Re: [FairfieldLife] The invention of telepathy. Sort of....
This morning I logged into Yahoo and, as has become my morning ritual, deleted 70 posts from Richard, Steve, Share, Ann, Nabby, Jim, and Dan without opening them. Out of curiosity, I then did a string search on the folder containing these deleted posts, and found that my name or ID was mentioned in over 60 of them, often preceded by the word From, as if they were replying to some post I'd made. What's up with that? These people have been told that I don't read their posts. Why then are they replying to mine? I made a total of 4 posts about TM or MIU yesterday, and that seems to have generated over 60 replies from people with their panties in a twist, all of them writing feverishly to someone *who isn't reading their posts*. It's as if they believe *I* have mastered the direct brain-to-brain communication talked about in this article, and that therefore they can still somehow manage to insult me telepathically even when I don't read their posts. :-) :-) :-) Thanks for the compliment...I guess...but to get real for a moment, all these people are writing these replies for themselves and for each other, probably to vent their frustrations at being called what they are -- cultists. Just to reiterate the point that they all seem to be missing -- I don't consider it even a *possibility* that any of them are or ever will be interesting enough or intelligent enough to *ever* read anything any of them writes, ever again. They are history -- written off. If in making all of these replies they're trying to pretend to themselves that I still *am* reading their posts, and that therefore they're still as important as they think they are, I would suggest that they're making a better case for them being cultists than I ever could. Thanks to them for helping out... :-) :-) :-) From: salyavin808 no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, September 4, 2014 8:49 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] The invention of telepathy. Sort of Direct brain-to-brain communication demonstrated in human subjects Direct brain-to-brain communication demonstrat... In a first-of-its-kind study, an international team of neuroscientists and robotics engineers has demonstrated the viability of direct brain-to-brain communication ... View on www.sciencedaily.com Preview by Yahoo
Re: [FairfieldLife] The invention of telepathy. Sort of....
Thank you for respecting my wish that YOU NEVER READ MY POSTS. Now you got it! Good boy.
Re: [FairfieldLife] The invention of telepathy. Sort of....
Second shot at this as first reply didn't show up. Barry, then you should feel pleased that your stated mission of pushing people's buttons or what your perceive as pushing people's buttons has been so successful. Of course, a more likely possibility is that your postings display so many blind spots, that people can't resist replying in some fashion. But, hey. Hang your hat on something, right?. P.S. Is it just me, or has some of your fan base dropped off. I guess the reporters still are tuned in. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote : This morning I logged into Yahoo and, as has become my morning ritual, deleted 70 posts from Richard, Steve, Share, Ann, Nabby, Jim, and Dan without opening them. Out of curiosity, I then did a string search on the folder containing these deleted posts, and found that my name or ID was mentioned in over 60 of them, often preceded by the word From, as if they were replying to some post I'd made. What's up with that? These people have been told that I don't read their posts. Why then are they replying to mine? I made a total of 4 posts about TM or MIU yesterday, and that seems to have generated over 60 replies from people with their panties in a twist, all of them writing feverishly to someone *who isn't reading their posts*. It's as if they believe *I* have mastered the direct brain-to-brain communication talked about in this article, and that therefore they can still somehow manage to insult me telepathically even when I don't read their posts. :-) :-) :-) Thanks for the compliment...I guess...but to get real for a moment, all these people are writing these replies for themselves and for each other, probably to vent their frustrations at being called what they are -- cultists. Just to reiterate the point that they all seem to be missing -- I don't consider it even a *possibility* that any of them are or ever will be interesting enough or intelligent enough to *ever* read anything any of them writes, ever again. They are history -- written off. If in making all of these replies they're trying to pretend to themselves that I still *am* reading their posts, and that therefore they're still as important as they think they are, I would suggest that they're making a better case for them being cultists than I ever could. Thanks to them for helping out... :-) :-) :-) From: salyavin808 no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, September 4, 2014 8:49 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] The invention of telepathy. Sort of Direct brain-to-brain communication demonstrated in human subjects http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/09/140903105646.htm http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/09/140903105646.htm Direct brain-to-brain communication demonstrat... http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/09/140903105646.htm In a first-of-its-kind study, an international team of neuroscientists and robotics engineers has demonstrated the viability of direct brain-to-brain communication ... View on www.sciencedaily.com http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/09/140903105646.htm Preview by Yahoo
Re: [FairfieldLife] The invention of telepathy. Sort of....
Steve, I never realized until this post of turq's, just how wounded he is. I guess we all are to some extent. But still... On Friday, September 5, 2014 7:01 AM, steve.sun...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Second shot at this as first reply didn't show up. Barry, then you should feel pleased that your stated mission of pushing people's buttons or what your perceive as pushing people's buttons has been so successful. Of course, a more likely possibility is that your postings display so many blind spots, that people can't resist replying in some fashion. But, hey. Hang your hat on something, right?. P.S. Is it just me, or has some of your fan base dropped off. I guess the reporters still are tuned in. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote : This morning I logged into Yahoo and, as has become my morning ritual, deleted 70 posts from Richard, Steve, Share, Ann, Nabby, Jim, and Dan without opening them. Out of curiosity, I then did a string search on the folder containing these deleted posts, and found that my name or ID was mentioned in over 60 of them, often preceded by the word From, as if they were replying to some post I'd made. What's up with that? These people have been told that I don't read their posts. Why then are they replying to mine? I made a total of 4 posts about TM or MIU yesterday, and that seems to have generated over 60 replies from people with their panties in a twist, all of them writing feverishly to someone *who isn't reading their posts*. It's as if they believe *I* have mastered the direct brain-to-brain communication talked about in this article, and that therefore they can still somehow manage to insult me telepathically even when I don't read their posts. :-) :-) :-) Thanks for the compliment...I guess...but to get real for a moment, all these people are writing these replies for themselves and for each other, probably to vent their frustrations at being called what they are -- cultists. Just to reiterate the point that they all seem to be missing -- I don't consider it even a *possibility* that any of them are or ever will be interesting enough or intelligent enough to *ever* read anything any of them writes, ever again. They are history -- written off. If in making all of these replies they're trying to pretend to themselves that I still *am* reading their posts, and that therefore they're still as important as they think they are, I would suggest that they're making a better case for them being cultists than I ever could. Thanks to them for helping out... :-) :-) :-) From: salyavin808 no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, September 4, 2014 8:49 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] The invention of telepathy. Sort of Direct brain-to-brain communication demonstrated in human subjects Direct brain-to-brain communication demonstrat... In a first-of-its-kind study, an international team of neuroscientists and robotics engineers has demonstrated the viability of direct brain-to-brain communication ... View on www.sciencedaily.comPreview by Yahoo
Re: [FairfieldLife] The invention of telepathy. Sort of....
