Hi, Oleg.
On Sat, 23 May 2020 at 18:45, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Dario,
>
> I'm afraid I can't help. Firstly, I do not really understand your
> questions.
> But even if I understood, I am not sure I could answer authoritatively.
>
No worries, I'm sure that it's just my lack of understanding
This thread reminds me of what I found hardest about the Lisp language.
How many evals? how many quotes? I remember a lot of trial and error...
Regarding
> L1 = 1,2,3;
> L2 = (1,2,3);
> process = ba.count(L1), ba.count((L1)), ba.count(L2), ba.count((L2));
I think 3, 1, 1, 1 would be the
Dario,
I'm afraid I can't help. Firstly, I do not really understand your questions.
But even if I understood, I am not sure I could answer authoritatively.
On 05/22, Dario Sanfilippo wrote:
>
> On Fri, 22 May 2020 at 20:22, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> > On 05/22, Dario Sanfilippo wrote:
> > >
> >
On Fri, 22 May 2020 at 20:22, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 05/22, Dario Sanfilippo wrote:
> >
> > Sorry for the confusion. What I wanted to ask is: why aren't the extra
> > parentheses making a difference? Because (0, (1,2,3)) is parsed as
> > ((0),((1,2,3)), right?
I missed a parenthesis, I
argh, forgot to comment this part of your email...
On 05/22, Dario Sanfilippo wrote:
>
> On Fri, 22 May 2020 at 08:20, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> > See above. try
> >
> > process(3, (_<-100,-1,-1,-1, _==0,0,0,0, _>100,1,1,1, 10,10,10));
> >
> > But note that it has 9 inputs, probably not
On 05/22, Dario Sanfilippo wrote:
>
> Sorry for the confusion. What I wanted to ask is: why aren't the extra
> parentheses making a difference? Because (0, (1,2,3)) is parsed as
> ((0),((1,2,3)), right?
Sorry, can't understand...
but in any case, I think that extra parentheses should _only_ make
Sorry for the confusion. What I wanted to ask is: why aren't the extra
parentheses making a difference? Because (0, (1,2,3)) is parsed as
((0),((1,2,3)), right?
I guess that what you explained earlier is also why process =
ba.count(((1,2),(3,4))); results in 3 instead of 2.
Dario
On Fri, 22 May
On 05/22, Dario Sanfilippo wrote:
>
> > But this doesn't really matter. What (I think) does matter is that, say,
> > 1,2 should match (x,xs), no matter how many parentheses you add.
> >
>
> What is the reason why this is not happening?
confused... this _is_ happening, iiuc. And again,
On Fri, 22 May 2020 at 08:20, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 05/22, Dario Sanfilippo wrote:
> >
> > > As for ifN. Perhaps something like this can work for you:
> > >
> > > ifN(N, inp) = par(n, N, line(n,C)) with {
> > > C = (outputs(inp) - N) / (N + 1);
> > >
Thank you.
> On 22 May 2020, at 12.10, Stéphane Letz wrote:
>
>
> https://join.slack.com/t/faustaudio/shared_invite/zt-a624szlz-fL4v2DTR~ZGlI7wARryT7g
>
>
>> Le 22 mai 2020 à 09:20, Alejandro Olarte a écrit :
>>
>> Could somebody point me to the Slack channel? I like to follow it.
>>
https://join.slack.com/t/faustaudio/shared_invite/zt-a624szlz-fL4v2DTR~ZGlI7wARryT7g
> Le 22 mai 2020 à 09:20, Alejandro Olarte a écrit :
>
> Could somebody point me to the Slack channel? I like to follow it.
> Thanks,
> Alejandro
>
>> On 22 May 2020, at 10.10, Stéphane Letz wrote:
>>
>>
Could somebody point me to the Slack channel? I like to follow it.
Thanks,
Alejandro
> On 22 May 2020, at 10.10, Stéphane Letz wrote:
>
> Faust Slack or Discord channels allows faster interactions which helps debug
> sometimes...
>
> We have the mailing list, those 2 channels and the
>
Faust Slack or Discord channels allows faster interactions which helps debug
sometimes...
We have the mailing list, those 2 channels and the
https://github.com/grame-cncm/faust/issues
We could even add a forum ?
I try to follow everything...
Stéphane
> Personally, regardless of the
On 05/22, Dario Sanfilippo wrote:
>
> > As for ifN. Perhaps something like this can work for you:
> >
> > ifN(N, inp) = par(n, N, line(n,C)) with {
> > C = (outputs(inp) - N) / (N + 1);
> > take(i) = inp : route(outputs(inp),1,i+1,1);
> >
>
> I managed to find a commit talking about the "route" primitive, but I
> couldn't find anything about "outputs": what is it?
>
> If I run
>
Look at « Inputs and Outputs of an Expression » section in
https://faustdoc.grame.fr/manual/syntax/
Stéphane
Hello!
On Thu, 21 May 2020 at 17:33, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 05/20, Dario Sanfilippo wrote:
> >
> > I use the "ceil" function for the cond in "if" as I want _any_ non-zero
> > value to result true, whereas ba.if gives false for any fractional
> > condition < 1. I opened an issue about this
On 05/20, Dario Sanfilippo wrote:
>
> I use the "ceil" function for the cond in "if" as I want _any_ non-zero
> value to result true, whereas ba.if gives false for any fractional
> condition < 1. I opened an issue about this but I think that fixing it, if
> bad behaviour (bad if thinking of C/C++,
Sorry for replying off-list earlier, Oleg. You're right that it could be
useful for others too.
I see why the function that we discussed wouldn't work to output sets of
values for each condition. (The others reading, see below.)
I use the "ceil" function for the cond in "if" as I want _any_
On 05/20, Dario Sanfilippo wrote:
>
> a_f(f) = ifthenelseif(( f < 25, .532,
> f < 31.5, .506,
> f < 40, .480,
> f < 50, .455,
> f < 63, .432,
> f < 80, .409,
> f < 100, .387,
> f < 125, .367,
> f < 160, .349,
> f < 200, .330,
> f < 250, .315,
> f < 315, .301,
> f < 400, .288,
> f < 500, .286,
> f
I thought that it would be useful for something like what you see below.
Those are some of the frequency-dependent coefficients of the ISO226
equal-loudness curves, but really I mostly wanted to better understand
pattern matching.
Cheers,
Dario
import("stdfaust.lib");
ifthenelse(cond,then,else)
On 05/20, Dario Sanfilippo wrote:
>
> Was there already something like that
not that I'm aware of,
> or was there a simpler way of doing
> it?
Sorry, I don't understand... doing what??
why do you want this helper?
Oleg.
___
Faudiostream-users
Oleg nailing it again. That's what I was looking for. Thanks :-)
It is just an if-then-else-if function, with an arbitrary number of ifs.
Was there already something like that or was there a simpler way of doing
it?
Dario
On Wed, 20 May 2020 at 12:11, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 05/19, Dario
On 05/19, Dario Sanfilippo wrote:
>
> Hello, list. I hope that you're all well.
>
> I just started using pattern matching and I'd kindly ask for your help to
> better understand how things work.
>
> The goal is to implement an *ifthenelseif* function that takes cond-then
> pairs as arguments
23 matches
Mail list logo
