--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anony_sleuth_ff
> wrote:
>
> > > Which would mean that the system is highly accepted, that is people
> > > would actually vote
> >
> >
> > Well, even 30-40% voting is quite lar
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anony_sleuth_ff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > Which would mean that the system is highly accepted, that is people
> > would actually vote
>
>
> Well, even 30-40% voting is quite large -- both in absolute numbers,
> and as a compared to good sample sizes
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anony_sleuth_ff
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > The dumping could be counteracted if positive votes couldn't be
> > > ca
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anony_sleuth_ff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity wrote:
> >
> >
> > The dumping could be counteracted if positive votes couldn't be
> > cancelled out by negatives and vice versa, both would show up.
>
>
http:/
