Re: X-Chat 2.4.0 to 2.6

2006-03-16 Thread Benjamin Smith
On Friday 10 March 2006 07:37, Danny Terweij - Net Tuning | Net wrote: > > That's the mission. You *did* read the mission statement, didn't you? > > Nope. I dont like reading :P If you don't read the sign that says "Caution: Sharks" then expect to be bit occasionally. > > Isn't that what FC4 i

Re: X-Chat 2.4.0 to 2.6

2006-03-16 Thread Benjamin Smith
On Friday 10 March 2006 07:37, Danny Terweij - Net Tuning | Net wrote: > > That's the mission. You *did* read the mission statement, didn't you? > > Nope. I dont like reading :P If you don't read the sign that says "Caution: Sharks" then expect to be bit occasionally. > > Isn't that what FC4 i

Re: X-Chat 2.4.0 to 2.6

2006-03-10 Thread Mike McCarty
Danny Terweij - Net Tuning | Net wrote: From: "Rex Dieter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Can someone provide a new version of X-Chat in legacy updates fc3 repo? Probably not. legacy updates is for security and critical bug fixes only. Hmm that sucks. That's the mission. You *did* read the missi

Re: X-Chat 2.4.0 to 2.6

2006-03-10 Thread Mike McCarty
Danny Terweij - Net Tuning | Net wrote: From: "Mike McCarty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Can someone provide a new version of X-Chat in legacy updates fc3 repo? Probably not. legacy updates is for security and critical bug fixes only. Hmm that sucks. That's the mission. You *did* read the miss

Re: X-Chat 2.4.0 to 2.6

2006-03-10 Thread Jim Popovitch
Danny Terweij - Net Tuning | Net wrote: From: "Rex Dieter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Where it ends? FC is not a good choice for production. Easy: If you don't like that, don't use FC for production. Nice advertising line.. put it on the FC website in big red letters :) Hey! That's my line! :-)

Re: X-Chat 2.4.0 to 2.6

2006-03-10 Thread Kelson
Danny Terweij - Net Tuning | Net wrote: Easy: If you don't like that, don't use FC for production. Nice advertising line.. put it on the FC website in big red letters :) It used to be there. Not sure what happened to it. Fedora Core was designed from the start to be a leading-edge (or, dep

Re: X-Chat 2.4.0 to 2.6

2006-03-10 Thread Eric Rostetter
Quoting Danny Terweij - Net Tuning | Net <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Isn't that what FC4 is supposed to be? Where it ends? FC is not a good choice for production. Then don't use it. There are lots of other choices. Linux is stable, linux dont have to reboot much. Linux can run for years without

Re: X-Chat 2.4.0 to 2.6

2006-03-10 Thread Jesse Keating
On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 17:27 +0100, Danny Terweij - Net Tuning | Net wrote: > Nice advertising line.. put it on the FC website in big red letters :) Why? You wouldn't read it anyway. Neither would any of your other user examples. So whats the point? Those that can read and do read are able to e

Re: X-Chat 2.4.0 to 2.6

2006-03-10 Thread Danny Terweij - Net Tuning | Net
From: "Rex Dieter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Where it ends? FC is not a good choice for production. > > Easy: If you don't like that, don't use FC for production. Nice advertising line.. put it on the FC website in big red letters :) Danny. -- fedora-legacy-list mailing list fedora-legacy-list@re

Re: X-Chat 2.4.0 to 2.6

2006-03-10 Thread Josep L. Guallar-Esteve
On Friday 10 March 2006 10:37, Danny Terweij - Net Tuning | Net wrote: > From: "Mike McCarty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > That's the mission. You *did* read the mission statement, didn't you? > Nope. I dont like reading :P Part of the "Linux is free and cost is low" means that Linux users either must

Re: X-Chat 2.4.0 to 2.6

2006-03-10 Thread Axel Thimm
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 04:37:58PM +0100, Danny Terweij - Net Tuning | Net wrote: > From: "Mike McCarty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Can someone provide a new version of X-Chat in legacy updates fc3 >repo? Probably not. legacy updates is for security and critical bug fixes only. > You

