Re: [Faudiostream-users] "ZDF" SVF in C++, could this be converted to FAUST?

2018-08-23 Thread Julius Smith
I would also include the one-multiply lattice (two sections) in a performance comparison. - Julius On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 7:05 AM Oliver Larkin via Faudiostream-users wrote: > > Bit busy to try this properly and compare with other faust svf offerings, but > after an initial test it seems nice!

Re: [Faudiostream-users] "ZDF" SVF in C++, could this be converted to FAUST?

2018-08-23 Thread Oliver Larkin via Faudiostream-users
Bit busy to try this properly and compare with other faust svf offerings, but after an initial test it seems nice! thanks Oleg, oli > On 23 Aug 2018, at 12:14, Julius Smith wrote: > > Yes, tf2snp is the most luxurious filter section I know about: exact > power normalization of both states.

Re: [Faudiostream-users] "ZDF" SVF in C++, could this be converted to FAUST?

2018-08-23 Thread Julius Smith
Yes, tf2snp is the most luxurious filter section I know about: exact power normalization of both states. A comparison to the modified coupled form should be better matched in terms of computational expense, and then given that, which is better behaved when modulated in various ways? In the

Re: [Faudiostream-users] "ZDF" SVF in C++, could this be converted to FAUST?

2018-08-23 Thread Oleg Nesterov
Hi Julius, On 08/23, Julius Smith wrote: > > Ok, sounds like they should be compared to the normalized ladder > filter. In Faust / filters.lib, the second order case is called tf2sn > ("transfer function, order 2, s-plane, normalized). I tend to use > tf2snp which adds "p" for "protected". The