On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 7:27 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.atwrote:
Gregory Maxwell wrote:
I noticed that http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora appears to be
strongly promoting i386 Fedora over x86_64. Is this intentional or an
oversight?
This is, sadly, intentional. I and others
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Ikem Krueger
ikem.krue...@googlemail.comwrote:
IMHO, the right solution is to make the 64-bit edition the default
download
and to work on making the error message people get when trying to install
it
on a 32-bit machine nicer: We're sorry, but your
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 8:18 PM, Ikem Krueger
ikem.krue...@googlemail.comwrote:
Except, that could be false advertising. In most cases, where CPU
computation is not used heavily, 64-bit is actually SLOWER than the
32-bit
counterpart. Optimizations are narrowing the gap, but it still
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Ikem Krueger
ikem.krue...@googlemail.comwrote:
Why then should someone prefer 64bit over 32bit?
4 Reasons:
1: Date/Time stamp, Unix time doesn't work in 32-bit past 2038 (not
really affecting us much, most of us will replace our PCs long before then)
Hello,
I got a warning from the buildsystem about OggConvert having broken
dependencies on PowerPC, when I know OggConvert is a noarch package. What am
I supposed to do?
This is what I got from the buildsystem:
oggconvert has broken dependencies in the development tree:
On ppc:
On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, 2009-11-08 at 14:34 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Wouldn't it be easier to work with GRUB2 folks to add the missing
features we need?
In theory yes, that's how it's supposed to go. In practice, with
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Joerg Schilling
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net wrote:
You have refused to cite specific legal problems with cdrkit, so there
are no known legal problems that anyone can see. The proper reporting
method is
.
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Joerg Schilling
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
King InuYasha ngomp...@gmail.com wrote:
While it is true that the GPL permits linking to CDDL libraries, that is
only in the case if the library is a system library, which is a library
that is NECESSARY
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 5:48 PM, Joerg Schilling
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
That may be true, but since cdrecord is not shippable, it's a pretty
vacuous truth. The solution is obviously to fix the bug and help revive
upstream, or else host a development tree on fh if upstream
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 7:18 AM, David Woodhouse dw...@infradead.orgwrote:
On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 22:25 -0400, Tony Nelson wrote:
On 09-10-28 18:24:49, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 06:17:31PM -0400, Tony Nelson wrote:
Sorry to bug developers, but I didn't get any bites from
Well, possibly the only thing fatELF would be needed for would be to rid
ourselves of multilib. Applications don't even need to be FatELF to link to
FatELF libraries.
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 11:28 AM, Ikem Krueger
ikem.krue...@googlemail.comwrote:
I just saw this article about an effort to
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.atwrote:
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
LLVM 2.6 has been announced with Clang declared as production quality in
this release
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-announce/2009-October/33.html
Has anyone been looking
Hello,
I just saw this article about an effort to create Universal binary style ELF
binaries for Linux, and I thought that this would be something to watch, so
that Fedora could integrate both x86-32 and x86-64 into single DVD sets.
http://icculus.org/fatelf/
There is even a proof of concept VM
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 12:57 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.atwrote:
King InuYasha wrote:
I just saw this article about an effort to create Universal binary style
ELF binaries for Linux, and I thought that this would be something to
watch, so that Fedora could integrate both x86-32
Because there is still no significant change in functionality, just
compatibility with current audio systems.
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 7:27 AM, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 1:08 AM, LinuxDonaldlinuxdon...@linuxdonald.de
wrote:
I have add the openal-soft package
and recompile it.
Am 11.08.2009 02:29, schrieb King InuYasha:
Shouldn't it also be possible for openal-soft to replace the crappy old
OpenAL package included in previous versions of Fedora? The openal-soft
library is supposed to be compatible with applications that normally use the
older OpenAL SI
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.comwrote:
On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 15:56 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 29.07.09 09:47, Jeff Garzik (jgar...@pobox.com) wrote:
mixing is certainly the smallest part of it. Plese don't forget that
mixing is not
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 5:51 AM, Ilyes Gouta ilyes.go...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Users with Intel's integrated chips need the updated DRM in that
kernel. I think that an update is highly recommended.
-Ilyes
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Bojan Smojverbo...@rexursive.com wrote:
Now that .1
If your desktop doubles as a server, then no you don't turn off the
computer...
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 10:55 AM, Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.dewrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 01.07.2009 17:48, schrieb Kevin Kofler:
Whose behavior? Turning the computer off
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 3:14 AM, Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com wrote:
Frank Murphy, Mon, 29 Jun 2009 08:38:45 +0100:
Is there any contingency plans in place, for a worst case scenario if
C#, is lost? FesCo?
Sure, there is, but no need to panic ... sky is not falling yet (and
there are many
I was reading an article today in ComputerWorld about something called
KSplice, which allows Linux users to install critical updates and patch in
without rebooting the computer. I tried it and while it was a bit odd for
installing (not auto-disabling the Ubuntu update system), it worked very
well.
