On Wed, 06 Jan 2010 13:57:14 +, Adam wrote:
On Tue, 2010-01-05 at 12:16 -0500, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
Well, I think a reasonable alternative would be to add those policies to
the AutoQA infrastructure, and if the package fails the check, it
doesn't get tagged and the packager gets
How much do we adhere to our Packaging Guidelines for static libraries?
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Libraries
What had started with a few Yum queries for corner-cases (see
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2009-December/msg00012.html )
On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 15:12:18 +, Matthew wrote:
Now we have abrt making it easier for lazy people to submit crash
reports, do we have enough information for a 'Top Crashers' list? It
would be good to highlight these centrally to provide an incentive to
give them the attention they
On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 11:53:28 +0100, Jiri wrote:
ABRT 1.0.2 should fix the problems with installing the debug packages,
the only problem I know about is when some of the enabled repositories
is down - then the yum fails to download debuginfo even if it's in
working directory and there is
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 22:04:59 +0100, Kevin wrote:
What's wrong with ABRT?
My main beef with it is that it reports its crashes to the downstream bug
tracker when really the right people to fix them are the upstream
developers. KCrash/DrKonqi is much better there.
Well, upstream would want
On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 13:16:18 +, Richard wrote:
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 12:52:49PM +, Rawhide Report wrote:
[...]
I got half way through doing these yesterday, but a combination of
being distracted and a mistake in my script means I forgot some. One
annoying thing about Koji is I
On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 10:52:54 +, Daniel wrote:
Hi,
OLPC's security system uses libtomcrypt / tomsfastmath, both at the
Linux level and the firmware level.
OLPC has previously had a specific version of tomcrypt/tommath
profesionally audited for security reasons. So we obviously want to
What's wrong with ABRT?
Originally, with stock F-12, I had received a couple of good backtraces in
bugzilla. Incredibly useful. A wonderful improvement over F-11 and older.
And later? - Recently, in all the backtraces dozens of debuginfo packages
are missing. :-(
--
fedora-devel-list mailing
On Fri, 25 Dec 2009 21:29:16 + (UTC), Simon wrote:
Author: cassmodiah
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/i3/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv21345/devel
Modified Files:
.cvsignore i3.spec import.log sources
Log Message:
3.d - 3.d-bf1
Name: i3
On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 19:40:36 -0500, Orcan wrote:
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
The temporary work-around is to compile with
-fno-var-tracking-assignments
and that also works for lv2-c++-tools in the review queue, btw.
Thanks! Yes, with that flag I
On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 17:19:37 -0500, Orcan wrote:
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 17:02:24 +
Jonathan Underwood wrote:
Hi,
I kicked off a couple of builds last night which appear stuck on koji.
I had checked they build locally with a make
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 22:07:04 +0100, I wrote:
Fedora 12 with LD_PRELOAD=libefence.so.0.0 EF_ALLOW_MALLOC_0=1, what is
more likely that these are false positives or real bugs?
It's hard to find GNOME/GTK apps that don't crash. One that works fine
in efence is gnome-about.
Many non-GUI tools
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 11:18:30 +, Bastien wrote:
$ eog
Electric Fence 2.2.2 Copyright (C) 1987-1999 Bruce Perens
br...@perens.com
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
== in ORBit corba-any.c once more
All the GNOME apps that use GConf or ORBit will fail because you need to
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 15:57:31 +, Bastien wrote:
I'm not sure even trying to use ElectricFence is such a good idea
anyway, when we have valgrind available.
Yeah, likely. I examined some uninitialised variables with Valgrind
yesterday. For a couple of other cases (including Audacious),
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 09:47:02 -0800, John wrote:
[ElectricFence] triggering ABRT activity, whereas [Valgrind] requires
increased effort to make sense of undetailed traces such as the following
(which is bug 548711):
==13516== Invalid read of size 1
==13516==at 0x400730E: strcmp
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 18:41:22 -0500, Tom wrote:
Orcan Ogetbil writes:
If there is a way to file an update (same version and release except
the disttag) to multiple branches, please let me know.
Usually it works: just add all the package NVRs to the same update
submission. (That's what
Fedora 12 with LD_PRELOAD=libefence.so.0.0 EF_ALLOW_MALLOC_0=1, what is
more likely that these are false positives or real bugs?