Yes, Share. I know you are being sincere, and so am I. He probably does not realize that really, I was a fan of the Barry who I felt valued self reflection. I am not sure if it was a result of his interactions with Judy, but he has decided to pretty much isolate himself, and then blame those from whom he has isolated himself as being unworthy Now, I remember fans in the arena used to bow down at Chicago Bulls game to Michael Jordan, saying we are not worthy', but for Barry to imply that with the denizens hereyikes! ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Steve, I never realized until this post of turq's, just how wounded he is. I guess we all are to some extent. But still... On Friday, September 5, 2014 7:01 AM, steve.sundur@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Second shot at this as first reply didn't show up. Barry, then you should feel pleased that your stated mission of pushing people's buttons or what your perceive as pushing people's buttons has been so successful. Of course, a more likely possibility is that your postings display so many blind spots, that people can't resist replying in some fashion. But, hey. Hang your hat on something, right?. P.S. Is it just me, or has some of your fan base dropped off. I guess the reporters still are tuned in. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote : This morning I logged into Yahoo and, as has become my morning ritual, deleted 70 posts from Richard, Steve, Share, Ann, Nabby, Jim, and Dan without opening them. Out of curiosity, I then did a string search on the folder containing these deleted posts, and found that my name or ID was mentioned in over 60 of them, often preceded by the word From, as if they were replying to some post I'd made. What's up with that? These people have been told that I don't read their posts. Why then are they replying to mine? I made a total of 4 posts about TM or MIU yesterday, and that seems to have generated over 60 replies from people with their panties in a twist, all of them writing feverishly to someone *who isn't reading their posts*. It's as if they believe *I* have mastered the direct brain-to-brain communication talked about in this article, and that therefore they can still somehow manage to insult me telepathically even when I don't read their posts. :-) :-) :-) Thanks for the compliment...I guess...but to get real for a moment, all these people are writing these replies for themselves and for each other, probably to vent their frustrations at being called what they are -- cultists. Just to reiterate the point that they all seem to be missing -- I don't consider it even a *possibility* that any of them are or ever will be interesting enough or intelligent enough to *ever* read anything any of them writes, ever again. They are history -- written off. If in making all of these replies they're trying to pretend to themselves that I still *am* reading their posts, and that therefore they're still as important as they think they are, I would suggest that they're making a better case for them being cultists than I ever could. Thanks to them for helping out... :-) :-) :-) From: salyavin808 no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, September 4, 2014 8:49 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] The invention of telepathy. Sort of Direct brain-to-brain communication demonstrated in human subjects http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/09/140903105646.htm http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/09/140903105646.htm Direct brain-to-brain communication demonstrat... http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/09/140903105646.htm In a first-of-its-kind study, an international team of neuroscientists and robotics engineers has demonstrated the viability of direct brain-to-brain communication ... View on www.sciencedaily.com http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/09/140903105646.htm Preview by Yahoo
Re: [FairfieldLife] The invention of telepathy. Sort of....