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 7:12 PM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 11:19:53PM +, Christopher Brown wrote:
I understand Microsoft has patented this technology so it is currently
no-go for inclusion.
[jwbo...@hansolo ~]$ koji latest-pkg dist-f11 ksplice
Build
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 10:58 PM, Bill McGonigle b...@bfccomputing.comwrote:
On 06/29/2009 10:49 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
It can only handle small patches which don't change
any data structures. So the official Fedora kernel updates will never be
suitable to be distributed through KSplice.
I found a very strange omission for the qt4-devel package. The path to
qt4-devel binaries (/usr/lib/qt4/bin) isn't automatically added to $PATH
like qt3's are.
Additionally, when I removed the qt3-devel package, the path to qt3-devel
binaries (/usr/lib/qt-3.3/bin) isn't automatically removed from
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 4:11 AM, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, 26 Jun 2009 03:05:41 -0500, King wrote:
I found a very strange omission for the qt4-devel package. The path to
qt4-devel binaries (/usr/lib/qt4/bin) isn't automatically added to $PATH
like qt3's are.
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 10:51 AM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.atwrote:
Seth Vidal wrote:
1. we're going to need split media for dvds - we're SOL there anyway - so
the code will need to live on.
Just kick out all the i18n stuff and you won't.
It doesn't make sense to force people to
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 3:17 PM, Tomas Mraz tm...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 11:42 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Chris Adams (cmad...@hiwaay.net) said:
Removing support for still-functional hardware is a trademark of
Microsoft, not Linux.
I'd also argue that doing
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 3:17 PM, Tomas Mraz tm...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 11:42 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Chris Adams (cmad...@hiwaay.net) said:
Removing support for still-functional hardware is a trademark of
Microsoft, not Linux.
I'd also argue that doing
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 11:38 PM, Bradley Baetz bba...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14/06/09 04:53, Robert 'Bob' Jensen wrote:
- Frank Murphyfrankl...@gmail.com wrote:
Just curious.
But if a user has bandwidth problems, how is\are mutiple CD's going
to help, or is it purely on hardware
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@j2solutions.netwrote:
On Jun 14, 2009, at 1:30, King InuYasha ngomp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 11:38 PM, Bradley Baetz bba...@gmail.com
bba...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14/06/09 04:53, Robert 'Bob' Jensen wrote
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 8:00 PM, Matthew Garrett m...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 05:03:56PM -0500, King InuYasha wrote:
Well, not necessarily Mac OS X itself. Wouldn't the Darwin kernel
require
it anyway? I have been installing Chameleon so I could boot the
regular
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 8:11 AM, Michal Nowak mno...@redhat.com wrote:
Just noticed Canonical is pushing GRUB 2 as default in
Ubuntu 9.10 [1]. There are some hints on testing [2] and
from what I can see there are 40 bugs opened against
GRUB 2 in launchpad [3] v. zero in our Bugzilla.
Was
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 3:43 AM, Christopher Brown snecklif...@gmail.comwrote:
2009/6/10 King InuYasha ngomp...@gmail.com:
I would like to see GRUB Legacy replaced in Fedora 12 with GRUB 2,
especially with a couple odd systems here that don't seem to like GRUB
Legacy all that much
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 9:50 AM, Dennis J. denni...@conversis.de wrote:
On 06/10/2009 10:43 AM, Christopher Brown wrote:
2009/6/10 King InuYashangomp...@gmail.com:
I would like to see GRUB Legacy replaced in Fedora 12 with GRUB 2,
especially with a couple odd systems here that don't seem
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Dennis J. denni...@conversis.de wrote:
On 06/10/2009 06:36 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 11:07 -0500, King InuYasha wrote:
Well, the existing GRUB used in distros was declared Legacy a long
time ago. GRUB 2 is a rewrite that is supposed
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 15:13 -0500, King InuYasha wrote:
EFI support is not the same as fake-EFI.
Your mail client has atrociously bad indentation. Fix it.
It appears from light googling that what you mean by fake EFI
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 11:36 AM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.atwrote:
King InuYasha wrote:
Then don't use FFmpeg. And since Moonlight itself will not contain the MS
codec pack, it can still fit in main Fedora repositories.
So you're suggesting we should promote the proprietary M
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.atwrote:
King InuYasha wrote:
I really don't see why you should freak out over Moonlight, if Mono is
protected, then Moonlight 2 should be protected, since it is a form of
Mono itself.
Moonlight needs to go to RPM Fusion
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 9:10 AM, James Laska jla...@redhat.com wrote:
Greetings,
The Fedora QA team would like your feedback on Fedora 11 Test Days. You
may have seen Adam Williamson's planet post [1] kicking off Fedora 12
Test Day planning. We're interested in identifying areas for
39 matches
Mail list logo