---
$ gnome-terminal
Electric Fence 2.2.2 Copyright (C) 1987-1999 Bruce Perens br...@perens.com
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
== in ORBit corba-any.c
$ geeqie
On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 14:00:06 +0530, Huzaifa wrote:
Hi,
So taking into consideration all the feed back , here are the changes done:
- - bump soname in the code from 1.2.11 to 1.2.12
Please, with further comments on this package let's limit ourselves to one
place only. _Eiter_ the review
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 14:07:29 +0530, Huzaifa wrote:
I have forked libtar as libtar-ng, because the upstream does not have
time to maintain it anymore.
Here is the bz:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546169
Now the question is what is a private fork?
Am i wrong in forking it
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 16:14:40 +0530, Rahul wrote:
On 12/11/2009 03:56 PM, Florian Festi wrote:
Without knowing the history:
Best solution would be to ask former upstream for permission to continue
the project under its original name
That was already denied
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 16:43:16 +0530, Rahul wrote:
On 12/11/2009 04:38 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 16:14:40 +0530, Rahul wrote:
On 12/11/2009 03:56 PM, Florian Festi wrote:
Without knowing the history:
Best solution would be to ask former upstream for permission
On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 19:47:23 + (UTC), Deji wrote:
Author: deji
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/blacs/F-12
- Fix broken dep issue on F-12
-Release: 34%{?dist}.1
+Release: 34%{?dist}.2
-Obsoletes: blacs-lam 1.1-33
+Obsoletes: blacs-lam = 1.1-33
This is a common pitfall due to %dist.
On Wed, 09 Dec 2009 07:47:44 -0500, Neal wrote:
I just got a crash in kde plasma. Traceback is not useful, because of
missing debug pacakges.
Seems to happen more frequently recently. The latest backtraces
I've seen in bugzilla all were missing dozens of debuginfo packages.
I'm told I can
On Thu, 03 Dec 2009 18:23:21 +0100, Jean-Luc wrote:
Thanks,
jlf
At least:
rpm -e selinux-policy policycoreutils-gui selinux-policy-targeted
rpm -e checkpolicy policycoreutils policycoreutils-python setroubleshoot-server
setroubleshoot-plugins
Drop any that aren't present (or else rpm -e
On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 10:38:15 +0100, Michal wrote:
Dne Mon, 30 Nov 2009 07:05:28 -0200 Paulo Cavalcanti napsal(a):
Thanks for the explanation.
At least 3 applications are not restoring the volumes:
xmms, mplayer and audacious.
Interesting. Maybe these programs try to be too clever
On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 10:43:10 +, Bastien wrote:
Notice that the documentation for pa_stream_connect_playback strongly
recommends passing NULL as volume.
This looks correct, you're never supposed to restore volume yourself
when using PulseAudio.
Which is exactly my fix that went into
On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 12:25:27 -0800, Carl wrote:
The rasmol source has a dual GPLv2/RASMOL license, so for Fedora we can
consider that it is licensed gplv2. There are some libraries that are
included that are licensed lgpl.
This is covered by:
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:59:20 -0500, Przemek wrote:
Essentially, these proposals can be seen as attempts to introduce a
2-dimensional ordering: on one hand, classifying packages by their
version number, and on the other hand by a distribution. Mathematically
this is impossible---it's a
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:26:11 -0500, Orcan wrote:
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 12:03 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 11:31:27 -0500, Tony wrote:
On 09-11-21 06:40:45, drago01 wrote:
...
You misunderstood me, I was not suggesting adding another epoch but
simply bump
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:39:28 +0100, Christoph wrote:
When two builds of the same version are done on the same day, the
rawhide report screws up the order of the changelog entries:
Am Montag, den 23.11.2009, 13:28 + schrieb Rawhide Report:
nimbus-0.1.4-2.fc13
---
*
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:04:49 +0100, Christoph wrote:
Am Montag, den 23.11.2009, 14:56 +0100 schrieb Michael Schwendt:
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:39:28 +0100, Christoph wrote:
When two builds of the same version are done on the same day, the
rawhide report screws up the order
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:56:58 -0500 (EST), Seth wrote:
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:04:49 +0100, Christoph wrote:
Am Montag, den 23.11.2009, 14:56 +0100 schrieb Michael Schwendt:
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:39:28 +0100, Christoph wrote:
When two
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:38:35 +0100, drago01 wrote:
We should just use release epochs, people might hate them for whatever
reasons, but they would easily prevent such issues from happing.
Vendor Epochs have been discussed years ago and have been rejected.
The normal %{epoch} in RPM Version
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 12:40:45 +0100, drago01 wrote:
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:38:35 +0100, drago01 wrote:
We should just use release epochs, people might hate them for whatever
reasons, but they would easily prevent such issues from happing.
