[FairfieldLife] Re: Alex--this is spam! to Ann Judy Ravi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn emilymae.reyn@... wrote: Barry?  Barry who? Look for the guy with the big callous on his right index finger. All that button pushing takes its toll.  Dear Ann, I'll have you know, I find you far more interesting and I've been laughing my ass off at you.  I particularly enjoy your exchanges with Share.  I can see that the two of you are moving closer and closer to compatibility. I do believe you may be correct here, dear Em, especially if by 'compatibl'e you mean more tolerant and willing to let a lot of things slide by unremarked upon. Although, now that Share and I both know how much Barry enjoys following our posts we may just have to keep pumping out the crap, for his sake you understand. Share and I are selfless like that.  The very nice thank you for your reply sounds like you are making good progress.  You are a hard case and a tough nut to crack, Ann, but someone is finally here to put you in your place and teach you a few manners. It's been tried before, with limited success. Hence, the lash marks.  You've been far too independent in your thought process; your sense of humor is much too irreverent.  Your insights lack both content and clarity and your manners, my dear, your manners. My mother, in all truthfulness, would be devastated to hear it (about the manners).  From where I sit, it is clear that the best descriptors around for your behavior include gratuitous, nasty, and overall -  negative.  Ann, there is a smidgen of hope for you, thanks be to God, but you must stop taking things so personally.  I'm not sure who here knows how to do that. Maybe Xeno could help me. Anyone who can listen to a potential terminal diagnosis and not take it personally can surely help me with my problems.  I think maybe Bob did, but I hear he is off traipsing through the Himalayas these days.  I'm rootin' for you Ann, I really am.  I hope you find the perfect prom dress that sets of your beautiful blue eyes with the perfect shade of lipstick to match and that you dance the night away in wild abandon. I would love to, I really would Emily but I am having a dickens of a time finding abalone shoes to match the dress.  Love, Emily From: Ann awoelflebater@... To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2013 6:08 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Alex--this is spam! to Ann Judy Ravi  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn wrote: Ravi, you just made my evening. àSo funny, you are. àShare, did you find this funny? àIs there hope that the equivalent of a wee dram of compatibility exists between the two of you? ààA word of caution here Emily. You are getting a tad close to what Barry regards as high school crap and if you aren't careful you may not be able to blow your nose. Or was it if you aren't smart enough dynamite will take the top of your head off? No, wait, I think he said if you blow your nose and brains come out you can't blame him. Damn, that can't be Wright, I mean right. You'll have to ask him what he said - I've got to go and figure out what I'm going to wear to the prom. From: Ravi Chivukula To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 4:11 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Alex--this is spam! to Ann Judy Ravi àAnd oh - Ravi Yogi was some loser who used to post here - any coincidence, resemblance to me is imaginary Oh no - not that Ravi Yogi - I loved him once and got burned. He represents something unknown, mysterious, dangerous, he's walking on razor's edge, he will go down and take me down as well. I'm vulnerable and don't want to be harmed - no matter if he changes names, shows me how he leads as normal life as any - he is trouble. There's great safety in numbers, in the cult - haven't you read the Guru Gita - the Guru is stable, predictable, consistent, poses no threat, challenge to me and will lead me across. No thank you, Ravi Yogi's crazy - not again, never. On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Ravi Chivukula wrote: Dear Share, Yay you are awesome - with your persistence I can clearly see I am very prejudiced and hold lots and lots of grudges, as thick as 6 inches of snow on the Fairfield dome, against you. My samskaras are fucked up, my aura too dense, my chakras totally polluted , karma - a big rap sheet, reincarnation - destined to the nether world, the abode of evil Rakshasaas. I'm sick Share - have pity on me for god's sake. I'm just waiting for the ascended masters to haul my sorry ass into the age of Enlightenment, till then I keep posting all kinds of cool quotes, pictures from Gandhi, Teresa on my Facebook page. And oh - Ravi Yogi was some loser who used to post here - any
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Alex--this is spam! to Ann Judy Ravi
Ah, selfless does sound like a compatible quality. I think Xeno was exhibiting acceptance of whatever. Smile. From: Ann awoelfleba...@yahoo.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2013 8:48 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Alex--this is spam! to Ann Judy Ravi --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn wrote: Barry?  Barry who? Look for the guy with the big callous on his right index finger. All that button pushing takes its toll.  Dear Ann, I'll have you know, I find you far more interesting and I've been laughing my ass off at you.  I particularly enjoy your exchanges with Share.  I can see that the two of you are moving closer and closer to compatibility. I do believe you may be correct here, dear Em, especially if by 'compatibl'e you mean more tolerant and willing to let a lot of things slide by unremarked upon. Although, now that Share and I both know how much Barry enjoys following our posts we may just have to keep pumping out the crap, for his sake you understand. Share and I are selfless like that.  The very nice thank you for your reply sounds like you are making good progress.  You are a hard case and a tough nut to crack, Ann, but someone is finally here to put you in your place and teach you a few manners. It's been tried before, with limited success. Hence, the lash marks.  You've been far too independent in your thought process; your sense of humor is much too irreverent.  Your insights lack both content and clarity and your manners, my dear, your manners. My mother, in all truthfulness, would be devastated to hear it (about the manners).  From where I sit, it is clear that the best descriptors around for your behavior include gratuitous, nasty, and overall -  negative.  Ann, there is a smidgen of hope for you, thanks be to God, but you must stop taking things so personally.  I'm not sure who here knows how to do that. Maybe Xeno could help me. Anyone who can listen to a potential terminal diagnosis and not take it personally can surely help me with my problems.  I think maybe Bob did, but I hear he is off traipsing through the Himalayas these days.  I'm rootin' for you Ann, I really am.  I hope you find the perfect prom dress that sets of your beautiful blue eyes with the perfect shade of lipstick to match and that you dance the night away in wild abandon. I would love to, I really would Emily but I am having a dickens of a time finding abalone shoes to match the dress.  Love, Emily From: Ann To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2013 6:08 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Alex--this is spam! to Ann Judy Ravi  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn wrote: Ravi, you just made my evening.  So funny, you are.  Share, did you find this funny?  Is there hope that the equivalent of a wee dram of compatibility exists between the two of you?   A word of caution here Emily. You are getting a tad close to what Barry regards as high school crap and if you aren't careful you may not be able to blow your nose. Or was it if you aren't smart enough dynamite will take the top of your head off? No, wait, I think he said if you blow your nose and brains come out you can't blame him. Damn, that can't be Wright, I mean right. You'll have to ask him what he said - I've got to go and figure out what I'm going to wear to the prom. From: Ravi Chivukula To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 4:11 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Alex--this is spam! to Ann Judy Ravi  And oh - Ravi Yogi was some loser who used to post here - any coincidence, resemblance to me is imaginary Oh no - not that Ravi Yogi - I loved him once and got burned. He represents something unknown, mysterious, dangerous, he's walking on razor's edge, he will go down and take me down as well. I'm vulnerable and don't want to be harmed - no matter if he changes names, shows me how he leads as normal life as any - he is trouble. There's great safety in numbers, in the cult - haven't you read the Guru Gita - the Guru is stable, predictable, consistent, poses no threat, challenge to me and will lead me across. No thank you, Ravi Yogi's crazy - not again, never. On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Ravi Chivukula wrote: Dear Share, Yay you are awesome - with your persistence I can clearly see I am very prejudiced and hold lots and lots of grudges, as thick as 6 inches of snow on the Fairfield dome, against you. My samskaras are fucked up, my aura too dense, my chakras totally polluted , karma - a big rap sheet, reincarnation - destined to the nether world, the abode of evil Rakshasaas. I'm sick Share - have
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Alex--this is spam! to Ann
I'll use the ex post as an example because it was the first one. I think you sent it right before your trip. Leaving it to the archivists of FFL I think you wrote: I wonder how he feels about being called ex. First of all there's an assumption that he knows he's being called ex. Which he didn't til I told him about this incident. Second of all there's an assumption that if he had known, he would have had a feeling about it. Finally there's an assumption that he would have had a negative feeling about it. Which is indirectly a negative assumption about me. All these assumptions of yours are revealed more clearly by what you say below: I asked if he minded being called an ex because to me that is so impersonal and does not indicate in any way feelings of fondness or closeness to that person. Exactly! This is the negative assumption you made about me. You did not make the correct and positive assumption. Which is I call him ex to avoid using his name to protect his privacy. I call him ex to avoid tediously writing ex intimate partner or ex significant other or ex pre fiance. But I did check with him because I am a really good person and though I know he would never in a bazillion years lurk on FFL, I didn't want to be doing something that might hurt him even on the quantum mechanical level (-: And I think he had as usual a good insight when he said that it sounded like I pushed one of your buttons. You say you've never been an ex. But maybe you have an issue about someone being impersonal about you. Or not feeling fondness or closeness with you. Natural enough. Just good to be clear that it's your issue. I don't mind when people disagree with me, etc. But when someone responds in a way that seems already prejudiced against me, then I'm not interested in engaging with that person. How is that beneficial to anyone? And certainly you sounded prejudiced against me in the ex instance and in what came after: your responses about planets and individual responsibility; women and competition; Xeno and his diagnosis. I do get your point about Norman churches. But even that seemed gratuitously confrontational on your part. I get that we all make assumptions about what's posted here. Seems the best we can do is make good guesses about someone's mindset based on their word choice, phraseology, etc. And track record. These 6 incidents listed below are your ONLY responses to my posts this year. So your track record from last year seems to be continuing. Again, this is NOT about my allegedly not liking people to disagree with me, challenge me, etc. This is about my not wanting to engage with people who sound prejudiced against and or as if they're carrying a grudge against me. Especially when they express this in a gratuitously confrontational and or nasty way. I believe you are beneficent towards others. I've seen that here. From: Ann awoelfleba...