Hi,
In F-7 a decision was made to bundle in the rt2x00 wireless drivers
for Ralink cards. I contend this was a poor decision because, simply
put, they do not work. Not for any ralink chipset device I have tried
(and I've tried several). Upstream rt2x00 developers have also gone on
a 3 month
On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 09:21 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 08:04 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
I'm mostly just rambling. In the past, there has been some vocal
dissent for having kmods period, so I wanted to know the opinions from
people on a more targeted list than
On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 22:55 +0800, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Tue, 2007-06-19 at 15:01 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
I'd like to just do a brief poll here just to see how many are yay or
nay for kmods. And I'm not talking about their current implementation
or the other various ways that the idea
On 06/20/2007 11:12 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
And if it isn't good enough for upstream to ship and support, why in
$DEITY's name would we want to ship it, again?
*cough* squashfs *cough cough* wireless-dev *cough* CFS *cough hack* xen
*cough*
... exec-shield
On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 11:15 -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
On 06/20/2007 11:12 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
And if it isn't good enough for upstream to ship and support, why in
$DEITY's name would we want to ship it, again?
*cough* squashfs *cough cough* wireless-dev *cough* CFS *cough hack* xen
On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 10:12 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
If it's good enough for Fedora to ship and support, we can put it in the
main kernel package. Besides; if it's good enough for Fedora to ship and
Which is something I suggested later in this thread.
And if it isn't good enough for
On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 23:39 +0800, David Woodhouse wrote:
Ok, out of those really only squashfs and xen aren't immediately headed
towards some kind of upstream inclusion.
Is squashfs not headed upstream?
squashfs gets posted every few months, people come back with complaints,
the
On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 23:39 +0800, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 10:12 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
If it's good enough for Fedora to ship and support, we can put it in the
main kernel package. Besides; if it's good enough for Fedora to ship and
Which is something I
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 01:39:47PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Dave Jones ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
Of course, upstream doesn't seem all that inclined[1] to make it so that
devices can actually work. *sigh*
Adding udev callouts as he suggests shouldn't be difficult though
There was some complaining here about problems dealing with separate
debuginfo files. In elfutils-0.128, in an f6 and fc7 update near you,
there is now eu-strip. This doesn't improve any non-elfutils tools you
were using that weren't handling separate debuginfo well, but it makes it
easy to
10 matches
Mail list logo
