Re: Review request begs

2010-01-08 Thread Peter Robinson
libcrystalhd - Broadcom Crystal HD device interface library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553717 I just got the driver for these cards merged into the linux kernel staging tree a few days ago. Now we need the device interface library to talk to the thing and add support to apps

Re: formal request - package take over (libssh2)

2010-01-05 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 7:21 PM, Kamil Dudka kdu...@redhat.com wrote: On Tuesday 05 of January 2010 17:24:46 Chris Weyl wrote: Well, it's post-holiday season now and I'm starting to catch up on my mail/bugs...  These should be taken care of this week.  Feel free to ping me via email/bugzilla if

Re: Vala programs and compiling from source

2009-12-22 Thread Peter Robinson
Hi, I recently submitting Deja-dup, a backup program written in Vala for review at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540761 Vala is described in more detail at http://live.gnome.org/Vala. Deja-dup like many Vala programs include both the Vala source

Re: Mono 2.6 - heads up

2009-12-21 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 7:39 AM, Paul p...@all-the-johnsons.co.uk wrote: Hi, Sometime today or tomorrow I'll be uploading Mono-2.6 and the final release of MD-2.2 with all the fun that it will bring. There are lots of changes under the hood of mono and while the likes of gtk-sharp2 et al are

Re: Vala programs and compiling from source

2009-12-21 Thread Peter Robinson
Hi, I recently submitting Deja-dup, a backup program written in Vala for review at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540761 Vala is described in more detail at http://live.gnome.org/Vala. Deja-dup like many Vala programs include both the Vala source code and the C source code to

Re: Release Milestones for the Masses

2009-12-21 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 11:37 PM, John Poelstra poels...@redhat.com wrote: On 12/21/2009 12:30 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 10:32:18 -0800,   John Poelstrapoels...@redhat.com  wrote: Great idea.  I need someone from the Spins SIG to tell me what those dates are.  It

Re: 190 packages with .la file(s)

2009-12-18 Thread Peter Robinson
sugar-base-0.86.0-1.fc12.src.rpm sugar-datastore-0.86.1-1.fc12.src.rpm sugar-toolkit-0.86.2-1.fc12.src.rpm I've fixed these 3 up. Cheers, Peter -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

Review swaps

2009-12-17 Thread Peter Robinson
Hi All, Anyone interested in swapping a couple of package reviews? mx https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538465 moblin-app-installer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546301 Regards, Peter -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com

rawhide and tagging requests

2009-12-09 Thread Peter Robinson
Hi All, What's the status of the issues with the rawhide compose? Are they going to be fixed and a push done before the upcoming extended outage? What about outstanding tag build-override requests? Cheers, Peter -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com

Re: Upstart 0.6.3 coming to a rawhide near you

2009-12-07 Thread Peter Robinson
What this means for you (for very specific values of you): If you own any of the following packages, you have upstart job files that will need modified for any needed format changes, and the new location. * olpc-utils            pbrobinson We're willing to do the legwork for you, or you

Re: Head-up - new firefox in rawhide

2009-12-03 Thread Peter Robinson
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 8:39 AM, Martin Stransky stran...@redhat.com wrote: On 11/20/2009 09:21 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: 2009/11/18 Martin Stranskystran...@redhat.com: Hi, a new firefox (3.6 beta 2) just hit rawhide (a.k.a f13). There are some changes which affect everyone who builds

Re: Fedora 12 Graphics Issues: Cancel F13 and concentrate on fixing F12 ?

2009-11-27 Thread Peter Robinson
On 11/27/09, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 21:24 +0100, stefan riemens wrote: Not that i'm unhappy about the way things are going forward (my intel gfx are working great!), but gnome 3 isn't going to be much useful without 3d support... Note that

Re: Fedora 12 Graphics Issues: Cancel F13 and concentrate on fixing F12 ?

2009-11-26 Thread Peter Robinson
On 11/26/09, Terry Barnaby ter...@beam.ltd.uk wrote: On 11/26/2009 04:34 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 04:08:27PM +, Terry Barnaby wrote: As you obviously know tracking down and reporting bugs like these do take a lot of time and effort, quite often more than actually

Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?

2009-11-20 Thread Peter Robinson
You must not confuse moblin with netbooks, nettops or with i386/32bit machines in general. The moblin desktop is addressing a completely different audience. Oh?  That's not what I got from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/FedoraMoblin It's what I get from this web-page and what I

Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?

