On Jul 16, 2009, at 21:24, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/16/2009 08:50 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 19:59 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
What's the consensus here?
If we install patch, will git come next, since people will want to
git
am stuff? Not
ricky and I were considering adding patch to global.pp and dennis
brought up that it might be a command used to do malicious stuff. So
what do you guys think?
Pros:
patch makes some things much easier to do. Want to cherrypick a change
as a hotfix? Many times patch is needed to apply the diff.
On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 19:59 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
What's the consensus here?
If we install patch, will git come next, since people will want to git
am stuff? Not that I'm against having patch, it would make things
easier.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- FreedomĀ² is a feature!
identi.ca:
On Thu, 16 Jul 2009, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
ricky and I were considering adding patch to global.pp and dennis
brought up that it might be a command used to do malicious stuff. So
what do you guys think?
Pros:
patch makes some things much easier to do. Want to cherrypick a change
as a
On 07/16/2009 08:50 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 19:59 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
What's the consensus here?
If we install patch, will git come next, since people will want to git
am stuff? Not that I'm against having patch, it would make things
easier.
Well I won't
On 07/16/2009 08:59 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
+0 no opinion if it would be of some use. I've generally scp'd files
where needed and copied from there. Same number of commands and files
copied as if you were to patch
scp blah.py app1: ; ssh app1 ; sudo cp blah.py /usr/blah
scp blah.patch