Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 09:42 -0500, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
On my system, the update replaced the repo file. Look at the date of
the files in /etc/yum.repos.d
I updated using yum update and some repo files were left untouched
while .rpmnew versions appeared in
On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 10:50 -0400, Jim wrote:
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 21:21 -0400, Jim wrote:
Using Yumex I did a refresh in Rawhide and selected the kde-4.1.1
packages and dependencies where satisfied.
I tried yum --enablerepo=rawhide groupupdate
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
I updated using yum update and some repo files were left untouched
while .rpmnew versions appeared in /etc/yum.repo.d. I moved them into
place by hand (having backed up the old ones of course). Seemed to work.
If you have edited the files by hand, rpm updates won't
Am Donnerstag, den 11.09.2008, 09:44 -0500 schrieb Mikkel L. Ellertson:
Christoph Höger wrote:
Hi,
mirrors.fedoraproject.org states:
This list is dynamically generated every hour, listing only up-to-date
mirrors.
But in fact it is not. There is no .newkey folder. That would be
I can't find the setting to choose between Small, Normal and Large
panel size, that used to be in KDE-4.
Has it disappeared, or have I just missed it?
My panel is rather small in height, which was the default before.
--
Timothy Murphy
e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom.net
tel: +353-86-2336090,
Hello fellows,
Dependency problem I ran into this morning from 2 machines:
xine-lib-extras-nonfree-1.1.15-1.lvn9.i386 from livna has depsolving
problems
-- Missing Dependency: xine-lib(plugin-abi) = 1.24 is needed by
package xine-lib-extras-nonfree-1.1.15-1.lvn9.i386 (livna)
Error: Missing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Konstantin Svist wrote:
Is that being planned at all? Or is F8 only supported in terms of
security patches such?
I was able to compile FF-3.0.1 for 64-bit Fedora8 using the Fedora9
src.rpm and a little tweaking. If you want to try them:
David R. Wilson wrote:
Hello fellows,
Dependency problem I ran into this morning from 2 machines:
xine-lib-extras-nonfree-1.1.15-1.lvn9.i386 from livna has depsolving
problems
-- Missing Dependency: xine-lib(plugin-abi) = 1.24 is needed by
package xine-lib-extras-nonfree-1.1.15-1.lvn9.i386
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 7:10 AM, Timothy Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Arthur Pemberton wrote:
It's a plain text email. Whether you can click on it or not is
entirely up to your email client. I can click on all the urls given so
far.
What email client, as a matter of interest?
Gmail
--
Hi Timothy,
I can't find the setting to choose between Small, Normal and Large
panel size, that used to be in KDE-4.
Has it disappeared, or have I just missed it?
My panel is rather small in height, which was the default before.
The way of doing it has changed since 4.0.x. It is solved much
On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 20:47 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
I updated using yum update and some repo files were left untouched
while .rpmnew versions appeared in /etc/yum.repo.d. I moved them into
place by hand (having backed up the old ones of course). Seemed to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I pulled down and installed about 90 updates, but since then none of the
objects in my ~/Desktop will launch programs -- instead they open as
text files in the editor.
I had this happen once before and managed to fix it, but for the life of
me I
Mikkel L. Ellertson escribío:
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 09:42 -0500, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
On my system, the update replaced the repo file. Look at the date of
the files in /etc/yum.repos.d
I updated using yum update and some repo files were left untouched
while
I sent a message asking for advice/help yesterday. Sorry if I'm
burdening anybody's in box, however, I have more info and I wanted to share.
The rawhide bluez-utils package seems to be missing /usr/bin/pand.
I tried to add the --enable-pand witch and rebuild the RPM from sources
however,
Mike McMullen wrote:
Thank you Gilboa and James!
Here's a little more information.
Someone gave me the de-branded HP Athlon 64 X2 PC. So I have a free PC
I'd like to turn into a NAS server. This doesn't have to be pretty just
functional and semi-cheap.
Since there isn't room in the PC case
I have added a rw\usb-stick as a ssh-client, pub-key added to server
authorised_keys etc..
What can I install in xfce to access the server gui based.
Frank
--
gpg id EB547226 Revoked Forgot Password :(
aMSN: Frankly3D
http://www.frankly3d.com
--
fedora-list mailing list
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
David R. Wilson wrote:
Hello fellows,
Dependency problem I ran into this morning from 2 machines:
xine-lib-extras-nonfree-1.1.15-1.lvn9.i386 from livna has depsolving
problems
-- Missing Dependency: xine-lib(plugin-abi) = 1.24 is needed by
package
Frank Murphy wrote:
I have added a rw\usb-stick as a ssh-client, pub-key added to server
authorised_keys etc..
