing
 > something of interest to me with John and turq. There are many topics and 
 > posts on FFL
 > that I ignore. 

 

What was the point you thought you were making? That famous people are more 
likely to have unpleasant deaths than people who aren't famous? And therefore 
we should trust reports of peaceful deaths of the not-famous? 

 Makes no sense, Share (not to mention the fact that whatever you were trying 
to say was based on the single example of Castaneda, in which those closest to 
him lied about how he died).
 

 Again, Share, you have this pathological compulsion to SAY SOMETHING, 
ANYTHING, just to be saying something, just to see your name as the author of a 
post, whether it makes sense or not, whether it makes a contribution or not.
 
Share wrote:
 
 > Emily I shared with John that death notices here report blissful and or 
 > peaceful deaths.
 > Turq brought up about Castanedas. I said the notices I've seen have been 
 > about unfamous
 > people. What do you think I'm talking about?