Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
There a re a number of split screen videos out now of Comey refuting every one of her claims as she made them. From: "hondosavg...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, July 6, 2016 7:21 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens She wanted to use only one single device, so she used several and more than one home-brew server. She never sent or resent a classified document and she turned over every single one of her email messages. She never deleted any messages that contained State Department information. She never compromised security by using her cell phone outside of the United States. She had a full staff of IT security to insure that none of her email was compromised by hackers. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : We are in he best of hands. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Oh, damn! Where did I put those nuclear launch codes? From: "hondosavgae2@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, July 5, 2016 11:47 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens What could go wrong? FBI finds John Wilkes Booth "extremely careless" in discharge of firearm. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Nothing. Nothing different. She's writing her own book. This is one chapter. From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, July 3, 2016 2:38 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens You don't know what you're talking about. It was the *prosecutor* who pointed out that Clinton tried to get out of defending the rapist. There's nothing new in this Daily News article that Snopes hasn't dealt with. I note that you have *no* response to what Snopes says about the case or the audiotapes. As usual, your claims are devoid of any evidence or even logical reasoning. Just for kicks, how do you think Hillary should have handled the rapist's defense? What should she have done that she didn't do, or not done that she did do? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : SNOPES absolutely sanitizes the events. The tape is Hillary in her own words, spoken years ago. SNOPES' explanation is recent damage control and an obvious attempt to clean up what is heard on the tape in Hillary's own words. So complete, that they, either SNOPES or the Clinton campaign, had to go get a judge, no doubt a Clinton supporter, campaign contributor to write something up in her defense and explain away what she said on the tape.Old Clinton trick, declare *nothing new here*. Well, the snopes attempt to cover for the Clinton's *is* new with new sources. The tape is the original. From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, July 3, 2016 12:27 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens There's nothing "sanitized" about what's on Snopes. The tapes and transcripts are the same as what's on the page you link to, and that were provided by the original report in the Washington Free Beacon, on which the Daily News story is based. Nothing new here, sorry. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : BTW, I'll stick with what I said earlier about Hillary and her rapist client.http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/young-hillary-clintBon-heard-laughing-discussing-defense-accused-child-rapist-newly-discovered-audio-tapes-article-1.1832009 | | | | | | | | | | | Young Hillary Clinton heard laughing while discussing her defense of an acc... A young Hillary Clinton callously rejoiced at getting an accused child-rapist off the hook even though the then-... | | | | SNOPES gets the sanitized version to counter Hillary in her own words. From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 8:16 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Broderick was dealing with the then Attorney General of Arkansas, William Jefferson Clinton, the person she accused of raping her in her own hotel room. Actually Broaddrick wasn't "dealing with him." But she could have had him charged with rape if she wanted to. She had witnesses of the aftermath, a bloodied, bruised, and swollen upper lip which she claims he bit in order to keep her from screaming during the attack. She screams with her lips? it would be nice if both took a polygraph, although Hillary says she has lost her confidence in them. You did notice the date of the affidavit regarding Trump and alleged rape of thirteen year old girl, June 18 2016? Does that sound suspicious to you? Not particularly, no. The first time Hillary attacked Trump on women, Trump slammed her back with Bill's exploits and warned her *never go there* and she b
Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
She wanted to use only one single device, so she used several and more than one home-brew server. She never sent or resent a classified document and she turned over every single one of her email messages. She never deleted any messages that contained State Department information. She never compromised security by using her cell phone outside of the United States. She had a full staff of IT security to insure that none of her email was compromised by hackers. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : We are in he best of hands. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Oh, damn! Where did I put those nuclear launch codes? From: "hondosavgae2@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, July 5, 2016 11:47 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens What could go wrong? FBI finds John Wilkes Booth "extremely careless" in discharge of firearm. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Nothing. Nothing different. She's writing her own book. This is one chapter. From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, July 3, 2016 2:38 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens You don't know what you're talking about. It was the *prosecutor* who pointed out that Clinton tried to get out of defending the rapist. There's nothing new in this Daily News article that Snopes hasn't dealt with. I note that you have *no* response to what Snopes says about the case or the audiotapes. As usual, your claims are devoid of any evidence or even logical reasoning. Just for kicks, how do you think Hillary should have handled the rapist's defense? What should she have done that she didn't do, or not done that she did do? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : SNOPES absolutely sanitizes the events. The tape is Hillary in her own words, spoken years ago. SNOPES' explanation is recent damage control and an obvious attempt to clean up what is heard on the tape in Hillary's own words. So complete, that they, either SNOPES or the Clinton campaign, had to go get a judge, no doubt a Clinton supporter, campaign contributor to write something up in her defense and explain away what she said on the tape. Old Clinton trick, declare *nothing new here*. Well, the snopes attempt to cover for the Clinton's *is* new with new sources. The tape is the original. From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, July 3, 2016 12:27 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens There's nothing "sanitized" about what's on Snopes. The tapes and transcripts are the same as what's on the page you link to, and that were provided by the original report in the Washington Free Beacon, on which the Daily News story is based. Nothing new here, sorry. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : BTW, I'll stick with what I said earlier about Hillary and her rapist client.http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/young-hillary-clintBon-heard-laughing-discussing-defense-accused-child-rapist-newly-discovered-audio-tapes-article-1.1832009 http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/young-hillary-clinton-heard-laughing-discussing-defense-accused-child-rapist-newly-discovered-audio-tapes-article-1.1832009 Young Hillary Clinton heard laughing while discussing her defense of an acc... A young Hillary Clinton callously rejoiced at getting an accused child-rapist off the hook even though the then-... http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/young-hillary-clinton-heard-laughing-discussing-defense-accused-child-rapist-newly-discovered-audio-tapes-article-1.1832009 SNOPES gets the sanitized version to counter Hillary in her own words. From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 8:16 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Broderick was dealing with the then Attorney General of Arkansas, William Jefferson Clinton, the person she accused of raping her in her own hotel room. Actually Broaddrick wasn't "dealing with him." But she could have had him charged with rape if she wanted to. She had witnesses of the aftermath, a bloodied, bruised, and swollen upper lip which she claims he bit in order to keep her from screaming during the attack. She screams with her lips? it would be nice if both took a polygraph, although Hillary says she has lost her confidence in them. You did notice the date of the affidavit regarding Trump and alleged rape of thirteen year old girl, June 18 2016? Does that sound suspicious to you? Not particularly, no. The first time Hillary attacked Trump on women, Trump slammed her ba
Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
We are in he best of hands. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Oh, damn! Where did I put those nuclear launch codes? From: "hondosavgae2@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, July 5, 2016 11:47 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens What could go wrong? FBI finds John Wilkes Booth "extremely careless" in discharge of firearm. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Nothing. Nothing different. She's writing her own book. This is one chapter. From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, July 3, 2016 2:38 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens You don't know what you're talking about. It was the *prosecutor* who pointed out that Clinton tried to get out of defending the rapist. There's nothing new in this Daily News article that Snopes hasn't dealt with. I note that you have *no* response to what Snopes says about the case or the audiotapes. As usual, your claims are devoid of any evidence or even logical reasoning. Just for kicks, how do you think Hillary should have handled the rapist's defense? What should she have done that she didn't do, or not done that she did do? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : SNOPES absolutely sanitizes the events. The tape is Hillary in her own words, spoken years ago. SNOPES' explanation is recent damage control and an obvious attempt to clean up what is heard on the tape in Hillary's own words. So complete, that they, either SNOPES or the Clinton campaign, had to go get a judge, no doubt a Clinton supporter, campaign contributor to write something up in her defense and explain away what she said on the tape. Old Clinton trick, declare *nothing new here*. Well, the snopes attempt to cover for the Clinton's *is* new with new sources. The tape is the original. From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, July 3, 2016 12:27 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens There's nothing "sanitized" about what's on Snopes. The tapes and transcripts are the same as what's on the page you link to, and that were provided by the original report in the Washington Free Beacon, on which the Daily News story is based. Nothing new here, sorry. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : BTW, I'll stick with what I said earlier about Hillary and her rapist client.http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/young-hillary-clintBon-heard-laughing-discussing-defense-accused-child-rapist-newly-discovered-audio-tapes-article-1.1832009 http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/young-hillary-clinton-heard-laughing-discussing-defense-accused-child-rapist-newly-discovered-audio-tapes-article-1.1832009 Young Hillary Clinton heard laughing while discussing her defense of an acc... A young Hillary Clinton callously rejoiced at getting an accused child-rapist off the hook even though the then-... http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/young-hillary-clinton-heard-laughing-discussing-defense-accused-child-rapist-newly-discovered-audio-tapes-article-1.1832009 SNOPES gets the sanitized version to counter Hillary in her own words. From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 8:16 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Broderick was dealing with the then Attorney General of Arkansas, William Jefferson Clinton, the person she accused of raping her in her own hotel room. Actually Broaddrick wasn't "dealing with him." But she could have had him charged with rape if she wanted to. She had witnesses of the aftermath, a bloodied, bruised, and swollen upper lip which she claims he bit in order to keep her from screaming during the attack. She screams with her lips? it would be nice if both took a polygraph, although Hillary says she has lost her confidence in them. You did notice the date of the affidavit regarding Trump and alleged rape of thirteen year old girl, June 18 2016? Does that sound suspicious to you? Not particularly, no. The first time Hillary attacked Trump on women, Trump slammed her back with Bill's exploits and warned her *never go there* and she backed off. This happened a couple of times as I recall. Um, so she *didn't* back off, she came back and did it again. The idea of Trump "warning" Hillary about anything is laughable. Of course there is a lot of talk about Clinton with under aged girls in the Bahamas at wild parties, I believe with Mark Rich. There's always been a lot of talk about the Clintons. The question is, how much of it is true? L
Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
