no you are not wrong, he just acts as a final arbiter if there no agreement
without him, otherwise he lets everyone else run things and does his program
and works on his research
ot;
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 2, 2014 12:29 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] George critique from the perspective of the
movement
I don't see any evidence that Tony works unilaterally like Maharishi did
and the other guys just make his pronouncemen
I don't see any evidence that Tony works unilaterally like Maharishi did and
the other guys just make his pronouncements. I could be wrong. Tony is the head
of the movement like the Queen is the head of England.
Of course I could be wrong, can you think of anything he has done that looked
like
The thing is though, he DID have "one guy he trusted to be his replacement."
He had all the rajahs chant Sanskrit over and over and over and over... and
over... and over... again in the weeks up until his death that reminded them
that Tony abu Nader IS the new head of all aspects of the TM org
PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] George critique from the perspective of the
movement
--In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
So what was the atmosphere like after? Were the people receptive or did they
think he was full of vedic baloney?
I couldn't get a read because I had run into an
--In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
So what was the atmosphere like after? Were the people receptive or did they
think he was full of vedic baloney?
I couldn't get a read because I had run into an old friend from MIU and his
wife and turned all my attention on them. People were freak
So what was the atmosphere like after? Were the people receptive or did they
think he was full of vedic baloney?
From: "curtisdeltabl...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]"
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, December 1, 2014 3:18 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] George critique from th