@yahoo.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 9:10 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Alex--this is spam! to Ann Judy Ravi I am going to reply to this just because you got so many things skewed and you misinterpreted so much of what I wrote and what I meant. It is for the record not, evidently, for you per se as you clearly do not want to interact and you seem to miss what I am about approximately 90% of the time. You were correct, you don't 'get' me. Probably through no fault of your own. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote: Ann, these examples of mine below have nothing to do with our disagreeing with each other. I don't think I said they were. Â They were all instances where I was exchanging with SOME OTHER FFL POSTER and you responded, leading with a negative attitude towards me. In your opinion. I am not actually negative in my feelings towards you, at least my interior experience is not one of negativity. It could be described more as trying to order what appears to me a disordered way of expressing oneself or thinking. Again, not your problem, merely my perception of you. Â For example, your assuming I'd call my ex ex if it bothered him. What??! How did you come up with THAT conclusion? Now THAT is a projection on me. I asked if he minded being called an ex because to me that is so impersonal and does not indicate in any way feelings of fondness or closeness to that person. I never indicated that you must be calling him your ex because you knew he disliked it. Â You also seem desperate to be negative about me when you leap on something casual I say, like you did with what I said about Norman churches in FF. Not desperate and not leap(ing). I don't get up in the morning salivating for your blood Share. You are not my reason for posting here and I don't look for ways to jump on you. Norman churches for me don't exist in North America just like Tudor houses don't
[FairfieldLife] Re: Alex--this is spam! to Ann
For the record, this kind of crap is *exactly* what I meant earlier by Junior High School mean girls fight- ing imaginary clique battles. *Both* Share and Ann have had ample opportunity to just let this crap drop, to cease and desist with this embarrassingly passive- aggressive dick-waving. But n. *Both* of them feel that their puny selves are so important that they have to prolong it. As those of us who actually moved on from Junior High School used to say back then, if brains were dynamite, neither of these women would have enough to blow their noses. And IMO that also goes for anyone who piles on to this pathetic argument-baiting in an attempt to perpetuate it. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@... wrote: I'll use the ex post as an example because it was the first one. I think you sent it right before your trip. Leaving it to the archivists of FFL I think you wrote: I wonder how he feels about being called ex. First of all there's an assumption that he knows he's being called ex. Which he didn't til I told him about this incident. Second of all there's an assumption that if he had known, he would have had a feeling about it. Finally there's an assumption that he would have had a negative feeling about it. Which is indirectly a negative assumption about me.   All these assumptions of yours are revealed more clearly by what you say below: I asked if he minded being called an ex because to me that is so impersonal and does not indicate in any way feelings of fondness or closeness to that person. Exactly! This is the negative assumption you made about me. You did not make the correct and positive assumption. Which is I call him ex to avoid using his name to protect his privacy. I call him ex to avoid tediously writing ex intimate partner or ex significant other or ex pre fiance. But I did check with him because I am a really good person and though I know he would never in a bazillion years lurk on FFL, I didn't want to be doing something that might hurt him even on the quantum mechanical level (-: And I think he had as usual a good insight when he said that it sounded like I pushed one of your buttons. You say you've never been an ex. But maybe you have an issue about someone being impersonal about you. Or not feeling fondness or closeness with you. Natural enough. Just good to be clear that it's your issue. I don't mind when people disagree with me, etc. But when someone responds in a way that seems already prejudiced against me, then I'm not interested in engaging with that person. How is that beneficial to anyone? And certainly you sounded prejudiced against me in the ex instance and in what came after: your responses about planets and individual responsibility; women and competition; Xeno and his diagnosis. I do get your point about Norman churches. But even that seemed gratuitously confrontational on your part. I get that we all make assumptions about what's posted here. Seems the best we can do is make good guesses about someone's mindset based on their word choice, phraseology, etc. And track record. These 6 incidents listed below are your ONLY responses to my posts this year. So your track record from last year seems to be continuing.   Again, this is NOT about my allegedly not liking people to disagree with me, challenge me, etc. This is about my not wanting to engage with people who sound prejudiced against and or as if they're carrying a grudge against me. Especially when they express this in a gratuitously confrontational and or nasty way. I believe you are beneficent towards others. I've seen that here. From: Ann awoelflebater@... To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 9:10 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Alex--this is spam! to Ann Judy Ravi  I am going to reply to this just because you got so many things skewed and you misinterpreted so much of what I wrote and what I meant. It is for the record not, evidently, for you per se as you clearly do not want to interact and you seem to miss what I am about approximately 90% of the time. You were correct, you don't 'get' me. Probably through no fault of your own. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote: Ann, these examples of mine below have nothing to do with our disagreeing with each other. I don't think I said they were. àThey were all instances where I was exchanging with SOME OTHER FFL POSTER and you responded, leading with a negative attitude towards me. In your opinion. I am not actually negative in my feelings towards you, at least my interior experience is not one of negativity. It could be described more as trying to order what appears to me a disordered way of expressing oneself or thinking. Again
[FairfieldLife] Re: Alex--this is spam! to Ann
What's fascinating is Barry's absolute obliviousness to the fact that every one of his eight posts so far today has been a demonstration of his own compulsion to wave his dick. And he doesn't even need for anybody to wave their dick at him to inspire him to wave his own. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@... wrote: For the record, this kind of crap is *exactly* what I meant earlier by Junior High School mean girls fight- ing imaginary clique battles. *Both* Share and Ann have had ample opportunity to just let this crap drop, to cease and desist with this embarrassingly passive- aggressive dick-waving. But n. *Both* of them feel that their puny selves are so important that they have to prolong it. As those of us who actually moved on from Junior High School used to say back then, if brains were dynamite, neither of these women would have enough to blow their noses. And IMO that also goes for anyone who piles on to this pathetic argument-baiting in an attempt to perpetuate it. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@ wrote: I'll use the ex post as an example because it was the first one. I think you sent it right before your trip. Leaving it to the archivists of FFL I think you wrote: I wonder how he feels about being called ex. First of all there's an assumption that he knows he's being called ex. Which he didn't til I told him about this incident. Second of all there's an assumption that if he had known, he would have had a feeling about it. Finally there's an assumption that he would have had a negative feeling about it. Which is indirectly a negative assumption about me.   All these assumptions of yours are revealed more clearly by what you say below: I asked if he minded being called an ex because to me that is so impersonal and does not indicate in any way feelings of fondness or closeness to that person. Exactly! This is the negative assumption you made about me. You did not make the correct and positive assumption. Which is I call him ex to avoid using his name to protect his privacy. I call him ex to avoid tediously writing ex intimate partner or ex significant other or ex pre fiance. But I did check with him because I am a really good person and though I know he would never in a bazillion years lurk on FFL, I didn't want to be doing something that might hurt him even on the quantum mechanical level (-: And I think he had as usual a good insight when he said that it sounded like I pushed one of your buttons. You say you've never been an ex. But maybe you have an issue about someone being impersonal about you. Or not feeling fondness or closeness with you. Natural enough. Just good to be clear that it's your issue. I don't mind when people disagree with me, etc. But when someone responds in a way that seems already prejudiced against me, then I'm not interested in engaging with that person. How is that beneficial to anyone? And certainly you sounded prejudiced against me in the ex instance and in what came after: your responses about planets and individual responsibility; women and competition; Xeno and his diagnosis. I do get your point about Norman churches. But even that seemed gratuitously confrontational on your part. I get that we all make assumptions about what's posted here. Seems the best we can do is make good guesses about someone's mindset based on their word choice, phraseology, etc. And track record. These 6 incidents listed below are your ONLY responses to my posts this year. So your track record from last year seems to be continuing.   Again, this is NOT about my allegedly not liking people to disagree with me, challenge me, etc. This is about my not wanting to engage with people who sound prejudiced against and or as if they're carrying a grudge against me. Especially when they express this in a gratuitously confrontational and or nasty way. I believe you are beneficent towards others. I've seen that here. From: Ann awoelflebater@ To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 9:10 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Alex--this is spam! to Ann Judy Ravi  I am going to reply to this just because you got so many things skewed and you misinterpreted so much of what I wrote and what I meant. It is for the record not, evidently, for you per se as you clearly do not want to interact and you seem to miss what I am about approximately 90% of the time. You were correct, you don't 'get' me. Probably through no fault of your own. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote: Ann, these examples of mine below have nothing to do with our disagreeing with each other. I don't
