-Original Message-
From: fedora-devel-list-boun...@redhat.com [mailto:fedora-devel-list-
boun...@redhat.com] On Behalf Of nodata
Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 01:01
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
Subject: Re: packages requiring me to reboot...
Am 2009-12-17
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 08:19, Rahul Sundaram
sunda...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On 12/17/2009 12:46 PM, Christof Damian wrote:
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 19:58, Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de
wrote:
pavucontrol currently crashes (and pulseaudio) for me on one machine
and I need this
On 12/17/2009 03:20 PM, Christof Damian wrote:
I just find it annoying that some people seem to have File a bug. in
their signature, when one should assume that on fedora-devel everyone
would file a bug for valid problems. It might and should be different
on fedora or the forums.
They do
2009/12/16 Nathanael D. Noblet nathan...@gnat.ca:
So basically, PK is designed for the non-experienced users, as such
everything it does is dumbed down, and experienced users should just ignore
it, using other tools to keep their system up to date.
See
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 9:43 PM, Otto Haliburton
ottohalibur...@tx.rr.com wrote:
- Original Message - From: nodata l...@nodata.co.uk
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 11:29 AM
Subject: Re: packages requiring
On 12/17/2009 08:38 AM, Jon Masters wrote:
On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 16:30 -0500, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
too. My own preference would be a more discriminating dialog
that offers three possibilities: 'do nothing', 'bounce the
service/application' and 'reboot'.
Yup, +1
Bounce the application
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 18:41:22 -0500, Tom wrote:
Orcan Ogetbil writes:
If there is a way to file an update (same version and release except
the disttag) to multiple branches, please let me know.
Usually it works: just add all the package NVRs to the same update
submission. (That's what
Compose started at Thu Dec 17 08:15:09 UTC 2009
Broken deps for i386
--
1:abiword-2.8.1-2.fc13.i686 requires libwv-1.2.so.3
anjal-0.1.0-1.fc13.i686 requires libevolution-mail-shared.so.0
anjal-0.1.0-1.fc13.i686
-Original Message-
From: fedora-devel-list-boun...@redhat.com [mailto:fedora-devel-list-
boun...@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Eelko Berkenpies
Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 05:09
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
Subject: Re: packages requiring me to reboot...
On
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 01:35:44PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 18:41:22 -0500, Tom wrote:
Orcan Ogetbil writes:
If there is a way to file an update (same version and release except
the disttag) to multiple branches, please let me know.
Usually it works: just
Hi all,
The past few Fedora installs, I've specified a NIS server during the
Anaconda installation so I don't have to create any local user accounts.
However, once installation is complete, I can't log into any NIS accounts
because autofs insn't installed, causing the user accounts' home folders
Hello there,
I'm currently relocating to another country and will be fedora-offline
for a while, probably one month (probably be on and off).
If my packages require immediate actions for any reason, please do the
necessary in my place.
Todd Volkert (tvolk...@gmail.com) said:
The past few Fedora installs, I've specified a NIS server during the
Anaconda installation so I don't have to create any local user accounts.
However, once installation is complete, I can't log into any NIS accounts
because autofs insn't installed,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Our election coordinator, Nigel Jones, was too swamped today to
process all of the election results, but will be doing so later today
(UTC time). Thanks for your patience, and thanks to Nigel for all his
work coordinating the voting system and
Michał Piotrowski wrote:
2009/12/16 Eric Sandeen sand...@redhat.com:
Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Hi,
I've got a home database/symfony env/etc../file server. It's based on
Intel D945GCLF2D Atom board. I've got a two hard drives WD Green Power
connected through Sata. First drive has / and /home
On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 08:50 +, Richard Hughes wrote:
2009/12/15 Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org:
This exists? Can you point me to the code?
I only finished this just this morning.
It's just been pushed to git master. You want to see this commit
Hm - perhaps it was as part of the first boot, post-anaconda. Basically, it
was when I was asked to create a user account. I selected use network
login (paraphrasing) instead of creating a local account.
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.comwrote:
Todd Volkert
On 11/24/2009 10:50 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
But I dunno if there's a policy
requirement that you should anyway.
