On Friday 01 December 2006 18:58, David D. Eisenstein wrote:
> > I'm involved in discussions with RH management this week, and probably
> > next week.
>
> Any chance that others involved with Fedora Legacy in addition to you
> might be able to be involved in those discussions, Jesse?
Unfortunately
Jesse Keating wrote:
On Thursday 30 November 2006 10:32, Matthew Miller wrote:
Everyone's pretty much talking like this is a done deal. Any idea when an
official decision will be made?
I'm involved in discussions with RH management this week, and probably next
week.
Any chance that others
On 11/30/06, Rex Dieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nils Breunese (Lemonbit) wrote:
> Unfortunately I will have to be migrating our last Fedora servers
> over to CentOS even sooner now...
I take it, then, that extending Fedora's (supported) life-cycle to 13+ mos
isn't sufficient for your needs?
Op 30-nov-2006, om 17:11 heeft Matthew Miller het volgende geschreven:
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 04:40:55PM +0100, Nils Breunese (Lemonbit)
wrote:
Not for that couple of FC3 machines my clients have running. Or am I
misunderstanding the 13 months of support somehow? FC3 was released
on November
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 04:40:55PM +0100, Nils Breunese (Lemonbit) wrote:
> Not for that couple of FC3 machines my clients have running. Or am I
> misunderstanding the 13 months of support somehow? FC3 was released
> on November 8 2004. Also, FC4 (I don't have any FC4 machines) was
> released
Rex Dieter wrote:
Unfortunately I will have to be migrating our last Fedora servers
over to CentOS even sooner now...
I take it, then, that extending Fedora's (supported) life-cycle to
13+ mos
isn't sufficient for your needs?
Not for that couple of FC3 machines my clients have running. Or
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 10:35:44AM -0500, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > Everyone's pretty much talking like this is a done deal. Any idea when an
> > official decision will be made?
> I'm involved in discussions with RH management this week, and probably next
> week.
Okay, thanks for the update.
--
On Thursday 30 November 2006 10:32, Matthew Miller wrote:
> Everyone's pretty much talking like this is a done deal. Any idea when an
> official decision will be made?
I'm involved in discussions with RH management this week, and probably next
week.
--
Jesse Keating RHCE (geek.j2solutions.
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 08:12:53AM -0500, Jesse Keating wrote:
> That honestly depends on if releasing core to the outside world gets the
> approval of Red Hat management. We hope it does, and if it does (and if
> Legacy and FESCO agrees) than the 13month will fall into effect. So it
> hasn't
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 09:11:52AM -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
> > Unfortunately I will have to be migrating our last Fedora servers
> > over to CentOS even sooner now...
> I take it, then, that extending Fedora's (supported) life-cycle to 13+ mos
> isn't sufficient for your needs?
That's the case he
On Thursday 30 November 2006 14:59, Nils Breunese (Lemonbit) wrote:
>
> I think it's sad Fedora Legacy seems to be ending a little
> prematurely, but I totally understand that the people that were
> carrying this dying beast have decided to just put it down and let it
> be. Unfortunately I will hav
Nils Breunese (Lemonbit) wrote:
> Unfortunately I will have to be migrating our last Fedora servers
> over to CentOS even sooner now...
I take it, then, that extending Fedora's (supported) life-cycle to 13+ mos
isn't sufficient for your needs?
-- Rex
--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
fedora-le
Axel Thimm wrote:
If some statement from legacy is needed about FC3/FC4 before that
decision is made (which IMHO is needed), how about something along a
heading of
"Fedora Legacy is ending its current support model working towards
direct involvement in maintenance of upcoming Fedora releas
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 08:12:53AM -0500, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Thursday 30 November 2006 06:55, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > Is the 13-month lifespan for Core (i.e. "merged Legacy") accepted as
> > official?
>
>
> That honestly depends on if releasing core to the outside world gets the
> appro
On Thursday 30 November 2006 06:55, Matthew Miller wrote:
> Is the 13-month lifespan for Core (i.e. "merged Legacy") accepted as
> official?
That honestly depends on if releasing core to the outside world gets the
approval of Red Hat management. We hope it does, and if it does (and if
Legacy a
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 10:12:11PM -0500, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > Okay, what more do we need to make it official?
> Webpage changes to note our wrapup, reporting to the Fedora Board regarding
> our project status, postings to fedora-announce-list, and then watching the
> flames roll in.
Is the
On Wednesday 29 November 2006 21:58, Matthew Miller wrote:
> Okay, what more do we need to make it official?
Webpage changes to note our wrapup, reporting to the Fedora Board regarding
our project status, postings to fedora-announce-list, and then watching the
flames roll in.
--
Jesse Keating
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 09:54:31PM -0500, Jesse Keating wrote:
> I think this would be best. Legacy was an experiment that worked for a
> period
> of time and has overtime worked less and less. Interest has waned as well as
> willingness to participate.
Okay, what more do we need to make it o
On Wednesday 29 November 2006 21:37, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 03:33:59AM +0100, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > I would rephrase it in a positive way: Legacy is merged with Core and
> > Extras under one umbrella redefining EOL time marks. E.g. there is a
> > shorter total lifespan, but
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 03:33:59AM +0100, Axel Thimm wrote:
> I would rephrase it in a positive way: Legacy is merged with Core and
> Extras under one umbrella redefining EOL time marks. E.g. there is a
> shorter total lifespan, but during that lifespan there is more
> manpower assigned to get time
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 02:29:28PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 01:26:12PM -0600, David Eisenstein wrote:
> > I wish I could do more. But really, I don't know that that wish is
> > realistic. Does anyone else wish more could be done? Or do we just kill
> > the
> > proj
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Discussion of the Fedora Legacy Project
Subject: nails in coffins? Re: Openssl updates
Benjamin Smith wrote:
> On Saturday 18 November 2006 01:20, Florian La Roche wrote:
>
>>Interest in Fedora Legacy has slowed down. You can find some
>>FC4 updates at http://www.
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 01:26:12PM -0600, David Eisenstein wrote:
> I wish I could do more. But really, I don't know that that wish is
> realistic. Does anyone else wish more could be done? Or do we just kill the
> project?
Well, as I've said, I wish more could be done, but I can't really do it
Benjamin Smith wrote:
> On Saturday 18 November 2006 01:20, Florian La Roche wrote:
>
>>Interest in Fedora Legacy has slowed down. You can find some
>>FC4 updates at http://www.jur-linux.org/rpms/fc-updates/4/ ,
>>but some updates will probably also soon show up at
>>http://fedoralegacy.org/
>
>
24 matches
Mail list logo
