--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Gillam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> It's interesting to me that this forum shows
> no consensus as to whether superradiance
> works. Most of us have fond memories of
> big courses. Most of us thought at one time
> superradiance was valid. I've
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Gillam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --- TurquoiseB wrote:
> >
> > My take on superradiance and the ME would have
> > to be, "I don't know." ...
> >
> > I think
> > that there is a possibility that a group of
> > people sitting together practicing th
--- ITurquoiseB wrote:
>
> My take on superradiance and the ME would have
> to be, "I don't know." ...
>
> I think
> that there is a possibility that a group of
> people sitting together practicing their normal
> meditation technique might generate a similar
> energy, and effect -- whatever it is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Gillam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> It's interesting to me that this forum shows
> no consensus as to whether superradiance
> works. Most of us have fond memories of
> big courses. Most of us thought at one time
> superradiance was valid. I've
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Gillam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> It's interesting to me that this forum shows
> no consensus as to whether superradiance
> works. Most of us have fond memories of
> big courses. Most of us thought at one time
> superradiance was valid. I've r
It's interesting to me that this forum shows
no consensus as to whether superradiance
works. Most of us have fond memories of
big courses. Most of us thought at one time
superradiance was valid. I've run across
variations of the theory outside the TM
organization. Yet "the sense of the meetin