2009-11-20 Thread Peter Robinson
On 11/20/2009 11:20 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: Users of the Fedora Moblin Spin would have a much better user experience on their NetBook, NetTop and other small devices That's what the marketing department wants it to be. Meh. You said the target of the spin is not netbooks but it clearly

Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?

2009-11-20 Thread Peter Robinson
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote: On 11/20/2009 11:58 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: IMO, they are targetting MID devices, competing with Android, Smart phones and similar. Not at the moment they're not/ Then please explain what they are targetting

Re: Broken deps for rawhide the past few days

2009-11-17 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 7:22 PM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote: Many of you received emails over the weekend and this morning regarding broken deps in rawhide.  If these emails mentioned that the deps were broken on ppc or ppc64 they can be ignored.  We are no longer producing

Re: ilbsndfile update!

2009-11-17 Thread Peter Robinson
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Orcan Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com wrote: Hi folks, After getting okays from a few folks I decided to fix the long standing libsndfile bugs. One of these was a request [1] to split the utilities that come with libsndfile into a utils subpackage. I did this

Re: ilbsndfile update!

2009-11-17 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 8:15 PM, Orcan Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: Hi folks, After getting okays from a few folks I decided to fix the long standing libsndfile bugs. One

Re: Fedora 12 has gone gold

2009-11-10 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 09:55 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: Hopefully Nouveau gets 3D support within a couple of releases as well. Ben says to send beer. :) Happily, ask him what slab he wants and where he wants it

Re: Booting Fedora live USB on MacBookPro

2009-11-10 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote: Hello, I'm creating an EFI bootable USB image on my rawhide system with this command-line:  ./livecd-iso-to-disk.sh --format  --efi --overlay-size-mb 400 \        --delete-home --extra-kernel-args selinux=0

Re: Dependency problems on upgrade from F-11 to F-12

2009-11-09 Thread Peter Robinson
| source rpm: clutter-cairo-0.8.2-3.fc11.src.rpm | package: clutter-cairo-devel-0.8.2-3.fc11.i586 from fedora-11-i386 |   unresolved deps: |      libclutter-cairo-0.8.so.0 |      clutter-cairo = 0:0.8.2-3.fc11 | related pkgs: |   clutter-cairo |   clutter No clutter-cairo anymore in

Re: Fedora Moblin remix

2009-11-09 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Tim Lauridsen tim.laurid...@googlemail.com wrote: On 11/07/2009 11:13 AM, Tim Lauridsen wrote: On 11/05/2009 07:01 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: Hi All, For those interested there's a new test LiveCD of Fedora Moblin remix [1] for those that are interesting

Re: Fedora Moblin remix

2009-11-09 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Bastien Nocera bnoc...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, 2009-11-05 at 18:01 +, Peter Robinson wrote: Hi All, For those interested there's a new test LiveCD of Fedora Moblin remix [1] for those that are interesting in playing. It would be nice to have some

Re: Fedora Moblin remix

2009-11-09 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Bastien Nocera bnoc...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 13:41 +, Peter Robinson wrote: On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Bastien Nocera bnoc...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, 2009-11-05 at 18:01 +, Peter Robinson wrote: Hi All, For those

Re: cvs-import.sh problem

2009-11-07 Thread Peter Robinson
2009/11/7 Jarosław Górny jaros...@aster.pl: Hi, CVS branches for my first package were created couple of days ago. Today I've set up my account (I think correctly), did a successful checkout, but I can't import sources: code [jaros...@moonstone mpdscribble]$ ./common/cvs-import.sh -b F-11

Re: Fedora Moblin remix

2009-11-06 Thread Peter Robinson
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 7:20 AM, Josephine Tannhäuser josephine.tannhau...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi all, Moblin is afaik Intel processors only. Would this work because of the fedora fundament on other processors like a via with 733mhz, too? Intel's version of Moblin is optimised for Intel

Re: Mesa 7.6.0 bugs

2009-11-04 Thread Peter Robinson
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 1:04 AM, Bojan Smojver bo...@rexursive.com wrote: New mesa (7.6.0) is causing trouble for people using F-11/12 code (see bugs #524338 and #509528 for instance). I've seen a couple of bugs in the 3D stuff with Moblin/clutter as well. RHBZ #521714 and #529372 come to mind.