Vendor Epochs have been discussed years ago and
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 11:31:27 -0500, Tony wrote:
On 09-11-21 06:40:45, drago01 wrote:
...
You misunderstood me, I was not suggesting adding another epoch but
simply bump the %{epoch} for every release.
If this were really important to do, just putting the release first in
the version
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 08:16:39 -0800, Adam wrote:
I was going to suggest what seems an obvious alternative way to do what
Christian wants, without changing anything in rpm. Instead of:
foobar-1.0-1.fc12.x86-64
have:
foobar-fc12-1.0-1.x86-64
Insufficient.
Making %dist most-significant
http://www.musepack.net/index.php?pg=src
http://files.musepack.net/source/musepack_src_r435.tar.gz
It seems we only have the old libmpcdec 1.2.6 in Fedora, which can decode
SV7 but not SV8.
Is the new set of libs and tools (from March 2009) hidden somewhere?
Or are there new legal problems?
--
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 10:29:10 +0100, Denys wrote:
Did anybody submit bugs successfully using this tool?
Yes.
Well, with F-12 and a segfault in Claws Mail, it created a bugzilla ticket
for me, but I couldn't get it to upload/attach the backtrace. Not even
when retrying multiple times to send
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 00:38:31 +0100, Martin wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537587
Hm... on a very quick first look, you obviously don't follow
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Package_Release
The difference being that *you* point out a specific
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:44:50 -0200, Itamar wrote:
may be, but sponsors or reviewers doesn't have entire day free time.
True, but an entire day is not needed. And nobody forces you to become a
reviewer [or a sponsor] and spend any time at all on reviewing or guiding
[new] packagers. The
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 07:18:27 -0800, Jesse wrote:
If we did a macro change in dist-f13 and a mass rebuild, and did a macro
change on dist-f12 and dist-f11 at the same time (without a mass
rebuild) this might work.
Only with severe discipline by all packagers who push updates to
multiple
On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:24:03 -0700, Nathanael wrote:
libdspam.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libdspam.so
[g...@iridium ~]$ ls -l /usr/lib64/libdspam.*
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 175812 2009-11-15 13:54 /usr/lib64/libdspam.a
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root954 2009-11-15 13:54
On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 17:02:01 -0500, Neal wrote:
Seems I do this every time we have a new release.
How about you avoid that mistake in the future? ;)
In F12:
cvs tag -F -c mercurial-1_4-1_fc12
ERROR: The tag mercurial-1_4-1_fc12 is already applied on a different branch
ERROR: You can not
On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 16:26:39 -0600, Dennis wrote:
On Monday 16 November 2009 04:02:01 pm Neal Becker wrote:
Seems I do this every time we have a new release.
In F12:
cvs tag -F -c mercurial-1_4-1_fc12
ERROR: The tag mercurial-1_4-1_fc12 is already applied on a different
branch
On Sat, 14 Nov 2009 23:36:27 +0100, Steve wrote:
$ repoclosure -r updates | grep '^ ' | sort | uniq -c | sort -gr | head
167 rtld(GNU_HASH)
130 /sbin/ldconfig
127 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)
127 libc.so.6()(64bit)
101 /bin/sh
on the
On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 22:30:44 +0100, Dominik wrote:
On Sunday, 15 November 2009 at 21:59, Nathanael Noblet wrote:
Hello,
So I recently posted my first package and the review. While I waited I
started cleaning up more issues I found after I realized you could run
rpmlint on the actual
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 23:30:43 + (UTC), Paul wrote:
Author: stingray
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/iptstate/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20114
Modified Files:
iptstate.spec
Log Message:
iptstate-2.2.2-2
Please give make clog and cvs commit -F clog a
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:17:58 + (UTC), Paul wrote:
Author: stingray
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/iptstate/F-12
%changelog
+* Tue Nov 10 2009 Paul P. Komkoff Jr i...@stingr.net - 2.2.2-2
+- rebuild for libnetfilter_conntrack-0.0.100
+
+* Tue Nov 10 2009 Thomas Woerner twoer...@redhat.com
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:53:35 +, Christopher wrote:
Oops, too late!
