Re: Updated EDU SIG Artwork Request

2009-01-21 Thread María Leandro
Hello again. This afternoon I had some ideas for the Artwork, and this two thing came up... only a sketch. http://tatica.fedorapeople.org/EduSig/thumb_wallpaper2.jpg http://tatica.fedorapeople.org/EduSig/thumb_wallpaper3.jpg 2009/1/18 María Leandro tat...@fedoraproject.org 2009/1/18

Re: Updated EDU SIG Artwork Request

2009-01-21 Thread Sebastian Dziallas
María Leandro wrote: Hello again. This afternoon I had some ideas for the Artwork, and this two thing came up... only a sketch. http://tatica.fedorapeople.org/EduSig/thumb_wallpaper2.jpg http://tatica.fedorapeople.org/EduSig/thumb_wallpaper3.jpg Hi and thanks for all your work! I do

Re: Updated EDU SIG Artwork Request

2009-01-21 Thread Nicu Buculei
Máirí­n Duffy wrote: María Leandro wrote: http://tatica.fedorapeople.org/EduSig/thumb_wallpaper2.jpg http://tatica.fedorapeople.org/EduSig/thumb_wallpaper3.jpg Me too, my favorite is wallpaper 3. Me too :p It is much stronger than the other A couple quick comments: - I would take the

Koji: ServerOffline

2009-01-21 Thread Jitesh Shah
Hi, I've been running a local koji instance at my workplace. It worked absolutely fine for a fortnight. But, since Monday, I am getting this error : ServerOffline: database outage for any CLI command that I try to execute. I initially suspected that it might be because koji cannot connect to the

Re: Koji: ServerOffline

2009-01-21 Thread Oliver Falk
Hi Jitesh! Jitesh Shah wrote: Hi, I've been running a local koji instance at my workplace. It worked absolutely fine for a fortnight. But, since Monday, I am getting this error : ServerOffline: database outage for any CLI command that I try to execute. I initially suspected that it might be

Re: Koji: ServerOffline

2009-01-21 Thread Jitesh Shah
Hi, Thank you for the quick reply Oliver. So, this morning I moved to a newer version of koji. Reconfigured everything (restarted apache after re-configuring koji-hub) and quite surprisingly, I still get the same error! So, if reinitialising both, postgresql and koji, doesn't do the trick, I

Re: Koji: ServerOffline

2009-01-21 Thread Oliver Falk
Jitesh Shah wrote: So, this morning I moved to a newer version of koji. Reconfigured everything (restarted apache after re-configuring koji-hub) and quite surprisingly, I still get the same error! So, if reinitialising both, postgresql and koji, doesn't do the trick, I wonder what might have

[Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) [renamed to cjkuni-fonts]

2009-01-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 --- Comment #45 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-01-21 03:28:29 EDT ---

Re: rpms/mgopen-fonts/devel mgopen-fonts.spec,1.11,1.12

2009-01-21 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le Mer 21 janvier 2009 11:32, Sarantis Paskalis a écrit : Author: sarantis Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/mgopen-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv25641 Modified Files: mgopen-fonts.spec Log Message: - Fix typo in provides: fontpackages-filesystem -

rpms/tetex-font-cm-lgc/devel .cvsignore,1.4,NONE

2009-01-21 Thread Sarantis Paskalis
Author: sarantis Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/tetex-font-cm-lgc/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv1395 Removed Files: .cvsignore Log Message: --- .cvsignore DELETED --- ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list

rpms/mgopen-fonts/devel mgopen-fonts.spec,1.11,1.12

2009-01-21 Thread Sarantis Paskalis
Author: sarantis Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/mgopen-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv25641 Modified Files: mgopen-fonts.spec Log Message: - Fix typo in provides: fontpackages-filesystem - Add provides mgopen-fonts to the -compat subpackage. Index:

rpms/mgopen-fonts/devel mgopen-fonts.spec,1.12,1.13

2009-01-21 Thread Sarantis Paskalis
Author: sarantis Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/mgopen-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv9209 Modified Files: mgopen-fonts.spec Log Message: Drop provides mgopen-fonts for the -compat subpackage Index: mgopen-fonts.spec

[Bug 480928] New: Fontconfig makes GStreamer plugin crash

2009-01-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Fontconfig makes GStreamer plugin crash https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480928 Summary: Fontconfig makes GStreamer plugin crash Product:

[Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11

2009-01-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477461, which changed state. Bug 477461 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

[Bug 477461] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-01-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477461 Sarantis Paskalis paska...@di.uoa.gr changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 477416] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-01-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477416 --- Comment #14 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2009-01-21 11:09:56 EDT --- Whoops, broken deps. Fixed:

[Bug 480685] fontforge multilib conflict

2009-01-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480685 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 480685] fontforge multilib conflict

2009-01-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480685 --- Comment #2 from Philippe Troin p...@fifi.org 2009-01-21 13:56:46 EDT --- Well, why are python files under /usr/share?