What can I install in xfce to access the server gui based.
Frank
You lost me, what do you mean? Do you need to get a GUI on the server
you SSH into? If so, you should just be
On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 14:12 -0400, Mark Haney wrote:
You lost me, what do you mean? Do you need to get a GUI on the server
GUI on the client, in gnome you can connect to server your in, and
bookmark it.
I don't want to type, just connect to server, but thunar doesn't seem
to have a
Hello Antonio,
Thanks for the feedback, first of all...
The answer is yes, I've done that in the alsamixer (gui/gnome version), and
what I find strange is that I am not able to see the respective information
also in the alsamixer console-version!
Does this help to go a bit further?
Again, thanks
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Frank Murphy wrote:
| I have added a rw\usb-stick as a ssh-client, pub-key added to server
| authorised_keys etc..
|
| What can I install in xfce to access the server gui based
PuTTY for linux:
On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 13:42 -0500, John Thompson wrote:
PuTTY for linux:
http://linux.softpedia.com/get/System/Networking/PuTTY-347.shtml
The very thing.
Frank
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Frank Murphy wrote:
| On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 13:42 -0500, John Thompson wrote:
|
| PuTTY for linux:
| http://linux.softpedia.com/get/System/Networking/PuTTY-347.shtml
|
|
| The very thing.
rpms are also available:
John Thompson wrote:
Konstantin Svist wrote:
Is that being planned at all? Or is F8 only supported in terms of
security patches such?
I was able to compile FF-3.0.1 for 64-bit Fedora8 using the Fedora9
src.rpm and a little tweaking. If you want to try them:
John Thompson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Frank Murphy wrote:
| On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 13:42 -0500, John Thompson wrote:
|
| PuTTY for linux:
| http://linux.softpedia.com/get/System/Networking/PuTTY-347.shtml
|
|
| The very thing.
rpms are also available:
JoaoCid wrote:
Hello Antonio,
Thanks for the feedback, first of all...
The answer is yes, I've done that in the alsamixer (gui/gnome version), and
what I find strange is that I am not able to see the respective information
also in the alsamixer console-version!
Does this help to go a bit
Hi Timothy,
Unfortunately, following your advice (probably wrongly)
has had a disastrous effect.
My panel has disappeared completely,
including the F start icon.
The only way I can run any application (like knode)
is to right-click on the empty screen and choose Give command.
In fact, I am
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kevin Martin wrote:
| John Thompson wrote:
|
| http://www.os2.dhs.org/~john/RPMS/firefox-3.0.1-1.fc8.x86_64.rpm
| http://www.os2.dhs.org/~john/RPMS/firefox-3.0.1-1.fc8.src.rpm
| Why use the rpm's at all? Why not just get it from Mozilla? If you
|
I update my server to f9; client is f8
my ftp no longer works; I get following error trying to put get or ls:
227 Entering Passive Mode (192,168,253,12,152,205).
ftp: connect: Connection timed out
an f9 client can connect without errors
I have not changed the f8 ftp client after updating the
On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 18:31 -0400, Jim wrote:
landon kelsey wrote:
Setting up Update Process
Resolving Dependencies
-- Running transaction check
--- Package yum-utils.noarch 0:1.1.16-1.fc9 set to be updated
-- Processing Dependency: yum = 3.2.19 for package: yum-utils
-- Finished
On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 09:42 -0500, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
Aaron Konstam wrote:
On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 08:23 -0500, Brian Millett wrote:
The old fedora-updates.repo ?? After the update hokey-pokey dance, all is
just great, and
that's what its all about. I'm happy. But I noticed that
Aaron Konstam wrote:
On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 09:42 -0500, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
Aaron Konstam wrote:
On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 08:23 -0500, Brian Millett wrote:
The old fedora-updates.repo ?? After the update hokey-pokey dance, all is
just great, and
that's what its all about. I'm happy.
John Thompson wrote:
Kevin Martin wrote:
| John Thompson wrote:
|
| http://www.os2.dhs.org/~john/RPMS/firefox-3.0.1-1.fc8.x86_64.rpm
| http://www.os2.dhs.org/~john/RPMS/firefox-3.0.1-1.fc8.src.rpm
| Why use the rpm's at all? Why not just get it from Mozilla? If you
| want the latest you
rfjones wrote:
I update my server to f9; client is f8
my ftp no longer works; I get following error trying to put get or ls:
227 Entering Passive Mode (192,168,253,12,152,205).
ftp: connect: Connection timed out
an f9 client can connect without errors
I have not changed the f8 ftp client
Hi:
Since I installed in my home computer with processor : model name:
Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E4400 @ 2.00GHz , Fedora 9 - both 32 and 64
bit version, my machine crashes all of a sudden, or as it happened right now,
while I use Free Cell Solitaire, there is no way to access the
Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Does someone know of a nice tool to move things between mail queues such
that special problems can be handled, such as longer than default retry
for certain systems, run only at a certain time, run unlikely to work
stuff occasionally only, from a
John Thompson wrote:
Konstantin Svist wrote:
Is that being planned at all? Or is F8 only supported in terms of
security patches such?