And now, do you realize what he has to do when he wants to make a post? I mean, most people here, just write a quick reply, and press send. But he is compelled to compose a pre-ample. Um, normally, I wouldn't be replying to this post, but under the circumstances, and because I see that so and so has replied to so and so's post, and because it touches on something I recently read, I have determined, after careful consideration that I will make a reply. But this should not be construed that I will suddenly be making a habit of reading or replying to other posts. Have I made this perfectly clear Okay ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, steve.sundur@... wrote : Yes, Share. I know you are being sincere, and so am I. He probably does not realize that really, I was a fan of the Barry who I felt valued self reflection. I am not sure if it was a result of his interactions with Judy, but he has decided to pretty much isolate himself, and then blame those from whom he has isolated himself as being unworthy Now, I remember fans in the arena used to bow down at Chicago Bulls game to Michael Jordan, saying we are not worthy', but for Barry to imply that with the denizens hereyikes! ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Steve, I never realized until this post of turq's, just how wounded he is. I guess we all are to some extent. But still... On Friday, September 5, 2014 7:01 AM, steve.sundur@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Second shot at this as first reply didn't show up. Barry, then you should feel pleased that your stated mission of pushing people's buttons or what your perceive as pushing people's buttons has been so successful. Of course, a more likely possibility is that your postings display so many blind spots, that people can't resist replying in some fashion. But, hey. Hang your hat on something, right?. P.S. Is it just me, or has some of your fan base dropped off. I guess the reporters still are tuned in. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote : This morning I logged into Yahoo and, as has become my morning ritual, deleted 70 posts from Richard, Steve, Share, Ann, Nabby, Jim, and Dan without opening them. Out of curiosity, I then did a string search on the folder containing these deleted posts, and found that my name or ID was mentioned in over 60 of them, often preceded by the word From, as if they were replying to some post I'd made. What's up with that? These people have been told that I don't read their posts. Why then are they replying to mine? I made a total of 4 posts about TM or MIU yesterday, and that seems to have generated over 60 replies from people with their panties in a twist, all of them writing feverishly to someone *who isn't reading their posts*. It's as if they believe *I* have mastered the direct brain-to-brain communication talked about in this article, and that therefore they can still somehow manage to insult me telepathically even when I don't read their posts. :-) :-) :-) Thanks for the compliment...I guess...but to get real for a moment, all these people are writing these replies for themselves and for each other, probably to vent their frustrations at being called what they are -- cultists. Just to reiterate the point that they all seem to be missing -- I don't consider it even a *possibility* that any of them are or ever will be interesting enough or intelligent enough to *ever* read anything any of them writes, ever again. They are history -- written off. If in making all of these replies they're trying to pretend to themselves that I still *am* reading their posts, and that therefore they're still as important as they think they are, I would suggest that they're making a better case for them being cultists than I ever could. Thanks to them for helping out... :-) :-) :-) From: salyavin808 no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, September 4, 2014 8:49 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] The invention of telepathy. Sort of Direct brain-to-brain communication demonstrated in human subjects http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/09/140903105646.htm http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/09/140903105646.htm Direct brain-to-brain communication demonstrat... http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/09/140903105646.htm In a first-of-its-kind study, an international team of neuroscientists and robotics engineers has demonstrated the viability of direct brain-to-brain communication ... View on www.sciencedaily.com http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/09/140903105646.htm Preview by Yahoo
Re: [FairfieldLife] The invention of telepathy. Sort of....
Ah, good morning. I see our less than sane resident has set to put things Wright. First you declare in your magnificently squeaky voice, that you do not read the 70 posts that you have gleefully deleted, the high point of your day apparently. Then oh glorious Wright one, you go on for several long winded and fantastic paragraphs, surmising all that you haven't seen. Splendidly holding forth, with the self assurance of a mouse, on all that you have imagined. And, Now, All Is Well, All Is Wright. Nice cover story, for a guy who basically does nothing. The rest of us are busy leading our lives - The moon was amazing in a huge sky last night, but sitting in a bar, you missed it. This sunrise over the hills, first lighting the symmetrical rows of cirrus clouds, is glorious, but staring feverishly into your TV, or laptop, you missed that, too. Yes, you keep reinforcing how awesome your little, blue-lit life is, and we'll keep having a great time, unfortunately for you, and sometimes, at your expense. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote : This morning I logged into Yahoo and, as has become my morning ritual, deleted 70 posts from Richard, Steve, Share, Ann, Nabby, Jim, and Dan without opening them. Out of curiosity, I then did a string search on the folder containing these deleted posts, and found that my name or ID was mentioned in over 60 of them, often preceded by the word From, as if they were replying to some post I'd made. What's up with that? These people have been told that I don't read their posts. Why then are they replying to mine? I made a total of 4 posts about TM or MIU yesterday, and that seems to have generated over 60 replies from people with their panties in a twist, all of them writing feverishly to someone *who isn't reading their posts*. It's as if they believe *I* have mastered the direct brain-to-brain communication talked about in this article, and that therefore they can still somehow manage to insult me telepathically even when I don't read their posts. :-) :-) :-) Thanks for the compliment...I guess...but to get real for a moment, all these people are writing these replies for themselves and for each other, probably to vent their frustrations at being called what they are -- cultists. Just to reiterate the point that they all seem to be missing -- I don't consider it even a *possibility* that any of them are or ever will be interesting enough or intelligent enough to *ever* read anything any of them writes, ever again. They are history -- written off. If in making all of these replies they're trying to pretend to themselves that I still *am* reading their posts, and that therefore they're still as important as they think they are, I would suggest that they're making a better case for them being cultists than I ever could. Thanks to them for helping out... :-) :-) :-) From: salyavin808 no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, September 4, 2014 8:49 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] The invention of telepathy. Sort of Direct brain-to-brain communication demonstrated in human subjects http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/09/140903105646.htm http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/09/140903105646.htm Direct brain-to-brain communication demonstrat... http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/09/140903105646.htm In a first-of-its-kind study, an international team of neuroscientists and robotics engineers has demonstrated the viability of direct brain-to-brain communication ... View on www.sciencedaily.com http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/09/140903105646.htm Preview by Yahoo
Re: [FairfieldLife] The invention of telepathy. Sort of....
Dearest Share, I have always felt pity for Turq, or Turqoise, or Turquoisebee, or whichever mad personality is posting at the time. Always Helpful, Dan
Re: [FairfieldLife] The invention of telepathy. Sort of....
The Harvest Moon, with my arm around my sweetheart is very dear. My suggestion is to live Life as if it is Real. Helping people everywhere, d
Re: [FairfieldLife] The invention of telepathy. Sort of....
