[FairfieldLife] Re: Fairfield's future, the 'guidelines'

2006-08-31 Thread dhamiltony2k5

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, L B Shriver 
 l_b_shriver@ wrote:
 
 There are signs lately that this judgmentalism is softening 
within 
 the
 university. Of course,
 there is no lack of judgments being held in the community south of 
 the
 university, either.
 The difference is that the TMO has the capability to enforce some 
of 
 its
 judgments,
 therefore signs of progress there bode well for all of us.
 
 LBS, that you have had some heartfelt two-way conversation with 
 them up there, but really what signs are there that have changed?  
 If they administratively do not 'look the other way', the 
guidelines 
 have not changed.  The guidelines themselves have not changed. 
That 
 is not very firm ground to go forward with them on with the 
 meditating community.  
 
 There has been no real ceasefire on their part.  The enduring 
 problem with them for the meditating community here is 
 those 'guidelines'.   Yes I agree with you that FF's best year's 
are to come.  
 It is getting there.
 
 -Doug in FF

 
Again, Go figure, the
guidelines have not changed but pages are not read or ignored for
some people at some times.

It is in process evidently, probably depending on whether it is John
Hagelin's view  his people or Bevan's oft hard-line take on 
the 'administration'
of the guidelines. With the TMorg it is all sub-terrain vie-ing.
They evidently just can't come out and say it, what the guidelines
are, because the guidelines are so rigid that if they were
universally applied few would be left in the domes at all. There is
a practicality on the ground in not being clear about it. It is
just TMorg administrative theocracy waiting on MMY.

-Doug in FF



 
 
 
  Fairfield's Future
  
  Over the past several years, I have engaged in countless 
 conversations about the state of 
  Fairfield and its prospects for the future. I have generally 
taken 
 the position that Fairfield's 
  best years are yet to come. A few years ago, most of the people 
I 
 engaged on this topic 
  were surprised by my position and only a few agreed. Within the 
 past year, however, I 
  would say that the majority agree: Fairfield's best years are 
yet 
 to come.
  






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Fairfield's future, the 'guidelines'

2006-08-30 Thread dhamiltony2k5
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, L B Shriver 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

There are signs lately that this judgmentalism is softening within 
the
university. Of course,
there is no lack of judgments being held in the community south of 
the
university, either.
The difference is that the TMO has the capability to enforce some of 
its
judgments,
therefore signs of progress there bode well for all of us.

LBS, what you have had some heartfelt two-way conversation with 
them up there, but really what signs are there that have changed?  
If they administratively do not 'look the other way', the guidelines 
have not changed.  The guidelines themselves have not changed. That 
is not very firm ground to go forward with them on with the 
meditating community.  

There has been no real ceasefire on their part.  The enduring 
problem with them for the meditating community here is 
those 'guidelines'.  Are you now colaberating with them up there 
on this a public relations ploy; have they not turned you to the 
dark side?  Yes I agree with you that FF's best year's are to come.  
It is getting there.

-Doug in FF




 Fairfield's Future
 
 Over the past several years, I have engaged in countless 
conversations about the state of 
 Fairfield and its prospects for the future. I have generally taken 
the position that Fairfield's 
 best years are yet to come. A few years ago, most of the people I 
engaged on this topic 
 were surprised by my position and only a few agreed. Within the 
past year, however, I 
 would say that the majority agree: Fairfield's best years are yet 
to come.
 
 Fairfield has a unique mix of businesses and industries. The only 
weakness there is that 
 the economic base is not currently strong enough to support more 
people who would like 
 to be living here but can't afford it.
 
 Nevertheless, the infrastructure here is good and the local 
government is forward-looking, 
 The entrepreneurial environment is outstanding. 
 
 In what some would regard as a worst case scenario, we must 
consider the possibility that 
 the university might tank. Although on one level that would be a 
loss,  no one knows what 
 might follow in its wake, including many fresh possibilities that 
none of us have 
 considered.
 
 On the other hand, the university has shown some signs of life 
lately. Aside from the 
 physical transformation of the campus, it has attracted some 
talented people. There are 
 signs here and there of the tide finally turning. Too early to say 
how far this will go, but if 
 the university has its own little renaissance, the rest of the 
community will benefit as well. 
 
 It is my contention that either way—with or without a viable TM 
organization—Fairfield will 
 thrive.
 
 I admit there is a bit of a paradox here that is uncomfortable for 
some people to address. 
 It is simply this: 
 
 Without Maharishi this community would never have been created, 
and the opportunities 
 and quality of life found here would never have come into 
existence. On the other, the 
 days are long gone where one could legitimately say that Fairfield 
is Maharishi's town. It 
 has evolved into something more complex and diverse, and in my 
view it is this 
 evolutionary development toward diversity that gives the community 
its viability.
 
 The judgement that this diversity is damaging to the community is 
both an anachronism 
 and a source of continuing bad feeling within the community. In 
fact, this judgement itself 
 is perhaps the biggest single barrier to the community's progress, 
at least on the spiritual 
 level.
 
 There are signs lately that this judgmentalism is softening within 
the university. Of course, 
 there is no lack of judgments being held in the community south of 
the university, either. 
 The difference is that the TMO has the capability to enforce some 
of its judgments, 
 therefore signs of progress there bode well for all of us.
 
 This is why I am optimistic about the future of the community. One 
way or another, the 
 most  spiritually regressive aspects of the community 
consciousness will be purged. There 
 is nothing especially magic or unexpected about this; when 
something goes as far as it 
 can go in one direction, the pendulum, as they say, swings the 
other way.
 
 L B S








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/