Re: Notice: Fedora 12 Tagging Status Update

2009-10-28 Thread Peter Robinson
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 5:40 AM, Bojan Smojver bo...@rexursive.com wrote: On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 16:18 -0400, Warren Togami wrote: 5) How many untagged packages are there? koji list-tagged --latest dist-f12-updates-candidate I ran this today (just for kicks). It gives back 323 packages. Even

Re: Nightly composes, rawhide or F12?

2009-10-28 Thread Peter Robinson
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Andreas Tunek andreas.tu...@gmail.com wrote: Are the nightly composes (such as this: http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/nightly-composes/desktop/ ) a build of what will become F12 or are they a build of rawhide? I believe F-12 and rawhide are still one and

Re: Fedora 12 Beta now available!

2009-10-24 Thread Peter Robinson
Hi All, * Moblin graphical interface for netbooks - The Moblin graphical interface and applications are fully integrated thanks to Peter Robinson, a Fedora Project volunteer, and others. To use it, just install the Moblin Desktop Environment package group using yum or the graphical software

Re: F-12 upgrade experience with Dell D630

2009-10-21 Thread Peter Robinson
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: As the Dell Latitude D630 is one of the more common devices that smolt reports being used by Fedora I thought I'd mention my upgrade experience and issues for F-12. Probably the two usual things that people query

Re: F-12 upgrade experience with Dell D630

2009-10-21 Thread Peter Robinson
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Dan Williams d...@redhat.com wrote: On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 13:31 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: As the Dell Latitude D630 is one of the more common devices that smolt reports being used

Re: F-12 upgrade experience with Dell D630

2009-10-21 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 7:22 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 11:17 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: Hi All, As the Dell Latitude D630 is one of the more common devices that smolt reports being used by Fedora I thought I'd mention my upgrade experience

F-12 upgrade experience with Dell D630

2009-10-20 Thread Peter Robinson
Hi All, As the Dell Latitude D630 is one of the more common devices that smolt reports being used by Fedora I thought I'd mention my upgrade experience and issues for F-12. Probably the two usual things that people query are grahics and wifi. The model I have has the Intel IWL-4965AGN device

the mass rebuild and i586 rpms?

2009-10-19 Thread Peter Robinson
Hi All, I thought with the mass rebuild the i586 rpms were suppose to be gone but it seems the F-12 repository still has quite a few of them. Are the old packages that should have been blocked, ones that's that weren't rebuilt for some reason or something that I've just missed? Peter --

tagging of non critical path package into F-12?

2009-10-15 Thread Peter Robinson
Hi All, I presume that the reason that tagging requests aren't being done is due to the upcoming beta but is there a reason that non core or critical path packages can't be tagged in. I have a number of Moblin packages that fix various issues, in particular a rebuild of network-manager-netbook to

Re: tagging of non critical path package into F-12?

2009-10-15 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 8:55 AM, Conrad Meyer ceme...@u.washington.edu wrote: On Thursday 15 October 2009 12:51:28 am Peter Robinson wrote: Hi All, I presume that the reason that tagging requests aren't being done is due to the upcoming beta but is there a reason that non core or critical

Re: tagging of non critical path package into F-12?

2009-10-15 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 08:59:13AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 8:55 AM, Conrad Meyer ceme...@u.washington.edu wrote: If they're not on any of the official spins, what benefit does tagging them

Re: tagging of non critical path package into F-12?

2009-10-15 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 08:59 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: Because it allows me to test them as part of what will become the F-12 Moblin remix spin You can add custom repositories to spin config files, so you could get

Re: tagging of non critical path package into F-12?

2009-10-15 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 16:53 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: Not according to Jesse, even in this thread there seems to be mixed communications. My understanding was from the last FUDCon would be that it would be complete

Re: tagging of non critical path package into F-12?

2009-10-15 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 16:53 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 08:59 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: Because it allows me

Re: python-json (was: Re: rawhide report: 20091010 changes)

2009-10-11 Thread Peter Robinson
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote: Rawhide Report wrote: Removed package python-json Why was this removed? sugar-toolkit requires this package and now has broken dependencies! Apparently the functionality has been merged into the main python package.

