Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Does the size of one's ego equate to their "need to argue?"

[Share Long]

dear Obba, as Judy says: dictionaries are fine and dandy, but one must use a 
little common sense in applying definitions.

So here's a little uncommon sense just for fun: Plonk (wine), poor quality wine


 From: obbajeeba 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2013 10:19 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Does the size of one's ego equate to their "need 
to argue?"
 


  
Okay. I understand.
Still, WTF is plonk or PLONK?
Anyone?

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula  wrote:
>
> Well dear I'm not neutral and I refuse to plonk this time.
> 
> 
> On Jul 9, 2013, at 7:18 PM, obbajeeba  wrote:
> 
> > Ravi, you being a neutral and all, acould you answer this for me, please?
> > WTF is a PLONK? 
> > 
> > Thank you, Obba Gopi
> > 
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula  
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Share dear - calm down please, you are getting triggered.
> > > 
> > > Please look up "argue" in the dictionary as well and see how it compares 
> > > to debate and engaging in conversation. Let me know if you need any help.
> > > 
> > > Hint: There's an emotional aspect in argue which isn't present in 
> > > debate. So people usually qualify it when used with debate such as 
> > > "heated" debate.
> > > 
> > > Oh what the fuck here it is
> > > 
> > > argue - "exchange or express diverging or opposite views, *typically in 
> > > a heated or angry way*"
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On 7/9/13 5:42 PM, Share Long wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Ann's turn to PLONK. Simply amazing!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > from google dictionary
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > de·bate
> > > >
> > > > /diˈbÄt/
> > > > Noun
> > > > A formal discussion on a particular topic in a public meeting or 
> > > > legislative assembly, in which opposing arguments are put forward.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Verb
> > > > Argue about (a subject), esp. in a formal manner.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Synonyms
> > > > /noun/. discussion - dispute - argument - disputation
> > > >
> > > > /verb/. dispute - discuss - argue - deliberate - canvass
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > *From:* Ann 
> > > > *To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> > > > *Sent:* Tuesday, July 9, 2013 5:03 PM
> > > > *Subject:* [FairfieldLife] Re: Does the size of one's ego equate to 
> > > > their "need to argue?"
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> > > > , Share Long  
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > turq wrote: have a corollary need to portray anyone who *won't* 
> > > > argue with them as "broken" or "defective" or "bad" in some way.
> > > > > Judy commented: Nobody has said anything like that for days.
> > > > > Emily to Xeno about Share: worse than that, not being willing to 
> > > > even engage in conversation or debate or play on what she does, FFL 
> > > > style or anything.
> > > > >
> > > > > Share replies: PLONK
> > > >
> > > > This is perhaps one of the most unbelievable responses I have ever 
> > > > witnessed at FFL. "engage in conversation", "debate" or "play" arenot 
> > > > arguing Share. My God, simply amazing.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > 
> > > > > From: authfriend 
> > > > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> > > > 
> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2013 2:55 PM
> > > > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Does the size of one's ego equate to 
> > > > their "need to argue?"
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Â
> > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> > > > , turquoiseb  wrote:
> > > > > (snip)
> > > > > > Yet on this forum (judging from the posts I skip these days but 
> > > > can grok
> > > > > > the essence of just from their first words in Message View), some 
> > > > people
> > > > > > not *only* seem to have a constant need to argue, they *also* seem 
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > have a corollary need to portray anyone who *won't* argue with them 
> > > > > > as
> > > > > > "broken" or "defective" or "bad" in some way.
> > > > >
> > > > > No, you're hallucinating again. Nobody has said anything
> > > > > like that for days.
> > > > >
> > > > > But you've said what you say here I don't know how many
> > > > > times. Dozens.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > 
> >
>


 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Does the size of one's ego equate to their "need to argue?"

[Ravi Chivukula]

Well dear I'm not neutral and I refuse to plonk this time.


