On Thursday 30 November 2006 06:55, Matthew Miller wrote:
Is the 13-month lifespan for Core (i.e. merged Legacy) accepted as
official?
That honestly depends on if releasing core to the outside world gets the
approval of Red Hat management. We hope it does, and if it does (and if
Legacy and
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 08:12:53AM -0500, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Thursday 30 November 2006 06:55, Matthew Miller wrote:
Is the 13-month lifespan for Core (i.e. merged Legacy) accepted as
official?
That honestly depends on if releasing core to the outside world gets the
approval of Red
Axel Thimm wrote:
If some statement from legacy is needed about FC3/FC4 before that
decision is made (which IMHO is needed), how about something along a
heading of
Fedora Legacy is ending its current support model working towards
direct involvement in maintenance of upcoming Fedora
Nils Breunese (Lemonbit) wrote:
Unfortunately I will have to be migrating our last Fedora servers
over to CentOS even sooner now...
I take it, then, that extending Fedora's (supported) life-cycle to 13+ mos
isn't sufficient for your needs?
-- Rex
--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
On Thursday 30 November 2006 14:59, Nils Breunese (Lemonbit) wrote:
I think it's sad Fedora Legacy seems to be ending a little
prematurely, but I totally understand that the people that were
carrying this dying beast have decided to just put it down and let it
be. Unfortunately I will have to
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 09:11:52AM -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
Unfortunately I will have to be migrating our last Fedora servers
over to CentOS even sooner now...
I take it, then, that extending Fedora's (supported) life-cycle to 13+ mos
isn't sufficient for your needs?
That's the case here
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 08:12:53AM -0500, Jesse Keating wrote:
That honestly depends on if releasing core to the outside world gets the
approval of Red Hat management. We hope it does, and if it does (and if
Legacy and FESCO agrees) than the 13month will fall into effect. So it
hasn't
On Thursday 30 November 2006 10:32, Matthew Miller wrote:
Everyone's pretty much talking like this is a done deal. Any idea when an
official decision will be made?
I'm involved in discussions with RH management this week, and probably next
week.
--
Jesse Keating RHCE
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 10:35:44AM -0500, Jesse Keating wrote:
Everyone's pretty much talking like this is a done deal. Any idea when an
official decision will be made?
I'm involved in discussions with RH management this week, and probably next
week.
Okay, thanks for the update.
--
Rex Dieter wrote:
Unfortunately I will have to be migrating our last Fedora servers
over to CentOS even sooner now...
I take it, then, that extending Fedora's (supported) life-cycle to
13+ mos
isn't sufficient for your needs?
Not for that couple of FC3 machines my clients have running.
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 04:40:55PM +0100, Nils Breunese (Lemonbit) wrote:
Not for that couple of FC3 machines my clients have running. Or am I
misunderstanding the 13 months of support somehow? FC3 was released
on November 8 2004. Also, FC4 (I don't have any FC4 machines) was
released on
Op 30-nov-2006, om 17:11 heeft Matthew Miller het volgende geschreven:
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 04:40:55PM +0100, Nils Breunese (Lemonbit)
wrote:
Not for that couple of FC3 machines my clients have running. Or am I
misunderstanding the 13 months of support somehow? FC3 was released
on
On 11/30/06, Rex Dieter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nils Breunese (Lemonbit) wrote:
Unfortunately I will have to be migrating our last Fedora servers
over to CentOS even sooner now...
I take it, then, that extending Fedora's (supported) life-cycle to 13+ mos
isn't sufficient for your needs?
13 matches
Mail list logo