[FairfieldLife] Re: Alex--this is spam! to Ann
What I can't figure out is why you bother to read our crap. I mean, it isn't like you don't know what you are clicking on to read when you see who posted something and what the message line is. Move on, there's nothing to see. Now carry on holding court. There must be a couple of people here who hang on your every word, even if we have to count you as one of them. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@... wrote: For the record, this kind of crap is *exactly* what I meant earlier by Junior High School mean girls fight- ing imaginary clique battles. *Both* Share and Ann have had ample opportunity to just let this crap drop, to cease and desist with this embarrassingly passive- aggressive dick-waving. But n. *Both* of them feel that their puny selves are so important that they have to prolong it. As those of us who actually moved on from Junior High School used to say back then, if brains were dynamite, neither of these women would have enough to blow their noses. And IMO that also goes for anyone who piles on to this pathetic argument-baiting in an attempt to perpetuate it. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@ wrote: I'll use the ex post as an example because it was the first one. I think you sent it right before your trip. Leaving it to the archivists of FFL I think you wrote: I wonder how he feels about being called ex. First of all there's an assumption that he knows he's being called ex. Which he didn't til I told him about this incident. Second of all there's an assumption that if he had known, he would have had a feeling about it. Finally there's an assumption that he would have had a negative feeling about it. Which is indirectly a negative assumption about me.   All these assumptions of yours are revealed more clearly by what you say below: I asked if he minded being called an ex because to me that is so impersonal and does not indicate in any way feelings of fondness or closeness to that person. Exactly! This is the negative assumption you made about me. You did not make the correct and positive assumption. Which is I call him ex to avoid using his name to protect his privacy. I call him ex to avoid tediously writing ex intimate partner or ex significant other or ex pre fiance. But I did check with him because I am a really good person and though I know he would never in a bazillion years lurk on FFL, I didn't want to be doing something that might hurt him even on the quantum mechanical level (-: And I think he had as usual a good insight when he said that it sounded like I pushed one of your buttons. You say you've never been an ex. But maybe you have an issue about someone being impersonal about you. Or not feeling fondness or closeness with you. Natural enough. Just good to be clear that it's your issue. I don't mind when people disagree with me, etc. But when someone responds in a way that seems already prejudiced against me, then I'm not interested in engaging with that person. How is that beneficial to anyone? And certainly you sounded prejudiced against me in the ex instance and in what came after: your responses about planets and individual responsibility; women and competition; Xeno and his diagnosis. I do get your point about Norman churches. But even that seemed gratuitously confrontational on your part. I get that we all make assumptions about what's posted here. Seems the best we can do is make good guesses about someone's mindset based on their word choice, phraseology, etc. And track record. These 6 incidents listed below are your ONLY responses to my posts this year. So your track record from last year seems to be continuing.   Again, this is NOT about my allegedly not liking people to disagree with me, challenge me, etc. This is about my not wanting to engage with people who sound prejudiced against and or as if they're carrying a grudge against me. Especially when they express this in a gratuitously confrontational and or nasty way. I believe you are beneficent towards others. I've seen that here. From: Ann awoelflebater@ To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 9:10 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Alex--this is spam! to Ann Judy Ravi  I am going to reply to this just because you got so many things skewed and you misinterpreted so much of what I wrote and what I meant. It is for the record not, evidently, for you per se as you clearly do not want to interact and you seem to miss what I am about approximately 90% of the time. You were correct, you don't 'get' me. Probably through no fault of your own. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote: Ann
[FairfieldLife] Re: Alex--this is spam! to Ann
Thanks for your reply. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@... wrote: I'll use the ex post as an example because it was the first one. I think you sent it right before your trip. Leaving it to the archivists of FFL I think you wrote: I wonder how he feels about being called ex. First of all there's an assumption that he knows he's being called ex. Which he didn't til I told him about this incident. Second of all there's an assumption that if he had known, he would have had a feeling about it. Finally there's an assumption that he would have had a negative feeling about it. Which is indirectly a negative assumption about me.   All these assumptions of yours are revealed more clearly by what you say below: I asked if he minded being called an ex because to me that is so impersonal and does not indicate in any way feelings of fondness or closeness to that person. Exactly! This is the negative assumption you made about me. You did not make the correct and positive assumption. Which is I call him ex to avoid using his name to protect his privacy. I call him ex to avoid tediously writing ex intimate partner or ex significant other or ex pre fiance. But I did check with him because I am a really good person and though I know he would never in a bazillion years lurk on FFL, I didn't want to be doing something that might hurt him even on the quantum mechanical level (-: And I think he had as usual a good insight when he said that it sounded like I pushed one of your buttons. You say you've never been an ex. But maybe you have an issue about someone being impersonal about you. Or not feeling fondness or closeness with you. Natural enough. Just good to be clear that it's your issue. I don't mind when people disagree with me, etc. But when someone responds in a way that seems already prejudiced against me, then I'm not interested in engaging with that person. How is that beneficial to anyone? And certainly you sounded prejudiced against me in the ex instance and in what came after: your responses about planets and individual responsibility; women and competition; Xeno and his diagnosis. I do get your point about Norman churches. But even that seemed gratuitously confrontational on your part. I get that we all make assumptions about what's posted here. Seems the best we can do is make good guesses about someone's mindset based on their word choice, phraseology, etc. And track record. These 6 incidents listed below are your ONLY responses to my posts this year. So your track record from last year seems to be continuing.   Again, this is NOT about my allegedly not liking people to disagree with me, challenge me, etc. This is about my not wanting to engage with people who sound prejudiced against and or as if they're carrying a grudge against me. Especially when they express this in a gratuitously confrontational and or nasty way. I believe you are beneficent towards others. I've seen that here. From: Ann awoelflebater@... To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 9:10 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Alex--this is spam! to Ann Judy Ravi  I am going to reply to this just because you got so many things skewed and you misinterpreted so much of what I wrote and what I meant. It is for the record not, evidently, for you per se as you clearly do not want to interact and you seem to miss what I am about approximately 90% of the time. You were correct, you don't 'get' me. Probably through no fault of your own. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote: Ann, these examples of mine below have nothing to do with our disagreeing with each other. I don't think I said they were. àThey were all instances where I was exchanging with SOME OTHER FFL POSTER and you responded, leading with a negative attitude towards me. In your opinion. I am not actually negative in my feelings towards you, at least my interior experience is not one of negativity. It could be described more as trying to order what appears to me a disordered way of expressing oneself or thinking. Again, not your problem, merely my perception of you. àFor example, your assuming I'd call my ex ex if it bothered him. What??! How did you come up with THAT conclusion? Now THAT is a projection on me. I asked if he minded being called an ex because to me that is so impersonal and does not indicate in any way feelings of fondness or closeness to that person. I never indicated that you must be calling him your ex because you knew he disliked it. àYou also seem desperate to be negative about me when you leap on something casual I say, like you did with what I said about Norman churches in FF. Not desperate and not leap
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Alex--this is spam! to Ann Judy Ravi
