RE: Re: Re: RE: RE: Re: RE: RE: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research
Re: "I do not initiate attack." Share has re-written reality in order to justify her post to you yesterday which wasn't even close to an "in kind" response. Then, she chooses to defend her reality re-write like it represents "truth" so she doesn't have to accept responsibility for her own behavior and motivations. Of course, I can't see her "figment of imagination" in her own mind. Share, try and be kind today. Standing up for yourself involves accepting your own behavior first and having the guts to own it, not fighting a battle to preserve your self-created delusions. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: Heck! It might even help global warming! But what about horses?! On Thursday, November 21, 2013 10:19 AM, "awoelflebater@..." wrote: ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: Judy, imo MGC did Avoidance Dance recently WRT indiff's language. Where was their outrage then?! It's still about RWC for them imo and that's why they exempt their buddies from their protestations, moral posturings, etc. and focus on me. Going by what others here have said, you are the queen of grudge holding and as such your words have little value from my perspective. Same for Ann and Emily when they're in that prejudiced and or nasty mode. And to answer the MGC posts from last night: one of your most vicious tactics imo is to poison a fun exchange I'm having with another poster. Which usually happens when I've been ignoring you all. IMO this is what Ann did, despite all of her clever and or politically correct utterances and your moral posturing. And I don't feel like a victim at all. I feel like someone who has stood up appropriately for herself. From the beginning of all this, you initiate attack, Judy and I defend myself as I see fit. I do not initiate attack and that is, I think an important difference. One that you will more likely neither see nor admit. Will this help? On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 10:45 PM, "emilymaenot@..." wrote: Ann, I love you. You and Judy are in a tie for the best post of year - song wise. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XBd93pJRJ54 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XBd93pJRJ54 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: Are you saying that Ann's picture of herself at the beach was vicious? Or are you saying her parody was vicious? I understand that you truly believe that Ann was after you, personally, on a public forum with public posting and you thought you were responding "in-kind." Share, you are doing the classic re-write of reality here to try and not take responsibility for yourself. I don't think you can help this. Take me on next, Share. Come on, I dare you - stop going after just Judy and Ann. I feel left out. And remember, If you like it, I love it. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: Emily, imo, Ann viciously poisoned a fun exchange that I was having with Richard, a tactic used often by MGC, not only when I ignore you all, but imo precisely because I'm enjoying exchanges with other posters. It's one of the most vicious things that you all do and I will continue to respond in kind. btw, turq once said something mean about Judy's looks. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 6:32 PM, "emilymaenot@..." wrote: And look, you are still at it Share...reaching for anything to distract yourself from the fact that you wrote a mean and malicious post. I can't even think of anyone else who has stooped so low as to attack someone's personal visage, except you. Face it Share. Your post was trying to hit below the belt and create hurt. Sad, but true. No biggie, just the "bad" part of the "blend of good and bad" (and I paraphrase what you say there) that human beings are, right? No reason to apologize. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: imo, RWC is the #1 big reason you all keep attacking me. Expecially you, Judy, the number 1 grudge holder maybe on the internet if what others say is true. Since that seems to be what's needed to be Queen Bee, I'm happy to let you keep that job. As for Emily, why exclude Obbajee and Susan? Except that my exchanges with them disproves what Emily initially said about me. From the beginning I've acknowledged that I have flaws. But Judy, when you don't like someone, it's as if you put on black glasses and see the person only through them. Worse, you either don't see that you've got the glasses on, or you won't admit that you do. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: Unlike you, Emily has integrity. So when you claimed that you liked Obbajeeba and Susan, she took you at your word and amended what she said about you to exclude them. And after she'd done that to accommodate your claim, you accused her of saying Obbajeeba and Susan weren't "strong and beautiful" and demanded to know how she accounted for your claim not to be thr
Re: RE: RE: Re: RE: RE: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research