[Bug 478662] Review Request: dustin-dustismo-fonts - font with serif and sans-serif versions

2009-01-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478662 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 477416] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-01-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477416 --- Comment #15 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-21 17:58:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14)

[Bug 477373] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-01-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477373 --- Comment #13 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-21 18:29:25 EDT --- Some comments on

[Bug 480774] Fontconfig cache files in bogus ~/${localstatedir}

2009-01-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480774 Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts

2009-01-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 --- Comment #33 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-01-21 19:40:47 EDT --- Ankur, what is your FAS account name?

[Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts

2009-01-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 --- Comment #32 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-01-21 19:36:58 EDT --- According to this review Ankur needs a

[Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts

2009-01-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 --- Comment #34 from Ankur Sinha ankursi...@fedoraproject.org 2009-01-21 21:32:05 EDT --- hi, It's

[Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) [renamed to cjkuni-fonts]

2009-01-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 --- Comment #46 from Caius kaio Chance ccha...@redhat.com 2009-01-21 21:48:35 EDT ---

rpms/cjkunifonts/devel CIDFnmap.zh_CN, 1.1, NONE CIDFnmap.zh_TW, 1.1, NONE FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN, 1.1, NONE FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW, 1.1, NONE Makefile, 1.1, NONE cidfmap.zh_CN, 1.1, NONE cidfmap.zh_TW, 1.1, NO

2009-01-21 Thread Caius Chance
Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv30246 Removed Files: CIDFnmap.zh_CN CIDFnmap.zh_TW FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW Makefile cidfmap.zh_CN cidfmap.zh_TW cjkunifonts-0.2.20080216.1-2.patch

rpms/cjkunifonts/devel dead.package,NONE,1.1

2009-01-21 Thread Caius Chance
Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv30412 Added Files: dead.package Log Message: dead.package indicator for package rename --- NEW FILE dead.package --- renamed to cjkuni-fonts

[Bug 477332] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-01-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477332 --- Comment #9 from Caius kaio Chance ccha...@redhat.com 2009-01-22 01:32:20 EDT ---

Broken dependencies: tetex-font-kerkis

2009-01-21 Thread buildsys
tetex-font-kerkis has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: tetex-font-kerkis-2.0-16.fc11.noarch requires kerkis-fonts = 0:2.0-16.fc11 On x86_64: tetex-font-kerkis-2.0-16.fc11.noarch requires kerkis-fonts = 0:2.0-16.fc11 On i386:

Re: rpms/mgopen-fonts/devel mgopen-fonts.spec,1.11,1.12

2009-01-21 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le Mer 21 janvier 2009 11:32, Sarantis Paskalis a écrit : Author: sarantis Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/mgopen-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv25641 Modified Files: mgopen-fonts.spec Log Message: - Fix typo in provides: fontpackages-filesystem -

Re: rpms/mgopen-fonts/devel mgopen-fonts.spec,1.11,1.12

2009-01-21 Thread Sarantis Paskalis
Resending to the list as well. On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 11:47:38AM +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: Le Mer 21 janvier 2009 11:32, Sarantis Paskalis a écrit : Author: sarantis Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/mgopen-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv25641

Re: Fedora Security Policy

2009-01-21 Thread Matthew ...
Hiya, There's subtle differences between both of the forward statements though. net.ipv4.ip_forward = 0 is referring to allowing IP traffic to forward between two networks, be it virtual or physical. The IP Tables forwarding rules are more for forwarding traffic into different IP tables chains

FYI: New packagedb depends on python-bugzilla snapshot

2009-01-21 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
Just a heads up. I've updated the app servers with a new version of the packagedb today. This reflects the most recent code from the bzr repository. It requires a snapshot package of python-bugzilla in order to do checking of bugzilla email accounts. I've added both

Re: Disk IO issues

2009-01-21 Thread Ray Van Dolson
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:55:35AM -0600, Mike McGrath wrote: On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, Jesse Keating wrote: On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 10:02 -0600, Mike McGrath wrote: on the netapp. Er, this is on nfs1 right, not the netapp? My mistake, correct. All this is on nfs1 which has directly

Re: Switching Fedora to pae kernel by default?