FWIW, the policy says:
If a package contains a GUI application, then it needs to also include
a properly installed .desktop file. For the purposes of these
guidelines, a GUI
I'm trying to package up a Common Lisp application that is built with
SBCL. Near the end of the rpmbuild run, I see this right before the
list of Provides:
prelink:
/home/jamesjer/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/pvs-sbcl-4.2-2.svn20091008.fc12.x86_64/usr/lib64/pvs/bin/ix86_64-Linux/runtime/pvs-sbclisp:
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 10:51 AM, James Antill ja...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
How do you plan on restarting firefox? Or you just planning to kill()
and get the user to restart?
Trying to send a close button event to the app's windows is probably
our best short-term approach; slightly longer
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com wrote:
Is that due to prelink? If so, what is broken? SBCL, because it
You probably have a prelinked file in BUILD ROOT (objdump -s file |
grep prelink) . Try to get rid of this in %install with prelink -u
Regards
--
Hi All,
Anyone interested in swapping a couple of package reviews?
mx https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538465
moblin-app-installer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546301
Regards,
Peter
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
On Thu, 2009-12-17 at 10:51 -0500, James Antill wrote:
The UI isn't very pretty at the moment (it just fails with an update
error) but I'll work on something a little bit more user friendly.
How do you plan on restarting firefox? Or you just planning to kill()
and get the user to
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 10:12 AM, yersinia yersinia.spi...@gmail.com wrote:
You probably have a prelinked file in BUILD ROOT (objdump -s file |
grep prelink) . Try to get rid of this in %install with prelink -u
Oh ho! The sbcl executable has already been prelinked. When
save-lisp-and-die is
Am 2009-12-17 10:36, schrieb Otto Haliburton:
-Original Message-
From: fedora-devel-list-boun...@redhat.com [mailto:fedora-devel-list-
boun...@redhat.com] On Behalf Of nodata
Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 01:01
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
Subject: Re: packages
On 12/17/2009 01:50 PM, nodata wrote:
yep. but all of that assumes I know what I am doing, and the people that
this is aimed at don't. windows requires fewer reboots now.
+1, and remember that they have an advantage right off the bat:
- much fewer subsystems (Windows and a couple of tiny
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 01:34:45PM +, Christopher Brown wrote:
SELinux was quite good on F11 and F12. Now it would seem it is
starting to regress again.
Your expectations are too high if you think rawhide shouldn't have
regressions.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
On 11/30/2009 08:42 AM, Pierre-Yves wrote:
gambas2-2.18.0-1.fc12.src.rpm
Gambas is... special. It needs these .la files to function.
~spot
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
-Original Message-
From: fedora-devel-list-boun...@redhat.com [mailto:fedora-devel-list-
boun...@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Przemek Klosowski
Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 13:05
To: fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
Subject: Re: packages requiring me to reboot...
On 12/17/2009
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 12:05:15PM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 10:51 AM, James Antill ja...@fedoraproject.org
wrote:
How do you plan on restarting firefox? Or you just planning to kill()
and get the user to restart?
Trying to send a close button event to the
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com wrote:
So this is going to hit anybody who tries to package up an executable
produced by SBCL. Perhaps this should be noted on
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Lisp.
And it's even worse than I thought: prelink -u
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 3:21 PM, Ewan Mac Mahon e...@macmahon.me.uk wrote:
That would fail pretty badly in the case of Firefox with multiple
windows open.
True; there's nothing stopping us from adding something
Firefox-specific as a short term measure, since how it does session
saving is
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 01:48:20PM -0700, Jerry James wrote:
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com wrote:
So this is going to hit anybody who tries to package up an executable
produced by SBCL. Perhaps this should be noted on
Fedora 12 with LD_PRELOAD=libefence.so.0.0 EF_ALLOW_MALLOC_0=1, what is
more likely that these are false positives or real bugs?
---
$ gnome-terminal
Electric Fence 2.2.2 Copyright (C) 1987-1999 Bruce Perens br...@perens.com
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
== in ORBit corba-any.c
$ geeqie
Am 2009-12-17 15:02, schrieb Otto Haliburton:
-Original Message-
From: fedora-devel-list-boun...@redhat.com [mailto:fedora-devel-list-
boun...@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Eelko Berkenpies
Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 05:09
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
Subject: Re:
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
You need to first prelink -u on a copy of the program, then
run it and let it dump itself, then package it up.