Ravi, you just made my evening. So funny, you are. Share, did you find this funny? Is there hope that the equivalent of a wee dram of compatibility exists between the two of you? From: Ravi Chivukula chivukula.r...@gmail.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 4:11 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Alex--this is spam! to Ann Judy Ravi And oh - Ravi Yogi was some loser who used to post here - any coincidence, resemblance to me is imaginary Oh no - not that Ravi Yogi - I loved him once and got burned. He represents something unknown, mysterious, dangerous, he's walking on razor's edge, he will go down and take me down as well. I'm vulnerable and don't want to be harmed - no matter if he changes names, shows me how he leads as normal life as any - he is trouble. There's great safety in numbers, in the cult - haven't you read the Guru Gita - the Guru is stable, predictable, consistent, poses no threat, challenge to me and will lead me across. No thank you, Ravi Yogi's crazy - not again, never. On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.r...@gmail.com wrote: Dear Share, Yay you are awesome - with your persistence I can clearly see I am very prejudiced and hold lots and lots of grudges, as thick as 6 inches of snow on the Fairfield dome, against you. My samskaras are fucked up, my aura too dense, my chakras totally polluted , karma - a big rap sheet, reincarnation - destined to the nether world, the abode of evil Rakshasaas. I'm sick Share - have pity on me for god's sake. I'm just waiting for the ascended masters to haul my sorry ass into the age of Enlightenment, till then I keep posting all kinds of cool quotes, pictures from Gandhi, Teresa on my Facebook page. And oh - Ravi Yogi was some loser who used to post here - any coincidence, resemblance to me is imaginary. Love, Ravi On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com wrote: Ann, these examples of mine below have nothing to do with our disagreeing with each other. They were all instances where I was exchanging with SOME OTHER FFL POSTER and you responded, leading with a negative attitude towards me. For example, your assuming I'd call my ex ex if it bothered him. You also seem desperate to be negative about me when you leap on something casual I say, like you did with what I said about Norman churches in FF. Even Judy responded to you about that. Twice. That's when I realized how desperate you are to see me in a negative way and that is why I have avoided you. I'm not interested in dealing with your prejudices about me. Even today, you made fun of Mr. Leed for missing the humor of my post to Buck this morning. But you missed it too, didn't you? When you said: wouldn't a true sidha be able to walk to the Dome, etc. Again, this is just you seeing me and writing about me in a negative way. By the way, I noticed you didn't criticize Steve for taking up for you recently in Jan. No making fun of him for being a knight on a white horse coming to the aid of a damsel in distress. Which is what you used to do when he came to my defense. Remember? So it's ok when he comes to your defense but not when he comes to mine? Why is that? I've accepted that we're not compatible and I'm happy to not interact with you. And you don't seem to enjoy what I have to say, even when it's to other posters. So I wonder why you have kept trying to start an interaction with me this year. Especially since it seems you've already come to a negative conclusion about me and or what's in my post. Which is your right of course. But generally I won't be participating in such. There are more enjoyable and or enriching exchanges to be had on FFL. to Judy: when I said Steve recently supported Ann, I was including January 2013. I'm pretty sure I did not reply to Ann before your reply to feste. In any case, I didn't BLAME her for not getting me. That's your spin on it. I skimmed Steve's post to Ravi and missed the bit about Ravi Yogi whose name I wouldn't have recognized anyway. I was talking about turq being ganged up on, not me. I'm not willing to be vulnerable with people who are prejudiced and or holding a grudge against me. You are of course entitled to your opinions about me and my posts. to Ravi: I wasn't thinking of you when I wrote my reply to Steve. Nor did I at that time even know who Ravi Yogi is. Actually I skimmed Steve's post so didn't register his reference to Ravi Yogi at all. You are of course entitled to your opinions about me and what I post. However, as long as it sounds to me as if you're still prejudiced against me and or carrying a grudge, I will more than likely not reply to your posts. But I wish you and your family all the best in everything. From: Ann awoelfleba...@yahoo.com To: FairfieldLife
[FairfieldLife] Re: Alex--this is spam! to Ann Judy Ravi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn emilymae.reyn@... wrote: Ravi, you just made my evening.  So funny, you are.  Share, did you find this funny?  Is there hope that the equivalent of a wee dram of compatibility exists between the two of you?   A word of caution here Emily. You are getting a tad close to what Barry regards as high school crap and if you aren't careful you may not be able to blow your nose. Or was it if you aren't smart enough dynamite will take the top of your head off? No, wait, I think he said if you blow your nose and brains come out you can't blame him. Damn, that can't be Wright, I mean right. You'll have to ask him what he said - I've got to go and figure out what I'm going to wear to the prom. From: Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@... To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 4:11 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Alex--this is spam! to Ann Judy Ravi  And oh - Ravi Yogi was some loser who used to post here - any coincidence, resemblance to me is imaginary Oh no - not that Ravi Yogi - I loved him once and got burned. He represents something unknown, mysterious, dangerous, he's walking on razor's edge, he will go down and take me down as well. I'm vulnerable and don't want to be harmed - no matter if he changes names, shows me how he leads as normal life as any - he is trouble. There's great safety in numbers, in the cult - haven't you read the Guru Gita - the Guru is stable, predictable, consistent, poses no threat, challenge to me and will lead me across. No thank you, Ravi Yogi's crazy - not again, never. On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@... wrote: Dear Share, Yay you are awesome - with your persistence I can clearly see I am very prejudiced and hold lots and lots of grudges, as thick as 6 inches of snow on the Fairfield dome, against you. My samskaras are fucked up, my aura too dense, my chakras totally polluted , karma - a big rap sheet, reincarnation - destined to the nether world, the abode of evil Rakshasaas. I'm sick Share - have pity on me for god's sake. I'm just waiting for the ascended masters to haul my sorry ass into the age of Enlightenment, till then I keep posting all kinds of cool quotes, pictures from Gandhi, Teresa on my Facebook page. And oh - Ravi Yogi was some loser who used to post here - any coincidence, resemblance to me is imaginary. Love, Ravi On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Share Long sharelong60@... wrote:  Ann, these examples of mine below have nothing to do with our disagreeing with each other. They were all instances where I was exchanging with SOME OTHER FFL POSTER and you responded, leading with a negative attitude towards me. For example, your assuming I'd call my ex ex if it bothered him. You also seem desperate to be negative about me when you leap on something casual I say, like you did with what I said about Norman churches in FF. Even Judy responded to you about that. Twice. That's when I realized how desperate you are to see me in a negative way and that is why I have avoided you. I'm not interested in dealing with your prejudices about me. Even today, you made fun of Mr. Leed for missing the humor of my post to Buck this morning. But you missed it too, didn't you? When you said: wouldn't a true sidha be able to walk to the Dome, etc. Again, this is just you seeing me and writing about me in a negative way. By the way, I noticed you didn't criticize Steve for taking up for you recently in Jan. No making fun of him for being a knight on a white horse coming to the aid of a damsel in distress. Which is what you used to do when he came to my defense. Remember? So it's ok when he comes to your defense but not when he comes to mine? Why is that? I've accepted that we're not compatible and I'm happy to not interact with you. And you don't seem to enjoy what I have to say, even when it's to other posters. So I wonder why you have kept trying to start an interaction with me this year. Especially since it seems you've already come to a negative conclusion about me and or what's in my post. Which is your right of course. But generally I won't be participating in such. There are more enjoyable and or enriching exchanges to be had on FFL.    to Judy: when I said Steve recently supported Ann, I was including January 2013. I'm pretty sure I did not reply to Ann before your reply to feste. In any case, I didn't BLAME her for not getting me. That's your spin on it. I skimmed Steve's post to Ravi and missed the bit about Ravi Yogi whose name I wouldn't have recognized anyway. I was talking about turq being ganged up on, not me. I'm not willing to be vulnerable with people who are prejudiced
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Alex--this is spam! to Ann Judy Ravi
Thank you dear Em, out skiing again - I will head to Reno, gamble a bit and then go home tonight - nowhere else I promise :-) Love, Ravi On Feb 23, 2013, at 5:52 PM, Emily Reyn emilymae.r...@yahoo.com wrote: Ravi, you just made my evening. So funny, you are. Share, did you find this funny? Is there hope that the equivalent of a wee dram of compatibility exists between the two of you? From: Ravi Chivukula chivukula.r...@gmail.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 4:11 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Alex--this is spam! to Ann Judy Ravi And oh - Ravi Yogi was some loser who used to post here - any coincidence, resemblance to me is imaginary Oh no - not that Ravi Yogi - I loved him once and got burned. He represents something unknown, mysterious, dangerous, he's walking on razor's edge, he will go down and take me down as well. I'm vulnerable and don't want to be harmed - no matter if he changes names, shows me how he leads as normal life as any - he is trouble. There's great safety in numbers, in the cult - haven't you read the Guru Gita - the Guru is stable, predictable, consistent, poses no threat, challenge to me and will lead me across. No thank you, Ravi Yogi's crazy - not again, never. On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.r...