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote : This morning I logged into Yahoo and, as has become my morning ritual, deleted 70 posts from Richard, Steve, Share, Ann, Nabby, Jim, and Dan without opening them. Out of curiosity, I then did a string search on the folder containing these deleted posts, and found that my name or ID was mentioned in over 60 of them, often preceded by the word From, as if they were replying to some post I'd made. What's up with that? These people have been told that I don't read their posts. Why then are they replying to mine? I made a total of 4 posts about TM or MIU yesterday, and that seems to have generated over 60 replies from people with their panties in a twist, all of them writing feverishly to someone *who isn't reading their posts*. It's as if they believe *I* have mastered the direct brain-to-brain communication talked about in this article, and that therefore they can still somehow manage to insult me telepathically even when I don't read their posts. :-) :-) :-) Thanks for the compliment...I guess...but to get real for a moment, all these people are writing these replies for themselves and for each other, probably to vent their frustrations at being called what they are -- cultists. Just to reiterate the point that they all seem to be missing -- I don't consider it even a *possibility* that any of them are or ever will be interesting enough or intelligent enough to *ever* read anything any of them writes, ever again. They are history -- written off. If in making all of these replies they're trying to pretend to themselves that I still *am* reading their posts, and that therefore they're still as important as they think they are, I would suggest that they're making a better case for them being cultists than I ever could. Thanks to them for helping out... :-) :-) :-) Poor bawee misses out on so much of life, doesn't he? There, you can count me as having mentioned you one more time. You can put that in your scrapbook of imaginary fame and real ego. LOL From: salyavin808 no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, September 4, 2014 8:49 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] The invention of telepathy. Sort of Direct brain-to-brain communication demonstrated in human subjects http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/09/140903105646.htm http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/09/140903105646.htm Direct brain-to-brain communication demonstrat... http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/09/140903105646.htm In a first-of-its-kind study, an international team of neuroscientists and robotics engineers has demonstrated the viability of direct brain-to-brain communication ... View on www.sciencedaily.com http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/09/140903105646.htm Preview by Yahoo
Re: [FairfieldLife] The invention of telepathy. Sort of....
If it makes the Turq feel better when he imagines that he got 60 replies, fine. He seems to be desperate for recognition and attention, anything to make him feel better. Wasn't he supposed to be a IT-guy, yet he doesn't get that subjects change even when subject-lines doesn't ?
Re: [FairfieldLife] The invention of telepathy. Sort of....
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote : Thank you for respecting my wish that YOU NEVER READ MY POSTS. Now you got it! Good boy. bawee only reads those things that reinforce his 'world view' (small as it is) or his ego. There are actually those who find him interesting enough to read and although I keep trying I have yet failed to get past his bloated sense of himself and his common rudeness. But I don't block anyone, don't feel the desperate need to, and I just keep plugging away in the hope that I stumble upon something that can strengthen my belief in human intelligence here at FFL. So far, the recent posting between Sal and Ricky got close.
Re: [FairfieldLife] The invention of telepathy. Sort of....
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, steve.sundur@... wrote : Second shot at this as first reply didn't show up. Barry, then you should feel pleased that your stated mission of pushing people's buttons or what your perceive as pushing people's buttons has been so successful. Of course, a more likely possibility is that your postings display so many blind spots, that people can't resist replying in some fashion. But, hey. Hang your hat on something, right?. P.S. Is it just me, or has some of your fan base dropped off. I guess the reporters still are tuned in. Don't you love how he assumes all of us read his drivel? And it's funny because I don't reply or respond to his posts for him (he's certifiably blind, deaf and dumb), I do it for myself and for others who might find it useful or entertaining in some way. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote : This morning I logged into Yahoo and, as has become my morning ritual, deleted 70 posts from Richard, Steve, Share, Ann, Nabby, Jim, and Dan without opening them. Out of curiosity, I then did a string search on the folder containing these deleted posts, and found that my name or ID was mentioned in over 60 of them, often preceded by the word From, as if they were replying to some post I'd made. What's up with that? These people have been told that I don't read their posts. Why then are they replying to mine? I made a total of 4 posts about TM or MIU yesterday, and that seems to have generated over 60 replies from people with their panties in a twist, all of them writing feverishly to someone *who isn't reading their posts*. It's as if they believe *I* have mastered the direct brain-to-brain communication talked about in this article, and that therefore they can still somehow manage to insult me telepathically even when I don't read their posts. :-) :-) :-) Thanks for the compliment...I guess...but to get real for a moment, all these people are writing these replies for themselves and for each other, probably to vent their frustrations at being called what they are -- cultists. Just to reiterate the point that they all seem to be missing -- I don't consider it even a *possibility* that any of them are or ever will be interesting enough or intelligent enough to *ever* read anything any of them writes, ever again. They are history -- written off. If in making all of these replies they're trying to pretend to themselves that I still *am* reading their posts, and that therefore they're still as important as they think they are, I would suggest that they're making a better case for them being cultists than I ever could. Thanks to them for helping out... :-) :-) :-) From: salyavin808 no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, September 4, 2014 8:49 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] The invention of telepathy. Sort of Direct brain-to-brain communication demonstrated in human subjects http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/09/140903105646.htm http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/09/140903105646.htm Direct brain-to-brain communication demonstrat... http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/09/140903105646.htm In a first-of-its-kind study, an international team of neuroscientists and robotics engineers has demonstrated the viability of direct brain-to-brain communication ... View on www.sciencedaily.com http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/09/140903105646.htm Preview by Yahoo
Re: [FairfieldLife] The invention of telepathy. Sort of....
