[Bug 477461] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477461 --- Comment #12 from Sarantis Paskalis paska...@di.uoa.gr 2009-01-14 04:14:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) After a

[Bug 477461] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477461 --- Comment #13 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 04:30:58 EDT --- The ctan bit is to be

[Bug 462038] Hotkeys has no response and Go To window couldn't be inputted.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462038 --- Comment #17 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-01-14 04:57:50 EDT --- I agree with Kevin: while the problem

[Bug 474514] file conflict on upgrading

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474514 James Antill james.ant...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 477368] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477368 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:36:38 EDT --- FPC approved those two

[Bug 477392] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477392 --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:36:57 EDT --- FPC approved those two

[Bug 477394] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477394 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:36:59 EDT --- FPC approved those two

[Bug 477472] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477472 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:38:12 EDT --- FPC approved those two

[Bug 477471] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477471 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:38:11 EDT --- FPC approved those two

[Bug 477382] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477382 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:36:47 EDT --- FPC approved those two

[Bug 477390] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477390 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:36:55 EDT --- FPC approved those two

[Bug 477487] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477487 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:38:24 EDT --- FPC approved those two

[Bug 477372] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477372 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:36:42 EDT --- FPC approved those two

[Bug 477477] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477477 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:38:18 EDT --- FPC approved those two

[Bug 477480] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477480 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:38:20 EDT --- FPC approved those two

[Bug 477439] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477439 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:37:43 EDT --- FPC approved those two

[Bug 477441] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477441 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:37:46 EDT --- FPC approved those two

[Bug 477450] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477450 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:37:55 EDT --- FPC approved those two

[Bug 477397] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477397 --- Comment #16 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:37:01 EDT --- FPC approved those two

[Bug 477442] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477442 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:37:47 EDT --- FPC approved those two

[Bug 477371] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477371 --- Comment #11 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:36:40 EDT --- FPC approved those two

[Bug 477335] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477335 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:36:35 EDT --- FPC approved those two

[Bug 477448] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477448 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:37:53 EDT --- FPC approved those two

[Bug 477337] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477337 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:36:37 EDT --- FPC approved those two

[Bug 477444] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477444 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:37:49 EDT --- FPC approved those two

[Bug 477336] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:36:36 EDT --- FPC approved those two

[Bug 477463] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477463 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:38:04 EDT --- FPC approved those two

[Bug 477427] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477427 --- Comment #16 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:37:34 EDT --- FPC approved those two

[Bug 477481] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477481 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:38:21 EDT --- FPC approved those two

[Bug 477419] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477419 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:37:25 EDT --- FPC approved those two

[Bug 477420] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477420 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:37:27 EDT --- FPC approved those two

[Bug 477421] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477421 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:37:28 EDT --- FPC approved those two

[Bug 477400] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477400 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:37:04 EDT --- FPC approved those two

[Bug 477405] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477405 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:37:10 EDT --- FPC approved those two

[Bug 477474] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477474 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:38:15 EDT --- FPC approved those two

[Bug 477473] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477473 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:38:13 EDT --- FPC approved those two

[Bug 477393] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477393 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:36:58 EDT --- FPC approved those two

[Bug 477386] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477386 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:36:51 EDT --- FPC approved those two

[Bug 477375] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477375 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:36:45 EDT --- FPC approved those two

[Bug 477378] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477378 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:36:46 EDT --- FPC approved those two

[Bug 477374] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477374 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:36:44 EDT --- FPC approved those two

[Bug 477436] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477436 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:37:39 EDT --- FPC approved those two

[Bug 477331] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477331 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:36:28 EDT --- FPC approved those two

[Bug 477437] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477437 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:37:41 EDT --- FPC approved those two

[Bug 477383] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477383 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:36:48 EDT --- FPC approved those two

[Bug 477401] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477401 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:37:06 EDT --- FPC approved those two

[Bug 477443] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477443 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:37:48 EDT --- FPC approved those two

[Bug 478891] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478891 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:38:27 EDT --- FPC approved those two

[Bug 477408] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477408 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:37:16 EDT --- FPC approved those two

[Bug 477476] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477476 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:38:17 EDT --- FPC approved those two

[Bug 477453] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477453 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:37:57 EDT --- FPC approved those two

[Bug 477458] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477458 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:37:59 EDT --- FPC approved those two

[Bug 477479] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477479 --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:38:19 EDT --- FPC approved those two

[Bug 477422] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477422 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:37:30 EDT --- FPC approved those two

[Bug 477445] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477445 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:37:50 EDT --- FPC approved those two

[Bug 477468] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477468 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:38:10 EDT --- FPC approved those two

[Bug 477406] kdeedu: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477406 --- Comment #10 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:37:11 EDT --- FPC approved those two