Oh, damn! Where did I put those nuclear launch codes? From: "hondosavg...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, July 5, 2016 11:47 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens What could go wrong? FBI finds John Wilkes Booth "extremely careless" in discharge of firearm. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Nothing. Nothing different. She's writing her own book. This is one chapter. From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, July 3, 2016 2:38 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens You don't know what you're talking about. It was the *prosecutor* who pointed out that Clinton tried to get out of defending the rapist. There's nothing new in this Daily News article that Snopes hasn't dealt with. I note that you have *no* response to what Snopes says about the case or the audiotapes. As usual, your claims are devoid of any evidence or even logical reasoning. Just for kicks, how do you think Hillary should have handled the rapist's defense? What should she have done that she didn't do, or not done that she did do? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : SNOPES absolutely sanitizes the events. The tape is Hillary in her own words, spoken years ago. SNOPES' explanation is recent damage control and an obvious attempt to clean up what is heard on the tape in Hillary's own words. So complete, that they, either SNOPES or the Clinton campaign, had to go get a judge, no doubt a Clinton supporter, campaign contributor to write something up in her defense and explain away what she said on the tape.Old Clinton trick, declare *nothing new here*. Well, the snopes attempt to cover for the Clinton's *is* new with new sources. The tape is the original. From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, July 3, 2016 12:27 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens There's nothing "sanitized" about what's on Snopes. The tapes and transcripts are the same as what's on the page you link to, and that were provided by the original report in the Washington Free Beacon, on which the Daily News story is based. Nothing new here, sorry. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : BTW, I'll stick with what I said earlier about Hillary and her rapist client.http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/young-hillary-clintBon-heard-laughing-discussing-defense-accused-child-rapist-newly-discovered-audio-tapes-article-1.1832009 | | | | | | | | | | | Young Hillary Clinton heard laughing while discussing her defense of an acc... A young Hillary Clinton callously rejoiced at getting an accused child-rapist off the hook even though the then-... | | | | SNOPES gets the sanitized version to counter Hillary in her own words. From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 8:16 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Broderick was dealing with the then Attorney General of Arkansas, William Jefferson Clinton, the person she accused of raping her in her own hotel room. Actually Broaddrick wasn't "dealing with him." But she could have had him charged with rape if she wanted to. She had witnesses of the aftermath, a bloodied, bruised, and swollen upper lip which she claims he bit in order to keep her from screaming during the attack. She screams with her lips? it would be nice if both took a polygraph, although Hillary says she has lost her confidence in them. You did notice the date of the affidavit regarding Trump and alleged rape of thirteen year old girl, June 18 2016? Does that sound suspicious to you? Not particularly, no. The first time Hillary attacked Trump on women, Trump slammed her back with Bill's exploits and warned her *never go there* and she backed off. This happened a couple of times as I recall. Um, so she *didn't* back off, she came back and did it again. The idea of Trump "warning" Hillary about anything is laughable. Of course there is a lot of talk about Clinton with under aged girls in the Bahamas at wild parties, I believe with Mark Rich. There's always been a lot of talk about the Clintons. The question is, how much of it is true? Look at how badly you screwed up on the ludicrous story about Hillary's defense of the accused rapist. The Clinton's had to *inoculate* themselves from their past and possible future, by accusing Trump of something worse first, Oh, jeez, Mike, can you be any more ridiculous? What have they accused him of besides misogyny? And it's not as if his misogyny wasn't already obvious. Hillary's just calling attention to it. Besides whic
Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
What could go wrong? FBI finds John Wilkes Booth "extremely careless" in discharge of firearm. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Nothing. Nothing different. She's writing her own book. This is one chapter. From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, July 3, 2016 2:38 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens You don't know what you're talking about. It was the *prosecutor* who pointed out that Clinton tried to get out of defending the rapist. There's nothing new in this Daily News article that Snopes hasn't dealt with. I note that you have *no* response to what Snopes says about the case or the audiotapes. As usual, your claims are devoid of any evidence or even logical reasoning. Just for kicks, how do you think Hillary should have handled the rapist's defense? What should she have done that she didn't do, or not done that she did do? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : SNOPES absolutely sanitizes the events. The tape is Hillary in her own words, spoken years ago. SNOPES' explanation is recent damage control and an obvious attempt to clean up what is heard on the tape in Hillary's own words. So complete, that they, either SNOPES or the Clinton campaign, had to go get a judge, no doubt a Clinton supporter, campaign contributor to write something up in her defense and explain away what she said on the tape. Old Clinton trick, declare *nothing new here*. Well, the snopes attempt to cover for the Clinton's *is* new with new sources. The tape is the original. From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, July 3, 2016 12:27 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens There's nothing "sanitized" about what's on Snopes. The tapes and transcripts are the same as what's on the page you link to, and that were provided by the original report in the Washington Free Beacon, on which the Daily News story is based. Nothing new here, sorry. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : BTW, I'll stick with what I said earlier about Hillary and her rapist client.http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/young-hillary-clintBon-heard-laughing-discussing-defense-accused-child-rapist-newly-discovered-audio-tapes-article-1.1832009 http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/young-hillary-clinton-heard-laughing-discussing-defense-accused-child-rapist-newly-discovered-audio-tapes-article-1.1832009 Young Hillary Clinton heard laughing while discussing her defense of an acc... A young Hillary Clinton callously rejoiced at getting an accused child-rapist off the hook even though the then-... http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/young-hillary-clinton-heard-laughing-discussing-defense-accused-child-rapist-newly-discovered-audio-tapes-article-1.1832009 SNOPES gets the sanitized version to counter Hillary in her own words. From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 8:16 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Broderick was dealing with the then Attorney General of Arkansas, William Jefferson Clinton, the person she accused of raping her in her own hotel room. Actually Broaddrick wasn't "dealing with him." But she could have had him charged with rape if she wanted to. She had witnesses of the aftermath, a bloodied, bruised, and swollen upper lip which she claims he bit in order to keep her from screaming during the attack. She screams with her lips? it would be nice if both took a polygraph, although Hillary says she has lost her confidence in them. You did notice the date of the affidavit regarding Trump and alleged rape of thirteen year old girl, June 18 2016? Does that sound suspicious to you? Not particularly, no. The first time Hillary attacked Trump on women, Trump slammed her back with Bill's exploits and warned her *never go there* and she backed off. This happened a couple of times as I recall. Um, so she *didn't* back off, she came back and did it again. The idea of Trump "warning" Hillary about anything is laughable. Of course there is a lot of talk about Clinton with under aged girls in the Bahamas at wild parties, I believe with Mark Rich. There's always been a lot of talk about the Clintons. The question is, how much of it is true? Look at how badly you screwed up on the ludicrous story about Hillary's defense of the accused rapist. The Clinton's had to *inoculate* themselves from their past and possible future, by accusing Trump of something worse first, Oh, jeez, Mike, can you be any more ridiculous? What have they accused him
Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
Nothing. Nothing different. She's writing her own book. This is one chapter. From: "authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, July 3, 2016 2:38 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens You don't know what you're talking about. It was the *prosecutor* who pointed out that Clinton tried to get out of defending the rapist. There's nothing new in this Daily News article that Snopes hasn't dealt with. I note that you have *no* response to what Snopes says about the case or the audiotapes. As usual, your claims are devoid of any evidence or even logical reasoning. Just for kicks, how do you think Hillary should have handled the rapist's defense? What should she have done that she didn't do, or not done that she did do? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : SNOPES absolutely sanitizes the events. The tape is Hillary in her own words, spoken years ago. SNOPES' explanation is recent damage control and an obvious attempt to clean up what is heard on the tape in Hillary's own words. So complete, that they, either SNOPES or the Clinton campaign, had to go get a judge, no doubt a Clinton supporter, campaign contributor to write something up in her defense and explain away what she said on the tape.Old Clinton trick, declare *nothing new here*. Well, the snopes attempt to cover for the Clinton's *is* new with new sources. The tape is the original. From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, July 3, 2016 12:27 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens There's nothing "sanitized" about what's on Snopes. The tapes and transcripts are the same as what's on the page you link to, and that were provided by the original report in the Washington Free Beacon, on which the Daily News story is based. Nothing new here, sorry. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : BTW, I'll stick with what I said earlier about Hillary and her rapist client.http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/young-hillary-clintBon-heard-laughing-discussing-defense-accused-child-rapist-newly-discovered-audio-tapes-article-1.1832009 | | | | | | | | | | | Young Hillary Clinton heard laughing while discussing her defense of an acc... A young Hillary Clinton callously rejoiced at getting an accused child-rapist off the hook even though the then-... | | | | SNOPES gets the sanitized version to counter Hillary in her own words. From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 8:16 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Broderick was dealing with the then Attorney General of Arkansas, William Jefferson Clinton, the person she accused of raping her in her own hotel room. Actually Broaddrick wasn't "dealing with him." But she could have had him charged with rape if she wanted to. She had witnesses of the aftermath, a bloodied, bruised, and swollen upper lip which she claims he bit in order to keep her from screaming during the attack. She screams with her lips? it would be nice if both took a polygraph, although Hillary says she has lost her confidence in them. You did notice the date of the affidavit regarding Trump and alleged rape of thirteen year old girl, June 18 2016? Does that sound suspicious to you? Not particularly, no. The first time Hillary attacked Trump on women, Trump slammed her back with Bill's exploits and warned her *never go there* and she backed off. This happened a couple of times as I recall. Um, so she *didn't* back off, she came back and did it again. The idea of Trump "warning" Hillary about anything is laughable. Of course there is a lot of talk about Clinton with under aged girls in the Bahamas at wild parties, I believe with Mark Rich. There's always been a lot of talk about the Clintons. The question is, how much of it is true? Look at how badly you screwed up on the ludicrous story about Hillary's defense of the accused rapist. The Clinton's had to *inoculate* themselves from their past and possible future, by accusing Trump of something worse first, Oh, jeez, Mike, can you be any more ridiculous? What have they accused him of besides misogyny? And it's not as if his misogyny wasn't already obvious. Hillary's just calling attention to it. Besides which, if he believes Bill Clinton is a rapist and "one of the worst abusers of women" in U.S. history, why did he invite Bill and Hillary to his wedding and pose for a photo with them (with Bill's arm around his new wife's waist)? so Hillary may continue with what she originally was going to say in respects to Trump and women. She will if and when she think
Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
You don't know what you're talking about. It was the *prosecutor* who pointed out that Clinton tried to get out of defending the rapist. There's nothing new in this Daily News article that Snopes hasn't dealt with. I note that you have *no* response to what Snopes says about the case or the audiotapes. As usual, your claims are devoid of any evidence or even logical reasoning. Just for kicks, how do you think Hillary should have handled the rapist's defense? What should she have done that she didn't do, or not done that she did do? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : SNOPES absolutely sanitizes the events. The tape is Hillary in her own words, spoken years ago. SNOPES' explanation is recent damage control and an obvious attempt to clean up what is heard on the tape in Hillary's own words. So complete, that they, either SNOPES or the Clinton campaign, had to go get a judge, no doubt a Clinton supporter, campaign contributor to write something up in her defense and explain away what she said on the tape. Old Clinton trick, declare *nothing new here*. Well, the snopes attempt to cover for the Clinton's *is* new with new sources. The tape is the original. From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, July 3, 2016 12:27 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens There's nothing "sanitized" about what's on Snopes. The tapes and transcripts are the same as what's on the page you link to, and that were provided by the original report in the Washington Free Beacon, on which the Daily News story is based. Nothing new here, sorry. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : BTW, I'll stick with what I said earlier about Hillary and her rapist client.http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/young-hillary-clintBon-heard-laughing-discussing-defense-accused-child-rapist-newly-discovered-audio-tapes-article-1.1832009 http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/young-hillary-clinton-heard-laughing-discussing-defense-accused-child-rapist-newly-discovered-audio-tapes-article-1.1832009 Young Hillary Clinton heard laughing while discussing her defense of an acc... A young Hillary Clinton callously rejoiced at getting an accused child-rapist off the hook even though the then-... http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/young-hillary-clinton-heard-laughing-discussing-defense-accused-child-rapist-newly-discovered-audio-tapes-article-1.1832009 SNOPES gets the sanitized version to counter Hillary in her own words. From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 8:16 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Broderick was dealing with the then Attorney General of Arkansas, William Jefferson Clinton, the person she accused of raping her in her own hotel room. Actually Broaddrick wasn't "dealing with him." But she could have had him charged with rape if she wanted to. She had witnesses of the aftermath, a bloodied, bruised, and swollen upper lip which she claims he bit in order to keep her from screaming during the attack. She screams with her lips? it would be nice if both took a polygraph, although Hillary says she has lost her confidence in them. You did notice the date of the affidavit regarding Trump and alleged rape of thirteen year old girl, June 18 2016? Does that sound suspicious to you? Not particularly, no. The first time Hillary attacked Trump on women, Trump slammed her back with Bill's exploits and warned her *never go there* and she backed off. This happened a couple of times as I recall. Um, so she *didn't* back off, she came back and did it again. The idea of Trump "warning" Hillary about anything is laughable. Of course there is a lot of talk about Clinton with under aged girls in the Bahamas at wild parties, I believe with Mark Rich. There's always been a lot of talk about the Clintons. The question is, how much of it is true? Look at how badly you screwed up on the ludicrous story about Hillary's defense of the accused rapist. The Clinton's had to *inoculate* themselves from their past and possible future, by accusing Trump of something worse first, Oh, jeez, Mike, can you be any more ridiculous? What have they accused him of besides misogyny? And it's not as if his misogyny wasn't already obvious. Hillary's just calling attention to it. Besides which, if he believes Bill Clinton is a rapist and "one of the worst abusers of women" in U.S. history, why did he invite Bill and Hillary to his wedding and pose for a photo with them (with Bill's arm around his new wife's waist)? so Hillary may con
Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
This is just hallucinatory, Mike. You're living in the fantasyland of your Clinton Derangement Syndrome. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Of course it's cooked up! Look at all of the dates involved! The supposed events took place twenty years ago and the affidavit is signed in the middle of June, this year, in the heat of the campaign! Thirteen year old girl lured to parties with promises of money and a modeling carrier, violently raped at the last party, tied down and repeatedly telling Trump *NO*. Covering all the bases here, aren't we. How else are the Clinton's going to shut Trump up about all the new allegations that could come out about Bill. The Clinton's have always been very smart but very sneaky. Trump is playing *hard ball* and has nothing to fear and that scares the Clinton's. They are dispirit. This will be Hillary's last shot and they're pulling out all the stops, even trying to tamper with the Attorney General. At this point , they have nothing to lose. Even Bill is probably going to be a target of the FBI investigation into his roll in the Clinton Foundation. Are you still convinced that the FBI isn't investigating Hillary but only doing a *security* evaluation of her home sever? Please Judy, I don't know if it's you that is that gullible or you just think everybody else is. From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, July 3, 2016 12:38 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens It's not "obviously a Clinton attempt to counter Trump"; the claim that it is, is obviously yet another cooked-up right-wing smear attempt. Disgusting. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Look at what has happened to the other women that have had to put up with Clinton's unwanted sexual advances. I think she felt helpless and thought long and hard about going up against the top law enforcement politician in the state. Each time Hillary started in on Trump about women, Trump brought up Bill and she shut up. They had to get something figured out. Took them a while to get this crap going about raping a thirteen year old girl. Trump hits back and much harder, something the Clinton's aren't used to. As I said, it's not holding water. Nobody is paying attention to it. It's not getting any traction. It's obviously a Clinton attempt to counter Trump. From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 8:16 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Broderick was dealing with the then Attorney General of Arkansas, William Jefferson Clinton, the person she accused of raping her in her own hotel room. Actually Broaddrick wasn't "dealing with him." But she could have had him charged with rape if she wanted to. She had witnesses of the aftermath, a bloodied, bruised, and swollen upper lip which she claims he bit in order to keep her from screaming during the attack. She screams with her lips? it would be nice if both took a polygraph, although Hillary says she has lost her confidence in them. You did notice the date of the affidavit regarding Trump and alleged rape of thirteen year old girl, June 18 2016? Does that sound suspicious to you? Not particularly, no. The first time Hillary attacked Trump on women, Trump slammed her back with Bill's exploits and warned her *never go there* and she backed off. This happened a couple of times as I recall. Um, so she *didn't* back off, she came back and did it again. The idea of Trump "warning" Hillary about anything is laughable. Of course there is a lot of talk about Clinton with under aged girls in the Bahamas at wild parties, I believe with Mark Rich. There's always been a lot of talk about the Clintons. The question is, how much of it is true? Look at how badly you screwed up on the ludicrous story about Hillary's defense of the accused rapist. The Clinton's had to *inoculate* themselves from their past and possible future, by accusing Trump of something worse first, Oh, jeez, Mike, can you be any more ridiculous? What have they accused him of besides misogyny? And it's not as if his misogyny wasn't already obvious. Hillary's just calling attention to it. Besides which, if he believes Bill Clinton is a rapist and "one of the worst abusers of women" in U.S. history, why did he invite Bill and Hillary to his wedding and pose for a photo with them (with Bill's arm around his new wife's waist)? so Hillary may continue with what she originally was going to say in respects to Trump and women. She will if and when she thinks it's called f
Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
You're seriously misrepresenting my views and putting words in my mouth. To you, every negative story about the Clintons, whether there's any evidence for it or not, represents catching them with their pants down. Me, I want to see the evidence. (And that goes for negative Trump stories as well as negative Clinton stories.) There's zero evidence the Clintons had anything to do with the Trump rape story. But as far as you're concerned, all that claim needs to be classified as true is for someone to make it. FYI, the Trump rape story has been shopped around to bloggers and journalists for almost a year; and a civil suit was filed in California in April but was thrown out. (Trump, of course, has denied the accusations.) Now that a federal suit has been filed in New York, however, the story has grown major legs; it's all over the Web (Google it), including on MSN.com. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : ROFLMAO! You're a real, died in the wool, True Believer. Nothing she or Bill can do is wrong, if caught doing something shady, then they were forced into it. It's always a vast right wing conspiracy with them and only idiots and True Believers fall for it. Once again, the Clinton's and their TB's are caught with their pants down. From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, July 3, 2016 12:33 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens Like I said, you're a real bottom-feeder. Disgusting. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Look at what has happened to the other women that have had to put up with Clinton's unwanted sexual advances. I think she felt helpless and thought long and hard about going up against the top law enforcement politician in the state. Each time Hillary started in on Trump about women, Trump brought up Bill and she shut up. They had to get something figured out. Took them a while to get this crap going about raping a thirteen year old girl. Trump hits back and much harder, something the Clinton's aren't used to. As I said, it's not holding water. Nobody is paying attention to it. It's not getting any traction. It's obviously a Clinton attempt to counter Trump. From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 8:16 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Broderick was dealing with the then Attorney General of Arkansas, William Jefferson Clinton, the person she accused of raping her in her own hotel room. Actually Broaddrick wasn't "dealing with him." But she could have had him charged with rape if she wanted to. She had witnesses of the aftermath, a bloodied, bruised, and swollen upper lip which she claims he bit in order to keep her from screaming during the attack. She screams with her lips? it would be nice if both took a polygraph, although Hillary says she has lost her confidence in them. You did notice the date of the affidavit regarding Trump and alleged rape of thirteen year old girl, June 18 2016? Does that sound suspicious to you? Not particularly, no. The first time Hillary attacked Trump on women, Trump slammed her back with Bill's exploits and warned her *never go there* and she backed off. This happened a couple of times as I recall. Um, so she *didn't* back off, she came back and did it again. The idea of Trump "warning" Hillary about anything is laughable. Of course there is a lot of talk about Clinton with under aged girls in the Bahamas at wild parties, I believe with Mark Rich. There's always been a lot of talk about the Clintons. The question is, how much of it is true? Look at how badly you screwed up on the ludicrous story about Hillary's defense of the accused rapist. The Clinton's had to *inoculate* themselves from their past and possible future, by accusing Trump of something worse first, Oh, jeez, Mike, can you be any more ridiculous? What have they accused him of besides misogyny? And it's not as if his misogyny wasn't already obvious. Hillary's just calling attention to it. Besides which, if he believes Bill Clinton is a rapist and "one of the worst abusers of women" in U.S. history, why did he invite Bill and Hillary to his wedding and pose for a photo with them (with Bill's arm around his new wife's waist)? so Hillary may continue with what she originally was going to say in respects to Trump and women. She will if and when she thinks it's called for. So far, it's not holding any water. It sounds like something the Clinton's would do. What would it look like if it were "holding water"? (What d
Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
http://www.100percentfedup.com/busted-main-political-fact-checker-for-snopes-is-finally-exposed-as-liberal-hack/ | | | | || | | | | | BUSTED! Main Political "Fact" Checker For SNOPES Is FINALLY EXPOS... By 100% FED Up Wait until you read this woman's biography and past quotes about conservatives! | | | | From: "Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com" Sent: Sunday, July 3, 2016 6:55 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens SNOPES absolutely sanitizes the events. The tape is Hillary in her own words, spoken years ago. SNOPES' explanation is recent damage control and an obvious attempt to clean up what is heard on the tape in Hillary's own words. So complete, that they, either SNOPES or the Clinton campaign, had to go get a judge, no doubt a Clinton supporter, campaign contributor to write something up in her defense and explain away what she said on the tape.Old Clinton trick, declare *nothing new here*. Well, the snopes attempt to cover for the Clinton's *is* new with new sources. The tape is the original. From: "authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, July 3, 2016 12:27 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens There's nothing "sanitized" about what's on Snopes. The tapes and transcripts are the same as what's on the page you link to, and that were provided by the original report in the Washington Free Beacon, on which the Daily News story is based. Nothing new here, sorry. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : BTW, I'll stick with what I said earlier about Hillary and her rapist client.http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/young-hillary-clintBon-heard-laughing-discussing-defense-accused-child-rapist-newly-discovered-audio-tapes-article-1.1832009 | | | | | | | | | | | Young Hillary Clinton heard laughing while discussing her defense of an acc... A young Hillary Clinton callously rejoiced at getting an accused child-rapist off the hook even though the then-... | | | | SNOPES gets the sanitized version to counter Hillary in her own words. From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 8:16 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Broderick was dealing with the then Attorney General of Arkansas, William Jefferson Clinton, the person she accused of raping her in her own hotel room. Actually Broaddrick wasn't "dealing with him." But she could have had him charged with rape if she wanted to. She had witnesses of the aftermath, a bloodied, bruised, and swollen upper lip which she claims he bit in order to keep her from screaming during the attack. She screams with her lips? it would be nice if both took a polygraph, although Hillary says she has lost her confidence in them. You did notice the date of the affidavit regarding Trump and alleged rape of thirteen year old girl, June 18 2016? Does that sound suspicious to you? Not particularly, no. The first time Hillary attacked Trump on women, Trump slammed her back with Bill's exploits and warned her *never go there* and she backed off. This happened a couple of times as I recall. Um, so she *didn't* back off, she came back and did it again. The idea of Trump "warning" Hillary about anything is laughable. Of course there is a lot of talk about Clinton with under aged girls in the Bahamas at wild parties, I believe with Mark Rich. There's always been a lot of talk about the Clintons. The question is, how much of it is true? Look at how badly you screwed up on the ludicrous story about Hillary's defense of the accused rapist. The Clinton's had to *inoculate* themselves from their past and possible future, by accusing Trump of something worse first, Oh, jeez, Mike, can you be any more ridiculous? What have they accused him of besides misogyny? And it's not as if his misogyny wasn't already obvious. Hillary's just calling attention to it. Besides which, if he believes Bill Clinton is a rapist and "one of the worst abusers of women" in U.S. history, why did he invite Bill and Hillary to his wedding and pose for a photo with them (with Bill's arm around his new wife's waist)? so Hillary may continue with what she originally was going to say in respects to Trump and women. She will if and when she thinks it's called for. So far, it's not holding any water. It sounds like something the Clinton's would do. What would it look like if it were "holding water"? (What does that even mean?) From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent
Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