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Steve, I never realized until this post of turq's, just how wounded he is. I guess we all are to some extent. But still... You can call it wounded if you want but I have and will continue to call it something quite different. Mac and I are pretty much in total agreement about this subject. And what took you so long, by the way? On Friday, September 5, 2014 7:01 AM, steve.sundur@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Second shot at this as first reply didn't show up. Barry, then you should feel pleased that your stated mission of pushing people's buttons or what your perceive as pushing people's buttons has been so successful. Of course, a more likely possibility is that your postings display so many blind spots, that people can't resist replying in some fashion. But, hey. Hang your hat on something, right?. P.S. Is it just me, or has some of your fan base dropped off. I guess the reporters still are tuned in. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote : This morning I logged into Yahoo and, as has become my morning ritual, deleted 70 posts from Richard, Steve, Share, Ann, Nabby, Jim, and Dan without opening them. Out of curiosity, I then did a string search on the folder containing these deleted posts, and found that my name or ID was mentioned in over 60 of them, often preceded by the word From, as if they were replying to some post I'd made. What's up with that? These people have been told that I don't read their posts. Why then are they replying to mine? I made a total of 4 posts about TM or MIU yesterday, and that seems to have generated over 60 replies from people with their panties in a twist, all of them writing feverishly to someone *who isn't reading their posts*. It's as if they believe *I* have mastered the direct brain-to-brain communication talked about in this article, and that therefore they can still somehow manage to insult me telepathically even when I don't read their posts. :-) :-) :-) Thanks for the compliment...I guess...but to get real for a moment, all these people are writing these replies for themselves and for each other, probably to vent their frustrations at being called what they are -- cultists. Just to reiterate the point that they all seem to be missing -- I don't consider it even a *possibility* that any of them are or ever will be interesting enough or intelligent enough to *ever* read anything any of them writes, ever again. They are history -- written off. If in making all of these replies they're trying to pretend to themselves that I still *am* reading their posts, and that therefore they're still as important as they think they are, I would suggest that they're making a better case for them being cultists than I ever could. Thanks to them for helping out... :-) :-) :-) From: salyavin808 no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, September 4, 2014 8:49 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] The invention of telepathy. Sort of Direct brain-to-brain communication demonstrated in human subjects http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/09/140903105646.htm http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/09/140903105646.htm Direct brain-to-brain communication demonstrat... http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/09/140903105646.htm In a first-of-its-kind study, an international team of neuroscientists and robotics engineers has demonstrated the viability of direct brain-to-brain communication ... View on www.sciencedaily.com http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/09/140903105646.htm Preview by Yahoo
Re: [FairfieldLife] The invention of telepathy. Sort of....
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote : ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote : Thank you for respecting my wish that YOU NEVER READ MY POSTS. Now you got it! Good boy. bawee only reads those things that reinforce his 'world view' (small as it is) or his ego. There are actually those who find him interesting enough to read and although I keep trying I have yet failed to get past his bloated sense of himself and his common rudeness. But I don't block anyone, don't feel the desperate need to, and I just keep plugging away in the hope that I stumble upon something that can strengthen my belief in human intelligence here at FFL. So far, the recent posting between Sal and Ricky got close. Dearest Ann, I had sized you up as a very open-minded person, and your post confirms my ovservation. NOW I FIND THAT IN ADDITION TO BEING OPEN YOU ARE ALSO VERY HELPFUL. I love that! Maybe some day I will get into one of these Philosophical Debates that go on between Sal and Richard, but for now I prefer to listen (and learn). But enough about both 'Bs', wow're you doin? Back from the beach, Dan Tan
Re: [FairfieldLife] The invention of telepathy. Sort of....
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote : ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, steve.sundur@... wrote : Second shot at this as first reply didn't show up. Barry, then you should feel pleased that your stated mission of pushing people's buttons or what your perceive as pushing people's buttons has been so successful. Of course, a more likely possibility is that your postings display so many blind spots, that people can't resist replying in some fashion. But, hey. Hang your hat on something, right?. P.S. Is it just me, or has some of your fan base dropped off. I guess the reporters still are tuned in. Don't you love how he assumes all of us read his drivel? And it's funny because I don't reply or respond to his posts for him (he's certifiably blind, deaf and dumb), I do it for myself and for others who might find it useful or entertaining in some way. I like to make fun. But, hey we're all different. And One. Another aspect of You, d ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote : This morning I logged into Yahoo and, as has become my morning ritual, deleted 70 posts from Richard, Steve, Share, Ann, Nabby, Jim, and Dan without opening them. Out of curiosity, I then did a string search on the folder containing these deleted posts, and found that my name or ID was mentioned in over 60 of them, often preceded by the word From, as if they were replying to some post I'd made. What's up with that? These people have been told that I don't read their posts. Why then are they replying to mine? I made a total of 4 posts about TM or MIU yesterday, and that seems to have generated over 60 replies from people with their panties in a twist, all of them writing feverishly to someone *who isn't reading their posts*. It's as if they believe *I* have mastered the direct brain-to-brain communication talked about in this article, and that therefore they can still somehow manage to insult me telepathically even when I don't read their posts. :-) :-) :-) Thanks for the compliment...I guess...but to get real for a moment, all these people are writing these replies for themselves and for each other, probably to vent their frustrations at being called what they are -- cultists. Just to reiterate the point that they all seem to be missing -- I don't consider it even a *possibility* that any of them are or ever will be interesting enough or intelligent enough to *ever* read anything any of them writes, ever again. They are history -- written off. If in making all of these replies they're trying to pretend to themselves that I still *am* reading their posts, and that therefore they're still as important as they think they are, I would suggest that they're making a better case for them being cultists than I ever could. Thanks to them for helping out... :-) :-) :-) From: salyavin808 no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, September 4, 2014 8:49 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] The invention of telepathy. Sort of Direct brain-to-brain communication demonstrated in human subjects http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/09/140903105646.htm http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/09/140903105646.htm Direct brain-to-brain communication demonstrat... http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/09/140903105646.htm In a first-of-its-kind study, an international team of neuroscientists and robotics engineers has demonstrated the viability of direct brain-to-brain communication ... View on www.sciencedaily.com http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/09/140903105646.htm Preview by Yahoo
Re: [FairfieldLife] The invention of telepathy. Sort of....