@gmail.com wrote: Dear Share, Yay you are awesome - with your persistence I can clearly see I am very prejudiced and hold lots and lots of grudges, as thick as 6 inches of snow on the Fairfield dome, against you. My samskaras are fucked up, my aura too dense, my chakras totally polluted , karma - a big rap sheet, reincarnation - destined to the nether world, the abode of evil Rakshasaas. I'm sick Share - have pity on me for god's sake. I'm just waiting for the ascended masters to haul my sorry ass into the age of Enlightenment, till then I keep posting all kinds of cool quotes, pictures from Gandhi, Teresa on my Facebook page. And oh - Ravi Yogi was some loser who used to post here - any coincidence, resemblance to me is imaginary. Love, Ravi On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com wrote: Ann, these examples of mine below have nothing to do with our disagreeing with each other. They were all instances where I was exchanging with SOME OTHER FFL POSTER and you responded, leading with a negative attitude towards me. For example, your assuming I'd call my ex ex if it bothered him. You also seem desperate to be negative about me when you leap on something casual I say, like you did with what I said about Norman churches in FF. Even Judy responded to you about that. Twice. That's when I realized how desperate you are to see me in a negative way and that is why I have avoided you. I'm not interested in dealing with your prejudices about me. Even today, you made fun of Mr. Leed for missing the humor of my post to Buck this morning. But you missed it too, didn't you? When you said: wouldn't a true sidha be able to walk to the Dome, etc. Again, this is just you seeing me and writing about me in a negative way. By the way, I noticed you didn't criticize Steve for taking up for you recently in Jan. No making fun of him for being a knight on a white horse coming to the aid of a damsel in distress. Which is what you used to do when he came to my defense. Remember? So it's ok when he comes to your defense but not when he comes to mine? Why is that? I've accepted that we're not compatible and I'm happy to not interact with you. And you don't seem to enjoy what I have to say, even when it's to other posters. So I wonder why you have kept trying to start an interaction with me this year. Especially since it seems you've already come to a negative conclusion about me and or what's in my post. Which is your right of course. But generally I won't be participating in such. There are more enjoyable and or enriching exchanges to be had on FFL. to Judy: when I said Steve recently supported Ann, I was including January 2013. I'm pretty sure I did not reply to Ann before your reply to feste. In any case, I didn't BLAME her for not getting me. That's your spin on it. I skimmed Steve's post to Ravi and missed the bit about Ravi Yogi whose name I wouldn't have recognized anyway. I was talking about turq being ganged up on, not me. I'm not willing to be vulnerable with people who are prejudiced and or holding a grudge against me. You are of course entitled to your opinions about me and my posts. to Ravi: I wasn't thinking of you when I wrote my reply to Steve. Nor did I at that time even know who Ravi Yogi is. Actually I skimmed Steve's post so didn't register his reference to Ravi Yogi at all. You are of course entitled to your opinions about me and what I post. However, as long as it sounds to me as if you're still
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Alex--this is spam! to Ann Judy Ravi
Oh and dear Em my situation seems to be more hopeless than the one I presented here. I was hoping my Brahmin ancestors would bail me out but there's no hope there either because I ate chicken both times I have skied since I found that easier to maintain my energy levels back up, eating meat after 17 years. But then again I have heard rumors that even God may be afraid of my yogi style confrontations and there's a deal in progress that would be presented to me upon my death - 144 virgins and 2 lifetimes of eternity - whatever the heck that means. So yeah there's hope after death. Love, Ravi On Feb 23, 2013, at 6:16 PM, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.r...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you dear Em, out skiing again - I will head to Reno, gamble a bit and then go home tonight - nowhere else I promise :-) Love, Ravi On Feb 23, 2013, at 5:52 PM, Emily Reyn emilymae.r...@yahoo.com wrote: Ravi, you just made my evening. So funny, you are. Share, did you find this funny? Is there hope that the equivalent of a wee dram of compatibility exists between the two of you? From: Ravi Chivukula chivukula.r...@gmail.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 4:11 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Alex--this is spam! to Ann Judy Ravi And oh - Ravi Yogi was some loser who used to post here - any coincidence, resemblance to me is imaginary Oh no - not that Ravi Yogi - I loved him once and got burned. He represents something unknown, mysterious, dangerous, he's walking on razor's edge, he will go down and take me down as well. I'm vulnerable and don't want to be harmed - no matter if he changes names, shows me how he leads as normal life as any - he is trouble. There's great safety in numbers, in the cult - haven't you read the Guru Gita - the Guru is stable, predictable, consistent, poses no threat, challenge to me and will lead me across. No thank you, Ravi Yogi's crazy - not again, never. On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.r...@gmail.com wrote: Dear Share, Yay you are awesome - with your persistence I can clearly see I am very prejudiced and hold lots and lots of grudges, as thick as 6 inches of snow on the Fairfield dome, against you. My samskaras are fucked up, my aura too dense, my chakras totally polluted , karma - a big rap sheet, reincarnation - destined to the nether world, the abode of evil Rakshasaas. I'm sick Share - have pity on me for god's sake. I'm just waiting for the ascended masters to haul my sorry ass into the age of Enlightenment, till then I keep posting all kinds of cool quotes, pictures from Gandhi, Teresa on my Facebook page. And oh - Ravi Yogi was some loser who used to post here - any coincidence, resemblance to me is imaginary. Love, Ravi On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com wrote: Ann, these examples of mine below have nothing to do with our disagreeing with each other. They were all instances where I was exchanging with SOME OTHER FFL POSTER and you responded, leading with a negative attitude towards me. For example, your assuming I'd call my ex ex if it bothered him. You also seem desperate to be negative about me when you leap on something casual I say, like you did with what I said about Norman churches in FF. Even Judy responded to you about that. Twice. That's when I realized how desperate you are to see me in a negative way and that is why I have avoided you. I'm not interested in dealing with your prejudices about me. Even today, you made fun of Mr. Leed for missing the humor of my post to Buck this morning. But you missed it too, didn't you? When you said: wouldn't a true sidha be able to walk to the Dome, etc. Again, this is just you seeing me and writing about me in a negative way. By the way, I noticed you didn't criticize Steve for taking up for you recently in Jan. No making fun of him for being a knight on a white horse coming to the aid of a damsel in distress. Which is what you used to do when he came to my defense. Remember? So it's ok when he comes to your defense but not when he comes to mine? Why is that? I've accepted that we're not compatible and I'm happy to not interact with you. And you don't seem to enjoy what I have to say, even when it's to other posters. So I wonder why you have kept trying to start an interaction with me this year. Especially since it seems you've already come to a negative conclusion about me and or what's in my post. Which is your right of course. But generally I won't be participating in such. There are more enjoyable and or enriching exchanges to be had on FFL. to Judy: when I said Steve recently supported Ann, I was including January 2013. I'm pretty sure I did not reply to Ann before your reply to feste. In any case, I didn't BLAME her for not getting me. That's your spin
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Alex--this is spam! to Ann Judy Ravi
On Feb 23, 2013, at 6:37 PM, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.r...@gmail.com wrote: Oh and dear Em my situation seems to be more hopeless than the one I presented here. I was hoping my Brahmin ancestors would bail me out but there's no hope there either because I ate chicken both times I have skied since I found that easier to maintain my energy levels back up, eating meat after 17 years. But then again I have heard rumors that even God may be afraid of my yogi style confrontations and there's a deal in progress that would be presented to me upon my death - 144 virgins and 2 lifetimes of eternity - whatever the heck that means. So yeah there's hope after death. Love, Ravi As a note of caution I will be quite happy with 108 virgins and I am quite willing to sacrifice 36 to honor my Hindu beliefs. I'm sure God would be quite happy to hear this. On Feb 23, 2013, at 6:16 PM, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.r...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you dear Em, out skiing again - I will head to Reno, gamble a bit and then go home tonight - nowhere else I promise :-) Love, Ravi On Feb 23, 2013, at 5:52 PM, Emily Reyn emilymae.r...@yahoo.com wrote: Ravi, you just made my evening. So funny, you are. Share, did you find this funny? Is there hope that the equivalent of a wee dram of compatibility exists between the two of you? From: Ravi Chivukula chivukula.r...@gmail.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 4:11 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Alex--this is spam! to Ann Judy Ravi And oh - Ravi Yogi was some loser who used to post here - any coincidence, resemblance to me is imaginary Oh no - not that Ravi Yogi - I loved him once and got burned. He represents something unknown, mysterious, dangerous, he's walking on razor's edge, he will go down and take me down as well. I'm vulnerable and don't want to be harmed - no matter if he changes names, shows me how he leads as normal life as any - he is trouble. There's great safety in numbers, in the cult - haven't you read the Guru Gita - the Guru is stable, predictable, consistent, poses no threat, challenge to me and will lead me across. No thank you, Ravi Yogi's crazy - not again, never. On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.r...@gmail.com wrote: Dear Share, Yay you are awesome - with your persistence I can clearly see I am very prejudiced and hold lots and lots of grudges, as thick as 6 inches of snow on the Fairfield dome, against you. My samskaras are fucked up, my aura too dense, my chakras totally polluted , karma - a big rap sheet, reincarnation - destined to the nether world, the abode of evil Rakshasaas. I'm sick Share - have pity on me for god's sake. I'm just waiting for the ascended masters to haul my sorry ass into the age of Enlightenment, till then I keep posting all kinds of cool quotes, pictures from Gandhi, Teresa on my Facebook page. And oh - Ravi Yogi was some loser who used to post here - any coincidence, resemblance to me is imaginary. Love, Ravi On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com wrote: Ann, these examples of mine below have nothing to do with our disagreeing with each other. They were all instances where I was exchanging with SOME OTHER FFL POSTER and you responded, leading with a negative attitude towards me. For example, your assuming I'd call my ex ex if it bothered him. You also seem desperate to be negative about me when you leap on something casual I say, like you did with what I said about Norman churches in FF. Even Judy responded to you about that. Twice. That's when I realized how desperate you are to see me in a negative way and that is why I have avoided you. I'm not interested in dealing with your prejudices about me. Even today, you made fun of Mr. Leed for missing the humor of my post to Buck this morning. But you missed it too, didn't you? When you said: wouldn't a true sidha be able to walk to the Dome, etc. Again, this is just you seeing me and writing about me in a negative way. By the way, I noticed you didn't criticize Steve for taking up for you recently in Jan. No making fun of him for being a knight on a white horse coming to the aid of a damsel in distress. Which is what you used to do when he came to my defense. Remember? So it's ok when he comes to your defense but not when he comes to mine? Why is that? I've accepted that we're not compatible and I'm happy to not interact with you. And you don't seem to enjoy what I have to say, even when it's to other posters. So I wonder why you have kept trying to start an interaction with me this year. Especially since it seems you've already come to a negative conclusion about me and or what's in my post. Which is your right of course. But generally I won't be participating in such. There are more enjoyable
