[FairfieldLife] Forget Her. Your life is already controlled by 'bots

2014-01-10 Thread TurquoiseB
I found this a fascinating article to stumble upon right after seeing
the film Her. There will be some who will deny that we as a culture
will never become so dependent on computers and AIs as to allow them to
shape and control our lives as much as Theodore does in Her.

Well, let me present a theoretical case to you. You're a fan of science
fiction, and of scifi writing, TV, and movies. As such, you'd love to go
to the most prestigious ceremony for such things, the annual Hugo
Awards. But the awards are being held at Worldcon, a big gathering of
scifi folk in another city, and you can't afford to go there, so you
tune in via the streamed video feed of the event. And everything's going
great. You're enjoying the speeches and the clips from the TV shows and
movies and all of a sudden the feed is cut, and replaced with a blank
screen containing the words:

Worldcon banned due to copyright infringement.


This actually happened, and it was done by 'bots.

There was not a human in the loop when the copyright police 'bots used
by Upstream (the streaming video provider for Worldcon) shut down its
broadcast.

These censor-bots just decided that something was being seen that they
didn't think *should* be seen, according to what they had been told by
their programmers, and so they just shut the whole feed down. When
Upstream found out what happened and tried to restart the feed
(according to them), they couldn't. The censor-bots' word turned out to
be final. Go figure.

http://io9.com/5940036/how-copyright-enforcement-robots-killed-the-hugo-\
awards
http://io9.com/5940036/how-copyright-enforcement-robots-killed-the-hugo\
-awards










Re: [FairfieldLife] Forget Her. Your life is already controlled by 'bots

2014-01-10 Thread Share Long
turq, I'd say that the world, on one level, is controlled by imperfect 
programming and still-learning programmers. bots are only as useful as their 
programming and programmers make them. Right?!





On Friday, January 10, 2014 4:19 AM, TurquoiseB turquoi...@yahoo.com wrote:
 
  
I found this a fascinating article to stumble upon right after seeing the film 
Her. There will be some who will deny that we as a culture will never become 
so dependent on computers and AIs as to allow them to shape and control our 
lives as much as Theodore does in Her. 

Well, let me present a theoretical case to you. You're a fan of science 
fiction, and of scifi writing, TV, and movies. As such, you'd love to go to the 
most prestigious ceremony for such things, the annual Hugo Awards. But the 
awards are being held at Worldcon, a big gathering of scifi folk in another 
city, and you can't afford to go there, so you tune in via the streamed video 
feed of the event. And everything's going great. You're enjoying the speeches 
and the clips from the TV shows and movies and all of a sudden the feed is cut, 
and replaced with a blank screen containing the words: 


Worldcon banned due to copyright infringement.


This actually happened, and it was done by 'bots. 

There was not a human in the loop when the copyright police 'bots used by 
Upstream (the streaming video provider for Worldcon) shut down its broadcast. 

These censor-bots just decided that something was being seen that they didn't 
think *should* be seen, according to what they had been told by their 
programmers, and so they just shut the whole feed down. When Upstream found out 
what happened and tried to restart the feed (according to them), they couldn't. 
The censor-bots' word turned out to be final. Go figure. 


http://io9.com/5940036/how-copyright-enforcement-robots-killed-the-hugo-awards 







 


Re: [FairfieldLife] Forget Her. Your life is already controlled by 'bots

2014-01-10 Thread Richard J. Williams
On 1/10/2014 10:09 AM, Share Long wrote:

  bots are only as useful as their programming and
  programmers make them. Right?!
 
Speaking of bots, somebody is monitoring my messages - probably bots 
at the NSA, FBI, and the CIA. Go figure.

So, I wonder who here spends the most time in front of their computers? 
It used to be me, when my job was a system analyst working fifty hours a 
week. But, now I'm thinking Barry is using his laptop to watch streaming 
video of the Hugo Awards at ComicCon; Judy is obviously in front o her 
desktop at least ten hours every day, judging from her response times; I 
wouldn't be surprised if the other Barry is on 24 x 7, multi-tasking and 
watching TV. There's probably at least one respondent on this list that 
uses an iPhone for reading newsgroups.


Re: [FairfieldLife] Forget Her. Your life is already controlled by 'bots

2014-01-10 Thread Bhairitu
Contrary to popular belief I do not watch TV 24/7.  Sounds like you 
watch more TV than I.  Of course I spend part of my day in front of a 
computer as I try to make a living from software development.  So 
looking at a big screen in the evening 8 feet away is very relaxing  on 
the eyes.  I also look at FFL sometimes using Chrome on Android.


You only worked 50 hours a week?  That's not enough to get an orange 
robe from the tech monastery. :-D


On 01/10/2014 08:26 AM, Richard J. Williams wrote:


On 1/10/2014 10:09 AM, Share Long wrote:

 bots are only as useful as their programming and
 programmers make them. Right?!

Speaking of bots, somebody is monitoring my messages - probably bots
at the NSA, FBI, and the CIA. Go figure.

So, I wonder who here spends the most time in front of their computers?
It used to be me, when my job was a system analyst working fifty hours a
week. But, now I'm thinking Barry is using his laptop to watch streaming
video of the Hugo Awards at ComicCon; Judy is obviously in front o her
desktop at least ten hours every day, judging from her response times; I
wouldn't be surprised if the other Barry is on 24 x 7, multi-tasking and
watching TV. There's probably at least one respondent on this list that
uses an iPhone for reading newsgroups.