So, as most of you have probably heard, we are now on a two-tiered
access system for CVS. The final change which we will be making is the
mass ACL open.
What will happen is all packages which are now set to be private,
accessible by their maintainers and a few specific individuals only,
will
Paul W. Frields wrote:
* I think pointing out Solar when you use a sun for the backdrop is
probably unnecessary -- it's actually cooler to let the sun speak for
itself as our theme.
I also think that naming the theme was a bit too much, a new graphic
theme would be enough.
I also think it's
Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
- Jarod Wen wrote:
I noticed this problem. In fact I did the 10 in Gimp since I don't
know how to make outer glow effect in Inkscape, then I imported the
png file into inkscape. Is there any way I can solve the problem? I
included the source xcf file of 10 in
- Jarod Wen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
New updates, including: fixed the font; reduce the size of the font in
the live CD; changed the CD title; source files have been packed.
Follow the link:
http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/jarodwen/Fedora/10/sleeve_arts/sleeve_arts.html
I
Some general questions:
When is it going to land for integration and review? Time is ticking...
(Also, is it known late this release, and scheduled to be earlier
in future releases?)
The poster on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Artwork/F10Themes/Solar -
it doesn't appear to be valid English,
Alec Moon wrote:
I have had some experience working with Photoshop, starting at verson 6,
all the way to CS 3. I'm also experienced with GIMP. I like to do
projects with a clear goal. I like abstract art more than realism. I'm
very open to any sort of project.
Hi Alec,
Do you find something
Bill Nottingham wrote:
Some general questions:
When is it going to land for integration and review? Time is ticking...
(Also, is it known late this release, and scheduled to be earlier
in future releases?)
As I understand, the final Solar images received OK and are ready for
packaging. I am
Nicu Buculei ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
When is it going to land for integration and review? Time is ticking...
(Also, is it known late this release, and scheduled to be earlier
in future releases?)
As I understand, the final Solar images received OK and are ready for
packaging. I am not
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 18:38 +0300, Nicu Buculei wrote:
Bill Nottingham wrote:
[...snip...]
The poster on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Artwork/F10Themes/Solar -
it doesn't appear to be valid English, certainly not in the header.
And I'm not sure what an all branded new way of technology is.
Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 09:17 +0300, Nicu Buculei wrote:
I also think it's very hard to make a short list with features to outline
We have made such a list in Marketing already:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-marketing-list/2008-September/msg00183.html
I know
Bill Nottingham wrote:
Some general questions:
When is it going to land for integration and review? Time is ticking...
Peter already has the artwork for syslinux and grub.
The wallpapers are ready to be checked in. I'm going to be
working with Ray to make this happen this week likely.
The
First of all, thanks for your feedback about my little video try.
* I think pointing out Solar when you use a sun for the backdrop is
probably unnecessary -- it's actually cooler to let the sun speak for
itself as our theme.
* The music is licensed as CC BY-NC-SA, which isn't appropriate for
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 12:52 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
Bill Nottingham wrote:
Some general questions:
When is it going to land for integration and review? Time is ticking...
Peter already has the artwork for syslinux and grub.
The wallpapers are ready to be checked in. I'm going to
Máirín Duffy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
When is it going to land for integration and review? Time is ticking...
Peter already has the artwork for syslinux and grub.
The wallpapers are ready to be checked in. I'm going to be
working with Ray to make this happen this week likely.
The
Bill Nottingham wrote:
I was thinking of it for the final cut as something akin to how the
name is determined, after the entries have been winnowed by the Art
team as above. But I understand where you're coming from. I'll hit
up the archives.
How do the ideas get winnowed by the art team
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 09:17 +0300, Nicu Buculei wrote:
Paul W. Frields wrote:
* I think pointing out Solar when you use a sun for the backdrop is
probably unnecessary -- it's actually cooler to let the sun speak for
itself as our theme.
I also think that naming the theme was a bit too
Hi Martin.