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Alex--this is spam! to Ann Judy Ravi
I don't know Ravi, I've heard virgins are overrated. Just something I've heard, never had one myself. I approve of your spending Saturday skiing and gambling. If you are in the phase of skiing where you need to be concentrating mightily to avoid bailing (as in, he bailed and landed on his head), a little meat now and then will help your brain. The goal, Ravi, is to never lean back; lean out over the mountain at all times and learn how to use your edges. I've been to Reno, although not for many years. My sister's boyfriend won 600 bucks at video poker there once, so we went to a nice dinner. I tried to learn craps, as I recall. I am always up for a confrontation Ravi, if you need to sow your wild oats. You will *win* of course, because I'm a bit slow on the uptake, but I do like to *win*, and I'm not above playing dirty and nasty to do it. Love, Emily From: Ravi Chivukula chivukula.r...@gmail.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2013 7:01 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Alex--this is spam! to Ann Judy Ravi On Feb 23, 2013, at 6:37 PM, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.r...@gmail.com wrote: Oh and dear Em my situation seems to be more hopeless than the one I presented here. I was hoping my Brahmin ancestors would bail me out but there's no hope there either because I ate chicken both times I have skied since I found that easier to maintain my energy levels back up, eating meat after 17 years. But then again I have heard rumors that even God may be afraid of my yogi style confrontations and there's a deal in progress that would be presented to me upon my death - 144 virgins and 2 lifetimes of eternity - whatever the heck that means. So yeah there's hope after death. Love, Ravi As a note of caution I will be quite happy with 108 virgins and I am quite willing to sacrifice 36 to honor my Hindu beliefs. I'm sure God would be quite happy to hear this. On Feb 23, 2013, at 6:16 PM, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.r...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you dear Em, out skiing again - I will head to Reno, gamble a bit and then go home tonight - nowhere else I promise :-) Love, Ravi On Feb 23, 2013, at 5:52 PM, Emily Reyn emilymae.r...@yahoo.com wrote: Ravi, you just made my evening. So funny, you are. Share, did you find this funny? Is there hope that the equivalent of a wee dram of compatibility exists between the two of you? From: Ravi Chivukula chivukula.r...@gmail.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 4:11 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Alex--this is spam! to Ann Judy Ravi And oh - Ravi Yogi was some loser who used to post here - any coincidence, resemblance to me is imaginary Oh no - not that Ravi Yogi - I loved him once and got burned. He represents something unknown, mysterious, dangerous, he's walking on razor's edge, he will go down and take me down as well. I'm vulnerable and don't want to be harmed - no matter if he changes names, shows me how he leads as normal life as any - he is trouble. There's great safety in numbers, in the cult - haven't you read the Guru Gita - the Guru is stable, predictable, consistent, poses no threat, challenge to me and will lead me across. No thank you, Ravi Yogi's crazy - not again, never. On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.r...@gmail.com wrote: Dear Share, Yay you are awesome - with your persistence I can clearly see I am very prejudiced and hold lots and lots of grudges, as thick as 6 inches of snow on the Fairfield dome, against you. My samskaras are fucked up, my aura too dense, my chakras totally polluted , karma - a big rap sheet, reincarnation - destined to the nether world, the abode of evil Rakshasaas. I'm sick Share - have pity on me for god's sake. I'm just waiting for the ascended masters to haul my sorry ass into the age of Enlightenment, till then I keep posting all kinds of cool quotes, pictures from Gandhi, Teresa on my Facebook page. And oh - Ravi Yogi was some loser who used to post here - any coincidence, resemblance to me is imaginary. Love, Ravi On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com wrote: Ann, these examples of mine below have nothing to do with our disagreeing with each other. They were all instances where I was exchanging with SOME OTHER FFL POSTER and you responded, leading with a negative attitude towards me. For example, your assuming I'd call my ex ex if it bothered him. You also seem desperate to be negative about me when you leap on something casual I say, like you did with what I said about Norman churches in FF. Even Judy responded to you about that. Twice. That's when I realized how desperate you are to see me in a negative way and that is why I have avoided you. I'm not interested in dealing with your prejudices
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Alex--this is spam! to Ann Judy Ravi
Barry? Barry who? Dear Ann, I'll have you know, I find you far more interesting and I've been laughing my ass off at you. I particularly enjoy your exchanges with Share. I can see that the two of you are moving closer and closer to compatibility. The very nice thank you for your reply sounds like you are making good progress. You are a hard case and a tough nut to crack, Ann, but someone is finally here to put you in your place and teach you a few manners. You've been far too independent in your thought process; your sense of humor is much too irreverent. Your insights lack both content and clarity and your manners, my dear, your manners. From where I sit, it is clear that the best descriptors around for your behavior include gratuitous, nasty, and overall - negative. Ann, there is a smidgen of hope for you, thanks be to God, but you must stop taking things so personally. I'm not sure who here knows how to do that. I think maybe Bob did, but I hear he is off traipsing through the Himalayas these days. I'm rootin' for you Ann, I really am. I hope you find the perfect prom dress that sets of your beautiful blue eyes with the perfect shade of lipstick to match and that you dance the night away in wild abandon. Love, Emily From: Ann awoelfleba...@yahoo.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2013 6:08 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Alex--this is spam! to Ann Judy Ravi --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn wrote: Ravi, you just made my evening.  So funny, you are.  Share, did you find this funny?  Is there hope that the equivalent of a wee dram of compatibility exists between the two of you?   A word of caution here Emily. You are getting a tad close to what Barry regards as high school crap and if you aren't careful you may not be able to blow your nose. Or was it if you aren't smart enough dynamite will take the top of your head off? No, wait, I think he said if you blow your nose and brains come out you can't blame him. Damn, that can't be Wright, I mean right. You'll have to ask him what he said - I've got to go and figure out what I'm going to wear to the prom. From: Ravi Chivukula To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 4:11 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Alex--this is spam! to Ann Judy Ravi  And oh - Ravi Yogi was some loser who used to post here - any coincidence, resemblance to me is imaginary Oh no - not that Ravi Yogi - I loved him once and got burned. He represents something unknown, mysterious, dangerous, he's walking on razor's edge, he will go down and take me down as well. I'm vulnerable and don't want to be harmed - no matter if he changes names, shows me how he leads as normal life as any - he is trouble. There's great safety in numbers, in the cult - haven't you read the Guru Gita - the Guru is stable, predictable, consistent, poses no threat, challenge to me and will lead me across. No thank you, Ravi Yogi's crazy - not again, never. On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Ravi Chivukula wrote: Dear Share, Yay you are awesome - with your persistence I can clearly see I am very prejudiced and hold lots and lots of grudges, as thick as 6 inches of snow on the Fairfield dome, against you. My samskaras are fucked up, my aura too dense, my chakras totally polluted , karma - a big rap sheet, reincarnation - destined to the nether world, the abode of evil Rakshasaas. I'm sick Share - have pity on me for god's sake. I'm just waiting for the ascended masters to haul my sorry ass into the age of Enlightenment, till then I keep posting all kinds of cool quotes, pictures from Gandhi, Teresa on my Facebook page. And oh - Ravi Yogi was some loser who used to post here - any coincidence, resemblance to me is imaginary. Love, Ravi On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Share Long wrote:  Ann, these examples of mine below have nothing to do with our disagreeing with each other. They were all instances where I was exchanging with SOME OTHER FFL POSTER and you responded, leading with a negative attitude towards me. For example, your assuming I'd call my ex ex if it bothered him. You also seem desperate to be negative about me when you leap on something casual I say, like you did with what I said about Norman churches in FF. Even Judy responded to you about that. Twice. That's when I realized how desperate you are to see me in a negative way and that is why I have avoided you. I'm not interested in dealing with your prejudices about me. Even today, you made fun of Mr. Leed for missing the humor of my post to Buck this morning. But you missed it too, didn't you? When you said: wouldn't a true sidha be able to walk to the Dome, etc. Again, this is just you seeing me
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Alex--this is spam! to Ann Judy Ravi