Ah, thanks.
I'd actually argue that such packaging is broken anyway, because you didn't
compile the binary you
-Original Message-
From: fedora-devel-list-boun...@redhat.com [mailto:fedora-devel-list-
boun...@redhat.com] On Behalf Of nodata
Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 15:09
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
Subject: Re: packages requiring me to reboot...
Am 2009-12-17
-Original Message-
From: fedora-devel-list-boun...@redhat.com [mailto:fedora-devel-list-
boun...@redhat.com] On Behalf Of nodata
Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 15:09
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
Subject: Re: packages requiring me to reboot...
Am 2009-12-17
2009/12/17, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com:
Anyone interested in swapping a couple of package reviews?
I currently try to review 2 of your previous review request. you
should finish them first
--
Josephine Fine Tannhäuser
2.6.31.5-127.fc12.i686.PAE
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
On Thu, 2009-12-17 at 22:08 +0100, nodata wrote:
Here is my point: Windows requires a reboot less often than Linux. Argue
all you want, it's true.
It's entirely false, because Linux *never* requires a reboot. Fedora
(not Linux, you are generalizing too far) *advises* reboots, it never
Am Montag, den 30.11.2009, 14:42 +0100 schrieb Pierre-Yves:
If I run:
for i in $(repoquery --disablerepo=rpmfusion\* -f *.la
--qf=%{name}.%{arch} | grep x86_64 | sort | uniq); do repoquery -s
$i; done | sort | uniq
exo-0.3.105-1.fc12.src.rpm
fixed
gtkglextmm-1.2.0-10.fc12.src.rpm
I
There will be an outage starting at 2009-12-18 02:00 UTC, which will last
approximately 2 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2009-12-18 02:00 UTC'
Affected Services:
Buildsystem
CVS / Source Control
Sorry everyone, I was off by a day. I've updated it.
-Mike
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009, Mike McGrath wrote:
There will be an outage starting at 2009-12-19 02:00 UTC, which will
last
approximately 2 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 19:21 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
git://publictest5.fedoraproject.org/git/pkgs/package eg if you wished
to clone the kernel, you'd type:
git clone git://publictest5.fedoraproject.org/git/pkgs/kernel
Just an FYI, the hostname (and path) changed slightly.
git clone
+1 to Adam W because I'm an ultra git neophyte (and a CVS one for that
matter) but the current make file automation essentially removes that as an
issue. I'm not saying I'm against learning git if need be, but I agree that
it would be an unfortunate regression.
-Adam (From Android - CM)
On Dec
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Test-Script:
f6b5baa6403cd24dac7f023e0ea22384 Test-Script-1.07.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list
Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com
Author: corsepiu
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Test-Script/F-11
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv16525/F-11
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-Test-Script.spec sources
Log Message:
* Tue Dec 15 2009 Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org - 1.07-1
- Upstream update.
-
Author: corsepiu
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Test-Script/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv16525/devel
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-Test-Script.spec sources
Log Message:
* Tue Dec 15 2009 Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org - 1.07-1
- Upstream update.
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-File-Find-Rule:
1b43810c6b8fd4ee5cee8046e1e05ff4 File-Find-Rule-0.32.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list
Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com
Author: corsepiu
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-File-Find-Rule/F-12
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv12924/F-12
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-File-Find-Rule.spec sources
Log Message:
* Mon Dec 14 2009 Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org - 0.32-1
- Upstream
Author: corsepiu
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-File-Find-Rule/F-11
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv12924/F-11
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-File-Find-Rule.spec sources
Log Message:
* Mon Dec 14 2009 Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org - 0.32-1
- Upstream
Author: corsepiu
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-File-Find-Rule/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv12924/devel
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-File-Find-Rule.spec sources
Log Message:
* Mon Dec 14 2009 Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org - 0.32-1
- Upstream
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=237421
Bug Zapper fedora-triage-l...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247476
Bug Zapper fedora-triage-l...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456019
Bug Zapper fedora-triage-l...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461350
Bug Zapper fedora-triage-l...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473407
Bug Zapper fedora-triage-l...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479101
Bug Zapper fedora-triage-l...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483772
Bug Zapper fedora-triage-l...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
59 matches
Mail list logo