Martin Sourada wrote:
most of you probably know, but I'll write it again - Echo Icon Theme is
the default icon theme in F10 since Beta (for testing purposes and
exposition to wider audience) and I am one of the feature owners. The
change is rather small (in that it does not break
Actually, because of the incompleteness of the list, I wasn't completely
sure which projects were still open. I was interested in the Fedora USB
distrobution Kit, though, as it looked like nobody has been working on it.
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 11:00 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Send
First of all, thanks for the review, it pretty much outlines the issues
I feel uneasy about as well. First, most of these issues are caused by
SVG icon being scaled down (sometimes for a reason unknown to me and
sometimes because of missing appropriate size variant). So I skip these,
because we
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 15:40 -0400, Greg Dekoenigsberg wrote:
On Wed, 15 Oct 2008, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 15:54 +, Paul W. Frields wrote:
This is the page where I collected your contributions to a design. The
time's come for me to refer the design candidates to the
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 14:21 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
Bill Nottingham wrote:
I was thinking of it for the final cut as something akin to how the
name is determined, after the entries have been winnowed by the Art
team as above. But I understand where you're coming from. I'll hit
up the
Hi,
I've just built an updated solar-backgrounds package [1]. It now
contains all wallpapers available on wiki (16:10, 4:3, 5:4 and dual) for
all day times with the xml for choosing one appropriate for the current
time and date. I've bumped up the release to 0.90.0 and if everything is
OK and
On Wed, 15 Oct 2008, Greg Dekoenigsberg wrote:
I don't suppose we could just defer to the Fedora Art team to make a
decision, since we have set them up to be the authoritative voice on
precisely these kinds of matters?
+1 -- this is how we prevent bikeshedding. Delegate choices to the
Martin Sourada ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
We need to enable them by default, I believe Mo is taking care of it?
There's one concern though - the size of the package is 37.4 MiB. Is
there a chance to make it smaller, or is it the best we can achieve?
That may be an issue for the livecd. The
Bill Nottingham wrote:
Martin Sourada ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
We need to enable them by default, I believe Mo is taking care of it?
There's one concern though - the size of the package is 37.4 MiB. Is
there a chance to make it smaller, or is it the best we can achieve?
That may be an
Máirín Duffy wrote:
Bill Nottingham wrote:
Martin Sourada ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
We need to enable them by default, I believe Mo is taking care of it?
There's one concern though - the size of the package is 37.4 MiB. Is
there a chance to make it smaller, or is it the best we can achieve?
Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 15:40 -0400, Greg Dekoenigsberg wrote:
On Wed, 15 Oct 2008, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 15:54 +, Paul W. Frields wrote:
This is the page where I collected your contributions to a design. The
time's come for me to refer the
Hi Adam,
Thanks for your comment. In fact the sentence has been changed back to
be i686 Live CD to conform to the names in the download page of live
cd. Please find the new version from the top of the list.
Thanks!
On Oct 15, 2008, at 5:21 PM, Adam Pribyl wrote:
There is a typo at:
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 17:16 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
Do we need to provide a palette of possible colors? Or is it
okay to be open-ended in the usage guidelines for this mark?
Or both? :)
I'd say both. Give some tasteful colors as examples, but allow them to
use any color they like provided
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 17:33 -0400, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 17:16 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
Do we need to provide a palette of possible colors? Or is it
okay to be open-ended in the usage guidelines for this mark?
Or both? :)
I'd say both. Give some tasteful
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 22:30 +0200, Max Spevack wrote:
On Wed, 15 Oct 2008, Greg Dekoenigsberg wrote:
I don't suppose we could just defer to the Fedora Art team to make a
decision, since we have set them up to be the authoritative voice on
precisely these kinds of matters?
+1 -- this
Hi all,
Please check out the sixth draft which fixed the pixelated text
problem, thanks to Jaroslav and Nicu:
http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/jarodwen/Fedora/10/sleeve_arts/sleeve_arts.html
Best,
On Oct 15, 2008, at 7:32 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
pixelated
--
Jarod Wen
[EMAIL
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 12:01 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Nicu Buculei ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
When is it going to land for integration and review? Time is ticking...