Re: python-json (was: Re: rawhide report: 20091010 changes)

2009-10-11 Thread Peter Robinson
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote: Rawhide Report wrote: Removed package python-json Why was this removed? sugar-toolkit requires this package and now has broken dependencies

Re: olpc components in x86/x86_64 repo

2009-10-07 Thread Peter Robinson
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 8:12 AM, Rahul Sundaram sunda...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On 10/06/2009 05:35 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote: Additionally, having OLPC-specific RPMS in mainline Fedora helps with the end goal that is , as I understand it, to have OLPC's OS be essentially a Spin of stock Fedora.  

Re: Opinions on packaging ATLAS (for the x86 architecture)

2009-10-07 Thread Peter Robinson
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote: Richard W.M. Jones (rjo...@redhat.com) said: This is going to be pretty important for scientific workloads where atlas is going to be used. I've eavesdropped on several conversations where people were talking about

Re: olpc components in x86/x86_64 repo

2009-10-06 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Rudolf Kastl che...@gmail.com wrote: yum list all |grep olpc dracut-modules-olpc.x86_64              0.2.1-2.fc12                   rawhide olpc-contents.x86_64                    2.6-2.fc12                     rawhide olpc-library.noarch                    

Re: olpc components in x86/x86_64 repo

2009-10-06 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Rudolf Kastl che...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/10/6 Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com: On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Rudolf Kastl che...@gmail.com wrote: yum list all |grep olpc dracut-modules-olpc.x86_64              0.2.1-2.fc12                   rawhide

Re: Orphaning some packages [Was: Re: Buyer Beware: A Major Change in NFS is about to happen]

2009-10-03 Thread Peter Robinson
syncevolution -- SyncML client for evolution I'll take this one. Peter -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

Re: Orphaning some packages [Was: Re: Buyer Beware: A Major Change in NFS is about to happen]

2009-10-03 Thread Peter Robinson
2009/10/3 Christoph Höger choe...@cs.tu-berlin.de: Am Samstag, den 03.10.2009, 10:09 +0100 schrieb Peter Robinson: syncevolution -- SyncML client for evolution I'll take this one. Peter I've just commented on that package, but you're not yet maintaining it, so I'll repeat what I've

dist-f12 locked?

2009-10-03 Thread Peter Robinson
Hi All, The last day or so I've been getting the following error when doing a 'make build' on the F-12 branches of various packages. Is there a reason for the branch being locked? Peter Usage: koji build [options] target URL (Specify the --help global option for a list of other help options)

Re: dist-f12 locked?

2009-10-03 Thread Peter Robinson
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 5:02 PM, Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com wrote: Le 03/10/2009 17:54, Peter Robinson a écrit : Hi All, The last day or so I've been getting the following error when doing a 'make build' on the F-12 branches of various packages. Is there a reason for the branch

Re: Orphaning some packages [Was: Re: Buyer Beware: A Major Change in NFS is about to happen]

2009-10-03 Thread Peter Robinson
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 7:21 PM, Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com wrote: Dominic Hopf, Sat, 03 Oct 2009 01:46:04 +0200: syncevolution -- SyncML client for evolution I would like to maintain this package then. Talk with Peter Robinson about comaintainership. I'll quite happily have someone to help

Re: Buyer Beware: A Major Change in NFS is about to happen

2009-09-30 Thread Peter Robinson
And Today I am %100 finished... Please point out which part of that did I misinterpret, because the last thing I want to do is cause problems... Because we do seem to fight this problem every release.  Was anyone else confused about when the deadline was?  It seems very clear to me, on

Re: sugar-pippy dependencies

2009-09-29 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 2:33 AM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote: Hello, the sugar-pippy rpm in Fedora depends on pygame, which is used by some of the examples. So far, so good, but pygame in turn depends on numpy, a 7.7MB package which a lot of huge dependencies such as atlas

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-pippy dependencies

2009-09-29 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 9:10 PM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote: El Tue, 29-09-2009 a las 12:36 +, Aleksey Lim escribió: pygame and numpy are parts of Sugar Platform[1], at least for 0.84, so, the right question is should these pakcages be a part of SP-0.86 I guess +1 for both,

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-pippy dependencies

2009-09-29 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 9:42 PM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote: El Tue, 29-09-2009 a las 16:25 -0400, Benjamin M. Schwartz escribió: Bernie Innocenti wrote: 1) are there lighter-weight alternatives for the most popular uses of numpy? No.  It has no competition, and is used by

Re: sugar-pippy dependencies

2009-09-29 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote: On 09/29/2009 12:51 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 2:33 AM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote: Hello, the sugar-pippy rpm in Fedora depends on pygame, which is used by some of the examples

Re: sugar-pippy dependencies

2009-09-29 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 10:02 PM, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote: On 09/29/2009 01:52 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote: I admit I'm not following sugar and numpy discussions too closely so I might have missed

Re: PPC/PPC64 disabled in Koji for dist-f13

2009-09-28 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 11:31 PM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, 2009-09-28 at 23:00 +0100, Mat Booth wrote: What do we have to do in order to build on PPC? Does it happen automagically? Once the ppc builders are setup and running smoothly, successful build requests on the

Re: Possible packages...