I was able to compile FF-3.0.1 for 64-bit Fedora8 using the Fedora9
src.rpm and a little tweaking. If you want to try them:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Now THIS is the kind of geeky response I was hoping for. A good first
step. Now I just need to control the current. :)
ok. this type of controlling is what i have done for past 30 years,
but in commercial and
On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 10:45 -0500, John Thompson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I pulled down and installed about 90 updates, but since then none of the
objects in my ~/Desktop will launch programs -- instead they open as
text files in the editor.
I had this happen
During a yum update (F8) I see a line that says that 2 packages are
being skipped due to repo protections. How can I tell what the 2
packages are so I can decide whether or not to enable the necessary repo
(if only during the next yum update)?
Thanks.
Kevin
--
fedora-list mailing list
On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 15:56 -0500, Kevin Martin wrote:
John Thompson wrote:
Kevin Martin wrote:
| John Thompson wrote:
|
| http://www.os2.dhs.org/~john/RPMS/firefox-3.0.1-1.fc8.x86_64.rpm
| http://www.os2.dhs.org/~john/RPMS/firefox-3.0.1-1.fc8.src.rpm
| Why use the rpm's at all?
On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 17:31:40 -0430
Patrick O'Callaghan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which begs the question as to why the 64-bit one is what gets installed
by default on 64-bit Fedora systems.
Actually, it raises the question. And the answer is probably because it's
easily possible to set up a
My laptop hard drive died. The dvd-etc drive had been generatinb I/O errors
for some time and i don't want to buy a new one in case it is a motherboard
problem.
I have a new hard drive and I am not sure if my bios will recognise a usb
flashdrive to boot.
The bios has a vrsion of pxe.
i can't
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 8:13 AM, Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone know what is happening with Glade?
The links to both the mailing lists on the web site
(http://glade.gnome.org/lists.htmll) are broken and there has been no news
update since 2007.
No idea, but version 3.4.5 is
Simon Tierney wrote:
My laptop hard drive died. The dvd-etc drive had been generatinb I/O errors
for some time and i don't want to buy a new one in case it is a motherboard
problem.
I have a new hard drive and I am not sure if my bios will recognise a usb
flashdrive to boot.
The bios
On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 17:35 +, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 13:23 -0400, Dave Feustel wrote:
Since I cannot stop the UNENDING stream of update/update failed
popup messages for F9, I have switched to Suse 11 until such time
as F9 gets its bugs straighten out.
You can
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 04:07:16PM -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
Which begs the question as to why the 64-bit one is what gets installed
by default on 64-bit Fedora systems.
Actually, it raises the question. And the answer is probably because it's
easily possible to set up a 64-bit only
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Burger wrote:
FWIW, it's just as easy to get the SRPM for F9, and rpmbuild it on F8,
which is what I've been doing.
That's what I do here. In fact, until last year I was running Fedora
Core 1 and keeping it up to date in that way. When the
I have been trying to download fedora from Fedora project website and
it gives an error. Could you please provide an alternative link for
download
Have you attempted to use bittorrent to download? The links to the
torrents are on http://fedoraproject.org/en/get-fedora
--
By working
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kevin Martin wrote:
John Thompson wrote:
AFAIK, Mozilla doesn't offer 64-bit builds of FF-3.x
The 32bit builds won't run on 64bit machines? I'm not sure what you
gain by running a 64bit build of FireFox (not that there's not something
there,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nifty Fedora Mitch wrote:
The Firefox issue is interesting... since we depend on external plugins
that are not open source and not 64 bit...
Isn't that what nspluginwrapper is for?