[ch...@yoda ~]$ sudo yum update
Loaded plugins: presto, refresh-packagekit
Setting up Update Process
Resolving Dependencies
-- Running transaction check
--- Package dhclient.x86_64 12:4.1.0p1-4.fc11 set to be updated
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 21:52:50 +0100, LinuxDonald wrote:
Am 11.11.2009 21:16, schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
On 11/12/2009 01:05 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
The following packages in the repository suffer from broken dependencies
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:36:38 -0600, Ian wrote:
Can someone give me a definitive answer on whether or not I need to
rebuild tremulous and tremfusion with the new ABI? I'm willing to, I
just need the confusion to go away.
No need to.
This was just the separate openal-soft package that is
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 11:01:54 +0100, Kevin wrote:
Mark McLoughlin wrote:
Leaving it as a package requires means hard-coding knowledge in qemu
about which version of gpxe-roms-qemu provides which roms. IMHO, the
file requires makes more sense.
So what? Many packages have hardcoded
Results of an extras-repoclosure run for F-11 + Updates to F-12 + Updates and
i686:
| source rpm: PolicyKit-olpc-1.2-2.fc11.src.rpm
| package: PolicyKit-olpc-1.2-2.fc11.noarch from fedora-11-i386
| unresolved deps:
| /var/lib/PolicyKit-public
| related pkgs:
| PolicyKit
The new polkit
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 09:06:34 -0700, Orion wrote:
On 11/04/2009 09:04 AM, Andrew Overholt wrote:
* Orion Poplawskior...@cora.nwra.com [2009-11-04 10:58]:
On 11/04/2009 07:47 AM, Rawhide Report wrote:
Compose started at Wed Nov 4 08:15:08 UTC 2009
Broken deps for ppc64
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/bugs/libsndfile
What's up with libsndfile in Fedora and EPEL?
There are open tickets about CVEs filed in March.
There are additional tickets without any reply.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 23:08:53 -0500, Jon wrote:
* fluidsynth and PA (jds2001, 17:04:44)
* LINK: http://markmail.org/message/bovdqb7na3zor2ck - without
comment. (mjg59, 17:17:07)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500087#c13
(jds2001, 17:19:22)
* AGREED: PA
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 10:51:14 + (UTC), Fabio wrote:
Author: fabbione
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fence-agents/F-11
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv15209
Modified Files:
fence-agents.spec
Log Message:
Fix Requires: on libvirt/libvirt-client
+%if 0%{?fedora}
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 12:17:30 +0100, Fabio wrote:
+%if 0%{?fedora} = 12
+Requires: libvirt-client
+%else
+Requires: libvirt
+%endif
+
What is this explicit dependency on a package name supposed to achieve?
There is the automatic arch-specific dependency on the libvirt SONAME
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 12:37:28 +0100, Fabio wrote:
I also considered a specific file Requires: /usr/bin/virsh, but policy
suggests to avoid that for different reasons.
Really? What policy is that? Programs in bin paths are covered by the
primary metadata. Such a dependency would be more
On Sun, 25 Oct 2009 22:20:59 +0100, Christoph wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 25.10.2009, 20:56 +0100 schrieb Haïkel Guémar:
This is personal policy to always push latest stable unless it's broken,
since it wasn't critical, i had always delayed it.
Why i pushed the update on older branches ?
On Sun, 25 Oct 2009 22:39:56 +0100, Haïkel wrote:
This was a very very low priority task for me, python-mpd is roughly one
python file mpd.py. There was only one use-case, i could think about :
an unexperienced developer including it in his multiplatform project.
Then, he shares it with his
On Fri, 16 Oct 2009 22:29:46 +0200, Haïkel wrote:
I recently came accross Gnaughty (aka Fast and Easy Porn Downloader),
I'm seriously thinking to file a ticket against it. It can be used to
download p0rn, yuck !
What sort of content should we provide as replacement ?
Is this a joke ?
It
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 13:26:53 -0700, Adam wrote:
(push some Xorg changes we'd never be happy about putting
in stable into it).
If you know that you would _never_ be happy with a test-update becoming
a stable update, then either don't push such a test-update or unpush
it (manually or by relying
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 08:58:45 +0200, Kevin wrote:
We really need some stricter enforcement against stuff sitting in testing
forever.
Rather we need some rules against such mindset.
We don't guarantee anything about updates-testing. It's a place where
to test potential updates/upgrades. And if
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 14:20:52 -0400, Adam wrote:
On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 10:32 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
If all Fedora releases have the autoprovides but EL-5 is still
affected, the
draft can be as simple as: rpm detects pkgconfig dependencies in all
Fedora
releases, please move the
On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 09:33:12 -0400, Jameson wrote:
My current attempt at their SVN code can be found at:
http://www.vtscrew.com/libprojectM-1.2.0r1295-9.fc11.src.rpm
Patch attached. Do the same for any other directories where it may be
necessary.
diff -Nur
The current thread on ksensors, id3lib has reminded me to give
gnome-applet-sensors another try right now. In F11. It works for me
while that hasn't been true before (troubles with acpi thrm or
no sensors).