Ann, these examples of mine below have nothing to do with our disagreeing with each other. They were all instances where I was exchanging with SOME OTHER FFL POSTER and you responded, leading with a negative attitude towards me. For example, your assuming I'd call my ex ex if it bothered him. You also seem desperate to be negative about me when you leap on something casual I say, like you did with what I said about Norman churches in FF. Even Judy responded to you about that. Twice. That's when I realized how desperate you are to see me in a negative way and that is why I have avoided you. I'm not interested in dealing with your prejudices about me. Even today, you made fun of Mr. Leed for missing the humor of my post to Buck this morning. But you missed it too, didn't you? When you said: wouldn't a true sidha be able to walk to the Dome, etc. Again, this is just you seeing me and writing about me in a negative way. By the way, I noticed you didn't criticize Steve for taking up for you recently in Jan. No making fun of him for being a knight on a white horse coming to the aid of a damsel in distress. Which is what you used to do when he came to my defense. Remember? So it's ok when he comes to your defense but not when he comes to mine? Why is that? I've accepted that we're not compatible and I'm happy to not interact with you. And you don't seem to enjoy what I have to say, even when it's to other posters. So I wonder why you have kept trying to start an interaction with me this year. Especially since it seems you've already come to a negative conclusion about me and or what's in my post. Which is your right of course. But generally I won't be participating in such. There are more enjoyable and or enriching exchanges to be had on FFL. to Judy: when I said Steve recently supported Ann, I was including January 2013. I'm pretty sure I did not reply to Ann before your reply to feste. In any case, I didn't BLAME her for not getting me. That's your spin on it. I skimmed Steve's post to Ravi and missed the bit about Ravi Yogi whose name I wouldn't have recognized anyway. I was talking about turq being ganged up on, not me. I'm not willing to be vulnerable with people who are prejudiced and or holding a grudge against me. You are of course entitled to your opinions about me and my posts. to Ravi: I wasn't thinking of you when I wrote my reply to Steve. Nor did I at that time even know who Ravi Yogi is. Actually I skimmed Steve's post so didn't register his reference to Ravi Yogi at all. You are of course entitled to your opinions about me and what I post. However, as long as it sounds to me as if you're still prejudiced against me and or carrying a grudge, I will more than likely not reply to your posts. But I wish you and your family all the best in everything. From: Ann awoelfleba...@yahoo.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 9:05 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: (Ouch...) Alex--this is spam! to Ann --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote: boy, Obbadohbba, did you ever! Get that wrong I mean. Anywho Annie I think you and I are working off our karma with each other very nicely I don't think I have any karma to 'work off with you' but we may be creating some. . To celebrate I'm gonna reply to all your attempts to start confrontations, er I mean conversations so far with me here in 2013: I get the impression that if I don't agree with you about something or ask you a question you take it as a confrontation. Am I confronting you now? Oops, and now because I just asked you a question? Oops and now? Oh dear, this could turn into an endless loop of quest, er, I mean confrontations. My ex does not mind my calling him ex. He laughed when I asked him and said that it sounded like I had pushed one of your buttons. Well, since I am no one's 'ex' I don't have a button there to push. Of course I know women can be competitive. I played sports in grade school and high school. And I'm here on FFL (-: Oh, because your comment stated otherwise. Take a look at it again. Not trying to say that you're wrong just that it looked like you were saying you were glad you were a woman because it meant you didn't have to worry about competing or being competitive. Judy thoroughly answered your confront, er comment about Norman churches in FF, thank you. I like the word thoroughly you used here to express what you felt was a positive for you and a negative for me. John perfectly answered your confront, er comment about the resigning Pope, responsibility and planets, thank you. And perfectly here is an interesting observation. I will have to look at that post again because I don't remember it. Have YOU ever answered me thoroughly or perfectly do you think? Concerning my NVC comment about contributing to
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Alex--this is spam! to Ann Judy Ravi
Dear Share, Yay you are awesome - with your persistence I can clearly see I am very prejudiced and hold lots and lots of grudges, as thick as 6 inches of snow on the Fairfield dome, against you. My samskaras are fucked up, my aura too dense, my chakras totally polluted , karma - a big rap sheet, reincarnation - destined to the nether world, the abode of evil Rakshasaas. I'm sick Share - have pity on me for god's sake. I'm just waiting for the ascended masters to haul my sorry ass into the age of Enlightenment, till then I keep posting all kinds of cool quotes, pictures from Gandhi, Teresa on my Facebook page. And oh - Ravi Yogi was some loser who used to post here - any coincidence, resemblance to me is imaginary. Love, Ravi On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com wrote: ** Ann, these examples of mine below have nothing to do with our disagreeing with each other. They were all instances where I was exchanging with SOME OTHER FFL POSTER and you responded, leading with a negative attitude towards me. For example, your assuming I'd call my ex ex if it bothered him. You also seem desperate to be negative about me when you leap on something casual I say, like you did with what I said about Norman churches in FF. Even Judy responded to you about that. Twice. That's when I realized how desperate you are to see me in a negative way and that is why I have avoided you. I'm not interested in dealing with your prejudices about me. Even today, you made fun of Mr. Leed for missing the humor of my post to Buck this morning. But you missed it too, didn't you? When you said: wouldn't a true sidha be able to walk to the Dome, etc. Again, this is just you seeing me and writing about me in a negative way. By the way, I noticed you didn't criticize Steve for taking up for you recently in Jan. No making fun of him for being a knight on a white horse coming to the aid of a damsel in distress. Which is what you used to do when he came to my defense. Remember? So it's ok when he comes to your defense but not when he comes to mine? Why is that? I've accepted that we're not compatible and I'm happy to not interact with you. And you don't seem to enjoy what I have to say, even when it's to other posters. So I wonder why you have kept trying to start an interaction with me this year. Especially since it seems you've already come to a negative conclusion about me and or what's in my post. Which is your right of course. But generally I won't be participating in such. There are more enjoyable and or enriching exchanges to be had on FFL. to Judy: when I said Steve recently supported Ann, I was including January 2013. I'm pretty sure I did not reply to Ann before your reply to feste. In any case, I didn't BLAME her for not getting me. That's your spin on it. I skimmed Steve's post to Ravi and missed the bit about Ravi Yogi whose name I wouldn't have recognized anyway. I was talking about turq being ganged up on, not me. I'm not willing to be vulnerable with people who are prejudiced and or holding a grudge against me. You are of course entitled to your opinions about me and my posts. to Ravi: I wasn't thinking of you when I wrote my reply to Steve. Nor did I at that time even know who Ravi Yogi is. Actually I skimmed Steve's post so didn't register his reference to Ravi Yogi at all. You are of course entitled to your opinions about me and what I post. However, as long as it sounds to me as if you're still prejudiced against me and or carrying a grudge, I will more than likely not reply to your posts. But I wish you and your family all the best in everything. -- *From:* Ann awoelfleba...@yahoo.com *To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com *Sent:* Friday, February 22, 2013 9:05 AM *Subject:* [FairfieldLife] Re: (Ouch...) Alex--this is spam! to Ann --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote: boy, Obbadohbba, did you ever! Get that wrong I mean. Anywho Annie I think you and I are working off our karma with each other very nicely I don't think I have any karma to 'work off with you' but we may be creating some. . To celebrate I'm gonna reply to all your attempts to start confrontations, er I mean conversations so far with me here in 2013: I get the impression that if I don't agree with you about something or ask you a question you take it as a confrontation. Am I confronting you now? Oops, and now because I just asked you a question? Oops and now? Oh dear, this could turn into an endless loop of quest, er, I mean confrontations. My ex does not mind my calling him ex. He laughed when I asked him and said that it sounded like I had pushed one of your buttons. Well, since I am no one's 'ex' I don't have a button there to push. Of course I know women can be competitive. I played sports in grade school and high school. And I'm here on FFL (-: Oh, because
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Alex--this is spam! to Ann Judy Ravi
And oh - Ravi Yogi was some loser who used to post here - any coincidence, resemblance to me is imaginary Oh no - not that Ravi Yogi - I loved him once and got burned. He represents something unknown, mysterious, dangerous, he's walking on razor's edge, he will go down and take me down as well. I'm vulnerable and don't want to be harmed - no matter if he changes names, shows me how he leads as normal life as any - he is trouble. There's great safety in numbers, in the cult - haven't you read the Guru Gita - the Guru will lead me across. No thank you, Ravi Yogi's crazy - not again, never. On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.r...@gmail.comwrote: Dear Share, Yay you are awesome - with your persistence I can clearly see I am very prejudiced and hold lots and lots of grudges, as thick as 6 inches of snow on the Fairfield dome, against you. My samskaras are fucked up, my aura too dense, my chakras totally polluted , karma - a big rap sheet, reincarnation - destined to the nether world, the abode of evil Rakshasaas. I'm sick Share - have pity on me for god's sake. I'm just waiting for the ascended masters to haul my sorry ass into the age of Enlightenment, till then I keep posting all kinds of cool quotes, pictures from Gandhi, Teresa on my Facebook page. And oh - Ravi Yogi was some loser who used to post here - any coincidence, resemblance to me is imaginary. Love, Ravi On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com wrote: ** Ann, these examples of mine below have nothing to do with our disagreeing with each other. They were all instances where I was exchanging with SOME OTHER FFL POSTER and you responded, leading with a negative attitude towards me. For example, your assuming I'd call my ex ex if it bothered him. You also seem desperate to be negative about me when you leap on something casual I say, like you did with what I said about Norman churches in FF. Even Judy responded to you about that. Twice. That's when I realized how desperate you are to see me in a negative way and that is why I have avoided you. I'm not interested in dealing with your prejudices about me. Even today, you made fun of Mr. Leed for missing the humor of my post to Buck this morning. But you missed it too, didn't you? When you said: wouldn't a true sidha be able to walk to the Dome, etc. Again, this is just you seeing me and writing about me in a negative way. By the way, I noticed you didn't criticize Steve for taking up for you recently in Jan. No making fun of him for being a knight on a white horse coming to the aid of a damsel in distress. Which is what you used to do when he came to my defense. Remember? So it's ok when he comes to your defense but not when he comes to mine? Why is that? I've accepted that we're not compatible and I'm happy to not interact with you. And you don't seem to enjoy what I have to say, even when it's to other posters. So I wonder why you have kept trying to start an interaction with me this year. Especially since it seems you've already come to a negative conclusion about me and or what's in my post. Which is your right of course. But generally I won't be participating in such. There are more enjoyable and or enriching exchanges to be had on FFL. to Judy: when I said Steve recently supported Ann, I was including January 2013. I'm pretty sure I did not reply to Ann before your reply to feste. In any case, I didn't BLAME her for not getting me. That's your spin on it. I skimmed Steve's post to Ravi and missed the bit about Ravi Yogi whose name I wouldn't have recognized anyway. I was talking about turq being ganged up on, not me. I'm not willing to be vulnerable with people who are prejudiced and or holding a grudge against me. You are of course entitled to your opinions about me and my posts. to Ravi: I wasn't thinking of you when I wrote my reply to Steve. Nor did I at that time even know who Ravi Yogi is. Actually I skimmed Steve's post so didn't register his reference to Ravi Yogi at all. You are of course entitled to your opinions about me and what I post. However, as long as it sounds to me as if you're still prejudiced against me and or carrying a grudge, I will more than likely not reply to your posts. But I wish you and your family all the best in everything. -- *From:* Ann awoelfleba...@yahoo.com *To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com *Sent:* Friday, February 22, 2013 9:05 AM *Subject:* [FairfieldLife] Re: (Ouch...) Alex--this is spam! to Ann --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote: boy, Obbadohbba, did you ever! Get that wrong I mean. Anywho Annie I think you and I are working off our karma with each other very nicely I don't think I have any karma to 'work off with you' but we may be creating some. . To celebrate I'm gonna reply to all your attempts to start confrontations, er I mean
