Yes, I was a high producer of high quality stuff myself, no question. On one
of the larger projects I was on, the scheduler would invite me to meetings
because I would say what needed to be said; everyone else was too scared.
That's what happens when one can't deliver what one has promised. S
You crack me up, emnot. sounds too much like me, burning another bridge, in
another meeting, during my working daze. Always got stuff done, though.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
I have no idea Share what you are talking about. You are talking gibberish
based on a knowledge
Yes, I'm aware of who you were conversing with. And yes, I sure am entitled to
my opinion about your posting.
Now, let's get back to what I asked you. You wrote to Barry:
"Well we're talking about the death notices of plain folks, not famous ones."
What was your point? That famous folk
Judy, I was discussing something of interest to me with John and turq. You are
of course entitled to your opinion about my posting.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
I wrote:
(snip)
> Again, Share, you have this pathological compulsion to SAY SOMETHING,
> ANYTHING, just to be
Very hollow laughter, Share. You can't even write a coherent sentence.
You've asked those (disingenuous) questions before, and you know what my
answers are. But you're afraid to even try to answer my questions.
What was the point of your post mentioning Castaneda?
Share babbled dishone
laughing, Judy, then why do you not only exchange posts with me? Why do you
actually butt into my exchanges with others to do so?! And are you even
interested in the topic?!
On Thursday, October 17, 2013 3:00 PM, "authfri...@yahoo.com"
wrote:
Share, this is not a response to my post.
Share, this is not a response to my post. Did you not read it? Or is this just
one more attempt to avoid dealing with reality? Or is it the compulsion I
mentioned to say SOMETHING, ANYTHING, even if it isn't the tiniest bit
responsive, so you can pretend you're interacting with other people?
Judy, it's true, I trust those death notices I read because I don't see why
people would lie about how the person passed. Others can trust or not as they
wish. I was discussing something of interest to me with John and turq. There
are many topics and posts on FFL that I ignore.
---In Fairfi
I wrote:
(snip)
> Again, Share, you have this pathological compulsion to SAY SOMETHING,
> ANYTHING, just to be saying something, just to see your name as the author
> of a > post, whether it makes sense or not, whether it makes a contribution
> or not.
Just to add: It's as if the only w
What was the point you thought you were making? That famous people are more
likely to have unpleasant deaths than people who aren't famous? And therefore
we should trust reports of peaceful deaths of the not-famous?
Makes no sense, Share (not to mention the fact that whatever you were trying
I have no idea Share what you are talking about. You are talking gibberish
based on a knowledge base of death and dying that appears to be zero, based on
your comments. That's what I'm saying here. That's my point.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Emily I shared with John th
ed if you thought the notices were lying.
On Thu, 10/17/13, emilymaenot@... mailto:emilymaenot@... mailto:emilymaenot@...> wrote:
Subject: RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Most Educated Countries in the World
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@
o.com wrote:
Subject: RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Most Educated Countries in the World
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thursday, October 17, 2013, 11:37 AM
Who have you heard of who has personally
rep
Who have you heard of who has personally reported. Also, you have taken the
conversation to a ludicrous place again with your trying to turn it into a case
of "lying." Nonsense, my dear, more nonsense. Waste of time.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Emily, I haven't but I b
14 matches
Mail list logo