Ann, if as you say, we have arrived at different places wrt turq, then how can we know that it's taken me so long to get here? For all we know, maybe it's taken me such a short time! Or maybe even just the right amount of time. On Friday, September 5, 2014 9:03 AM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Steve, I never realized until this post of turq's, just how wounded he is. I guess we all are to some extent. But still... You can call it wounded if you want but I have and will continue to call it something quite different. Mac and I are pretty much in total agreement about this subject. And what took you so long, by the way? On Friday, September 5, 2014 7:01 AM, steve.sundur@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Second shot at this as first reply didn't show up. Barry, then you should feel pleased that your stated mission of pushing people's buttons or what your perceive as pushing people's buttons has been so successful. Of course, a more likely possibility is that your postings display so many blind spots, that people can't resist replying in some fashion. But, hey. Hang your hat on something, right?. P.S. Is it just me, or has some of your fan base dropped off. I guess the reporters still are tuned in. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote : This morning I logged into Yahoo and, as has become my morning ritual, deleted 70 posts from Richard, Steve, Share, Ann, Nabby, Jim, and Dan without opening them. Out of curiosity, I then did a string search on the folder containing these deleted posts, and found that my name or ID was mentioned in over 60 of them, often preceded by the word From, as if they were replying to some post I'd made. What's up with that? These people have been told that I don't read their posts. Why then are they replying to mine? I made a total of 4 posts about TM or MIU yesterday, and that seems to have generated over 60 replies from people with their panties in a twist, all of them writing feverishly to someone *who isn't reading their posts*. It's as if they believe *I* have mastered the direct brain-to-brain communication talked about in this article, and that therefore they can still somehow manage to insult me telepathically even when I don't read their posts. :-) :-) :-) Thanks for the compliment...I guess...but to get real for a moment, all these people are writing these replies for themselves and for each other, probably to vent their frustrations at being called what they are -- cultists. Just to reiterate the point that they all seem to be missing -- I don't consider it even a *possibility* that any of them are or ever will be interesting enough or intelligent enough to *ever* read anything any of them writes, ever again. They are history -- written off. If in making all of these replies they're trying to pretend to themselves that I still *am* reading their posts, and that therefore they're still as important as they think they are, I would suggest that they're making a better case for them being cultists than I ever could. Thanks to them for helping out... :-) :-) :-) From: salyavin808 no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, September 4, 2014 8:49 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] The invention of telepathy. Sort of Direct brain-to-brain communication demonstrated in human subjects Direct brain-to-brain communication demonstrat... In a first-of-its-kind study, an international team of neuroscientists and robotics engineers has demonstrated the viability of direct brain-to-brain communication ... View on www.sciencedaily.comPreview by Yahoo
Re: [FairfieldLife] The invention of telepathy. Sort of....
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Ann, if as you say, we have arrived at different places wrt turq, then how can we know that it's taken me so long to get here? For all we know, maybe it's taken me such a short time! Or maybe even just the right amount of time. True, everything in its own time. Perhaps one day I will see him as some saintly wise sage who holds the key to all things good and life-supporting. And maybe some day he can admit that his avoidance of all those who might be able to teach or show him something that could make his world a better one (and I'm not just talking about FFL) he will learn something vital about himself and become far less abusive, judgmental and closed. On Friday, September 5, 2014 9:03 AM, awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Steve, I never realized until this post of turq's, just how wounded he is. I guess we all are to some extent. But still... You can call it wounded if you want but I have and will continue to call it something quite different. Mac and I are pretty much in total agreement about this subject. And what took you so long, by the way? On Friday, September 5, 2014 7:01 AM, steve.sundur@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Second shot at this as first reply didn't show up. Barry, then you should feel pleased that your stated mission of pushing people's buttons or what your perceive as pushing people's buttons has been so successful. Of course, a more likely possibility is that your postings display so many blind spots, that people can't resist replying in some fashion. But, hey. Hang your hat on something, right?. P.S. Is it just me, or has some of your fan base dropped off. I guess the reporters still are tuned in. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote : This morning I logged into Yahoo and, as has become my morning ritual, deleted 70 posts from Richard, Steve, Share, Ann, Nabby, Jim, and Dan without opening them. Out of curiosity, I then did a string search on the folder containing these deleted posts, and found that my name or ID was mentioned in over 60 of them, often preceded by the word From, as if they were replying to some post I'd made. What's up with that? These people have been told that I don't read their posts. Why then are they replying to mine? I made a total of 4 posts about TM or MIU yesterday, and that seems to have generated over 60 replies from people with their panties in a twist, all of them writing feverishly to someone *who isn't reading their posts*. It's as if they believe *I* have mastered the direct brain-to-brain communication talked about in this article, and that therefore they can still somehow manage to insult me telepathically even when I don't read their posts. :-) :-) :-) Thanks for the compliment...I guess...but to get real for a moment, all these people are writing these replies for themselves and for each other, probably to vent their frustrations at being called what they are -- cultists. Just to reiterate the point that they all seem to be missing -- I don't consider it even a *possibility* that any of them are or ever will be interesting enough or intelligent enough to *ever* read anything any of them writes, ever again. They are history -- written off. If in making all of these replies they're trying to pretend to themselves that I still *am* reading their posts, and that therefore they're still as important as they think they are, I would suggest that they're making a better case for them being cultists than I ever could. Thanks to them for helping out... :-) :-) :-) From: salyavin808 no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, September 4, 2014 8:49 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] The invention of telepathy. Sort of Direct brain-to-brain communication demonstrated in human subjects http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/09/140903105646.htm Direct brain-to-brain communication demonstrat... http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/09/140903105646.htm In a first-of-its-kind study, an international team of neuroscientists and robotics engineers has demonstrated the viability of direct brain-to-brain communication ... View on www.sciencedaily.com http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/09/140903105646.htm Preview by Yahoo
Re: [FairfieldLife] The invention of telepathy. Sort of....