Judy, imo MGC did Avoidance Dance recently WRT indiff's language. Where was their outrage then?! It's still about RWC for them imo and that's why they exempt their buddies from their protestations, moral posturings, etc. and focus on me. Going by what others here have said, you are the queen of grudge holding and as such your words have little value from my perspective. Same for Ann and Emily when they're in that prejudiced and or nasty mode. And to answer the MGC posts from last night: one of your most vicious tactics imo is to poison a fun exchange I'm having with another poster. Which usually happens when I've been ignoring you all. IMO this is what Ann did, despite all of her clever and or politically correct utterances and your moral posturing. And I don't feel like a victim at all. I feel like someone who has stood up appropriately for herself. >From the beginning of all this, you initiate attack, Judy and I defend myself >as I see fit. I do not initiate attack and that is, I think an important >difference. One that you will more likely neither see nor admit. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 10:45 PM, "emilymae...@yahoo.com" wrote: Ann, I love you. You and Judy are in a tie for the best post of year - song wise. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XBd93pJRJ54 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: > > >Are you saying that Ann's picture of herself at the beach was vicious? Or are >you saying her parody was vicious? I understand that you truly believe that >Ann was after you, personally, on a public forum with public posting and you >thought you were responding "in-kind." Share, you are doing the classic >re-write of reality here to try and not take responsibility for yourself. I >don't think you can help this. Take me on next, Share. Come on, I dare you - >stop going after just Judy and Ann. I feel left out. And remember, If you >like it, I love it. > > > >---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: >> >> >>Emily, imo, Ann viciously poisoned a fun exchange that I was having with >>Richard, a tactic used often by MGC, not only when I ignore you all, but imo >>precisely because I'm enjoying exchanges with other posters. It's one of the >>most vicious things that you all do and I will continue to respond in kind. >>btw, turq once said something mean about Judy's looks. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 6:32 PM, "emilymaenot@..." >>wrote: >> >> >>And look, you are still at it Share...reaching for anything to distract >>yourself from the fact that you wrote a mean and malicious post. I can't even >>think of anyone else who has stooped so low as to attack someone's personal >>visage, except you. Face it Share. Your post was trying to hit below the >>belt and create hurt. Sad, but true. No biggie, just the "bad" part of the >>"blend of good and bad" (and I paraphrase what you say there) that human >>beings are, right? No reason to apologize. >> >> >>---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: >> >> >>imo, RWC is the #1 big reason you all keep attacking me. Expecially you, >>Judy, the number 1 grudge holder maybe on the internet if what others say is >>true. Since that seems to be what's needed to be Queen Bee, I'm happy to let >>you keep that job. As for Emily, why exclude Obbajee and Susan? Except that >>my exchanges with them disproves what Emily initially said about me. >> >> >>From the beginning I've acknowledged that I have flaws. But Judy, when you >>don't like someone, it's as if you put on black glasses and see the person >>only through them. Worse, you either don't see that you've got the glasses >>on, or you won't admit that you do. >> >> >> >> >>---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: Unlike you, Emily has integrity. So when you claimed that you liked Obbajeeba and Susan, she took you at your word and amended what she said about you to exclude them. And after she'd done that to accommodate your claim, you accused her of saying Obbajeeba and Susan weren't "strong and beautiful" and demanded to know how she accounted for your claim not to be threatened by them--when she'd just got done accounting for it. It's all right here in black and white, Share, but you simply can't acknowledge the facts. One of the big reasons we keep going after you, Share, is because of your inability to be straightforward when there's any kind of conflict--one more unmistakeable sign that your saintly pose is just that, a pose, not the real Share. You twist and obfuscate and conceal and confound and create massive muddles to protect yourself from having to deal with reality. And the reality is, as Emily so aptly points out, that your posts are not "cute," you are not the Queen Bee of FFL that you'd like to see yourself as.
RE: RE: RE: Re: RE: RE: Re: RE: RE: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research
Has Barry been forging my email again?? I'll skin him alive. I guess he's trying to scrounge a bit of income now that he's left his job. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: Are you *sure* there is no such thing as the MGC? Because if that's the case, I just wired my thousand dollar 'Platinum' initiation fee to someone, who I thought was you, in Nigeria. You even attached those pics from your "camera safari" - The giraffes, and the chimp wearing a fez. You said you'd be back stateside soon, and my scroll, and ceremonial ring would be arriving shortly. What's going on?? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: Share snarled: > Judy, imo MGC did Avoidance Dance recently WRT indiff's language. Where was > their > outrage then?! In the first place, there's no such thing as "MGC." That's a fantasy of Barry's. In the second place, what the hell does "indiff's language" (whatever that refers to) have to do with our exchanges? This is just more avoidance on your part, trying to change the subject.