(Also, is it known late this release, and scheduled to be earlier
in future releases?)
As I understand, the final
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 15:54 +, Paul W. Frields wrote:
This is the page where I collected your contributions to a design. The
time's come for me to refer the design candidates to the Board for
approval.
Yay art opinions!
So, I strongly dislike what is done to the R of Remix in 13. Maybe
On Wed, 15 Oct 2008, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 15:54 +, Paul W. Frields wrote:
This is the page where I collected your contributions to a design. The
time's come for me to refer the design candidates to the Board for
approval.
Yay art opinions!
So, I strongly dislike
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 15:40 -0400, Greg Dekoenigsberg wrote:
On Wed, 15 Oct 2008, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 15:54 +, Paul W. Frields wrote:
This is the page where I collected your contributions to a design. The
time's come for me to refer the design candidates to the
There is a typo at:
http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/jarodwen/Fedora/10/sleeve_arts/r5/Artwork_MediaArt_F10_CDSleeve_1.png
For all Inter-Compatible PCs - For all Intel-Compatible PCs.
even though inter-compatible PC is also nice.:)
Adam Pribyl
___
the attached patch makes the calls to anaconda include all sparc 32 bit arches
when building a sparc tree.
Without change the treearch to sparcv9v we would get the small handful of
sparc packages and noarch. all the sparcv9 and sparcv9v woule be excluded.
this patch is against master.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463036
Caius CHANCE [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132
--- Comment #169 from Martijn Wargers (Mozilla QA) (IRC: mw22) [EMAIL
PROTECTED] 2008-10-15 07:09:58 PDT ---
Shouldn't this bug be marked fixed now that it seems to be working
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017
Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017
--- Comment #39 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-15
13:40:46 EDT ---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457281
Toshio Ernie Kuratomi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466672
Dennis Jang [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Is the extras_signers group in FAS still needed for anything?
Is it still used for ownership of any files on buildsys.fedoraproject.org?
(e.g. the pushscript cvs checkout) If so, can't the same files be owned by
the epel_signers? In either case, I no longer seem to be able to access those
files
[EMAIL PROTECTED] audacity]$ cvs commit -m 'mention upstream plans on
1.3.6-beta' README
Access denied: mschwendt is not in ACL for rpms/audacity
cvs commit: Pre-commit check failed
cvs [commit aborted]: correct above errors first!
That used to work. I'm co-maintainer:
On Wed, 15 Oct 2008, Michael Schwendt wrote:
Is the extras_signers group in FAS still needed for anything?
Is it still used for ownership of any files on buildsys.fedoraproject.org?
(e.g. the pushscript cvs checkout) If so, can't the same files be owned by
the epel_signers? In either case, I
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008, Michael Schwendt wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] audacity]$ cvs commit -m 'mention upstream plans on
1.3.6-beta' README
Access denied: mschwendt is not in ACL for rpms/audacity
cvs commit: Pre-commit check failed
cvs [commit aborted]: correct above errors first!
That
On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 17:30:30 -0500 (CDT), Mike McGrath wrote:
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008, Michael Schwendt wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] audacity]$ cvs commit -m 'mention upstream plans on
1.3.6-beta' README
Access denied: mschwendt is not in ACL for rpms/audacity
cvs commit: Pre-commit
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 11:27:36PM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
Hello,
This question is asked in the context of
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pertusus/Draft_keeping_infra_open_for_EOL
which has not already been approved by FESCO, so this could have no
follow-up, though I think that
So I was going through some old tickets and stumbled across this:
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/164
I gave it a quick look over and I'm not against this integration but I'm
generally apathetic about it. So I ask if anyone here is interested
enough to get it into Fedora.