As a result, I'd like to retire GAI (General Applet Interface Library)
and two of the
On Sun, 4 Oct 2009 15:28:24 + (UTC), Paul wrote:
Author: pfj
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/libgdiplus/devel
Log Message:
Bump to 2.6 preview 1
+libgdiplus-2_6-1_fc12:HEAD:libgdiplus-2.6-1.fc12.src.rpm:1254669963
You need to update your common checkout, because devel has become
.fc13
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 14:32:06 +0200, Stefan wrote:
Hi all,
I took over a package a couple of days ago and have a question according
to a provide statement. Consider the following one:
Name: myapp
Provides: myapp.pl
If I interpret the naming guidelines right, then a period is not
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 17:43:38 +0200, Nicolas wrote:
Le Mar 29 septembre 2009 17:26, Jason L Tibbitts III a écrit :
SSF == Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus writes:
SSF https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Separators
SSF When naming packages for Fedora, the maintainer must
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009 21:10:16 -0400, Neal wrote:
But the original problem was a file level conflict.
I've been reporting file level conflicts for a long time (with
a script on my fedorapeople page which is lacking automatic multilib
support, however), but the openmpi/libotf conflict has been
On Fri, 11 Sep 2009 20:10:03 +0200, Till wrote:
Good example of how poor the current process is.
I agree, but at least in 3 weeks if I do remember to write all mails or
bug comments, then FESCo will hopefully agree to allow other maintainers
to get the packages in this case. But I would
On Tue, 01 Sep 2009 15:13:25 -0700, Jesse wrote:
On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 17:44 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Multi-ownership seems *far* preferable to me than using triggers to
move files around, or moving a prelink-specific directory to the base
filesystem package.
Then the guidelines
On Sun, 30 Aug 2009 20:44:40 -0700, Elio wrote:
Problem should be fixed in nss-3.12.3.99.3-29.fc12. See
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=129934
and comments in Bug 520277.
Why do you add an explicit Requires: sqlite to package nss if
that one isn't even linked with
The packaging style in the nss-softokn package continues to bug me.
There are RPM triggers being used to install/remove a prelink config file
whenever the prelink package gets installed/removed. According to a comment
in the spec file, it is only done like that because the package doesn't
want
On Sun, 30 Aug 2009 07:13:54 + (UTC), Elio wrote:
Author: emaldonado
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/nss/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv14629
Modified Files:
nss.spec
Log Message:
Do not require sqlite for nss, it breaks nss-util install - bug 520277
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:30:21 -0400 (EDT), Seth wrote:
Working on something else I stumbled across this:
http://fpaste.org/jDwM/
that's a list of pkgs in rawhide which are obsoleted by something else in
rawhide.
seems a bit dodgy to me.
Yeah, often packagers don't request Fedora
On Thu, 27 Aug 2009 12:14:43 -0400, Ben wrote:
[KDE X session file]
So your issue is that kdebase-workspace puts it there, but it's
not complete, so it shouldn't?
Well, in case installing ktorrent shall drag in the packages
for a complete KDE desktop, the current dependencies are incomplete.
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:07:48 +0200, Kevin wrote:
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
A quick way to actually check for such dependencies is to switch to
another desktop environment, say Xfce, remove all the KDE packages and
install one of the KDE apps. It usually reveals dependencies which
are rather
though E doesn't use any of the functionality that A provides.
For example, Michael Schwendt demonstrated that ktorrent pulls in qt-mysql,
which in turn depends on mysql-libs. That's OK if Ktorrent can actually do
something that results in queries to a MySQL database. Otherwise it drags
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 10:01:39 -0400, Ben wrote:
Oh dear, run for your lives. Last I used GDM, I didn't know
where to change the session type (I was looking). I haven't used
it in over a year since it's one of the first things to get
replaced on my systems. Looking at a screenshot with
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 20:19:10 +0100, Richard wrote:
2009/8/25 Paul W. Frields:
I might be wrong, but I could swear that PK acted like this in my
Rawhide machine the other day when there was a particular deps problem
at the mirror.