RE: RE: RE: Re: RE: RE: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research
Ann, I love you. You and Judy are in a tie for the best post of year - song wise. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XBd93pJRJ54 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XBd93pJRJ54 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: Are you saying that Ann's picture of herself at the beach was vicious? Or are you saying her parody was vicious? I understand that you truly believe that Ann was after you, personally, on a public forum with public posting and you thought you were responding "in-kind." Share, you are doing the classic re-write of reality here to try and not take responsibility for yourself. I don't think you can help this. Take me on next, Share. Come on, I dare you - stop going after just Judy and Ann. I feel left out. And remember, If you like it, I love it. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: Emily, imo, Ann viciously poisoned a fun exchange that I was having with Richard, a tactic used often by MGC, not only when I ignore you all, but imo precisely because I'm enjoying exchanges with other posters. It's one of the most vicious things that you all do and I will continue to respond in kind. btw, turq once said something mean about Judy's looks. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 6:32 PM, "emilymaenot@..." wrote: And look, you are still at it Share...reaching for anything to distract yourself from the fact that you wrote a mean and malicious post. I can't even think of anyone else who has stooped so low as to attack someone's personal visage, except you. Face it Share. Your post was trying to hit below the belt and create hurt. Sad, but true. No biggie, just the "bad" part of the "blend of good and bad" (and I paraphrase what you say there) that human beings are, right? No reason to apologize. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: imo, RWC is the #1 big reason you all keep attacking me. Expecially you, Judy, the number 1 grudge holder maybe on the internet if what others say is true. Since that seems to be what's needed to be Queen Bee, I'm happy to let you keep that job. As for Emily, why exclude Obbajee and Susan? Except that my exchanges with them disproves what Emily initially said about me. From the beginning I've acknowledged that I have flaws. But Judy, when you don't like someone, it's as if you put on black glasses and see the person only through them. Worse, you either don't see that you've got the glasses on, or you won't admit that you do. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: Unlike you, Emily has integrity. So when you claimed that you liked Obbajeeba and Susan, she took you at your word and amended what she said about you to exclude them. And after she'd done that to accommodate your claim, you accused her of saying Obbajeeba and Susan weren't "strong and beautiful" and demanded to know how she accounted for your claim not to be threatened by them--when she'd just got done accounting for it. It's all right here in black and white, Share, but you simply can't acknowledge the facts. One of the big reasons we keep going after you, Share, is because of your inability to be straightforward when there's any kind of conflict--one more unmistakeable sign that your saintly pose is just that, a pose, not the real Share. You twist and obfuscate and conceal and confound and create massive muddles to protect yourself from having to deal with reality. And the reality is, as Emily so aptly points out, that your posts are not "cute," you are not the Queen Bee of FFL that you'd like to see yourself as. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: > I believe Obbajee posted recently and Susan about a month ago. But you both > want to > exclude them from Emily's assessment for an obvious reason. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:32 PM, "authfriend@..." wrote: No, Share, look for the parenthetical in what Emily wrote. (You know what a parenthetical is, right?) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: No, Judy, what's interesting and predictable is that Emily and now you, are ignoring the women who disprove what Emily's saying about me. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:18 PM, "authfriend@..." wrote: You appear to have overlooked the parenthetical, Share. Isn't that interesting!? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: Emily, are you saying that Obbajee and Susan aren't strong and beautiful?! I'm not threatened by either of them. How do you account for that? On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:01 PM, "emilymaenot@..." wrote: This might be the *nastiest* thing I've seen her write. Share, I say this based on the face value of your words, ignoring the energy that accompanies them. You are *not* cute, Share. I wonder if you have the ability to apologize for this? You are threatened by strong and beautiful women Share (the ones that are posting); you wa