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 21:02 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
So I was going through some old tickets and stumbled across this:
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/164
I gave it a quick look over and I'm not against this integration but I'm
generally apathetic about it. So I
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 21:02 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
So I was going through some old tickets and stumbled across this:
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/164
I gave it a quick look over and I'm not against this integration but I'm
generally apathetic about it. So I
Doug Chapman wrote:
This patch has been submitted upstream but I don't know if it will get
pulled in to Fedora through the normal channels prior to F10 or not.
Without this patch Fedora 10 will not install on cciss which breaks
nearly all HP server systems.
thanks,
I think it is
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 12:28 -0400, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
Doug Chapman wrote:
This patch has been submitted upstream but I don't know if it will get
pulled in to Fedora through the normal channels prior to F10 or not.
Without this patch Fedora 10 will not install on cciss which breaks
On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 12:25:19 -0700 (PDT)
Roland McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've done a rebase of the utrace patch in the F-9 kernel.
Builds = 2.6.26.6-74.fc9 have the new code. It should now
match the rawhide/F-10 version of utrace exactly.
I believe this fixes all the outstanding
Have you also looked at the kerneloops.org data? That tends to have a
nice collection of utrace oopses/warnings...
I typed utrace in the Function Search box. The only common one (many
many hits) was fixed a while ago (on 9/15 around lunch time, it so happens).
The other ones for non-ancient
On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 12:39:55 -0400
Doug Chapman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, meant to include the BZ in the original email. It has been
reported at least once. I have heard from several co-workers back in HP
that have been blocked by this.
Giulio Fidente wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Jon Stanley wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 5:40 PM, Rahul Sundaram
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is no need to translate. Refer http://www.linux-xp.com/. I haven't
looked for source code.
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 20:03 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
CC'ing fedora-legal list.
Well, that's an awful lot of content without much context. Care to
explain what the legal concern is?
~spot
___
Fedora-legal-list mailing list
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 12:49:07PM -0400, Jon Stanley wrote:
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Tom spot Callaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks like they're distributing some source code. Are there specific
areas of concern?
According to the website, the software requires activation and
Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 12:49:07PM -0400, Jon Stanley wrote:
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Tom spot Callaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks like they're distributing some source code. Are there specific
areas of concern?
According to the website, the software requires
On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 15:24 -0700, Dan Thurman wrote:
Thinking that the chainloader +1 was not finding the right
partition, I assumed that +1 means to locate the next partition,
No, it's to do with how it reads *that* partition.
13.3.4 chainloader
--
-- Command: chainloader
On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 11:00 -0400, Kevin J. Cummings wrote:
Recently, one of my machines (running F8) has started beeping and I
can't figure out the reason why. After watching it this morning, I've
noticed that every 30 minutes it seems to beep 20 times.
No stuck keys on the keyboard?
On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 21:11 +, g wrote:
title Scientific Linux SL (2.6.18-92.1.10.el5)
root (hd0,1)
kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.18-92.1.10.el5 ro root=LABEL=/1 rhgb quiet
initrd /boot/initrd-2.6.18-92.1.10.el5.img
+++
in above;
'title' = what is displayed in menu when shown
On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 21:20 +0100, Stuart Sears wrote:
possibly not
I seem to recall that it depends on your computer, rather than just
whether you had Fedora 8 or 9.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ uname -r
2.6.26.5-45.fc9.i686
Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I
Jones Richard wrote:
Dear Sir,
Iam using fedora 9. How to upgrade it to fedora10? Thanks for your
wonderful service.
The first question I would ask...Do you really want to run the Fedora
10 BETA?
--
Oh, give me a home, Where the buffalo roam, And I'll show you a house
with a really messy
how i can adjust the brightness level in my laptop?
i am using Fedora 9.
also my functions keys are not working !!! how i can enable them?
i don't know what to do with Fedora 9. I have just format my vista home
premium
and set the Fedora 9 as my main OS
Can anybody help me!!!
--
fedora-list
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 08:18 -0400, Steve West wrote:
I have compiled a new kernel and it cannot find the filesystem to
boot. How do I specify in the kernel confg what disk to boot?