On Jul 9, 2013, at 7:18 PM, obbajeeba  wrote:

> Ravi, you being a neutral and all, acould you answer this for me, please?
> WTF is a PLONK? 
> 
> Thank you, Obba Gopi
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula  
> wrote:
> >
> > Share dear - calm down please, you are getting triggered.
> > 
> > Please look up "argue" in the dictionary as well and see how it compares 
> > to debate and engaging in conversation. Let me know if you need any help.
> > 
> > Hint: There's an emotional aspect in argue which isn't present in 
> > debate. So people usually qualify it when used with debate such as 
> > "heated" debate.
> > 
> > Oh what the fuck here it is
> > 
> > argue - "exchange or express diverging or opposite views, *typically in 
> > a heated or angry way*"
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On 7/9/13 5:42 PM, Share Long wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Ann's turn to PLONK. Simply amazing!
> > >
> > >
> > > from google dictionary
> > >
> > >
> > > de·bate
> > >
> > > /diˈbāt/
> > > Noun
> > > A formal discussion on a particular topic in a public meeting or 
> > > legislative assembly, in which opposing arguments are put forward.
> > >
> > >
> > > Verb
> > > Argue about (a subject), esp. in a formal manner.
> > >
> > >
> > > Synonyms
> > > /noun/. discussion - dispute - argument - disputation
> > >
> > > /verb/. dispute - discuss - argue - deliberate - canvass
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > *From:* Ann 
> > > *To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> > > *Sent:* Tuesday, July 9, 2013 5:03 PM
> > > *Subject:* [FairfieldLife] Re: Does the size of one's ego equate to 
> > > their "need to argue?"
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> > > , Share Long  
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > turq wrote: have a corollary need to portray anyone who *won't* 
> > > argue with them as "broken" or "defective" or "bad" in some way.
> > > > Judy commented: Nobody has said anything like that for days.
> > > > Emily to Xeno about Share: worse than that, not being willing to 
> > > even engage in conversation or debate or play on what she does, FFL 
> > > style or anything.
> > > >
> > > > Share replies: PLONK
> > >
> > > This is perhaps one of the most unbelievable responses I have ever 
> > > witnessed at FFL. "engage in conversation", "debate" or "play" arenot 
> > > arguing Share. My God, simply amazing.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 
> > > > From: authfriend 
> > > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> > > 
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2013 2:55 PM
> > > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Does the size of one's ego equate to 
> > > their "need to argue?"
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Â
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> > > , turquoiseb  wrote:
> > > > (snip)
> > > > > Yet on this forum (judging from the posts I skip these days but 
> > > can grok
> > > > > the essence of just from their first words in Message View), some 
> > > people
> > > > > not *only* seem to have a constant need to argue, they *also* seem to
> > > > > have a corollary need to portray anyone who *won't* argue with them as
> > > > > "broken" or "defective" or "bad" in some way.
> > > >
> > > > No, you're hallucinating again. Nobody has said anything
> > > > like that for days.
> > > >
> > > > But you've said what you say here I don't know how many
> > > > times. Dozens.
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> 
> 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Does the size of one's ego equate to their "need to argue?"

[Ravi Chivukula]

Share dear - calm down please, you are getting triggered.

Please look up "argue" in the dictionary as well and see how it compares 
to debate and engaging in conversation. Let me know if you need any help.


Hint: There's an emotional aspect in argue which isn't present in 
debate. So people usually qualify it when used with debate such as 
"heated" debate.


Oh what the fuck here it is

argue - "exchange or express diverging or opposite views, *typically in 
a heated or angry way*"




On 7/9/13 5:42 PM, Share Long wrote:



  Ann's turn to PLONK. Simply amazing!


  from google dictionary


  de·bate

/diˈbāt/
Noun
A formal discussion on a particular topic in a public meeting or 
legislative assembly, in which opposing arguments are put forward.



Verb
Argue about (a subject), esp. in a formal manner.


Synonyms
/noun/. discussion - dispute - argument - disputation

/verb/. dispute - discuss - argue - deliberate - canvass




*From:* Ann 
*To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
*Sent:* Tuesday, July 9, 2013 5:03 PM
*Subject:* [FairfieldLife] Re: Does the size of one's ego equate to 
their "need to argue?"