[Bug 477395] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477395 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:37:00 EDT --- FPC approved those two

[Bug 477457] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477457 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:37:58 EDT --- FPC approved those two

[Bug 477449] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477449 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:37:54 EDT --- FPC approved those two

[Bug 477465] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477465 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:38:06 EDT --- FPC approved those two

[Bug 477398] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477398 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:37:03 EDT --- FPC approved those two

[Bug 477432] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477432 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:37:38 EDT --- FPC approved those two

[Bug 477451] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477451 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:37:56 EDT --- FPC approved those two

[Bug 477416] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477416 --- Comment #9 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:37:23 EDT --- FPC approved those two

[Bug 477467] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477467 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:38:08 EDT --- FPC approved those two

[Bug 477389] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477389 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:36:54 EDT --- FPC approved those two

[Bug 477429] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477429 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:37:36 EDT --- FPC approved those two

[Bug 477332] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477332 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:36:31 EDT --- FPC approved those two

[Bug 477423] mathml-fonts: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477423 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:37:31 EDT --- FPC approved those two

[Bug 477407] kdelibs: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477407 --- Comment #8 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:37:14 EDT --- FPC approved those two

[Bug 477411] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477411 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:37:20 EDT --- FPC approved those two

[Bug 477461] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477461 --- Comment #14 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:38:01 EDT --- FPC approved those two

[Bug 477410] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:37:19 EDT --- FPC approved those two

[Bug 477426] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477426 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:37:33 EDT --- FPC approved those two

[Bug 477385] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477385 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:36:50 EDT --- FPC approved those two

[Bug 477431] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477431 --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:37:37 EDT --- FPC approved those two

[Bug 477418] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477418 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:37:24 EDT --- FPC approved those two

[Bug 477334] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477334 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:36:34 EDT --- FPC approved those two

[Bug 475661] Review Request: google-droid-fonts - The Droid font set

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475661 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 477392] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477392 --- Comment #7 from Tim Fenn f...@stanford.edu 2009-01-14 14:32:57 EDT --- 1.0.4-13 in rawhide drops the doxygen included

[Bug 477392] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477392 --- Comment #8 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 15:18:58 EDT --- I you don't have any font

[Bug 477392] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477392 Tim Fenn f...@stanford.edu changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477392, which changed state. Bug 477392 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

[Bug 475661] Review Request: google-droid-fonts - General-purpose fonts released by Google as part of Android

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475661 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477438, which changed state. Bug 477438 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

[Bug 477438] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477438 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 478891] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478891 --- Comment #4 from Qianqian Fang fan...@gmail.com 2009-01-14 18:36:09 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=329052) --

[Bug 478891] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478891 --- Comment #3 from Qianqian Fang fan...@gmail.com 2009-01-14 18:35:05 EDT --- sorry for my delay in responding to this

rpms/fontpackages/devel .cvsignore, 1.4, 1.5 fontpackages.spec, 1.4, 1.5 import.log, 1.4, 1.5 sources, 1.4, 1.5

Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv1253/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore fontpackages.spec import.log sources Log Message: 1.14 Index: .cvsignore

rpms/bitstream-vera-fonts/devel bitstream-vera-fonts.spec, 1.10, 1.11 import.log, 1.1, 1.2

Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/bitstream-vera-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv2084/devel Modified Files: bitstream-vera-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: Update for new FPC naming rules Index: bitstream-vera-fonts.spec

[Bug 474514] file conflict on upgrading

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474514 Akira TAGOH ta...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 479596] Review Request: serafettin-cartoon-fonts - Sans-serif Cartoon Fonts

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479596 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-01-14 21:50:36 EDT ---

[Bug 479596] Review Request: serafettin-cartoon-fonts - Sans-serif Cartoon Fonts

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479596 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 477402] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477402 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-01-14 22:01:07 EDT ---

[Bug 471103] Font spacing wrong in menus and text

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471103 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 477402] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477402 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 477402] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477402 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-01-14 22:05:57 EDT ---

Broken dependencies: tetex-font-cm-lgc

tetex-font-cm-lgc has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: tetex-font-cm-lgc-0.5-11.fc11.noarch requires cm-lgc-fonts On x86_64: tetex-font-cm-lgc-0.5-11.fc11.noarch requires cm-lgc-fonts On i386: tetex-font-cm-lgc-0.5-11.fc11.noarch requires cm-lgc-fonts

Broken dependencies: tetex-font-kerkis

tetex-font-kerkis has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: tetex-font-kerkis-2.0-16.fc11.noarch requires kerkis-fonts = 0:2.0-16.fc11 On x86_64: tetex-font-kerkis-2.0-16.fc11.noarch requires kerkis-fonts = 0:2.0-16.fc11 On i386:

  1   2   >