Re: [fd-dev] RV: FreeDos with FAT32 Success!!!!!

2002-12-02 Thread tom ehlert
isn't there a similar API at least on some Windows versions for NTFS or even FAT32 ? Yes. Would it make sense for FreeDOS to offer that API? No. tom -- list options/archives/etc.: http://www.topica.com/lists/fd-dev unsubscribe: send blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Re: [fd-dev] Enquiry: Update packs

2002-12-02 Thread tom ehlert
is possible. the problem is with the installer, not with ZIP. pipes == temp space under DOS. So doesn't change much. I meant, that the problem is with the *permanent* space requirements. 233 Kb *temp* requirement is certainly available; at least if you have - a CDROM - some

Re: [fd-dev] DISPLAY CON?=

2002-12-02 Thread tom ehlert
One could at least think of having multiple console drivers residing concurrently in a system, say CO80: and BW80: connected to different video systems and screens, and CON dynamically assigned one can *always* think of something, that would break something else. but with this kind of thinking,

Re: [fd-dev] Modifying character's shape

2002-12-02 Thread tom ehlert
This might be a problem for system using display frontend drivers or for screen reader software, although I am not currently aware of a particular example. It is, however, a problem, for the CopyCursor feature built into our FreeKEYB advanced keyboard driver, Now I start to understand, why

Re: [fd-dev] DISPLAY CON?=

2002-12-03 Thread tom ehlert
IMO, I prefer working 2003 for 98% all cases over might work in 2010 - eventually (if I'm not too busy) Hm, being at 98% in 2003 is completely illusoric, IMHO. you are right. but then I prefer 80% in 2003, and hope for 95% in 2010 IMHO the fine arts of engineering is to find the right

Re: [fd-dev] [OT] Microkernel architecture

2002-12-04 Thread tom ehlert
Interprocess communication in a true microkernel architecture is a drag though (simply a question of overhead you generate if you send messages instead of directy talking to the hardware). It's mostly a drag, because 'pure' message passing involves context ('process') switching, which is *very

Re: [fd-dev] LBA and FAT32 vs. other DOSes

2002-12-05 Thread tom ehlert
I understand the last Q/A as PC DOS 7 is abandonware, feel free to grab it whereever you can find it ??? certainly not - note 'local computer shops' http://www-3.ibm.com/software/os/dos/compare.html ... among others, low memory footprint. Read the rest yourself... a pretty long TODO for us

Re: AW: AW: [fd-dev] [OT] Microkernel architecture

2002-12-05 Thread tom ehlert
Sorry for a newbie to enter the discussion here. Was just wondering, it appears to me this is just the sort of thing that Tripple Dos does - multitasking so you could run multiple instances of DOS. Maybe you were thinking of something else, I don't know... Yes, but Tripple Dos is

Re: [fd-dev] GPL

2002-12-09 Thread tom ehlert
for instance, what good is encryption/decryption software with released source code that hackers can look through?). I STRONGLY disagree. encryption/decryption software withOUT released source code that ANYBODY can go through is probably trying to replace obscurity by security and should be