--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
, Share Long  
wrote:

>
> turq wrote: have a corollary need to portray anyone who *won't* 
argue with them as "broken" or "defective" or "bad" in some way.

> Judy commented: Nobody has said anything like that for days.
> Emily to Xeno about Share: worse than that, not being willing to 
even engage in conversation or debate or play on what she does, FFL 
style or anything.

>
> Share replies: PLONK

This is perhaps one of the most unbelievable responses I have ever 
witnessed at FFL. "engage in conversation", "debate" or "play" arenot 
arguing Share. My God, simply amazing.

>
>
> 
> From: authfriend 
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 


> Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2013 2:55 PM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Does the size of one's ego equate to 
their "need to argue?"

>
>
>
> Â
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
, turquoiseb  wrote:

> (snip)
> > Yet on this forum (judging from the posts I skip these days but 
can grok
> > the essence of just from their first words in Message View), some 
people

> > not *only* seem to have a constant need to argue, they *also* seem to
> > have a corollary need to portray anyone who *won't* argue with them as
> > "broken" or "defective" or "bad" in some way.
>
> No, you're hallucinating again. Nobody has said anything
> like that for days.
>
> But you've said what you say here I don't know how many
> times. Dozens.
>

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Does the size of one's ego equate to their "need to argue?"

[Share Long]

Ann's turn to PLONK. Simply amazing!

from google dictionary

de·bate  
/diˈbāt/
Noun
A formal discussion on a particular topic in a public meeting or 
legislative assembly, in which opposing arguments are put forward.  
 
Verb
Argue about (a subject), esp. in a formal manner.  
 
Synonyms
noun.   discussion - dispute - argument - disputation 
verb.   dispute - discuss - argue - deliberate - canvass  




 From: Ann 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2013 5:03 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Does the size of one's ego equate to their "need 
to argue?"
 


  


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:
>
> turq wrote: have a corollary need to portray anyone who *won't* argue with 
> them as "broken" or "defective" or "bad" in some way.
> Judy commented: Nobody has said anything like that for days.
> Emily to Xeno about Share: worse than that, not being willing to even engage 
> in conversation or debate or play on what she does, FFL style or anything. 
> 
> Share replies: PLONK

This is perhaps one of the most unbelievable responses I have ever witnessed at 
FFL. "engage in conversation", "debate" or "play" arenot arguing Share. My God, 
simply amazing.
> 
> 
> 
>  From: authfriend 
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2013 2:55 PM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Does the size of one's ego equate to their "need 
> to argue?"
> 
> 
> 
>   
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb  wrote:
> (snip)
> > Yet on this forum (judging from the posts I skip these days but can grok
> > the essence of just from their first words in Message View), some people
> > not *only* seem to have a constant need to argue, they *also* seem to
> > have a corollary need to portray anyone who *won't* argue with them as
> > "broken" or "defective" or "bad" in some way.
> 
> No, you're hallucinating again. Nobody has said anything
> like that for days.
> 
> But you've said what you say here I don't know how many
> times. Dozens.
>


 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Does the size of one's ego equate to their "need to argue?"

[Share Long]

turq wrote: have a corollary need to portray anyone who *won't* argue with them 
as "broken" or "defective" or "bad" in some way.
Judy commented: Nobody has said anything like that for days.
Emily to Xeno about Share: worse than that, not being willing to even engage in 
conversation or debate or play on what she does, FFL style or anything. 

Share replies: PLONK



 From: authfriend 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2013 2:55 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Does the size of one's ego equate to their "need 
to argue?"
 


  
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb  wrote:
(snip)
> Yet on this forum (judging from the posts I skip these days but can grok
> the essence of just from their first words in Message View), some people
> not *only* seem to have a constant need to argue, they *also* seem to
> have a corollary need to portray anyone who *won't* argue with them as
> "broken" or "defective" or "bad" in some way.

No, you're hallucinating again. Nobody has said anything
like that for days.

But you've said what you say here I don't know how many
times. Dozens.