2009-09-17 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 3:08 PM, Tomasz Torcz to...@pipebreaker.pl wrote: On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 02:35:56PM +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 09:52 +0200, Rudolf Kastl wrote: 2009/7/13 Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com: snip PS3MediaServer. A Java program to talk to a

Re: rawhide report: 20090910 changes

2009-09-11 Thread Peter Robinson
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote: Hiyas, why are the new packages now hidden below the broken dependencies? Iirc there was even a discussion about changing the format more than a year ago and back then it was decided to keep it as it is. This was

Re: rawhide report: 20090910 changes

2009-09-11 Thread Peter Robinson
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote: On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:37:59AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: This was discussed a couple of days ago against another rawhide report. I would check out the list archives for the reasoning. I fail to find

Re: Review needed for libtnc

2009-09-01 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 8:11 PM, Tom spot Callawaytcall...@redhat.com wrote: Hi folks, I need this package reviewed so that I can fix the broken dep on xsupplicant in rawhide: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501017 I'd be happy to do a review trade, just let me know. Will do

Re: Packaging Request: Pure Data

2009-08-31 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 6:28 PM, Mani Aa.mani@gmail.com wrote: http://puredata.info/ is not in the package database. From the license POV, there are no problems. I think this is the bug your after. A review is in progress but there's a few build issues.

rawhide LiveCD with EFI boot?

2009-08-27 Thread Peter Robinson
Hi All, I have a little touch screen device that I'm playing around with. It has EFI and its easy enough to get it to boot something other than what its meant to. It seems the LiveCD doesn't have EFI support there. Any hints welcome. Cheers, Peter -- fedora-devel-list mailing list

Re: rawhide report: 20090826 changes

2009-08-26 Thread Peter Robinson
snip telepathy-mission-control-5.2.0-1.fc12 -- * Tue Aug 25 2009 Brian Pepple bpep...@fedoraproject.org - 5.2.0-1 - Update to 5.2.0. - Drop BR on libtelepathy. - Update url source links. snip Broken deps for i386

issues with livecd-creator on F-11?

2009-08-25 Thread Peter Robinson
Hi, Is anyone else having issues with livecd-creator? I'm seeing the issue below on a 2 F-11 boxes, and possible a rawhide one as well. Peter Installing: xorg-x11-drivers # [804/807] Installing: plymouth-gdm-hooks # [805/807]

Re: issues with livecd-creator on F-11?

2009-08-25 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Jeremy Katzka...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 2:49 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: Is anyone else having issues with livecd-creator? I'm seeing the issue below on a 2 F-11 boxes, and possible a rawhide one as well. [snip

Re: issues with livecd-creator on F-11?

2009-08-25 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Jeremy Katzka...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 2:49 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: Is anyone else having issues with livecd-creator? I'm seeing the issue below on a 2 F-11 boxes, and possible a rawhide one as well. [snip

fedora mini alpha testing

2009-08-25 Thread Peter Robinson
Arriving fashionably late, and mostly intact, to the Constantine Alpha party I'd like to announce that Moblin on Fedora has made it's initial debut for Fedora Mini :) Still a work in progress, Moblin is now in a mostly usable state on Fedora for testing. It has hence come well dressed for the

Re: Broken dependencies in Fedora 11 - 2009-08-20

2009-08-21 Thread Peter Robinson
Sorry but the fail here is 100% on bodhi's side , why does a single package obsolete a complete group update? That is just broken, and this example clearly showed it. It's broken (we've had some fun with that with the KDE grouped updates too, we learned to be careful about what we push

