Re: [Faudiostream-users] mterm normalization bug, integer overflow

2018-08-24 Thread Julius Smith
I think this one may have been fixed. I cannot reproduce it in the latest git master-dev branch: faust -v FAUST : DSP to C, C++, Java, JavaScript, old C++, asm.js, WebAssembly (wast/wasm) compiler, Version 2.8.1 Copyright (C) 2002-2018, GRAME - Centre National de Creation Musicale. All rights

[Faudiostream-users] mterm normalization bug, integer overflow

2018-08-24 Thread Oleg Nesterov
For example, this program process = no.noise <: *(mem); outputs zeroes due to integer overflow. process = no.noise <: *; the same. This one works correctly process = no.noise : ^(2);

Re: [Faudiostream-users] mterm normalization bug, integer overflow

2018-08-24 Thread Oleg Nesterov
On 08/24, Julius Smith wrote: > > I think this one may have been fixed. I cannot reproduce it in the > latest git master-dev branch: I am on master-dev too, > faust -v > FAUST : DSP to C, C++, Java, JavaScript, old C++, asm.js, WebAssembly > (wast/wasm) compiler, Version 2.8.1 FAUST : DSP to

Re: [Faudiostream-users] mterm normalization bug, integer overflow

2018-08-24 Thread yann orlarey
Hi, That's clearly a bug. Thanks Oleg for discovering the problem. I will have a look asap... Yann Le ven. 24 août 2018 à 16:30, Oleg Nesterov a écrit : > On 08/24, Julius Smith wrote: > > > > I think this one may have been fixed. I cannot reproduce it in the > > latest git master-dev branch:

Re: [Faudiostream-users] mterm normalization bug, integer overflow

2018-08-24 Thread Julius Smith
On second look, I am getting strangeness as well. I was expecting zeros, but I see now that it's incorrect floats. On Sat, Aug 25, 2018 at 6:51 AM yann orlarey wrote: > > Hi, > > That's clearly a bug. Thanks Oleg for discovering the problem. I will have a > look asap... > > Yann > > Le ven. 24

[Faudiostream-users] logic lib

2018-08-24 Thread gr
Dear faust users, please allow me to present a little something to you. This work originates in the preparation to a test on hardware design at university. I wanted to model some of the logical circuits in a graphical environment like Pure Data. As the solutions I found there were not

Re: [Faudiostream-users] "ZDF" SVF in C++, could this be converted to FAUST?

2018-08-24 Thread pdowling
> By the way, I don't know why they are called "zero-delay filters". I > just see second-order digital filters, they are *not* called 'zero-delay filters'. they are called 'zero-delay feedback (filters)' - 'zdf filters' - the f stands for feedback, as of course there is no such thing as a

Re: [Faudiostream-users] "ZDF" SVF in C++, could this be converted to FAUST?

2018-08-24 Thread Julius Smith
Hey, thanks for posting. I made a faust2octave test program (attached). Everything looks good to me, assuming I guessed all the names right. - Julius On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 2:52 PM Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > On 07/19, Oliver Larkin via Faudiostream-users wrote: > > > > Based on the pseudo code