As with all these related things of the movement, money is a great Satan in the
movement community.
At this point we should carry on without the movement doing the soliciting and
the paying of people to meditate. That is just fraught with bad feeling. Parse
that off to some other non-profit ent
Q: They wonder, why are people not meditating together?
A:Using our own communal technical Vedic Science nomenclature.. Monitoring
lowered the group coherence and numbers meditating in Fairfield by 'tainting
the wave function' of consciousness as the wave function of individual
consciousness
Big meetings going on right now in ™. The larger international ™org is looking
at Fairfield weighing resources and sees that numbers are way down here. There
is wondering why people are not meditating together(?)
Constrained by budget flows they are wondering if it is worthwhile funding the
The “grant program” is austere enough without forcing them to work during all
their moments in time off. They should be treated with the magnanimity of a
whole lot more respect than they get.
A push back against forcing grantees to work for the movement during their
hours off would be to shor
Ideas floating around ‘the administrative state’ of the TMO is to have
grantees work for the movement during the afternoon time they are not
meditating for two hours a day to earn supplemental income to help take
pressure off the grant budget.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
There has been a long steady slide in attending numbers, particularly since
the 'grant program' conceived to pay people to meditate was scaled back and
that grant program was tied with administrative 'monitoring' to closely watch
over grant people meditating as they would practice their medita
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
The current Income Support initiative for sustaining Fairfield meditators in
group meditating.. It costs now $90,000 a month to sustain paying those in
need who can be meditating doing “the long program”, full time in the Domes..
A million buc