PK already does skip-broken, but can't run if the
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 21:32:11 -0700, Elio wrote:
Conrad,
You are right. By reading at Makefile.common it seems that make
new-source nss-softokn-3.12.3.99.3-stripped.tar.bz2
would be the way to place them in the lookaside cache (after I do the
cvs remove on them).
The nss/nss-softokn
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 01:12:49 -0400, Todd wrote:
I tried to build a git update into dist-f12-openssl earlier and had it
die in %doc with an error from cp¹:
cp: preserving times for
`/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/git-1.6.4.1-1.fc12.i386/usr/share/doc/git-1.6.4.1/contrib/hooks':
Function not
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506671
No comment since two months. Not even a confirmation that the last comment
is true. Fedora 11 still looks bad due to this.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 14:31:28 +0400, Pavel wrote:
23.08.2009 02:15, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote:
My point was different: I want use gwenview but don't always use
kdegrapics, wich have big size. So, I often use it in XFCE.
But packaging an obsolete
On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 20:13:34 +0200, Kevin wrote:
drago01 wrote:
Sorry but the fail here is 100% on bodhi's side , why does a single
package obsolete a complete group update?
That is just broken, and this example clearly showed it.
It's broken (we've had some fun with that with the KDE
On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 22:34:24 +0200, Aurelien wrote:
I'm orphaning a few packages I'm not using anymore, feel free to take over:
- taglib -- Audio Meta-Data Library
I'll sign up for that one...
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 07:18:50 -0400, Josh wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:19:39AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
==
The results in this summary consider Test Updates
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:20:54 -0500, Juan wrote:
I maintain beagle, and although I did add the Excludes directive to it, the
reason I haven't pushed the update is because it doesn't actually fix
anything other than prevent that annoying email from being sent out.
Thanks for calling it
It looks to me as if some people need to learn how to talk to eachother.
Look at this!
A big update package for Mono packages:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-6615
Date Released: 2009-06-18 11:01:34
gbrainy,
giver,
gnome-do,
mono-zeroconf,
ipod-sharp,
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 15:24:38 +0530, Rahul wrote:
On 08/17/2009 03:22 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
Then you should also know that a buildroot overwrite for the other
branches has been requested as well, so a simple rebuild should fix
everything for those maintainers, who want to switch
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 17:17:55 -0400, Braden wrote:
On 7/23/09 12:13 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 11:55:57 -0400, Braden wrote:
Is the problem that the gecko-libs dependency is not arch-specific? How
do we fix that?
You could make it arch-specific by depending
On Sun, 16 Aug 2009 14:04:14 +0200, LinuxDonald wrote:
I have updated the packages for F-10 and F-11 with conflicts and without
obseltues :)
Explicit Conflicts need the approval of the Fedora Packaging Committee.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
On Sun, 16 Aug 2009 22:39:37 +0900, Mamoru wrote:
Michael Schwendt wrote, at 08/16/2009 09:29 PM +9:00:
On Sun, 16 Aug 2009 14:04:14 +0200, LinuxDonald wrote:
I have updated the packages for F-10 and F-11 with conflicts and without
obseltues :)
Explicit Conflicts need the approval
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 00:30:31 +0900, Mamoru wrote:
Michael Schwendt wrote, at 08/16/2009 11:47 PM +9:00:
On Sun, 16 Aug 2009 22:39:37 +0900, Mamoru wrote:
Michael Schwendt wrote, at 08/16/2009 09:29 PM +9:00:
On Sun, 16 Aug 2009 14:04:14 +0200, LinuxDonald wrote:
I have updated
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 04:34:20 +0900, Mamoru wrote:
First of all, please make it clear under what branch
you want to discuss, devel, F-11 or F-10.
With regard to Conflicts, the policies apply to all branches.
There are still open bugzilla tickets filed long ago with packagers
not taking action
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 04:56:55 + (UTC), Jesse wrote:
And, what can I do to help get descriptions added for the 4 updates
I mentioned?
If you can't get the submitter of the updates to add descriptions, in the
future it may need a separate team of community volunteers who get an
Edit
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 10:41:26 +0200, Kevin wrote:
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Correct, such a step will add a significant bureaucratic burdons to
maintainers.
As maintainers hate bureaucrazy and prefer investing time on dealing
with technical issues (such as bug fixes), this will likely
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 15:51:57 +0200, Kevin wrote:
AIUI, the package changelog only really needs to contain what you changed in
the specfile,
Tell that all the package maintainers, who do it differently.
Overall, however, what updates need is feedback from actual testers before
they are
1 - 100 of 194 matches
Mail list logo
