Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477461 --- Comment #12 from Sarantis Paskalis <[email protected]> 2009-01-14 04:14:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > After a mail exchange with Tom the new naming rules will probably look like > that > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_(2009-01-13) > > As your package is one of the most complex naming-wise please check you're ok > with the proposal (or suggest amendments) I am ok with most of the proposal. I have some doubts about the TeX-related subpackage. One is whether tex should be a prefix or a suffix. The other is whether the foundry name (ctan) should be in the package name. After all, we do not name all the perl modules perl-cpan-perlmodule. But I guess this is not so critical, can be left unspecified (it is after all a TeX related subpackage) and wait for some input from the TeX guys. (My preference would be that tex should be a prefix and the ctan deleted as in tex-cm-lgc). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