- --
John ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Ed Greshko wrote:
I have been trying to download fedora from Fedora project website and
it gives an error. Could you please provide an alternative link for
download
Have you attempted to use bittorrent to download? The links to the
torrents are on http://fedoraproject.org/en/get-fedora
Vikas Tehlan wrote:
Ed Greshko wrote:
I have been trying to download fedora from Fedora project website and
it gives an error. Could you please provide an alternative link for
download
Have you attempted to use bittorrent to download? The links to the
torrents are on
Ed Greshko wrote:
Vikas Tehlan wrote:
Ed Greshko wrote:
I have been trying to download fedora from Fedora project website and
it gives an error. Could you please provide an alternative link for
download
Have you attempted to use bittorrent to download? The links to the
Rahul Sundaram sundaram at fedoraproject.org writes:
Known issue. Updates have been pushed and not just synced with all the
mirrors yet.
That's not the problem here. See:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-September/msg01124.html
for what's actually going on.
Kevin
Patrick O'Callaghan pocallaghan at gmail.com writes:
Yes. Ironically I could never remember the name Kicker since it means
nothing whereas Kickoff does kind of mean something :-)
Well, a kicker is somebody who kicks. :-) In some German-speaking regions, it's
used as a slang term for soccer
Florian Sievert wrote:
My panel has disappeared completely,
including the F start icon.
...
If I knew which file in .kde/share/configs/ actually deals with the panel
I could probably fix it.
plasma-appletsrc
plasmarc
Are both files that handles plasma configuration. IMAO the panel
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 07:13:30PM -0500, John Thompson wrote:
Nifty Fedora Mitch wrote:
The Firefox issue is interesting... since we depend on external plugins
that are not open source and not 64 bit...
Isn't that what nspluginwrapper is for?
Yes...
when I tried 64bit brand new
Lately I've been getting messages sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm subscribed to fedora-list@redhat.com, and it seems that
some send to something, and [EMAIL PROTECTED]
is forwarding it to the list. What gives?
Mike
--
p=p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);};main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
Oppose
On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 17:03 -0400, James Kosin wrote:
rfjones wrote:
I update my server to f9; client is f8
my ftp no longer works; I get following error trying to put get or ls:
227 Entering Passive Mode (192,168,253,12,152,205).
ftp: connect: Connection timed out
an f9 client can
Mike McCarty wrote:
Lately I've been getting messages sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm subscribed to fedora-list@redhat.com, and it seems that
some send to something, and [EMAIL PROTECTED]
is forwarding it to the list. What gives?
Nothing
The Sender header has been [EMAIL PROTECTED] for as
new problem:
OpenGL Screensavers not working...the others work however!
I love molecule as a screensaver and it is an OpenGL Screensaver
Printing still sends off a kernel diagnostic
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe:
when i add items to desktop, with konqueror or konsole,
they are not displayed on the screen.
is this a quirk with kde-4.1 or something else?
charles zeitler
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines:
exactly how did you add the icons?
--- On Thu, 9/11/08, charles zeitler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: charles zeitler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: new items not showing up on desktop
To: fedora-list fedora-list@redhat.com
Date: Thursday, September 11, 2008, 10:59 PM
when i add items to desktop,
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 11:01 PM, landon kelsey [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
exactly how did you add the icons?
--- On *Thu, 9/11/08, charles zeitler [EMAIL PROTECTED]* wrote:
From: charles zeitler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: new items not showing up on desktop
To: fedora-list
/20080911/bd50b205/attachment.html
--
Message: 2
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 16:10:36 +0530
From: Steve Repo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: no new kernels?
To: Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using
Fedora. fedora-list@redhat.com
Message-ID:
[EMAIL
do work under my user account!
Yes I know...I shouldn't be using X windows with root but why?
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines:
landon kelsey wrote:
do work under my user account!
Yes I know...I shouldn't be using X windows with root but why?
Never login as root in your graphical environment. A number of programs
will not run as intended.
http://www.jwz.org/xscreensaver/faq.html#root-fail
Rahul
--
fedora-list
do work under my user account!
Yes I know...I shouldn't be using X windows with root but why?
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines:
After update my Fedora 8 system from updates-newkey, pidgin don't startup. I
run pidgin from gnome-terminal and this is the output:
---
Pidgin 2.5.1-1.fc8 has segfaulted and attempted to dump a core file.
This is a bug in the software and has happened through
no fault of your own.
If you
yordy wrote:
I will try to gat a backtrace and post a ticket to developers. But, It will be
an error of pidgin (developers) or it will be an error of pidgin compiled for
Fedora 8, or and error particular of my system.
You would need to backtrace to know for sure but usually it is a
On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 22:59 -0500, charles zeitler wrote:
when i add items to desktop, with konqueror or konsole,
they are not displayed on the screen.
is this a quirk with kde-4.1 or something else?
I have termed the desktop in KDE-4.x the dead zone.
