[Bug 483363] Review Request: yanone-tagesschrift-fonts - Serif decorative latin TTF font

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483363 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #27 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-01-31 05:15:03 EDT --- would still appreciate some comment

[Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #26 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-01-31 05:14:30 EDT --- Ah I see, thank you. Yes, baekmuk

[Bug 477435] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477435 Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #28 from Caius kaio Chance ccha...@redhat.com 2009-01-31 07:07:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #24) (Anyway

[Bug 483391] New: [te_IN] New Telugu codepoints/glyphs in Unicode 5.1

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [te_IN] New Telugu codepoints/glyphs in Unicode 5.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483391 Summary: [te_IN] New Telugu codepoints/glyphs in Unicode

[Bug 483391] [te_IN] New Telugu codepoints/glyphs in Unicode 5.1

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483391 --- Comment #1 from Padmanabhan V. K. bugzillas+padremovethi...@gmail.com 2009-01-31 10:17:23 EDT --- Created an

[Bug 483400] Review Request: vollkorn-fonts - A serif latin OTF font

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483400 Paul Lange pala...@gmx.de changed: What|Removed |Added

rpms/google-droid-fonts/devel google-droid-fonts.spec, 1.2, 1.3 import.log, 1.2, 1.3

Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/google-droid-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv7944/devel Modified Files: google-droid-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: fix fontconfig links for sans and mono Index: google-droid-fonts.spec

[Bug 483363] Review Request: yanone-tagesschrift-fonts - Serif decorative latin TTF font

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483363 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 483400] Review Request: vollkorn-fonts - A serif latin OTF font

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483400 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 483363] Review Request: yanone-tagesschrift-fonts - Serif decorative latin TTF font

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483363 Paul Lange pala...@gmx.de changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 483400] Review Request: vollkorn-fonts - A serif latin OTF font

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483400 Paul Lange pala...@gmx.de changed: What|Removed |Added

Re: Packaging questions

Am Samstag, den 31.01.2009, 09:43 +0100 schrieb Nicolas Mailhot: Le vendredi 30 janvier 2009 à 20:28 -0300, Paul Lange a écrit : Hey, thank you for your fast answer! np I created a Review request for my package. You find it here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483363

Re: Packaging questions

Am Samstag, den 31.01.2009, 17:36 +0100 schrieb Nicolas Mailhot: Le samedi 31 janvier 2009 à 12:34 -0300, Paul Lange a écrit : Well, created an archive for it. You should not :p Oh, misunderstood you but it's clear now. %setup has all kinds of magic switches to deal with stuff in

Re: Font CVS Requests

On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Paul Lange wrote: Hey, after my two packages has been approved (thank you Nicolas). I'm going to start to integrate them into the Fedora CVS system. That's nice Now I have some question for creating the New Package CVS Request: Actually the font lifecycle

Lost in translation, part II: Lost in orthographies

I was trying to avoid fontconfig, but it caught me at the end. Trying to figure out which languages in comps are supported by which font, to be able to include them in the language group, I compared the list of languages in F11's comps file with the orthography lists fontconfig supports. To my