Re: Add Moblin Desktop group to comps

2009-08-21 Thread Peter Robinson
Hi All, I would like to add a group for the Moblin Desktop. My proposed patch is below and feedback is welcome. This is updated with the current components that are in rawhide. All the other packages should be pulled in by deps. Cheers, Peter --- comps-f12.xml.in.orig 2009-08-20

Re: Broken dependencies in Fedora 11 - 2009-08-20

2009-08-20 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Michael Schwendtmschwe...@gmail.com wrote: == The results in this summary consider Test Updates! == Summary of broken

Add Moblin Desktop group to comps

2009-08-20 Thread Peter Robinson
Hi All, I would like to add a group for the Moblin Desktop. My proposed patch is below and feedback is welcome. Cheers, Peter --- comps-f12.xml.in.orig 2009-08-20 17:10:23.0 +0100 +++ comps-f12.xml.in2009-08-20 17:20:47.0 +0100 @@ -4235,6 +4235,17 @@ /packagelist

Re: Add Moblin Desktop group to comps

2009-08-20 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Bill Nottinghamnott...@redhat.com wrote: Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said: I would like to add a group for the Moblin Desktop. My proposed patch is below and feedback is welcome. ... this seems small. There are no other apps required? Yes

Re: Add Moblin Desktop group to comps

2009-08-20 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Jesse Keatingjkeat...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 17:22 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: Hi All, I would like to add a group for the Moblin Desktop. My proposed patch is below and feedback is welcome. Is Moblin a trademark of anybody? Intel has

Re: Add Moblin Desktop group to comps

2009-08-20 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Bill Nottinghamnott...@redhat.com wrote: Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said: On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Bill Nottinghamnott...@redhat.com wrote: Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said: I would like to add a group for the Moblin Desktop. My

Re: Add Moblin Desktop group to comps

2009-08-20 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Colin Walterswalt...@verbum.org wrote: On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Peter Robinsonpbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, I would like to add a group for the Moblin Desktop. My proposed patch is below and feedback is welcome. Peter, thanks for all your work

Re: Fedora 12 Features Proposed for Removal

2009-08-19 Thread Peter Robinson
After requesting status updates, including direct email to the feature owners, the following feature pages do not have a current status or their ability to tested during the Alpha is unclear based on the lack of information provided or percentage of completion.

Re: Last call for talking points - what makes you excited about F12?

2009-08-18 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Rahul Sundaramsunda...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On 08/18/2009 10:12 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Mel Chuam...@redhat.com wrote: If you've got a moment for some last-minute help... We (Marketing) will be freezing the F12 talking

Re: Empathy default in F12?

2009-08-16 Thread Peter Robinson
The F12 feature still indicates the switch to Empathy as a default IM client in Fedora. However, the talk page for the feature (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Talk:Features/Empathy) raises material concerns that the switch to Empathy would result in an insufficiently justified loss of

Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)

2009-08-14 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Bill Nottinghamnott...@redhat.com wrote: Martin Langhoff (martin.langh...@gmail.com) said: To note: it _is_ reported as a 586, so at least ancillary work in yum/anaconda/rpm will be needed so that installing F12 on these supported but not quite 686 CPUs is

Re: F12 to require i686, but which CPUs do not qualify?

2009-08-13 Thread Peter Robinson
I've noticed that F12 will require a CPU with i686 architecture, and that my Athlon 1.2GHz won't qualify.  I accept that F11 is the last Fedora release that I'll be able to use.  My concern is that many present Fedora users will be unpleasantly surprised that a new installation doesn't work,

Re: source file audit - 2009-08-10

2009-08-11 Thread Peter Robinson
pbrobinson:BADURL:Journal-99.tar.bz2:sugar-journal I'm pretty sure this has been obsoleted and is a dead package but I'm in the process of confirming the status and will update as appropriate once I have confirmation. Confirmed the package is now dead and have completed the dead package

Re: source file audit - 2009-08-10

2009-08-10 Thread Peter Robinson
Hi, pbrobinson:BADURL:Journal-99.tar.bz2:sugar-journal I'm pretty sure this has been obsoleted and is a dead package but I'm in the process of confirming the status and will update as appropriate once I have confirmation. pbrobinson:BADURL:mojito-0.19.2.tar.bz2:mojito This is fixed in cvs

Re: pygtk2 and its numpy dependency

2009-08-10 Thread Peter Robinson
Hi, pygtk2 implements a function called gtk.gdk.get_pixels_array(), which returns the pixel contents of a GDK pixbuf as a numpy array.  Fine and dandy, but this means it links against numpy (7 megs) which is itself linked against atlas (12 megs).  Kind of a lot for a single function,