You've left off a lot of details so I have no idea if this applies to
you or not but watch out for a
On Wednesday 15 October 2008, Steve West wrote:
I have compiled a new kernel and it cannot find the filesystem to boot. How
do I specify in the kernel confg what disk to boot?
Steve
The obvious question is: did you make a new stanza for it in
your /boot/grub/grub.conf?
--
Cheers, Gene
There
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 09:22 -0400, Steve West wrote:
I have compiled a new kernel and it cannot find the filesystem to boot.
How
do I specify in the kernel confg what disk to boot?
Steve
The obvious question is: did you make a new stanza for it in
your /boot/grub/grub.conf?
Yes the
On Wednesday 15 October 2008, Steve West wrote:
I have compiled a new kernel and it cannot find the filesystem to boot.
How
do I specify in the kernel confg what disk to boot?
Steve
The obvious question is: did you make a new stanza for it in
your /boot/grub/grub.conf?
Yes the grub is all
I have compiled a new kernel and it cannot find the filesystem to boot. How do
I specify in the kernel confg what disk to boot?
Steve--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines:
JeroenSt wrote:
When trying to install KDESDK in FC9 i get the error Missing dependency:
libexiv2.so.2 is needed by package libexiv2-0.1.6-4.fc9.i386 (installed)
The packes libexiv2 only installs libexiv2.so.3 and not libexiv2.so.2.
What can I do about this problem?
2 things:
1. run
Dave Feustel wrote:
When will Open Office 3 be available for F9?
When you upgrade to F10. :)
I can't speak on the ooo maintainer's intentions on F-9, but I'd venture
that based on history, such a large upgrade is unlikely to happen.
-- Rex
--
fedora-list mailing list
Joe Smith wrote:
...
Any ideas what broke, or suggestions for getting my old configuration
working again?
Ack. You know, I've had so few real problems with F9 that I've gotten
totally rusty and dusty with age here. Cobwebs in the attic.
What's the first thing you check when a system that's
Steve West wrote:

I have compiled a new kernel and it cannot find the filesystem to boot.
How do I specify in the kernel confg what disk to boot?
Steve
If you are asking what drivers to load to access a specific type of
drive, you can build them into the kernel, or create an initrd
Mikolaj Kucharski wrote:
Hi,
I would like to have plain text console all the way from grub to login
prompt completely disabling plymouth, as currently I have high
resolution glass console after kernel is reaching init. How I can
achieve that? TIA.
Please redirect questions to fedora-test list
What are the hardware requirements for running F9?
Thanks in advance.
Regards
/Bravo
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
hi there,
i did a little bit of research myself. The 6930p is actually Suse Certified.
That is of course good news.
This page might solve your driver problems. It doesnt tell how, but it says
what drivers will work with the hardware.
Suse Certified Elitebook 6930p [1]
i would be happy to
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 07:06:06AM -0400, Jim wrote:
Dave Feustel wrote:
When will Open Office 3 be available for F9?
Thanks.
Go here and get the RPM and install, it's very easy
http://download.openoffice.org/index.html
Thanks for the link!
I am a complete newbie with respect to rpms.
Rex Dieter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dave Feustel wrote:
When will Open Office 3 be available for F9?
When you upgrade to F10. :)
I can't speak on the ooo maintainer's intentions on F-9, but I'd venture
that based on history, such a large upgrade is unlikely to happen.
Right. Major
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 16:44 +0200, Bravismore Mumanyi wrote:
What are the hardware requirements for running F9?
A computer...
See: http://docs.fedoraproject.org/release-notes/f9/en_US/sn-ArchSpecific.html
for more specific information. The requirements vary, depending on what
sort of
I have compiled a new kernel and it cannot find the filesystem to boot.
How
do I specify in the kernel confg what disk to boot?
Steve
The obvious question is: did you make a new stanza for it in
your /boot/grub/grub.conf?