Of course it's cooked up! Look at all of the dates involved! The supposed events took place twenty years ago and the affidavit is signed in the middle of June, this year, in the heat of the campaign! Thirteen year old girl lured to parties with promises of money and a modeling carrier, violently raped at the last party, tied down and repeatedly telling Trump *NO*. Covering all the bases here, aren't we. How else are the Clinton's going to shut Trump up about all the new allegations that could come out about Bill. The Clinton's have always been very smart but very sneaky. Trump is playing *hard ball* and has nothing to fear and that scares the Clinton's. They are dispirit. This will be Hillary's last shot and they're pulling out all the stops, even trying to tamper with the Attorney General. At this point , they have nothing to lose. Even Bill is probably going to be a target of the FBI investigation into his roll in the Clinton Foundation. Are you still convinced that the FBI isn't investigating Hillary but only doing a *security* evaluation of her home sever? Please Judy, I don't know if it's you that is that gullible or you just think everybody else is. From: "authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, July 3, 2016 12:38 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens It's not "obviously a Clinton attempt to counter Trump"; the claim that it is, is obviously yet another cooked-up right-wing smear attempt. Disgusting. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Look at what has happened to the other women that have had to put up with Clinton's unwanted sexual advances. I think she felt helpless and thought long and hard about going up against the top law enforcement politician in the state. Each time Hillary started in on Trump about women, Trump brought up Bill and she shut up. They had to get something figured out. Took them a while to get this crap going about raping a thirteen year old girl. Trump hits back and much harder, something the Clinton's aren't used to. As I said, it's not holding water. Nobody is paying attention to it. It's not getting any traction. It's obviously a Clinton attempt to counter Trump. From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 8:16 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Broderick was dealing with the then Attorney General of Arkansas, William Jefferson Clinton, the person she accused of raping her in her own hotel room. Actually Broaddrick wasn't "dealing with him." But she could have had him charged with rape if she wanted to. She had witnesses of the aftermath, a bloodied, bruised, and swollen upper lip which she claims he bit in order to keep her from screaming during the attack. She screams with her lips? it would be nice if both took a polygraph, although Hillary says she has lost her confidence in them. You did notice the date of the affidavit regarding Trump and alleged rape of thirteen year old girl, June 18 2016? Does that sound suspicious to you? Not particularly, no. The first time Hillary attacked Trump on women, Trump slammed her back with Bill's exploits and warned her *never go there* and she backed off. This happened a couple of times as I recall. Um, so she *didn't* back off, she came back and did it again. The idea of Trump "warning" Hillary about anything is laughable. Of course there is a lot of talk about Clinton with under aged girls in the Bahamas at wild parties, I believe with Mark Rich. There's always been a lot of talk about the Clintons. The question is, how much of it is true? Look at how badly you screwed up on the ludicrous story about Hillary's defense of the accused rapist. The Clinton's had to *inoculate* themselves from their past and possible future, by accusing Trump of something worse first, Oh, jeez, Mike, can you be any more ridiculous? What have they accused him of besides misogyny? And it's not as if his misogyny wasn't already obvious. Hillary's just calling attention to it. Besides which, if he believes Bill Clinton is a rapist and "one of the worst abusers of women" in U.S. history, why did he invite Bill and Hillary to his wedding and pose for a photo with them (with Bill's arm around his new wife's waist)? so Hillary may continue with what she originally was going to say in respects to Trump and women. She will if and when she thinks it's called for. So far, it's not holding any water. It sounds like something the Clinton's would do. What would it look like if it were "holding water"? (What does that even mean?) From: "authfriend@... [Fairfiel
Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
ROFLMAO! You're a real, died in the wool, True Believer. Nothing she or Bill can do is wrong, if caught doing something shady, then they were forced into it. It's always a vast right wing conspiracy with them and only idiots and True Believers fall for it. Once again, the Clinton's and their TB's are caught with their pants down. From: "authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, July 3, 2016 12:33 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens Like I said, you're a real bottom-feeder. Disgusting. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Look at what has happened to the other women that have had to put up with Clinton's unwanted sexual advances. I think she felt helpless and thought long and hard about going up against the top law enforcement politician in the state. Each time Hillary started in on Trump about women, Trump brought up Bill and she shut up. They had to get something figured out. Took them a while to get this crap going about raping a thirteen year old girl. Trump hits back and much harder, something the Clinton's aren't used to. As I said, it's not holding water. Nobody is paying attention to it. It's not getting any traction. It's obviously a Clinton attempt to counter Trump. From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 8:16 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Broderick was dealing with the then Attorney General of Arkansas, William Jefferson Clinton, the person she accused of raping her in her own hotel room. Actually Broaddrick wasn't "dealing with him." But she could have had him charged with rape if she wanted to. She had witnesses of the aftermath, a bloodied, bruised, and swollen upper lip which she claims he bit in order to keep her from screaming during the attack. She screams with her lips? it would be nice if both took a polygraph, although Hillary says she has lost her confidence in them. You did notice the date of the affidavit regarding Trump and alleged rape of thirteen year old girl, June 18 2016? Does that sound suspicious to you? Not particularly, no. The first time Hillary attacked Trump on women, Trump slammed her back with Bill's exploits and warned her *never go there* and she backed off. This happened a couple of times as I recall. Um, so she *didn't* back off, she came back and did it again. The idea of Trump "warning" Hillary about anything is laughable. Of course there is a lot of talk about Clinton with under aged girls in the Bahamas at wild parties, I believe with Mark Rich. There's always been a lot of talk about the Clintons. The question is, how much of it is true? Look at how badly you screwed up on the ludicrous story about Hillary's defense of the accused rapist. The Clinton's had to *inoculate* themselves from their past and possible future, by accusing Trump of something worse first, Oh, jeez, Mike, can you be any more ridiculous? What have they accused him of besides misogyny? And it's not as if his misogyny wasn't already obvious. Hillary's just calling attention to it. Besides which, if he believes Bill Clinton is a rapist and "one of the worst abusers of women" in U.S. history, why did he invite Bill and Hillary to his wedding and pose for a photo with them (with Bill's arm around his new wife's waist)? so Hillary may continue with what she originally was going to say in respects to Trump and women. She will if and when she thinks it's called for. So far, it's not holding any water. It sounds like something the Clinton's would do. What would it look like if it were "holding water"? (What does that even mean?) From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 3:26 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens Of course. Just wanted to know who you thought the accuser was. Broaddrick's accusation is hardly straightforward. After untold oodles of investigation, it still hasn't been confirmed; it remains he said-she said. She never had charges brought against Clinton, and she denied the rape rumors in an affidavit to Paula Jones's lawyers, although she later "told all" to NBC and the Wall Street Journal editorial page. So we still don't know if her story is true. In any case, my original point was that your claim that the suit against Trump makes him "doubly qualified to be president by Democratic standards" is just extraordinarily meanspirited nonsense. No Democratic president has ever even been accused of raping a 13-year-old girl. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : How many rapes? Juanita BrodrickHm
Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
SNOPES absolutely sanitizes the events. The tape is Hillary in her own words, spoken years ago. SNOPES' explanation is recent damage control and an obvious attempt to clean up what is heard on the tape in Hillary's own words. So complete, that they, either SNOPES or the Clinton campaign, had to go get a judge, no doubt a Clinton supporter, campaign contributor to write something up in her defense and explain away what she said on the tape.Old Clinton trick, declare *nothing new here*. Well, the snopes attempt to cover for the Clinton's *is* new with new sources. The tape is the original. From: "authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, July 3, 2016 12:27 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens There's nothing "sanitized" about what's on Snopes. The tapes and transcripts are the same as what's on the page you link to, and that were provided by the original report in the Washington Free Beacon, on which the Daily News story is based. Nothing new here, sorry. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : BTW, I'll stick with what I said earlier about Hillary and her rapist client.http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/young-hillary-clintBon-heard-laughing-discussing-defense-accused-child-rapist-newly-discovered-audio-tapes-article-1.1832009 | | | | | | | | | | | Young Hillary Clinton heard laughing while discussing her defense of an acc... A young Hillary Clinton callously rejoiced at getting an accused child-rapist off the hook even though the then-... | | | | SNOPES gets the sanitized version to counter Hillary in her own words. From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 8:16 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Broderick was dealing with the then Attorney General of Arkansas, William Jefferson Clinton, the person she accused of raping her in her own hotel room. Actually Broaddrick wasn't "dealing with him." But she could have had him charged with rape if she wanted to. She had witnesses of the aftermath, a bloodied, bruised, and swollen upper lip which she claims he bit in order to keep her from screaming during the attack. She screams with her lips? it would be nice if both took a polygraph, although Hillary says she has lost her confidence in them. You did notice the date of the affidavit regarding Trump and alleged rape of thirteen year old girl, June 18 2016? Does that sound suspicious to you? Not particularly, no. The first time Hillary attacked Trump on women, Trump slammed her back with Bill's exploits and warned her *never go there* and she backed off. This happened a couple of times as I recall. Um, so she *didn't* back off, she came back and did it again. The idea of Trump "warning" Hillary about anything is laughable. Of course there is a lot of talk about Clinton with under aged girls in the Bahamas at wild parties, I believe with Mark Rich. There's always been a lot of talk about the Clintons. The question is, how much of it is true? Look at how badly you screwed up on the ludicrous story about Hillary's defense of the accused rapist. The Clinton's had to *inoculate* themselves from their past and possible future, by accusing Trump of something worse first, Oh, jeez, Mike, can you be any more ridiculous? What have they accused him of besides misogyny? And it's not as if his misogyny wasn't already obvious. Hillary's just calling attention to it. Besides which, if he believes Bill Clinton is a rapist and "one of the worst abusers of women" in U.S. history, why did he invite Bill and Hillary to his wedding and pose for a photo with them (with Bill's arm around his new wife's waist)? so Hillary may continue with what she originally was going to say in respects to Trump and women. She will if and when she thinks it's called for. So far, it's not holding any water. It sounds like something the Clinton's would do. What would it look like if it were "holding water"? (What does that even mean?) From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 3:26 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens Of course. Just wanted to know who you thought the accuser was. Broaddrick's accusation is hardly straightforward. After untold oodles of investigation, it still hasn't been confirmed; it remains he said-she said. She never had charges brought against Clinton, and she denied the rape rumors in an affidavit to Paula Jones's lawyers, although she later "told all" to NBC and the Wall Street Journal editorial page. So we still don't know if her story is true. In an
Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
It's not "obviously a Clinton attempt to counter Trump"; the claim that it is, is obviously yet another cooked-up right-wing smear attempt. Disgusting. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Look at what has happened to the other women that have had to put up with Clinton's unwanted sexual advances. I think she felt helpless and thought long and hard about going up against the top law enforcement politician in the state. Each time Hillary started in on Trump about women, Trump brought up Bill and she shut up. They had to get something figured out. Took them a while to get this crap going about raping a thirteen year old girl. Trump hits back and much harder, something the Clinton's aren't used to. As I said, it's not holding water. Nobody is paying attention to it. It's not getting any traction. It's obviously a Clinton attempt to counter Trump. From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 8:16 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Broderick was dealing with the then Attorney General of Arkansas, William Jefferson Clinton, the person she accused of raping her in her own hotel room. Actually Broaddrick wasn't "dealing with him." But she could have had him charged with rape if she wanted to. She had witnesses of the aftermath, a bloodied, bruised, and swollen upper lip which she claims he bit in order to keep her from screaming during the attack. She screams with her lips? it would be nice if both took a polygraph, although Hillary says she has lost her confidence in them. You did notice the date of the affidavit regarding Trump and alleged rape of thirteen year old girl, June 18 2016? Does that sound suspicious to you? Not particularly, no. The first time Hillary attacked Trump on women, Trump slammed her back with Bill's exploits and warned her *never go there* and she backed off. This happened a couple of times as I recall. Um, so she *didn't* back off, she came back and did it again. The idea of Trump "warning" Hillary about anything is laughable. Of course there is a lot of talk about Clinton with under aged girls in the Bahamas at wild parties, I believe with Mark Rich. There's always been a lot of talk about the Clintons. The question is, how much of it is true? Look at how badly you screwed up on the ludicrous story about Hillary's defense of the accused rapist. The Clinton's had to *inoculate* themselves from their past and possible future, by accusing Trump of something worse first, Oh, jeez, Mike, can you be any more ridiculous? What have they accused him of besides misogyny? And it's not as if his misogyny wasn't already obvious. Hillary's just calling attention to it. Besides which, if he believes Bill Clinton is a rapist and "one of the worst abusers of women" in U.S. history, why did he invite Bill and Hillary to his wedding and pose for a photo with them (with Bill's arm around his new wife's waist)? so Hillary may continue with what she originally was going to say in respects to Trump and women. She will if and when she thinks it's called for. So far, it's not holding any water. It sounds like something the Clinton's would do. What would it look like if it were "holding water"? (What does that even mean?) From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 3:26 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens Of course. Just wanted to know who you thought the accuser was. Broaddrick's accusation is hardly straightforward. After untold oodles of investigation, it still hasn't been confirmed; it remains he said-she said. She never had charges brought against Clinton, and she denied the rape rumors in an affidavit to Paula Jones's lawyers, although she later "told all" to NBC and the Wall Street Journal editorial page. So we still don't know if her story is true. In any case, my original point was that your claim that the suit against Trump makes him "doubly qualified to be president by Democratic standards" is just extraordinarily meanspirited nonsense. No Democratic president has ever even been accused of raping a 13-year-old girl. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : How many rapes? Juanita Brodrick Hmmm,. sound familiar? From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 11:02 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : How many does it take? How many does it take to what?
Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
Like I said, you're a real bottom-feeder. Disgusting. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Look at what has happened to the other women that have had to put up with Clinton's unwanted sexual advances. I think she felt helpless and thought long and hard about going up against the top law enforcement politician in the state. Each time Hillary started in on Trump about women, Trump brought up Bill and she shut up. They had to get something figured out. Took them a while to get this crap going about raping a thirteen year old girl. Trump hits back and much harder, something the Clinton's aren't used to. As I said, it's not holding water. Nobody is paying attention to it. It's not getting any traction. It's obviously a Clinton attempt to counter Trump. From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 8:16 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Broderick was dealing with the then Attorney General of Arkansas, William Jefferson Clinton, the person she accused of raping her in her own hotel room. Actually Broaddrick wasn't "dealing with him." But she could have had him charged with rape if she wanted to. She had witnesses of the aftermath, a bloodied, bruised, and swollen upper lip which she claims he bit in order to keep her from screaming during the attack. She screams with her lips? it would be nice if both took a polygraph, although Hillary says she has lost her confidence in them. You did notice the date of the affidavit regarding Trump and alleged rape of thirteen year old girl, June 18 2016? Does that sound suspicious to you? Not particularly, no. The first time Hillary attacked Trump on women, Trump slammed her back with Bill's exploits and warned her *never go there* and she backed off. This happened a couple of times as I recall. Um, so she *didn't* back off, she came back and did it again. The idea of Trump "warning" Hillary about anything is laughable. Of course there is a lot of talk about Clinton with under aged girls in the Bahamas at wild parties, I believe with Mark Rich. There's always been a lot of talk about the Clintons. The question is, how much of it is true? Look at how badly you screwed up on the ludicrous story about Hillary's defense of the accused rapist. The Clinton's had to *inoculate* themselves from their past and possible future, by accusing Trump of something worse first, Oh, jeez, Mike, can you be any more ridiculous? What have they accused him of besides misogyny? And it's not as if his misogyny wasn't already obvious. Hillary's just calling attention to it. Besides which, if he believes Bill Clinton is a rapist and "one of the worst abusers of women" in U.S. history, why did he invite Bill and Hillary to his wedding and pose for a photo with them (with Bill's arm around his new wife's waist)? so Hillary may continue with what she originally was going to say in respects to Trump and women. She will if and when she thinks it's called for. So far, it's not holding any water. It sounds like something the Clinton's would do. What would it look like if it were "holding water"? (What does that even mean?) From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 3:26 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens Of course. Just wanted to know who you thought the accuser was. Broaddrick's accusation is hardly straightforward. After untold oodles of investigation, it still hasn't been confirmed; it remains he said-she said. She never had charges brought against Clinton, and she denied the rape rumors in an affidavit to Paula Jones's lawyers, although she later "told all" to NBC and the Wall Street Journal editorial page. So we still don't know if her story is true. In any case, my original point was that your claim that the suit against Trump makes him "doubly qualified to be president by Democratic standards" is just extraordinarily meanspirited nonsense. No Democratic president has ever even been accused of raping a 13-year-old girl. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : How many rapes? Juanita Brodrick Hmmm,. sound familiar? From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 11:02 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : How many does it take? How many does it take to what?? And, again, how many was it? Below you refer to "the rape victim," so I gather there was only o
Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
There's nothing "sanitized" about what's on Snopes. The tapes and transcripts are the same as what's on the page you link to, and that were provided by the original report in the Washington Free Beacon, on which the Daily News story is based. Nothing new here, sorry. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : BTW, I'll stick with what I said earlier about Hillary and her rapist client.http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/young-hillary-clintBon-heard-laughing-discussing-defense-accused-child-rapist-newly-discovered-audio-tapes-article-1.1832009 http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/young-hillary-clinton-heard-laughing-discussing-defense-accused-child-rapist-newly-discovered-audio-tapes-article-1.1832009 Young Hillary Clinton heard laughing while discussing her defense of an acc... A young Hillary Clinton callously rejoiced at getting an accused child-rapist off the hook even though the then-... http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/young-hillary-clinton-heard-laughing-discussing-defense-accused-child-rapist-newly-discovered-audio-tapes-article-1.1832009 SNOPES gets the sanitized version to counter Hillary in her own words. From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 8:16 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Broderick was dealing with the then Attorney General of Arkansas, William Jefferson Clinton, the person she accused of raping her in her own hotel room. Actually Broaddrick wasn't "dealing with him." But she could have had him charged with rape if she wanted to. She had witnesses of the aftermath, a bloodied, bruised, and swollen upper lip which she claims he bit in order to keep her from screaming during the attack. She screams with her lips? it would be nice if both took a polygraph, although Hillary says she has lost her confidence in them. You did notice the date of the affidavit regarding Trump and alleged rape of thirteen year old girl, June 18 2016? Does that sound suspicious to you? Not particularly, no. The first time Hillary attacked Trump on women, Trump slammed her back with Bill's exploits and warned her *never go there* and she backed off. This happened a couple of times as I recall. Um, so she *didn't* back off, she came back and did it again. The idea of Trump "warning" Hillary about anything is laughable. Of course there is a lot of talk about Clinton with under aged girls in the Bahamas at wild parties, I believe with Mark Rich. There's always been a lot of talk about the Clintons. The question is, how much of it is true? Look at how badly you screwed up on the ludicrous story about Hillary's defense of the accused rapist. The Clinton's had to *inoculate* themselves from their past and possible future, by accusing Trump of something worse first, Oh, jeez, Mike, can you be any more ridiculous? What have they accused him of besides misogyny? And it's not as if his misogyny wasn't already obvious. Hillary's just calling attention to it. Besides which, if he believes Bill Clinton is a rapist and "one of the worst abusers of women" in U.S. history, why did he invite Bill and Hillary to his wedding and pose for a photo with them (with Bill's arm around his new wife's waist)? so Hillary may continue with what she originally was going to say in respects to Trump and women. She will if and when she thinks it's called for. So far, it's not holding any water. It sounds like something the Clinton's would do. What would it look like if it were "holding water"? (What does that even mean?) From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 3:26 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens Of course. Just wanted to know who you thought the accuser was. Broaddrick's accusation is hardly straightforward. After untold oodles of investigation, it still hasn't been confirmed; it remains he said-she said. She never had charges brought against Clinton, and she denied the rape rumors in an affidavit to Paula Jones's lawyers, although she later "told all" to NBC and the Wall Street Journal editorial page. So we still don't know if her story is true. In any case, my original point was that your claim that the suit against Trump makes him "doubly qualified to be president by Democratic standards" is just extraordinarily meanspirited nonsense. No Democratic president has ever even been accused of raping a 13-year-old girl. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : How many rapes? Juanita Brodrick Hmmm,. sound familiar? From: &qu
Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
BTW, I'll stick with what I said earlier about Hillary and her rapist client.http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/young-hillary-clinton-heard-laughing-discussing-defense-accused-child-rapist-newly-discovered-audio-tapes-article-1.1832009 | | | | || | | | || Young Hillary Clinton heard laughing while discussing her defense of an acc... A young Hillary Clinton callously rejoiced at getting an accused child-rapist off the hook even though the then-... | | | | SNOPES gets the sanitized version to counter Hillary in her own words. From: "authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 8:16 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Broderick was dealing with the then Attorney General of Arkansas, William Jefferson Clinton, the person she accused of raping her in her own hotel room. Actually Broaddrick wasn't "dealing with him." But she could have had him charged with rape if she wanted to. She had witnesses of the aftermath, a bloodied, bruised, and swollen upper lip which she claims he bit in order to keep her from screaming during the attack. She screams with her lips? it would be nice if both took a polygraph, although Hillary says she has lost her confidence in them. You did notice the date of the affidavit regarding Trump and alleged rape of thirteen year old girl, June 18 2016? Does that sound suspicious to you? Not particularly, no. The first time Hillary attacked Trump on women, Trump slammed her back with Bill's exploits and warned her *never go there* and she backed off. This happened a couple of times as I recall. Um, so she *didn't* back off, she came back and did it again. The idea of Trump "warning" Hillary about anything is laughable. Of course there is a lot of talk about Clinton with under aged girls in the Bahamas at wild parties, I believe with Mark Rich. There's always been a lot of talk about the Clintons. The question is, how much of it is true? Look at how badly you screwed up on the ludicrous story about Hillary's defense of the accused rapist. The Clinton's had to *inoculate* themselves from their past and possible future, by accusing Trump of something worse first, Oh, jeez, Mike, can you be any more ridiculous? What have they accused him of besides misogyny? And it's not as if his misogyny wasn't already obvious. Hillary's just calling attention to it. Besides which, if he believes Bill Clinton is a rapist and "one of the worst abusers of women" in U.S. history, why did he invite Bill and Hillary to his wedding and pose for a photo with them (with Bill's arm around his new wife's waist)? so Hillary may continue with what she originally was going to say in respects to Trump and women. She will if and when she thinks it's called for. So far, it's not holding any water. It sounds like something the Clinton's would do. What would it look like if it were "holding water"? (What does that even mean?) From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 3:26 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens Of course. Just wanted to know who you thought the accuser was. Broaddrick's accusation is hardly straightforward. After untold oodles of investigation, it still hasn't been confirmed; it remains he said-she said. She never had charges brought against Clinton, and she denied the rape rumors in an affidavit to Paula Jones's lawyers, although she later "told all" to NBC and the Wall Street Journal editorial page. So we still don't know if her story is true. In any case, my original point was that your claim that the suit against Trump makes him "doubly qualified to be president by Democratic standards" is just extraordinarily meanspirited nonsense. No Democratic president has ever even been accused of raping a 13-year-old girl. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : How many rapes? Juanita BrodrickHmmm,. sound familiar? From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 11:02 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : How many does it take? How many does it take to what?? And, again, how many was it? Below you refer to "the rape victim," so I gather there was only one who accused him of rape. Who was it? As for the woman accusing Trump, listen to what she has to say and let her have her day in court. At least she'll have one. I'm guessing she won't. Trump is too powerful. I just hope she doesn't meet wih a mysterious fatal "accident." More likely, he'll arra
Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
Look at what has happened to the other women that have had to put up with Clinton's unwanted sexual advances. I think she felt helpless and thought long and hard about going up against the top law enforcement politician in the state. Each time Hillary started in on Trump about women, Trump brought up Bill and she shut up. They had to get something figured out. Took them a while to get this crap going about raping a thirteen year old girl. Trump hits back and much harder, something the Clinton's aren't used to. As I said, it's not holding water. Nobody is paying attention to it. It's not getting any traction. It's obviously a Clinton attempt to counter Trump. From: "authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 8:16 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Broderick was dealing with the then Attorney General of Arkansas, William Jefferson Clinton, the person she accused of raping her in her own hotel room. Actually Broaddrick wasn't "dealing with him." But she could have had him charged with rape if she wanted to. She had witnesses of the aftermath, a bloodied, bruised, and swollen upper lip which she claims he bit in order to keep her from screaming during the attack. She screams with her lips? it would be nice if both took a polygraph, although Hillary says she has lost her confidence in them. You did notice the date of the affidavit regarding Trump and alleged rape of thirteen year old girl, June 18 2016? Does that sound suspicious to you? Not particularly, no. The first time Hillary attacked Trump on women, Trump slammed her back with Bill's exploits and warned her *never go there* and she backed off. This happened a couple of times as I recall. Um, so she *didn't* back off, she came back and did it again. The idea of Trump "warning" Hillary about anything is laughable. Of course there is a lot of talk about Clinton with under aged girls in the Bahamas at wild parties, I believe with Mark Rich. There's always been a lot of talk about the Clintons. The question is, how much of it is true? Look at how badly you screwed up on the ludicrous story about Hillary's defense of the accused rapist. The Clinton's had to *inoculate* themselves from their past and possible future, by accusing Trump of something worse first, Oh, jeez, Mike, can you be any more ridiculous? What have they accused him of besides misogyny? And it's not as if his misogyny wasn't already obvious. Hillary's just calling attention to it. Besides which, if he believes Bill Clinton is a rapist and "one of the worst abusers of women" in U.S. history, why did he invite Bill and Hillary to his wedding and pose for a photo with them (with Bill's arm around his new wife's waist)? so Hillary may continue with what she originally was going to say in respects to Trump and women. She will if and when she thinks it's called for. So far, it's not holding any water. It sounds like something the Clinton's would do. What would it look like if it were "holding water"? (What does that even mean?) From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 3:26 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens Of course. Just wanted to know who you thought the accuser was. Broaddrick's accusation is hardly straightforward. After untold oodles of investigation, it still hasn't been confirmed; it remains he said-she said. She never had charges brought against Clinton, and she denied the rape rumors in an affidavit to Paula Jones's lawyers, although she later "told all" to NBC and the Wall Street Journal editorial page. So we still don't know if her story is true. In any case, my original point was that your claim that the suit against Trump makes him "doubly qualified to be president by Democratic standards" is just extraordinarily meanspirited nonsense. No Democratic president has ever even been accused of raping a 13-year-old girl. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : How many rapes? Juanita BrodrickHmmm,. sound familiar? From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 11:02 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : How many does it take? How many does it take to what?? And, again, how many was it? Below you refer to "the rape victim," so I gather there was only one who accused him of rape. Who was it? As for the woman accusing Trump, listen to what she has to say and let her have her day in court. At least she'll have one. I'm guessing she won't. Trump is too powerful. I jus
Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Broderick was dealing with the then Attorney General of Arkansas, William Jefferson Clinton, the person she accused of raping her in her own hotel room. Actually Broaddrick wasn't "dealing with him." But she could have had him charged with rape if she wanted to. She had witnesses of the aftermath, a bloodied, bruised, and swollen upper lip which she claims he bit in order to keep her from screaming during the attack. She screams with her lips? it would be nice if both took a polygraph, although Hillary says she has lost her confidence in them. You did notice the date of the affidavit regarding Trump and alleged rape of thirteen year old girl, June 18 2016? Does that sound suspicious to you? Not particularly, no. The first time Hillary attacked Trump on women, Trump slammed her back with Bill's exploits and warned her *never go there* and she backed off. This happened a couple of times as I recall. Um, so she *didn't* back off, she came back and did it again. The idea of Trump "warning" Hillary about anything is laughable. Of course there is a lot of talk about Clinton with under aged girls in the Bahamas at wild parties, I believe with Mark Rich. There's always been a lot of talk about the Clintons. The question is, how much of it is true? Look at how badly you screwed up on the ludicrous story about Hillary's defense of the accused rapist. The Clinton's had to *inoculate* themselves from their past and possible future, by accusing Trump of something worse first, Oh, jeez, Mike, can you be any more ridiculous? What have they accused him of besides misogyny? And it's not as if his misogyny wasn't already obvious. Hillary's just calling attention to it. Besides which, if he believes Bill Clinton is a rapist and "one of the worst abusers of women" in U.S. history, why did he invite Bill and Hillary to his wedding and pose for a photo with them (with Bill's arm around his new wife's waist)? so Hillary may continue with what she originally was going to say in respects to Trump and women. She will if and when she thinks it's called for. So far, it's not holding any water. It sounds like something the Clinton's would do. What would it look like if it were "holding water"? (What does that even mean?) From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 3:26 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens Of course. Just wanted to know who you thought the accuser was. Broaddrick's accusation is hardly straightforward. After untold oodles of investigation, it still hasn't been confirmed; it remains he said-she said. She never had charges brought against Clinton, and she denied the rape rumors in an affidavit to Paula Jones's lawyers, although she later "told all" to NBC and the Wall Street Journal editorial page. So we still don't know if her story is true. In any case, my original point was that your claim that the suit against Trump makes him "doubly qualified to be president by Democratic standards" is just extraordinarily meanspirited nonsense. No Democratic president has ever even been accused of raping a 13-year-old girl. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : How many rapes? Juanita Brodrick Hmmm,. sound familiar? From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 11:02 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : How many does it take? How many does it take to what?? And, again, how many was it? Below you refer to "the rape victim," so I gather there was only one who accused him of rape. Who was it? As for the woman accusing Trump, listen to what she has to say and let her have her day in court. At least she'll have one. I'm guessing she won't. Trump is too powerful. I just hope she doesn't meet wih a mysterious fatal "accident." More likely, he'll arrange for her to be paid off to withdraw the suit and keep silent. Clinton's victims had to deal with the powerful politicians. The rape victim had to deal with the attorney general of Arkansas, her rapist. From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 9:11 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : The women's stories that accused him is good enough for me. There are way too many. How many have accused him of rape? And those that have made such charges, didn't exactly give him h
Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
Broderick was dealing with the then Attorney General of Arkansas, William Jefferson Clinton, the person she accused of raping her in her own hotel room. She had witnesses of the aftermath, a bloodied, bruised, and swollen upper lip which she claims he bit in order to keep her from screaming during the attack. it would be nice if both took a polygraph, although Hillary says she has lost her confidence in them.You did notice the date of the affidavit regarding Trump and alleged rape of thirteen year old girl, June 18 2016? Does that sound suspicious to you? The first time Hillary attacked Trump on women, Trump slammed her back with Bill's exploits and warned her *never go there* and she backed off. This happened a couple of times as I recall. Of course there is a lot of talk about Clinton with under aged girls in the Bahamas at wild parties, I believe with Mark Rich.The Clinton's had to *inoculate* themselves from their past and possible future, by accusing Trump of something worse first, so Hillary may continue with what she originally was going to say in respects to Trump and women. So far, it's not holding any water. It sounds like something the Clinton's would do. From: "authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 3:26 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens Of course. Just wanted to know who you thought the accuser was. Broaddrick's accusation is hardly straightforward. After untold oodles of investigation, it still hasn't been confirmed; it remains he said-she said. She never had charges brought against Clinton, and she denied the rape rumors in an affidavit to Paula Jones's lawyers, although she later "told all" to NBC and the Wall Street Journal editorial page. So we still don't know if her story is true. In any case, my original point was that your claim that the suit against Trump makes him "doubly qualified to be president by Democratic standards" is just extraordinarily meanspirited nonsense. No Democratic president has ever even been accused of raping a 13-year-old girl. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : How many rapes? Juanita BrodrickHmmm,. sound familiar? From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 11:02 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : How many does it take? How many does it take to what?? And, again, how many was it? Below you refer to "the rape victim," so I gather there was only one who accused him of rape. Who was it? As for the woman accusing Trump, listen to what she has to say and let her have her day in court. At least she'll have one. I'm guessing she won't. Trump is too powerful. I just hope she doesn't meet wih a mysterious fatal "accident." More likely, he'll arrange for her to be paid off to withdraw the suit and keep silent. Clinton's victims had to deal with the powerful politicians. The rape victim had to deal with the attorney general of Arkansas, her rapist. From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 9:11 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : The women's stories that accused him is good enough for me. There are way too many. How many have accused him of rape? And those that have made such charges, didn't exactly give him his reputation. I think it was Hillary that said every woman should be believes when they make that charge. Except when it involves her or her interests. So we should believe the woman who is suing Trump for raping her when she was 13 years old, right? It's one thing to believe every woman *when they make the charge*. It's quite another to continue to believe them when it turns out the evidence for the charge is flimsy or nonexistent. That story has been out for months and I had already checked SNOPES. They don't exactly deny it, although they seriously massage it to make it not sound so bad. Translation: They present the facts, which show that it's the nonfacts parroted by right-wingers like you that make it sound so bad. Did you listen to her taped interview? Yeah, she laughed when she said the guy passed a polygraph. Made her lose all confidence in them she said. Which questions and answers was she referring to, specifically? Nowhere did she laugh about the outcome of the case. Got the guy a reduced sentence because some evidence had been mishandled. Did you actually read the Snopes page? The girl and her mother pressured the prosecutor for a plea deal to avoid the girl having to testify at trial (understandably). The prosecutor reduced the charge, and the judge then
Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
Of course. Just wanted to know who you thought the accuser was. Broaddrick's accusation is hardly straightforward. After untold oodles of investigation, it still hasn't been confirmed; it remains he said-she said. She never had charges brought against Clinton, and she denied the rape rumors in an affidavit to Paula Jones's lawyers, although she later "told all" to NBC and the Wall Street Journal editorial page. So we still don't know if her story is true. In any case, my original point was that your claim that the suit against Trump makes him "doubly qualified to be president by Democratic standards" is just extraordinarily meanspirited nonsense. No Democratic president has ever even been accused of raping a 13-year-old girl. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : How many rapes? Juanita Brodrick Hmmm,. sound familiar? From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 11:02 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : How many does it take? How many does it take to what?? And, again, how many was it? Below you refer to "the rape victim," so I gather there was only one who accused him of rape. Who was it? As for the woman accusing Trump, listen to what she has to say and let her have her day in court. At least she'll have one. I'm guessing she won't. Trump is too powerful. I just hope she doesn't meet wih a mysterious fatal "accident." More likely, he'll arrange for her to be paid off to withdraw the suit and keep silent. Clinton's victims had to deal with the powerful politicians. The rape victim had to deal with the attorney general of Arkansas, her rapist. From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 9:11 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : The women's stories that accused him is good enough for me. There are way too many. How many have accused him of rape? And those that have made such charges, didn't exactly give him his reputation. I think it was Hillary that said every woman should be believes when they make that charge. Except when it involves her or her interests. So we should believe the woman who is suing Trump for raping her when she was 13 years old, right? It's one thing to believe every woman *when they make the charge*. It's quite another to continue to believe them when it turns out the evidence for the charge is flimsy or nonexistent. That story has been out for months and I had already checked SNOPES. They don't exactly deny it, although they seriously massage it to make it not sound so bad. Translation: They present the facts, which show that it's the nonfacts parroted by right-wingers like you that make it sound so bad. Did you listen to her taped interview? Yeah, she laughed when she said the guy passed a polygraph. Made her lose all confidence in them she said. Which questions and answers was she referring to, specifically? Nowhere did she laugh about the outcome of the case. Got the guy a reduced sentence because some evidence had been mishandled. Did you actually read the Snopes page? The girl and her mother pressured the prosecutor for a plea deal to avoid the girl having to testify at trial (understandably). The prosecutor reduced the charge, and the judge then reduced the sentence. She had to do it though... as a favor. A *favor* she said in the tape. Sounds like one of those sniper stories. Snopes quotes the *prosecutor* as confirming that she didn't want to take the case when the judge appointed her and tried hard to get out of it. But she got stuck with it. Right-wingers like you don't believe in due process (unless they or their interests are on trial, of course). You don't think the lawyer for the accused has an ethical obligation to do his or her best for the client. You think he or she should flout judicial ethics and allow the accused to be convicted and punished without making the best possible case. If you did believe in due process, there would be no way for you to smear Hillary with her involvement in this case. From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 9:16 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Clinton raped older women and molested them. And the proof is...? Hillary also defended, successfully, a rapist of an eleven or twelve year old girl, that she knew was guilty... and laughed about it. You're a real bottom-feeder, aren't you? Y
Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
How many rapes? Juanita BrodrickHmmm,. sound familiar? From: "authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 11:02 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : How many does it take? How many does it take to what?? And, again, how many was it? Below you refer to "the rape victim," so I gather there was only one who accused him of rape. Who was it? As for the woman accusing Trump, listen to what she has to say and let her have her day in court. At least she'll have one. I'm guessing she won't. Trump is too powerful. I just hope she doesn't meet wih a mysterious fatal "accident." More likely, he'll arrange for her to be paid off to withdraw the suit and keep silent. Clinton's victims had to deal with the powerful politicians. The rape victim had to deal with the attorney general of Arkansas, her rapist. From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 9:11 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : The women's stories that accused him is good enough for me. There are way too many. How many have accused him of rape? And those that have made such charges, didn't exactly give him his reputation. I think it was Hillary that said every woman should be believes when they make that charge. Except when it involves her or her interests. So we should believe the woman who is suing Trump for raping her when she was 13 years old, right? It's one thing to believe every woman *when they make the charge*. It's quite another to continue to believe them when it turns out the evidence for the charge is flimsy or nonexistent. That story has been out for months and I had already checked SNOPES. They don't exactly deny it, although they seriously massage it to make it not sound so bad. Translation: They present the facts, which show that it's the nonfacts parroted by right-wingers like you that make it sound so bad. Did you listen to her taped interview? Yeah, she laughed when she said the guy passed a polygraph. Made her lose all confidence in them she said. Which questions and answers was she referring to, specifically? Nowhere did she laugh about the outcome of the case. Got the guy a reduced sentence because some evidence had been mishandled. Did you actually read the Snopes page? The girl and her mother pressured the prosecutor for a plea deal to avoid the girl having to testify at trial (understandably). The prosecutor reduced the charge, and the judge then reduced the sentence. She had to do it though... as a favor. A *favor* she said in the tape. Sounds like one of those sniper stories. Snopes quotes the *prosecutor* as confirming that she didn't want to take the case when the judge appointed her and tried hard to get out of it. But she got stuck with it. Right-wingers like you don't believe in due process (unless they or their interests are on trial, of course). You don't think the lawyer for the accused has an ethical obligation to do his or her best for the client. You think he or she should flout judicial ethics and allow the accused to be convicted and punished without making the best possible case. If you did believe in due process, there would be no way for you to smear Hillary with her involvement in this case. From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 9:16 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Clinton raped older women and molested them. And the proof is...? Hillary also defended, successfully, a rapist of an eleven or twelve year old girl, that she knew was guilty... and laughed about it. You're a real bottom-feeder, aren't you? You just don't care what the facts are. It's more important to get your smears in than to tell the truth: FALSE: Hillary Clinton Freed Child Rapist, Laughed About It | | | | | | FALSE: Hillary Clinton Freed Child Rapist, Laughed About... Hillary Clinton's role in a 40-year-old rape case became the focal point of a viral meme in 2016, but the claims made about it were mostly inaccurate. | | | View on www.snopes.com| Preview by Yahoo | | | From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 5:34 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens Oh, really? And which Democratic presidents have been accused of raping 13-year-old girls? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : ROFLMAO! That should make Trump doubly qualified to be president by Democratic standards! From: "awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife]"
Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
If Snopes and/or PolitiFact report on this at all, the facts they cite will be the facts of what Lynch (and anybody else who was present) said about the conversation. Neither of them is in a position to report the facts of what was said on the plane (unless somebody slips them an audiotape). If they report on this, it will only be because some crazed right-wingers start spreading made-up rumors about what was discussed. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : BTW, undoubtedly Snopes and Politifact will report that there is absolutely no truth to anything other than grandchildren and golf being discussed between Loretta Lynch and Bill Clinton on an airplane in Phoenix for thirty minutes. Those are the facts because that's what Lynch said.
Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : How many does it take? How many does it take to what?? And, again, how many was it? Below you refer to "the rape victim," so I gather there was only one who accused him of rape. Who was it? As for the woman accusing Trump, listen to what she has to say and let her have her day in court. At least she'll have one. I'm guessing she won't. Trump is too powerful. I just hope she doesn't meet wih a mysterious fatal "accident." More likely, he'll arrange for her to be paid off to withdraw the suit and keep silent. Clinton's victims had to deal with the powerful politicians. The rape victim had to deal with the attorney general of Arkansas, her rapist. From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 9:11 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : The women's stories that accused him is good enough for me. There are way too many. How many have accused him of rape? And those that have made such charges, didn't exactly give him his reputation. I think it was Hillary that said every woman should be believes when they make that charge. Except when it involves her or her interests. So we should believe the woman who is suing Trump for raping her when she was 13 years old, right? It's one thing to believe every woman *when they make the charge*. It's quite another to continue to believe them when it turns out the evidence for the charge is flimsy or nonexistent. That story has been out for months and I had already checked SNOPES. They don't exactly deny it, although they seriously massage it to make it not sound so bad. Translation: They present the facts, which show that it's the nonfacts parroted by right-wingers like you that make it sound so bad. Did you listen to her taped interview? Yeah, she laughed when she said the guy passed a polygraph. Made her lose all confidence in them she said. Which questions and answers was she referring to, specifically? Nowhere did she laugh about the outcome of the case. Got the guy a reduced sentence because some evidence had been mishandled. Did you actually read the Snopes page? The girl and her mother pressured the prosecutor for a plea deal to avoid the girl having to testify at trial (understandably). The prosecutor reduced the charge, and the judge then reduced the sentence. She had to do it though... as a favor. A *favor* she said in the tape. Sounds like one of those sniper stories. Snopes quotes the *prosecutor* as confirming that she didn't want to take the case when the judge appointed her and tried hard to get out of it. But she got stuck with it. Right-wingers like you don't believe in due process (unless they or their interests are on trial, of course). You don't think the lawyer for the accused has an ethical obligation to do his or her best for the client. You think he or she should flout judicial ethics and allow the accused to be convicted and punished without making the best possible case. If you did believe in due process, there would be no way for you to smear Hillary with her involvement in this case. From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 9:16 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Clinton raped older women and molested them. And the proof is...? Hillary also defended, successfully, a rapist of an eleven or twelve year old girl, that she knew was guilty... and laughed about it. You're a real bottom-feeder, aren't you? You just don't care what the facts are. It's more important to get your smears in than to tell the truth: FALSE: Hillary Clinton Freed Child Rapist, Laughed About It http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-freed-child-rapist-laughed-about-it/ http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-freed-child-rapist-laughed-about-it/ FALSE: Hillary Clinton Freed Child Rapist, Laughed About... http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-freed-child-rapist-laughed-about-it/ Hillary Clinton's role in a 40-year-old rape case became the focal point of a viral meme in 2016, but the claims made about it were mostly inaccurate. View on www.snopes.com http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-freed-child-rapist-laughed-about-it/ Preview by Yahoo From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 5:34 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens Oh, really? And which Democratic presidents have been accused of raping 13-year-old girls? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrot
Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
BTW, undoubtedly Snopes and Politifact will report that there is absolutely no truth to anything other than grandchildren and golf being discussed between Loretta Lynch and Bill Clinton on an airplane in Phoenix for thirty minutes. Those are the facts because that's what Lynch said. From: "authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 9:11 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : The women's stories that accused him is good enough for me. There are way too many. How many have accused him of rape? And those that have made such charges, didn't exactly give him his reputation. I think it was Hillary that said every woman should be believes when they make that charge. Except when it involves her or her interests. So we should believe the woman who is suing Trump for raping her when she was 13 years old, right? It's one thing to believe every woman *when they make the charge*. It's quite another to continue to believe them when it turns out the evidence for the charge is flimsy or nonexistent. That story has been out for months and I had already checked SNOPES. They don't exactly deny it, although they seriously massage it to make it not sound so bad. Translation: They present the facts, which show that it's the nonfacts parroted by right-wingers like you that make it sound so bad. Did you listen to her taped interview? Yeah, she laughed when she said the guy passed a polygraph. Made her lose all confidence in them she said. Which questions and answers was she referring to, specifically? Nowhere did she laugh about the outcome of the case. Got the guy a reduced sentence because some evidence had been mishandled. Did you actually read the Snopes page? The girl and her mother pressured the prosecutor for a plea deal to avoid the girl having to testify at trial (understandably). The prosecutor reduced the charge, and the judge then reduced the sentence. She had to do it though... as a favor. A *favor* she said in the tape. Sounds like one of those sniper stories. Snopes quotes the *prosecutor* as confirming that she didn't want to take the case when the judge appointed her and tried hard to get out of it. But she got stuck with it. Right-wingers like you don't believe in due process (unless they or their interests are on trial, of course). You don't think the lawyer for the accused has an ethical obligation to do his or her best for the client. You think he or she should flout judicial ethics and allow the accused to be convicted and punished without making the best possible case. If you did believe in due process, there would be no way for you to smear Hillary with her involvement in this case. From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 9:16 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Clinton raped older women and molested them. And the proof is...? Hillary also defended, successfully, a rapist of an eleven or twelve year old girl, that she knew was guilty... and laughed about it. You're a real bottom-feeder, aren't you? You just don't care what the facts are. It's more important to get your smears in than to tell the truth: FALSE: Hillary Clinton Freed Child Rapist, Laughed About It | | | | | | FALSE: Hillary Clinton Freed Child Rapist, Laughed About... Hillary Clinton's role in a 40-year-old rape case became the focal point of a viral meme in 2016, but the claims made about it were mostly inaccurate. | | | View on www.snopes.com| Preview by Yahoo | | | From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 5:34 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens Oh, really? And which Democratic presidents have been accused of raping 13-year-old girls? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : ROFLMAO! That should make Trump doubly qualified to be president by Democratic standards! From: "awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 12:48 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens https://www.scribd.com/doc/316341058/Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-Rape-Lawsuit-and-Affidavits Oh, really? And which Democratic presidents have been accused of raping 13-year-old girls? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : ROFLMAO! That should make Trump doubly qualified to be president by Democratic standards! From: "awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 12:48 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens https://www.scribd.com/doc/316341058/Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstei
Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
How many does it take? As for the woman accusing Trump, listen to what she has to say and let her have her day in court. At least she'll have one. Clinton's victims had to deal with the powerful politicians. The rape victim had to deal with the attorney general of Arkansas, her rapist. From: "authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 9:11 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : The women's stories that accused him is good enough for me. There are way too many. How many have accused him of rape? And those that have made such charges, didn't exactly give him his reputation. I think it was Hillary that said every woman should be believes when they make that charge. Except when it involves her or her interests. So we should believe the woman who is suing Trump for raping her when she was 13 years old, right? It's one thing to believe every woman *when they make the charge*. It's quite another to continue to believe them when it turns out the evidence for the charge is flimsy or nonexistent. That story has been out for months and I had already checked SNOPES. They don't exactly deny it, although they seriously massage it to make it not sound so bad. Translation: They present the facts, which show that it's the nonfacts parroted by right-wingers like you that make it sound so bad. Did you listen to her taped interview? Yeah, she laughed when she said the guy passed a polygraph. Made her lose all confidence in them she said. Which questions and answers was she referring to, specifically? Nowhere did she laugh about the outcome of the case. Got the guy a reduced sentence because some evidence had been mishandled. Did you actually read the Snopes page? The girl and her mother pressured the prosecutor for a plea deal to avoid the girl having to testify at trial (understandably). The prosecutor reduced the charge, and the judge then reduced the sentence. She had to do it though... as a favor. A *favor* she said in the tape. Sounds like one of those sniper stories. Snopes quotes the *prosecutor* as confirming that she didn't want to take the case when the judge appointed her and tried hard to get out of it. But she got stuck with it. Right-wingers like you don't believe in due process (unless they or their interests are on trial, of course). You don't think the lawyer for the accused has an ethical obligation to do his or her best for the client. You think he or she should flout judicial ethics and allow the accused to be convicted and punished without making the best possible case. If you did believe in due process, there would be no way for you to smear Hillary with her involvement in this case. From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 9:16 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Clinton raped older women and molested them. And the proof is...? Hillary also defended, successfully, a rapist of an eleven or twelve year old girl, that she knew was guilty... and laughed about it. You're a real bottom-feeder, aren't you? You just don't care what the facts are. It's more important to get your smears in than to tell the truth: FALSE: Hillary Clinton Freed Child Rapist, Laughed About It | | | | | | FALSE: Hillary Clinton Freed Child Rapist, Laughed About... Hillary Clinton's role in a 40-year-old rape case became the focal point of a viral meme in 2016, but the claims made about it were mostly inaccurate. | | | View on www.snopes.com| Preview by Yahoo | | | From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 5:34 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens Oh, really? And which Democratic presidents have been accused of raping 13-year-old girls? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : ROFLMAO! That should make Trump doubly qualified to be president by Democratic standards! From: "awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 12:48 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens https://www.scribd.com/doc/316341058/Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-Rape-Lawsuit-and-Affidavits Oh, really? And which Democratic presidents have been accused of raping 13-year-old girls? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : ROFLMAO! That should make Trump doubly qualified to be president by Democratic standards! From: "awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 12:48 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens https://www.scribd.com/doc/316341058/Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-E
Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : The women's stories that accused him is good enough for me. There are way too many. How many have accused him of rape? And those that have made such charges, didn't exactly give him his reputation. I think it was Hillary that said every woman should be believes when they make that charge. Except when it involves her or her interests. So we should believe the woman who is suing Trump for raping her when she was 13 years old, right? It's one thing to believe every woman *when they make the charge*. It's quite another to continue to believe them when it turns out the evidence for the charge is flimsy or nonexistent. That story has been out for months and I had already checked SNOPES. They don't exactly deny it, although they seriously massage it to make it not sound so bad. Translation: They present the facts, which show that it's the nonfacts parroted by right-wingers like you that make it sound so bad. Did you listen to her taped interview? Yeah, she laughed when she said the guy passed a polygraph. Made her lose all confidence in them she said. Which questions and answers was she referring to, specifically? Nowhere did she laugh about the outcome of the case. Got the guy a reduced sentence because some evidence had been mishandled. Did you actually read the Snopes page? The girl and her mother pressured the prosecutor for a plea deal to avoid the girl having to testify at trial (understandably). The prosecutor reduced the charge, and the judge then reduced the sentence. She had to do it though... as a favor. A *favor* she said in the tape. Sounds like one of those sniper stories. Snopes quotes the *prosecutor* as confirming that she didn't want to take the case when the judge appointed her and tried hard to get out of it. But she got stuck with it. Right-wingers like you don't believe in due process (unless they or their interests are on trial, of course). You don't think the lawyer for the accused has an ethical obligation to do his or her best for the client. You think he or she should flout judicial ethics and allow the accused to be convicted and punished without making the best possible case. If you did believe in due process, there would be no way for you to smear Hillary with her involvement in this case. From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 9:16 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Clinton raped older women and molested them. And the proof is...? Hillary also defended, successfully, a rapist of an eleven or twelve year old girl, that she knew was guilty... and laughed about it. You're a real bottom-feeder, aren't you? You just don't care what the facts are. It's more important to get your smears in than to tell the truth: FALSE: Hillary Clinton Freed Child Rapist, Laughed About It http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-freed-child-rapist-laughed-about-it/ http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-freed-child-rapist-laughed-about-it/ FALSE: Hillary Clinton Freed Child Rapist, Laughed About... http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-freed-child-rapist-laughed-about-it/ Hillary Clinton's role in a 40-year-old rape case became the focal point of a viral meme in 2016, but the claims made about it were mostly inaccurate. View on www.snopes.com http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-freed-child-rapist-laughed-about-it/ Preview by Yahoo From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 5:34 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens Oh, really? And which Democratic presidents have been accused of raping 13-year-old girls? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : ROFLMAO! That should make Trump doubly qualified to be president by Democratic standards! From: "awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 12:48 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens https://www.scribd.com/doc/316341058/Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-Rape-Lawsuit-and-Affidavits https://www.scribd.com/doc/316341058/Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-Rape-Lawsuit-and-Affidavits Oh, really? And which Democratic presidents have been accused of raping 13-year-old girls? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : ROFLMAO! That should make Trump doubly qualified to be president by Democratic standards! From: "awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 12:48 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens https://www.scribd.com
Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
The women's stories that accused him is good enough for me. There are way too many. And those that have made such charges, didn't exactly give him his reputation. I think it was Hillary that said every woman should be believes when they make that charge. Except when it involves her or her interests. That story has been out for months and I had already checked SNOPES. They don't exactly deny it, although they seriously massage it to make it not sound so bad. Did you listen to her taped interview?Yeah, she laughed when she said the guy passed a polygraph. Made her lose all confidence in them she said. Got the guy a reduced sentence because some evidence had been mishandled. She had to do it though... as a favor. A *favor* she said in the tape. Sounds like one of those sniper stories. From: "authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 9:16 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Clinton raped older women and molested them. And the proof is...? Hillary also defended, successfully, a rapist of an eleven or twelve year old girl, that she knew was guilty... and laughed about it. You're a real bottom-feeder, aren't you? You just don't care what the facts are. It's more important to get your smears in than to tell the truth: FALSE: Hillary Clinton Freed Child Rapist, Laughed About It || |||| FALSE: Hillary Clinton Freed Child Rapist, Laughed About... Hillary Clinton's role in a 40-year-old rape case became the focal point of a viral meme in 2016, but the claims made about it were mostly inaccurate.|| | View on www.snopes.com |Preview by Yahoo| || From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 5:34 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens Oh, really? And which Democratic presidents have been accused of raping 13-year-old girls? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : ROFLMAO! That should make Trump doubly qualified to be president by Democratic standards! From: "awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 12:48 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens https://www.scribd.com/doc/316341058/Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-Rape-Lawsuit-and-Affidavits Oh, really? And which Democratic presidents have been accused of raping 13-year-old girls? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : ROFLMAO! That should make Trump doubly qualified to be president by Democratic standards! From: "awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 12:48 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens https://www.scribd.com/doc/316341058/Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-Rape-Lawsuit-and-Affidavits #yiv8236439652 #yiv8236439652 -- #yiv8236439652ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;}#yiv8236439652 #yiv8236439652ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}#yiv8236439652 #yiv8236439652ygrp-mkp #yiv8236439652hd {color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 0;}#yiv8236439652 #yiv8236439652ygrp-mkp #yiv8236439652ads {margin-bottom:10px;}#yiv8236439652 #yiv8236439652ygrp-mkp .yiv8236439652ad {padding:0 0;}#yiv8236439652 #yiv8236439652ygrp-mkp .yiv8236439652ad p {margin:0;}#yiv8236439652 #yiv8236439652ygrp-mkp .yiv8236439652ad a {color:#ff;text-decoration:none;}#yiv8236439652 #yiv8236439652ygrp-sponsor #yiv8236439652ygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;}#yiv8236439652 #yiv8236439652ygrp-sponsor #yiv8236439652ygrp-lc #yiv8236439652hd {margin:10px 0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}#yiv8236439652 #yiv8236439652ygrp-sponsor #yiv8236439652ygrp-lc .yiv8236439652ad {margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}#yiv8236439652 #yiv8236439652actions {font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;}#yiv8236439652 #yiv8236439652activity {background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;}#yiv8236439652 #yiv8236439652activity span {font-weight:700;}#yiv8236439652 #yiv8236439652activity span:first-child {text-transform:uppercase;}#yiv8236439652 #yiv8236439652activity span a {color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;}#yiv8236439652 #yiv8236439652activity span span {color:#ff7900;}#yiv8236439652 #yiv8236439652activity span .yiv8236439652underline {text-decoration:underline;}#yiv8236439652 .yiv8236439652attach {clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 0;width:400px;}#yiv8236439652 .yiv8236439652attach div a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv8236439652 .yiv8236439652attach img {border:none;padding-right:5px;}#yiv8236439652 .yiv8236439652attach label {display:block;margin-bottom:5px;}#yiv8236439652 .yiv8236
Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Clinton raped older women and molested them. And the proof is...? Hillary also defended, successfully, a rapist of an eleven or twelve year old girl, that she knew was guilty... and laughed about it. You're a real bottom-feeder, aren't you? You just don't care what the facts are. It's more important to get your smears in than to tell the truth: FALSE: Hillary Clinton Freed Child Rapist, Laughed About It http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-freed-child-rapist-laughed-about-it/ http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-freed-child-rapist-laughed-about-it/ FALSE: Hillary Clinton Freed Child Rapist, Laughed About... http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-freed-child-rapist-laughed-about-it/ Hillary Clinton's role in a 40-year-old rape case became the focal point of a viral meme in 2016, but the claims made about it were mostly inaccurate. View on www.snopes.com http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-freed-child-rapist-laughed-about-it/ Preview by Yahoo From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 5:34 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens Oh, really? And which Democratic presidents have been accused of raping 13-year-old girls? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : ROFLMAO! That should make Trump doubly qualified to be president by Democratic standards! From: "awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 12:48 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens https://www.scribd.com/doc/316341058/Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-Rape-Lawsuit-and-Affidavits https://www.scribd.com/doc/316341058/Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-Rape-Lawsuit-and-Affidavits Oh, really? And which Democratic presidents have been accused of raping 13-year-old girls? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : ROFLMAO! That should make Trump doubly qualified to be president by Democratic standards! From: "awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 12:48 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens https://www.scribd.com/doc/316341058/Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-Rape-Lawsuit-and-Affidavits https://www.scribd.com/doc/316341058/Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-Rape-Lawsuit-and-Affidavits
Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
Clinton raped older women and molested them. Hillary also defended, successfully, a rapist of an eleven or twelve year old girl, that she knew was guilty... and laughed about it. From: "authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 5:34 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens Oh, really? And which Democratic presidents have been accused of raping 13-year-old girls? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : ROFLMAO! That should make Trump doubly qualified to be president by Democratic standards! From: "awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 12:48 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens https://www.scribd.com/doc/316341058/Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-Rape-Lawsuit-and-Affidavits #yiv7765943346 #yiv7765943346 -- #yiv7765943346ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;}#yiv7765943346 #yiv7765943346ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}#yiv7765943346 #yiv7765943346ygrp-mkp #yiv7765943346hd {color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 0;}#yiv7765943346 #yiv7765943346ygrp-mkp #yiv7765943346ads {margin-bottom:10px;}#yiv7765943346 #yiv7765943346ygrp-mkp .yiv7765943346ad {padding:0 0;}#yiv7765943346 #yiv7765943346ygrp-mkp .yiv7765943346ad p {margin:0;}#yiv7765943346 #yiv7765943346ygrp-mkp .yiv7765943346ad a {color:#ff;text-decoration:none;}#yiv7765943346 #yiv7765943346ygrp-sponsor #yiv7765943346ygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;}#yiv7765943346 #yiv7765943346ygrp-sponsor #yiv7765943346ygrp-lc #yiv7765943346hd {margin:10px 0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}#yiv7765943346 #yiv7765943346ygrp-sponsor #yiv7765943346ygrp-lc .yiv7765943346ad {margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}#yiv7765943346 #yiv7765943346actions {font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;}#yiv7765943346 #yiv7765943346activity {background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;}#yiv7765943346 #yiv7765943346activity span {font-weight:700;}#yiv7765943346 #yiv7765943346activity span:first-child {text-transform:uppercase;}#yiv7765943346 #yiv7765943346activity span a {color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;}#yiv7765943346 #yiv7765943346activity span span {color:#ff7900;}#yiv7765943346 #yiv7765943346activity span .yiv7765943346underline {text-decoration:underline;}#yiv7765943346 .yiv7765943346attach {clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 0;width:400px;}#yiv7765943346 .yiv7765943346attach div a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv7765943346 .yiv7765943346attach img {border:none;padding-right:5px;}#yiv7765943346 .yiv7765943346attach label {display:block;margin-bottom:5px;}#yiv7765943346 .yiv7765943346attach label a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv7765943346 blockquote {margin:0 0 0 4px;}#yiv7765943346 .yiv7765943346bold {font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;}#yiv7765943346 .yiv7765943346bold a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv7765943346 dd.yiv7765943346last p a {font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv7765943346 dd.yiv7765943346last p span {margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv7765943346 dd.yiv7765943346last p span.yiv7765943346yshortcuts {margin-right:0;}#yiv7765943346 div.yiv7765943346attach-table div div a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv7765943346 div.yiv7765943346attach-table {width:400px;}#yiv7765943346 div.yiv7765943346file-title a, #yiv7765943346 div.yiv7765943346file-title a:active, #yiv7765943346 div.yiv7765943346file-title a:hover, #yiv7765943346 div.yiv7765943346file-title a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#yiv7765943346 div.yiv7765943346photo-title a, #yiv7765943346 div.yiv7765943346photo-title a:active, #yiv7765943346 div.yiv7765943346photo-title a:hover, #yiv7765943346 div.yiv7765943346photo-title a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#yiv7765943346 div#yiv7765943346ygrp-mlmsg #yiv7765943346ygrp-msg p a span.yiv7765943346yshortcuts {font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;font-weight:normal;}#yiv7765943346 .yiv7765943346green {color:#628c2a;}#yiv7765943346 .yiv7765943346MsoNormal {margin:0 0 0 0;}#yiv7765943346 o {font-size:0;}#yiv7765943346 #yiv7765943346photos div {float:left;width:72px;}#yiv7765943346 #yiv7765943346photos div div {border:1px solid #66;min-height:62px;overflow:hidden;width:62px;}#yiv7765943346 #yiv7765943346photos div label {color:#66;font-size:10px;overflow:hidden;text-align:center;white-space:nowrap;width:64px;}#yiv7765943346 #yiv7765943346reco-category {font-size:77%;}#yiv7765943346 #yiv7765943346reco-desc {font-size:77%;}#yiv7765943346 .yiv7765943346replbq {margin:4px;}#yiv7765943346 #yiv7765943346ygrp-actbar div a:first-child {margin-right:2px;padding-right:5px;}#yiv7765943346 #yiv7765943346ygrp-mlmsg {font-size:13px;font-family:Arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;}#yiv7765943346 #yiv7765943346ygrp-mlmsg table {fo
Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
Oh, really? And which Democratic presidents have been accused of raping 13-year-old girls? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : ROFLMAO! That should make Trump doubly qualified to be president by Democratic standards! From: "awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 12:48 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens https://www.scribd.com/doc/316341058/Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-Rape-Lawsuit-and-Affidavits https://www.scribd.com/doc/316341058/Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-Rape-Lawsuit-and-Affidavits
Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
ROFLMAO! That should make Trump doubly qualified to be president by Democratic standards! From: "awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 12:48 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens https://www.scribd.com/doc/316341058/Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-Rape-Lawsuit-and-Affidavits #yiv4734258183 #yiv4734258183 -- #yiv4734258183ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;}#yiv4734258183 #yiv4734258183ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}#yiv4734258183 #yiv4734258183ygrp-mkp #yiv4734258183hd {color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 0;}#yiv4734258183 #yiv4734258183ygrp-mkp #yiv4734258183ads {margin-bottom:10px;}#yiv4734258183 #yiv4734258183ygrp-mkp .yiv4734258183ad {padding:0 0;}#yiv4734258183 #yiv4734258183ygrp-mkp .yiv4734258183ad p {margin:0;}#yiv4734258183 #yiv4734258183ygrp-mkp .yiv4734258183ad a {color:#ff;text-decoration:none;}#yiv4734258183 #yiv4734258183ygrp-sponsor #yiv4734258183ygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;}#yiv4734258183 #yiv4734258183ygrp-sponsor #yiv4734258183ygrp-lc #yiv4734258183hd {margin:10px 0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}#yiv4734258183 #yiv4734258183ygrp-sponsor #yiv4734258183ygrp-lc .yiv4734258183ad {margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}#yiv4734258183 #yiv4734258183actions {font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;}#yiv4734258183 #yiv4734258183activity {background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;}#yiv4734258183 #yiv4734258183activity span {font-weight:700;}#yiv4734258183 #yiv4734258183activity span:first-child {text-transform:uppercase;}#yiv4734258183 #yiv4734258183activity span a {color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;}#yiv4734258183 #yiv4734258183activity span span {color:#ff7900;}#yiv4734258183 #yiv4734258183activity span .yiv4734258183underline {text-decoration:underline;}#yiv4734258183 .yiv4734258183attach {clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 0;width:400px;}#yiv4734258183 .yiv4734258183attach div a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv4734258183 .yiv4734258183attach img {border:none;padding-right:5px;}#yiv4734258183 .yiv4734258183attach label {display:block;margin-bottom:5px;}#yiv4734258183 .yiv4734258183attach label a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv4734258183 blockquote {margin:0 0 0 4px;}#yiv4734258183 .yiv4734258183bold {font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;}#yiv4734258183 .yiv4734258183bold a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv4734258183 dd.yiv4734258183last p a {font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv4734258183 dd.yiv4734258183last p span {margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv4734258183 dd.yiv4734258183last p span.yiv4734258183yshortcuts {margin-right:0;}#yiv4734258183 div.yiv4734258183attach-table div div a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv4734258183 div.yiv4734258183attach-table {width:400px;}#yiv4734258183 div.yiv4734258183file-title a, #yiv4734258183 div.yiv4734258183file-title a:active, #yiv4734258183 div.yiv4734258183file-title a:hover, #yiv4734258183 div.yiv4734258183file-title a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#yiv4734258183 div.yiv4734258183photo-title a, #yiv4734258183 div.yiv4734258183photo-title a:active, #yiv4734258183 div.yiv4734258183photo-title a:hover, #yiv4734258183 div.yiv4734258183photo-title a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#yiv4734258183 div#yiv4734258183ygrp-mlmsg #yiv4734258183ygrp-msg p a span.yiv4734258183yshortcuts {font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;font-weight:normal;}#yiv4734258183 .yiv4734258183green {color:#628c2a;}#yiv4734258183 .yiv4734258183MsoNormal {margin:0 0 0 0;}#yiv4734258183 o {font-size:0;}#yiv4734258183 #yiv4734258183photos div {float:left;width:72px;}#yiv4734258183 #yiv4734258183photos div div {border:1px solid #66;min-height:62px;overflow:hidden;width:62px;}#yiv4734258183 #yiv4734258183photos div label {color:#66;font-size:10px;overflow:hidden;text-align:center;white-space:nowrap;width:64px;}#yiv4734258183 #yiv4734258183reco-category {font-size:77%;}#yiv4734258183 #yiv4734258183reco-desc {font-size:77%;}#yiv4734258183 .yiv4734258183replbq {margin:4px;}#yiv4734258183 #yiv4734258183ygrp-actbar div a:first-child {margin-right:2px;padding-right:5px;}#yiv4734258183 #yiv4734258183ygrp-mlmsg {font-size:13px;font-family:Arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;}#yiv4734258183 #yiv4734258183ygrp-mlmsg table {font-size:inherit;font:100%;}#yiv4734258183 #yiv4734258183ygrp-mlmsg select, #yiv4734258183 input, #yiv4734258183 textarea {font:99% Arial, Helvetica, clean, sans-serif;}#yiv4734258183 #yiv4734258183ygrp-mlmsg pre, #yiv4734258183 code {font:115% monospace;}#yiv4734258183 #yiv4734258183ygrp-mlmsg * {line-height:1.22em;}#yiv4734258183 #yiv4734258183ygrp-mlmsg #yiv4734258183logo {padding-bottom:10px;}#yiv4734258183 #yiv4734258183ygrp-msg p a {font-family:Verdana;}#yiv4734258183 #yiv4734258183ygrp-msg p#yiv4