If I can offer something (as always, take it or leave it), here it is: Mr Cafe has many turbulences in mind. This, of course manifests in different thoughts and subsequent behaviours. We are each seeing a different Mr Cafe as a result. I offer him my love, but tough love; necessary to get through to him. To reach his core Being, I need go past the dark alleys and passages of mind. Knowing that he always deletes my posts, leaves me comfortable in making this explanation to the two of you. Please respect privacy in this matter. Helping as best as I can, from a distance, d in NYC
Re: [FairfieldLife] The invention of telepathy. Sort of....
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote : ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote : ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote : Thank you for respecting my wish that YOU NEVER READ MY POSTS. Now you got it! Good boy. bawee only reads those things that reinforce his 'world view' (small as it is) or his ego. There are actually those who find him interesting enough to read and although I keep trying I have yet failed to get past his bloated sense of himself and his common rudeness. But I don't block anyone, don't feel the desperate need to, and I just keep plugging away in the hope that I stumble upon something that can strengthen my belief in human intelligence here at FFL. So far, the recent posting between Sal and Ricky got close. Dearest Ann, I had sized you up as a very open-minded person, and your post confirms my ovservation. NOW I FIND THAT IN ADDITION TO BEING OPEN YOU ARE ALSO VERY HELPFUL. I love that! Maybe some day I will get into one of these Philosophical Debates that go on between Sal and Richard, but for now I prefer to listen (and learn). But enough about both 'Bs', wow're you doin? Not sure if this was a typo or not but I like the wow're you doin'? Back from the beach, Dan Tan
Re: [FairfieldLife] The invention of telepathy. Sort of....
Ann, I'm guessing that if a misbehaving horse is brought to you and it's obvious the horse has been mistreated, I'm guessing that you don't say a bunch of negative stuff about or to it. That's all. On Friday, September 5, 2014 10:39 AM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Ann, if as you say, we have arrived at different places wrt turq, then how can we know that it's taken me so long to get here? For all we know, maybe it's taken me such a short time! Or maybe even just the right amount of time. True, everything in its own time. Perhaps one day I will see him as some saintly wise sage who holds the key to all things good and life-supporting. And maybe some day he can admit that his avoidance of all those who might be able to teach or show him something that could make his world a better one (and I'm not just talking about FFL) he will learn something vital about himself and become far less abusive, judgmental and closed. On Friday, September 5, 2014 9:03 AM, awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Steve, I never realized until this post of turq's, just how wounded he is. I guess we all are to some extent. But still... You can call it wounded if you want but I have and will continue to call it something quite different. Mac and I are pretty much in total agreement about this subject. And what took you so long, by the way? On Friday, September 5, 2014 7:01 AM, steve.sundur@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Second shot at this as first reply didn't show up. Barry, then you should feel pleased that your stated mission of pushing people's buttons or what your perceive as pushing people's buttons has been so successful. Of course, a more likely possibility is that your postings display so many blind spots, that people can't resist replying in some fashion. But, hey. Hang your hat on something, right?. P.S. Is it just me, or has some of your fan base dropped off. I guess the reporters still are tuned in. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote : This morning I logged into Yahoo and, as has become my morning ritual, deleted 70 posts from Richard, Steve, Share, Ann, Nabby, Jim, and Dan without opening them. Out of curiosity, I then did a string search on the folder containing these deleted posts, and found that my name or ID was mentioned in over 60 of them, often preceded by the word From, as if they were replying to some post I'd made. What's up with that? These people have been told that I don't read their posts. Why then are they replying to mine? I made a total of 4 posts about TM or MIU yesterday, and that seems to have generated over 60 replies from people with their panties in a twist, all of them writing feverishly to someone *who isn't reading their posts*. It's as if they believe *I* have mastered the direct brain-to-brain communication talked about in this article, and that therefore they can still somehow manage to insult me telepathically even when I don't read their posts. :-) :-) :-) Thanks for the compliment...I guess...but to get real for a moment, all these people are writing these replies for themselves and for each other, probably to vent their frustrations at being called what they are -- cultists. Just to reiterate the point that they all seem to be missing -- I don't consider it even a *possibility* that any of them are or ever will be interesting enough or intelligent enough to *ever* read anything any of them writes, ever again. They are history -- written off. If in making all of these replies they're trying to pretend to themselves that I still *am* reading their posts, and that therefore they're still as important as they think they are, I would suggest that they're making a better case for them being cultists than I ever could. Thanks to them for helping out... :-) :-) :-) From: salyavin808 no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, September 4, 2014 8:49 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] The invention of telepathy. Sort of Direct brain-to-brain communication demonstrated in human subjects Direct brain-to-brain communication demonstrat... In a first-of-its-kind study, an international team of neuroscientists and robotics engineers has demonstrated the viability of direct brain-to-brain communication ... View on www.sciencedaily.comPreview by Yahoo
Re: [FairfieldLife] The invention of telepathy. Sort of....
