Hi,
here's the proposal for the final version of the printer icon set. I
used the One Canvas Workflow and added 256x256 icon (which is *not* just
48x48 one scaled up). Seems like the new workflow is quite helpful in
many aspects and also saves some space on HDD (the final SVG is smaller
than
Martin Sourada wrote:
here's the proposal for the final version of the printer icon set. I
used the One Canvas Workflow and added 256x256 icon (which is *not* just
48x48 one scaled up). Seems like the new workflow is quite helpful in
Actually I had to open the SVG and verify the strokes are
On Wed, 2008-08-20 at 17:26 +0300, Nicu Buculei wrote:
Actually I had to open the SVG and verify the strokes are the same size
as I had the impression they are thinner in the 256x256 (I was wrong,
maybe due to the lighter color?)
That's intentional. I disliked the strong contrast between
On Tue, 2008-08-05 at 18:15 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
Martin Sourada a écrit :
Just a notice that I've redone the other = 22x22 sizes in that style as
well. I attach the current candidates for approval (only PNGs). SVGs and
the previous tries can be found on my fedorapeople page
On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 12:23 +0300, Nicu Buculei wrote:
This one is, IMO, much better.
Just a notice that I've redone the other = 22x22 sizes in that style as
well. I attach the current candidates for approval (only PNGs). SVGs and
the previous tries can be found on my fedorapeople page [1].
Martin Sourada a écrit :
Just a notice that I've redone the other = 22x22 sizes in that style as
well. I attach the current candidates for approval (only PNGs). SVGs and
the previous tries can be found on my fedorapeople page [1].
Looks much better without the printed. The base looks
Martin Sourada wrote:
I've reworked the printer icon and added missing sizes. I've done two
slightly different designs. I attach 22x22 version, the rest can be
found at my fedorapeople page [1].
Maybe my tired eyes are at fault, but I find both of them a bit too blurry.
--
nicu ::
On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 10:14 +0300, Nicu Buculei wrote:
Maybe my tired eyes are at fault, but I find both of them a bit too blurry.
Do you have any idea/suggestion how to improve that (other than to
recheck pixel grid alignment)? Does that feeling apply only on the icons
I attached (22x22) or on
Martin Sourada wrote:
On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 10:14 +0300, Nicu Buculei wrote:
Maybe my tired eyes are at fault, but I find both of them a bit too blurry.
Do you have any idea/suggestion how to improve that (other than to
recheck pixel grid alignment)? Does that feeling apply only on the icons
On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 10:41 +0300, Nicu Buculei wrote:
Only 22x22, even 16x16 seems crisp (maybe 32x32 is also a bit blurry,
but being larger it seems OK).
Well, the main difference between = 22x22 and 16x16 is the used type of
projection, which makes the 16x16 easier to make crisp. I'll
Martin Sourada wrote:
On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 10:41 +0300, Nicu Buculei wrote:
If so, what opinion have you about this, as you have a lot of experience
working with icons, could it be of benefit or the [possible] benefits
does not compensate for the additional work?
I haven't. When I first
On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 11:17 +0300, Nicu Buculei wrote:
He provides various versions, including an OGG Theora. Basically is
about using a single SVG sheet (like
http://jimmac.musichall.cz/images/blog/twitter.png) for keeping the
sources for all resolutions.
This way is easier to reuse
Martin Sourada wrote:
On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 11:17 +0300, Nicu Buculei wrote:
He provides various versions, including an OGG Theora. Basically is
about using a single SVG sheet (like
http://jimmac.musichall.cz/images/blog/twitter.png) for keeping the
sources for all resolutions.
This way is
Hi, I think that better is 22a variant, because it's near to how the printer
works - the blank paper goes in from the top side..
JJM
2008/8/3 Martin Sourada [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
I've reworked the printer icon and added missing sizes. I've done two
slightly different designs. I
14 matches
Mail list logo
