On Jun 7, 2006, at 7:57 PM, gullible fool wrote:
> I did hear of this, but I prefer the new way, only
> because the type is bold and much easier to read than
> before
Really? One reason I didn't like it is because the type on my messages
was teeny tiny...and nothing I did seemed to make much of
I did hear of this, but I prefer the new way, only
because the type is bold and much easier to read than
before - all the other changes they can get rid of.
The biggest problem with the readibility of the new
format is that the messages are only about four inches
wide, pretty narrow for a 21-inch