Re: Fit and Finish, round three: peripherals

2009-08-08 Thread Peter Robinson
a camera, a phone, a usb stick, or whatever gizmos you have at home... Real plastic and metal plugs only, or bluetooth connections as well? Bluetooth is definitively in scope. The scope seems worryingly large, to me, on this one. We could talk about modems, 3G modems, mice,

Re: rt2860 driver (fc11)

2009-08-06 Thread Peter Robinson
I was hoping that the devs who worked hard to even make it part of the source rpm might be lurking on this mailing list and see my post :) I don't think anything special is done to make it part of our kernel .src.rpm, it's just in there because it's in the upstream kernel tarball :). I

Re: Fedora 12 Features Proposed for Removal

2009-08-06 Thread Peter Robinson
After requesting status updates, including direct email to the feature owners, the following feature pages do not have a current status or their ability to tested during the Alpha is unclear based on the lack of information provided or percentage of completion.

Re: rt2860 driver (fc11)

2009-08-06 Thread Peter Robinson
Good luck with that! This driver has been in the process of being re-written for well over a year, I've long given up hope. Its unfortunate as its in alot of netbooks including all the atom based eeePCs. Fortunately rpmfusion has one that works reasonably well (it even suspends and resumes!)

Re: rawhide report: 20090806 changes

2009-08-06 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 11:06 AM, Rawhide Reportrawh...@fedoraproject.org wrote: Compose started at Thu Aug  6 06:15:06 UTC 2009 Updated Packages: firefox-3.5.2-2.fc11 * Mon Aug 03 2009 Martin Stransky stran...@redhat.com - 3.5.2-2 - Updated to 3.5.2.

Re: Fedora 12 Features Proposed for Removal

2009-08-06 Thread Peter Robinson
IMO, this feature should be scratched, because the packages in question are of immature nature (... and of low packaging quality from my POV). Be specific. This is not enough information to influence the decision at this stage. OK, more verbose: * In their present shape the packages are

Re: rawhide report: 20090806 changes

2009-08-06 Thread Peter Robinson
This looks somewhat truncated. I have at least one new package that should be in the list :-( We're in Freeze.  If you didn't request a freeze tag, it won't get into the rawhide compose. Of course! I thought the alpha was going to be a running snapshot of rawhide without a freeze this time

Re: rawhide report: 20090806 changes

2009-08-06 Thread Peter Robinson
This looks somewhat truncated. I have at least one new package that should be in the list :-( We're in Freeze.  If you didn't request a freeze tag, it won't get into the rawhide compose. Of course! I thought the alpha was going to be a running snapshot of rawhide without a freeze this time

Re: Fedora 12 Features Proposed for Removal

2009-08-06 Thread Peter Robinson
Would you please be so kind and name names here? What packages and what reviews are you talking about? In this context, I am talking about all moblin package submissions by Mr. Robinson. I asked you to write down the problems you found in bz and CC me, but so far I haven't received a

Re: Fedora 12 Features Proposed for Removal

2009-08-06 Thread Peter Robinson
1. He is running the autotools while building. It's your personal opinion that this is low quality, many other packagers don't agree with their assertion and the guidelines (intentionally) don't ban it. FYI, all our KDE 3 packages reran the autotools during the build (KDE 3's make cvs

Re: Fedora 12 Features Proposed for Removal

2009-08-06 Thread Peter Robinson
The feature process can be very forgiving when there is *information* on the feature page about how testable a particular feature is or further information what is left to be done past feature freeze. I don't currently have the ability to know what every upstream project is doing or know

Re: rt2860 driver (fc11)

2009-08-06 Thread Peter Robinson
Thanks for the clarification. From what I read, I inferred that the driver in /staging was the serialmonkey driver, but it seems I read it wrong, and what it actually means to say was 'this is the vendor driver, it sucks, don't contribute any code to this driver, contribute to the

Re: rt2860 driver (fc11)

2009-08-06 Thread Peter Robinson
I had the same confusion. So there are 3 drivers around: The vendor driver, the staging driver which is a fork of the vendor driver and the serialmonkey driver.  Multiply that by 3 for rt2860, rt2870 and rt3070. And this leads to another confusion. Do (or will) the Fedora kernels have

  1   2   >