Re: X-Chat 2.4.0 to 2.6

2006-03-10 Thread Jesse Keating
On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 16:37 +0100, Danny Terweij - Net Tuning | Net wrote: > You think every "user" reading that? > Here a practical "user" example: > - Hmm no more updates when i do yum update > - lets google > - hey a new repo called legacy.. > - Ah here i found how to add it to my yum > - Nice

Re: X-Chat 2.4.0 to 2.6

2006-03-10 Thread Rex Dieter
Danny Terweij - Net Tuning | Net wrote: From: "Mike McCarty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Are there here people that wants create a *real* legacy-updates repo for NEW versions? Isn't that what FC4 is supposed to be? Where it ends? FC is not a good choice for production. Easy: If you don't lik

Re: X-Chat 2.4.0 to 2.6

2006-03-10 Thread Danny Terweij - Net Tuning | Net
From: "Mike McCarty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>Can someone provide a new version of X-Chat in legacy updates fc3 repo? > >>Probably not. legacy updates is for security and critical bug fixes only. > > Hmm that sucks. > That's the mission. You *did* read the mission statement, didn't you? Nope. I

Re: X-Chat 2.4.0 to 2.6

2006-03-08 Thread David Rees
On 3/8/06, Danny Terweij - Net Tuning | Net <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Are there here people that wants create a *real* legacy-updates repo for NEW > versions? I suggest you look at one of the many available 3rd party repos such as ATrpms or Dag RPMs: http://www.atrpms.net/ http://dag.wieers.co

Re: X-Chat 2.4.0 to 2.6

2006-03-08 Thread Josep L. Guallar-Esteve
On Wednesday 08 March 2006 11:46, Danny Terweij - Net Tuning | Net wrote: > From: "Rex Dieter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Can someone provide a new version of X-Chat in legacy updates fc3 repo? > > > > Probably not. legacy updates is for security and critical bug fixes > > only. > > Hmm that suck

Re: X-Chat 2.4.0 to 2.6

2006-03-08 Thread Kelson
Danny Terweij - Net Tuning | Net wrote: Not 1 of all the FC3 repo's providing a new version. I use RH since 5.0. But sinds Fedora i dislike it more and more. Are there here people that wants create a *real* legacy-updates repo for NEW versions? If you want new versions of Fedora's applications

Re: X-Chat 2.4.0 to 2.6

2006-03-08 Thread Stephen J. Smoogen
On 3/8/06, Danny Terweij - Net Tuning | Net <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From: "Rex Dieter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Can someone provide a new version of X-Chat in legacy updates fc3 repo? > > > Probably not. legacy updates is for security and critical bug fixes only. > > Hmm that sucks. > >

Re: X-Chat 2.4.0 to 2.6

2006-03-08 Thread Rex Dieter
Danny Terweij - Net Tuning | Net wrote: From: "Rex Dieter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Can someone provide a new version of X-Chat in legacy updates fc3 repo? Probably not. legacy updates is for security and critical bug fixes only. Hmm that sucks. It's prominent on http://fedoralegacy.org/ "

Re: X-Chat 2.4.0 to 2.6

2006-03-08 Thread Danny Terweij - Net Tuning | Net
From: "Rex Dieter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Can someone provide a new version of X-Chat in legacy updates fc3 repo? > Probably not. legacy updates is for security and critical bug fixes only. Hmm that sucks. Not 1 of all the FC3 repo's providing a new version. I use RH since 5.0. But sinds Fed

Re: X-Chat 2.4.0 to 2.6

2006-03-08 Thread Rex Dieter
Danny Terweij - Net Tuning | Net wrote: Can someone provide a new version of X-Chat in legacy updates fc3 repo? Probably not. legacy updates is for security and critical bug fixes only. -- Rex -- fedora-legacy-list mailing list fedora-legacy-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/lis

X-Chat 2.4.0 to 2.6

2006-03-08 Thread Danny Terweij - Net Tuning | Net
Can someone provide a new version of X-Chat in legacy updates fc3 repo? its still at 2.4.0 but newest is in 2.6. Thank you. Danny. -- fedora-legacy-list mailing list fedora-legacy-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list