Re: -vanilla builds.
Bill Nottingham wrote: Jason L Tibbitts III ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: DJ == Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: DJ I think we ended up settling on putting them on DJ people.fedoraproject.org. Given the 150MB quota, this probably DJ means... Actually all it means is that you need to ask for more space. Sort of. Adding debuginfo + all arches means that each vanilla build could end up taking up over a gigabyte. There are limits to how much space we can ask for. We have just to find a sucker to fix the DWARF mess that we have these days... hey, don't look at me... too closely... :-P - Arnaldo ___ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
Re: -vanilla builds.
DJ == Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: DJ I think we ended up settling on putting them on DJ people.fedoraproject.org. Given the 150MB quota, this probably DJ means... Actually all it means is that you need to ask for more space. - J ___ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
Re: -vanilla builds.
Jason L Tibbitts III ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: DJ == Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: DJ I think we ended up settling on putting them on DJ people.fedoraproject.org. Given the 150MB quota, this probably DJ means... Actually all it means is that you need to ask for more space. Sort of. Adding debuginfo + all arches means that each vanilla build could end up taking up over a gigabyte. There are limits to how much space we can ask for. Bill ___ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
Re: -vanilla builds.
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 06:52:41AM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: On 29.08.2007 21:05, Dave Jones wrote: I'd like to move forward on us getting vanilla builds out for testers. I'm willing to help here if there is anything I can do. There are a couple things worth thinking about, which I'd like other peoples thoughts on. * The location of the binaries - I think we ended up settling on putting them on people.fedoraproject.org. My vote is still to ship them in the proper repos -- an idea lot of people liked in last weeks discussion here. But people feared the space requirements. But that's a problem on p.f.o as well afaics. Nearly everyone else I've talked to about this seems to be against that idea for whatever reasons. * how/where to building them. AFAIK, it isn't possible to pass switches like --with-vanilla to koji, so the two options are.. - build vanilla as part of the regular build (not a great idea, it already takes hours to build a complete set of kernels). How about a different package kernel-vanilla in CVS that can be build independently of the normal build? This means committing rebases to 1 place, which sounds like losing. It doesn't really bring any advantages either afaics. [...] * dependancies. This is the only remaining technical puzzle I think. I'd like the vanilla rpms to install on FC6, F7, and rawhide. Doing separate builds per distro is just going to kill me. But often needed, as people otherwise often can't build kernel modules theirselfs, as GCC doesn't match (it does currently iirc, but often there are different major versions of gcc in the different distros. 3rd party modules for kernel-vanilla brings up an interesting question. For bugs found in kernel-vanilla, I want *everything* to go to linux-kernel or bugzilla.kernel.org. If reports there contain any out-of-tree modules, they'll get closed out no questions asked. AFAIAC, 3rd party modules are even less supportable on -vanilla than they are on the regular fedora kernel. For the minority that can't live without 3rd party modules, they can build their own kernels, because building a full set of kernels for each distro is time consuming enough that I only want to do this once. Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk ___ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
Re: -vanilla builds.
On 30.08.2007 07:03, Dave Jones wrote: On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 06:52:41AM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: On 29.08.2007 21:05, Dave Jones wrote: I'd like to move forward on us getting vanilla builds out for testers. I'm willing to help here if there is anything I can do. There are a couple things worth thinking about, which I'd like other peoples thoughts on. * The location of the binaries - I think we ended up settling on putting them on people.fedoraproject.org. My vote is still to ship them in the proper repos -- an idea lot of people liked in last weeks discussion here. But people feared the space requirements. But that's a problem on p.f.o as well afaics. Nearly everyone else I've talked to about this seems to be against that idea for whatever reasons. Hallway conversations :-/ I understand that it makes things easier often, but please share what you discussed and especially the outcome (like you did with that sentence above) with the public, so outside contributors don't feel like second class contributors whos opinion doesn't count. * how/where to building them. AFAIK, it isn't possible to pass switches like --with-vanilla to koji, so the two options are.. - build vanilla as part of the regular build (not a great idea, it already takes hours to build a complete set of kernels). How about a different package kernel-vanilla in CVS that can be build independently of the normal build? This means committing rebases to 1 place, which sounds like losing. It doesn't really bring any advantages either afaics. Yeah, you have a point. [...] * dependancies. This is the only remaining technical puzzle I think. I'd like the vanilla rpms to install on FC6, F7, and rawhide. Doing separate builds per distro is just going to kill me. But often needed, as people otherwise often can't build kernel modules theirselfs, as GCC doesn't match (it does currently iirc, but often there are different major versions of gcc in the different distros. 3rd party modules for kernel-vanilla brings up an interesting question. For bugs found in kernel-vanilla, I want *everything* to go to linux-kernel or bugzilla.kernel.org. +1 If reports there contain any out-of-tree modules, they'll get closed out no questions asked. AFAIAC, 3rd party modules are even less supportable on -vanilla than they are on the regular fedora kernel. For the minority that can't live without 3rd party modules, they can build their own kernels, because building a full set of kernels for each distro is time consuming enough that I only want to do this once. I think you are making your life to easy here. CU knurd ___ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