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Alex--this is spam! to Ann Judy Ravi
And oh - Ravi Yogi was some loser who used to post here - any coincidence, resemblance to me is imaginary Oh no - not that Ravi Yogi - I loved him once and got burned. He represents something unknown, mysterious, dangerous, he's walking on razor's edge, he will go down and take me down as well. I'm vulnerable and don't want to be harmed - no matter if he changes names, shows me how he leads as normal life as any - he is trouble. There's great safety in numbers, in the cult - haven't you read the Guru Gita - the Guru is stable, predictable, consistent, poses no threat, challenge to me and will lead me across. No thank you, Ravi Yogi's crazy - not again, never. On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.r...@gmail.comwrote: Dear Share, Yay you are awesome - with your persistence I can clearly see I am very prejudiced and hold lots and lots of grudges, as thick as 6 inches of snow on the Fairfield dome, against you. My samskaras are fucked up, my aura too dense, my chakras totally polluted , karma - a big rap sheet, reincarnation - destined to the nether world, the abode of evil Rakshasaas. I'm sick Share - have pity on me for god's sake. I'm just waiting for the ascended masters to haul my sorry ass into the age of Enlightenment, till then I keep posting all kinds of cool quotes, pictures from Gandhi, Teresa on my Facebook page. And oh - Ravi Yogi was some loser who used to post here - any coincidence, resemblance to me is imaginary. Love, Ravi On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com wrote: ** Ann, these examples of mine below have nothing to do with our disagreeing with each other. They were all instances where I was exchanging with SOME OTHER FFL POSTER and you responded, leading with a negative attitude towards me. For example, your assuming I'd call my ex ex if it bothered him. You also seem desperate to be negative about me when you leap on something casual I say, like you did with what I said about Norman churches in FF. Even Judy responded to you about that. Twice. That's when I realized how desperate you are to see me in a negative way and that is why I have avoided you. I'm not interested in dealing with your prejudices about me. Even today, you made fun of Mr. Leed for missing the humor of my post to Buck this morning. But you missed it too, didn't you? When you said: wouldn't a true sidha be able to walk to the Dome, etc. Again, this is just you seeing me and writing about me in a negative way. By the way, I noticed you didn't criticize Steve for taking up for you recently in Jan. No making fun of him for being a knight on a white horse coming to the aid of a damsel in distress. Which is what you used to do when he came to my defense. Remember? So it's ok when he comes to your defense but not when he comes to mine? Why is that? I've accepted that we're not compatible and I'm happy to not interact with you. And you don't seem to enjoy what I have to say, even when it's to other posters. So I wonder why you have kept trying to start an interaction with me this year. Especially since it seems you've already come to a negative conclusion about me and or what's in my post. Which is your right of course. But generally I won't be participating in such. There are more enjoyable and or enriching exchanges to be had on FFL. to Judy: when I said Steve recently supported Ann, I was including January 2013. I'm pretty sure I did not reply to Ann before your reply to feste. In any case, I didn't BLAME her for not getting me. That's your spin on it. I skimmed Steve's post to Ravi and missed the bit about Ravi Yogi whose name I wouldn't have recognized anyway. I was talking about turq being ganged up on, not me. I'm not willing to be vulnerable with people who are prejudiced and or holding a grudge against me. You are of course entitled to your opinions about me and my posts. to Ravi: I wasn't thinking of you when I wrote my reply to Steve. Nor did I at that time even know who Ravi Yogi is. Actually I skimmed Steve's post so didn't register his reference to Ravi Yogi at all. You are of course entitled to your opinions about me and what I post. However, as long as it sounds to me as if you're still prejudiced against me and or carrying a grudge, I will more than likely not reply to your posts. But I wish you and your family all the best in everything. -- *From:* Ann awoelfleba...@yahoo.com *To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com *Sent:* Friday, February 22, 2013 9:05 AM *Subject:* [FairfieldLife] Re: (Ouch...) Alex--this is spam! to Ann --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote: boy, Obbadohbba, did you ever! Get that wrong I mean. Anywho Annie I think you and I are working off our karma with each other very nicely I don't think I have any karma to 'work off with you' but we may be creating some. . To celebrate
[FairfieldLife] Re: Alex--this is spam! to Ann Judy Ravi
I am going to reply to this just because you got so many things skewed and you misinterpreted so much of what I wrote and what I meant. It is for the record not, evidently, for you per se as you clearly do not want to interact and you seem to miss what I am about approximately 90% of the time. You were correct, you don't 'get' me. Probably through no fault of your own. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@... wrote: Ann, these examples of mine below have nothing to do with our disagreeing with each other. I don't think I said they were.  They were all instances where I was exchanging with SOME OTHER FFL POSTER and you responded, leading with a negative attitude towards me. In your opinion. I am not actually negative in my feelings towards you, at least my interior experience is not one of negativity. It could be described more as trying to order what appears to me a disordered way of expressing oneself or thinking. Again, not your problem, merely my perception of you.  For example, your assuming I'd call my ex ex if it bothered him. What??! How did you come up with THAT conclusion? Now THAT is a projection on me. I asked if he minded being called an ex because to me that is so impersonal and does not indicate in any way feelings of fondness or closeness to that person. I never indicated that you must be calling him your ex because you knew he disliked it.  You also seem desperate to be negative about me when you leap on something casual I say, like you did with what I said about Norman churches in FF. Not desperate and not leap(ing). I don't get up in the morning salivating for your blood Share. You are not my reason for posting here and I don't look for ways to jump on you. Norman churches for me don't exist in North America just like Tudor houses don't. There are mock tudors and Norman style churches as far as I am concerned but maybe because I grew up in Europe it is a bias I have. There they have the real thing, built in the Norman times; so for me those are the real deal. Judy was correct in clarifying the architectural style as existing in North America but for me Norman is like Jacobean or Regency styles. If they aren't made in that era from materials that originated from that time for me they are faux or mock or neo. Technically I am probably wrong but there you have it.  Even Judy responded to you about that. Twice. That's when I realized how desperate you are to see me in a negative way and that is why I have avoided you. I'm not interested in dealing with your prejudices about me. Again, hardly desperate. It is not always about you Share, you just happen to be the recipient of some of my posts and thoughts that result from reading what you write. You seem to think that if someone expresses doubt or disagrees about what you think or write that it is negative. It is not. It is a chance to question your own beliefs and to see how it feels to consider other viewpoints. So far, I only see you feeling put upon when others don't congratulate you on or agree with your world view. Even today, you made fun of Mr. Leed for missing the humor of my post to Buck this morning. Actually, I read it that mr leed was ragging on me for making jokes about sidhas. I didn't read it as him addressing your post at all. He was actually seriously annoyed that I was making jokes about sidhas not being able to get around in the snow.  But you missed it too, didn't you? Sure did, still do.  When you said: wouldn't a true sidha be able to walk to the Dome, etc. Again, this is just you seeing me and writing about me in a negative way. My God woman, these were not serious statements. This is where you possess a complete lack of an ability to laugh at yourself, at the world, at how I was joking about (and here I'll spell it out) how ironic that those who practice the siddhis can supposedly change the world, bring about great coherence and world peace but can't walk a mile in the snow or shovel out their car. By the way, I noticed you didn't criticize Steve for taking up for you recently in Jan. I don't even remember what you are referring to.  No making fun of him for being a knight on a white horse coming to the aid of a damsel in distress. Was I a damsel in distress? You could cite the post to jog (get it?) my memory because I am at a complete loss here.  Which is what you used to do when he came to my defense. Remember? So it's ok when he comes to your defense but not when he comes to mine? Why is that? Again WHAT?! This is what I mean by disordered thinking. I just don't understand how your mind works, how you jump all around to all sorts of conclusions. I sort of watch you leaping about, quite excited and agitated and all I can do is follow you back and forth like watching some demented tennis match. I've accepted that we're not compatible and I'm happy to not interact