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote : ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote : ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote : ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote : Thank you for respecting my wish that YOU NEVER READ MY POSTS. Now you got it! Good boy. bawee only reads those things that reinforce his 'world view' (small as it is) or his ego. There are actually those who find him interesting enough to read and although I keep trying I have yet failed to get past his bloated sense of himself and his common rudeness. But I don't block anyone, don't feel the desperate need to, and I just keep plugging away in the hope that I stumble upon something that can strengthen my belief in human intelligence here at FFL. So far, the recent posting between Sal and Ricky got close. Dearest Ann, I had sized you up as a very open-minded person, and your post confirms my ovservation. NOW I FIND THAT IN ADDITION TO BEING OPEN YOU ARE ALSO VERY HELPFUL. I love that! Maybe some day I will get into one of these Philosophical Debates that go on between Sal and Richard, but for now I prefer to listen (and learn). But enough about both 'Bs', wow're you doin? Not sure if this was a typo or not but I like the wow're you doin'? Now yer talkin! Back from the beach, Dan Tan d with the nyc twang
Re: [FairfieldLife] The invention of telepathy. Sort of....
This is a very strange post. It's, well, kind of nutty. Your morning ritual is to delete other people's posts? And then you make a post of your own, telling us all about the content of the posts you just deleted unread. Is this not strange? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote : This morning I logged into Yahoo and, as has become my morning ritual, deleted 70 posts from Richard, Steve, Share, Ann, Nabby, Jim, and Dan without opening them. Out of curiosity, I then did a string search on the folder containing these deleted posts, and found that my name or ID was mentioned in over 60 of them, often preceded by the word From, as if they were replying to some post I'd made. What's up with that? These people have been told that I don't read their posts. Why then are they replying to mine? I made a total of 4 posts about TM or MIU yesterday, and that seems to have generated over 60 replies from people with their panties in a twist, all of them writing feverishly to someone *who isn't reading their posts*. It's as if they believe *I* have mastered the direct brain-to-brain communication talked about in this article, and that therefore they can still somehow manage to insult me telepathically even when I don't read their posts. :-) :-) :-) Thanks for the compliment...I guess...but to get real for a moment, all these people are writing these replies for themselves and for each other, probably to vent their frustrations at being called what they are -- cultists. Just to reiterate the point that they all seem to be missing -- I don't consider it even a *possibility* that any of them are or ever will be interesting enough or intelligent enough to *ever* read anything any of them writes, ever again. They are history -- written off. If in making all of these replies they're trying to pretend to themselves that I still *am* reading their posts, and that therefore they're still as important as they think they are, I would suggest that they're making a better case for them being cultists than I ever could. Thanks to them for helping out... :-) :-) :-) From: salyavin808 no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, September 4, 2014 8:49 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] The invention of telepathy. Sort of Direct brain-to-brain communication demonstrated in human subjects http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/09/140903105646.htm http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/09/140903105646.htm Direct brain-to-brain communication demonstrat... http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/09/140903105646.htm In a first-of-its-kind study, an international team of neuroscientists and robotics engineers has demonstrated the viability of direct brain-to-brain communication ... View on www.sciencedaily.com http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/09/140903105646.htm Preview by Yahoo
Re: [FairfieldLife] The invention of telepathy. Sort of....
It's a good thing if imagining 60 people responding to his posts makes him feel good about himself. That's the power of positive thinking right there :-) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote : This is a very strange post. It's, well, kind of nutty. Your morning ritual is to delete other people's posts? And then you make a post of your own, telling us all about the content of the posts you just deleted unread. Is this not strange? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote : This morning I logged into Yahoo and, as has become my morning ritual, deleted 70 posts from Richard, Steve, Share, Ann, Nabby, Jim, and Dan without opening them. Out of curiosity, I then did a string search on the folder containing these deleted posts, and found that my name or ID was mentioned in over 60 of them, often preceded by the word From, as if they were replying to some post I'd made. What's up with that? These people have been told that I don't read their posts. Why then are they replying to mine? I made a total of 4 posts about TM or MIU yesterday, and that seems to have generated over 60 replies from people with their panties in a twist, all of them writing feverishly to someone *who isn't reading their posts*. It's as if they believe *I* have mastered the direct brain-to-brain communication talked about in this article, and that therefore they can still somehow manage to insult me telepathically even when I don't read their posts. :-) :-) :-) Thanks for the compliment...I guess...but to get real for a moment, all these people are writing these replies for themselves and for each other, probably to vent their frustrations at being called what they are -- cultists. Just to reiterate the point that they all seem to be missing -- I don't consider it even a *possibility* that any of them are or ever will be interesting enough or intelligent enough to *ever* read anything any of them writes, ever again. They are history -- written off. If in making all of these replies they're trying to pretend to themselves that I still *am* reading their posts, and that therefore they're still as important as they think they are, I would suggest that they're making a better case for them being cultists than I ever could. Thanks to them for helping out... :-) :-) :-) From: salyavin808 no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, September 4, 2014 8:49 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] The invention of telepathy. Sort of Direct brain-to-brain communication demonstrated in human subjects http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/09/140903105646.htm http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/09/140903105646.htm Direct brain-to-brain communication demonstrat... http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/09/140903105646.htm In a first-of-its-kind study, an international team of neuroscientists and robotics engineers has demonstrated the viability of direct brain-to-brain communication ... View on www.sciencedaily.com http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/09/140903105646.htm Preview by Yahoo
Re: [FairfieldLife] The invention of telepathy. Sort of....
my sense is that he is caught between his love starvation, and not being able to admit it to anyone, so he ends up doing a very impoverished version of bad-ass, every time he is triggered by his empty heart. A hell of a way to live. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote : Dearest Share, I have always felt pity for Turq, or Turqoise, or Turquoisebee, or whichever mad personality is posting at the time. Always Helpful, Dan
Re: [FairfieldLife] The invention of telepathy. Sort of....
Fleet, my kind-hearted friend: You are being very generous. I laid out the facts a time ago. They haven't changed. Helping make the world a better place for you and for me, d