With the 4.1 updates, you can add
On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 14:20 +0100, Jonathan Roberts wrote:
2008/9/10 Rahul Sundaram [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Jonathan Roberts wrote:
My thoughts on the above are:
a) Dedicate a day a week to one particular piece of content.
What purpose does that serve? My original push for this was to
Máirín Duffy wrote:
Hi,
Attached is a sketch of some four f's icon ideas. In order, first,
friends, and features.
Me thinks that this is freedom
Not sure if the flag really signifies first though. :/
For features was thinking of a gear... haven't done that yet.
Hey Everyone,
Let's have our weekly meeting today at 20:00 UTC, thats 15:00 Eastern,
12:00 Pacific.
Meet On: irc.freenode.net in channel #fedora-mktg.
Working from: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Marketing/Tasks
See you all then,
Jack
--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
On Thursday 11 September 2008 07:47:41 pm Jack Aboutboul wrote:
Hey Everyone,
Let's have our weekly meeting today at 20:00 UTC, thats 15:00 Eastern,
12:00 Pacific.
And that is like 1:30 AM here in India, which makes it more difficult to
attend :(
I like the previous time.
Kushal
--
Fedora
On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 11:25 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
Kushal Das wrote:
On Thursday 11 September 2008 07:47:41 pm Jack Aboutboul wrote:
Hey Everyone,
Let's have our weekly meeting today at 20:00 UTC, thats 15:00 Eastern,
12:00 Pacific.
And that is like 1:30 AM here in India, which
Make it 19:00 UTC! Sorry!!
Jack
Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 11:25 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
Kushal Das wrote:
On Thursday 11 September 2008 07:47:41 pm Jack Aboutboul wrote:
Hey Everyone,
Let's have our weekly meeting today at 20:00 UTC, thats 15:00
Michael DeHaan wrote:
Sorry for another desktop thread, but I thought this was an interesting
data point. This is an interesting data point because I think it's
about message and not so much about technical data.
I was talking with a user who did not want to look at Fedora or an EL on
the
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Michael DeHaan wrote:
Sorry for another desktop thread, but I thought this was an
interesting data point. This is an interesting data point because I
think it's about message and not so much about technical data.
I was talking with a user who did not want to look at
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461877
--- Comment #1 from Ralf Corsepius [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 01:58:03 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #0)
Can you branch
Author: corsepiu
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-File-Remove/F-8
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv19753/F-8
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-File-Remove.spec sources
Log Message:
* Wed Sep 10 2008 Ralf Corsepius [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 1.42-1
- Upstream update.
Index:
Author: corsepiu
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-File-Remove/F-9
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv19753/F-9
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-File-Remove.spec sources
Log Message:
* Wed Sep 10 2008 Ralf Corsepius [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 1.42-1
- Upstream update.
Index:
Author: corsepiu
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Pod-Tests/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv27191/devel
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-Pod-Tests.spec sources
Log Message:
* Wed Sep 10 2008 Ralf Corsépius [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 1.19-1
- Upstream update.
Index:
Author: corsepiu
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Pod-Tests/F-8
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv27191/F-8
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-Pod-Tests.spec sources
Log Message:
* Wed Sep 10 2008 Ralf Corsépius [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 1.19-1
- Upstream update.
Index:
Author: corsepiu
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Pod-Tests/F-9
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv27191/F-9
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-Pod-Tests.spec sources
Log Message:
* Wed Sep 10 2008 Ralf Corsépius [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 1.19-1
- Upstream update.
Index:
Author: spot
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Image-Info/F-9
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv4030/F-9
Modified Files:
perl-Image-Info.spec sources
Log Message:
update to 1.28
Index: perl-Image-Info.spec
Author: spot
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Image-Info/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv4030/devel
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-Image-Info.spec sources
Log Message:
update to 1.28
Index: .cvsignore
Author: cweyl
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-Catalyst-Devel/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv28767
Modified Files:
perl-Catalyst-Devel.spec
Log Message:
* Wed Sep 10 2008 Chris Weyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.08-2
- add perl(parent) as a requires (BZ#461581)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458638
Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460088
Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460085
Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460088
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11
13:01:00 EDT ---
perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-0.34-1.fc8
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458638
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11
12:56:30 EDT ---
perl-Image-Info-1.28-1.fc8 has been
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460088
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11
13:00:20 EDT ---
perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-0.34-1.fc9
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461561
Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461561
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11
13:01:55 EDT ---
perl-PPI-1.203-1.fc9 has been
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458638
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11
12:56:54 EDT ---
perl-Image-Info-1.28-1.fc9 has been
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461285
Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461581
Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
101 - 200 of 200 matches
Mail list logo