Yes the grub is all set. It does not seem to matter if I use a LVM or
When trying to install KDESDK in FC9 i get the error Missing dependency:
libexiv2.so.2 is needed by package libexiv2-0.1.6-4.fc9.i386 (installed)
The packes libexiv2 only installs libexiv2.so.3 and not libexiv2.so.2.
What can I do about this problem?
--
This is an email sent via The Fedora
Sean Bruno wrote:
Just a notice, if you are using Flash and install the recently released
Flash 10 for linux, you'll need to install curl-devel to get it to
acutally work.
For some reason the folks at adobe didn't add that as a dependency in
their RPM ... *sigh* ...
works fine here
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 10:50:17AM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 23:33:50 +0100,
Mikolaj Kucharski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to have plain text console all the way from grub to login
prompt completely disabling plymouth, as currently I have high
FC8-i386 To get sound in flashplayer, do you need to install
libflashsupport ??
Is there a definitive answer?
I have Fedora 10 (rawhide) with flash-plugin 10 (released last night).
Do I need libflashsupport?
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe:
Dave Feustel wrote:
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 07:06:06AM -0400, Jim wrote:
Dave Feustel wrote:
When will Open Office 3 be available for F9?
Thanks.
Go here and get the RPM and install, it's very easy
http://download.openoffice.org/index.html
Thanks for the link!
I am
Sean Bruno wrote:
Just a notice, if you are using Flash and install the recently released
Flash 10 for linux, you'll need to install curl-devel to get it to
acutally work.
Curl-devel includes development headers. It is very unlikely that any
package would require *-devel packages as a run time
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 11:04 AM, Sean Bruno [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Just a notice, if you are using Flash and install the recently released
Flash 10 for linux, you'll need to install curl-devel to get it to
acutally work.
For some reason the folks at adobe didn't add that as a dependency in
When will Open Office 3 be available for F9?
Thanks.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Jim wrote:
Dave Feustel wrote:
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 07:06:06AM -0400, Jim wrote:
Dave Feustel wrote:
When will Open Office 3 be available for F9?
Thanks.
Go here and get the RPM and install, it's very easy
http://download.openoffice.org/index.html
Thanks for the
On Wednesday 15 October 2008, Tim wrote:
On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 11:00 -0400, Kevin J. Cummings wrote:
Recently, one of my machines (running F8) has started beeping and I
can't figure out the reason why. After watching it this morning, I've
noticed that every 30 minutes it seems to beep 20
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 01:07:47PM -0400, Jim wrote:
Jim wrote:
I forgot to mention if you have any old Office apps installed, Remove them.
Do you use Yumex, a package Updater-Installer-Remover , for newbie it is
easy to see all the packages.
If you want insall it, as SU terminal type,
Dear Sir,
Iam using fedora 9. How to upgrade it to fedora10? Thanks for your wonderful
service.
Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to
http://messenger.yahoo.com/invite/--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe:
Il giorno mer, 15/10/2008 alle 10.31 +0100, Adam Deacon ha scritto:
There are SRPMS which seem to work well, take a look here for the back
story.
Ok. Thanks!
--
Dario Lesca [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe:
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 10:14:37AM -0600, Andrig T. Miller wrote:
[...]
The other options that I have tried include preupgrade, but that requires
GTK, and won't run in text mode (the only thing I have available on the
server).
If you can ssh in to your server and have X forwarding on, you
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 11:13 +0200, Dario Lesca wrote:
Why Fedora not have in our standard repo the open-vm-tools package?
http://open-vm-tools.sourceforge.net/
linux-0chi:~ # rpm -qi open-vm-tools-2008.04.14-21.1
Name: open-vm-toolsRelocations: (not relocatable)
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Wednesday 15 October 2008, Tim wrote:
On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 11:00 -0400, Kevin J. Cummings wrote:
Recently, one of my machines (running F8) has started beeping and I
can't figure out the reason why. After watching it this morning, I've
noticed that every 30
1 - 100 of 166 matches
Mail list logo