2009-01-21 Thread Christopher Brown
2009/1/20 Kyle McMartin k...@infradead.org: On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:06:17AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: Eric Paris wrote: I've got a P3 (Coppermine) with 256M memory running F10. My significant other took it with her to Antarctica (Well F9 has been to Antarctica but it'll be F10 in

Re: Switching Fedora to pae kernel by default?

2009-01-21 Thread Avi Kivity
Christopher Brown wrote: May I point out that those that care enough to want PAE usually know how to go about getting it enabled whereas those that have install failure because they're running non-PAE hardware probably wont know how to go about getting it disabled. You mean, ordinary users

Re: Switching Fedora to pae kernel by default?

2009-01-21 Thread Josh Boyer
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 09:15:24AM +, Christopher Brown wrote: The original argument that many machines have 4GB of memory is simply false. Manufacturers aren't shipping anything more than 2GB on desktops at most unless you have oodles of money to throw at a Alienware box or something. Sure,

Re: Switching Fedora to pae kernel by default?

2009-01-21 Thread Josh Boyer
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 11:41:04AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: Servers should use x86_64 anyway. But I strongly disagree about No they shouldn't. They should use PowerPC. Then this whole stupid argument wouldn't even matter. /me stops antagonizing people now. josh

Re: Switching Fedora to pae kernel by default?

2009-01-21 Thread Jeremy Katz
On Wednesday, January 21 2009, Kyle McMartin said: On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 09:15:24AM +, Christopher Brown wrote: The fall-out from this going onto the livecd makes me shudder. Jesse explained this to me, To clarify: the anaconda installer is i586, and all 3 kernel flavours are

F10 EDAC Errors on intel based server

2009-01-21 Thread Ted Sume Nzuonkwelle
Hi, Just did a new install of Fedora 10 on an 8 core intel server (2 quad cores) and i got the following messages during first boot. They are continuosly being printed to the terminal just about every second. I originally had an install of Fedora 9 on this server and did not see any such

[PATCH] kernel: only build kernel-headers on ARM

2009-01-21 Thread Kedar Sovani
Since kernels for different ARM CPUs differ wildly, and since embedded folks tend to provide their own kernels, this patch makes the Fedora kernel package only build kernel-headers when built for ARM. Please consider for inclusion. Signed-off-by: Lennert Buytenhek buyt...@marvell.com

Re: F10 EDAC Errors on intel based server

2009-01-21 Thread Oliver Falk
Ted Sume Nzuonkwelle wrote: Hi, Just did a new install of Fedora 10 on an 8 core intel server (2 quad cores) and i got the following messages during first boot. They are continuosly being printed to the terminal just about every second. I originally had an install of Fedora 9 on this server

Re: updateing ARGHH.

2009-01-21 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Tue, 20 Jan 2009 16:54:20 -0700, Craig wrote: For your question, it's not always clear where the packages came from since there's no official way to do that (not that there haven't been proposals for that). Not true. There have been proposals, such as continueing to let a project's package

Re: updateing ARGHH.

2009-01-21 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Tue, 20 Jan 2009 17:50:33 -0700, Craig wrote: [mich...@merlin ~]$ yum repolist Loaded plugins: protectbase, refresh-packagekit if protectbase is stopping it. I'm not a user of protectbase and I somewhat think that plugins such as protectbase cause problems that users aren't capable of

Re: updateing ARGHH

2009-01-21 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Tue, 20 Jan 2009 15:31:52 -0500, R. wrote: I think I have had actually had to use --force about twice in four years, in some circumstance where part of a package was messed up but the system didn't' know that. That doesn't sound right. The RPM database certainly knows about packages

RE: Package Manager Denies Permission to Install

2009-01-21 Thread Richard Hughes
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 13:21 -0500, R. G. Newbury wrote: It does not stop me from doing what I want to do. It just makes it more difficult and time-consuming. It does not actually enhance security in any meaningful way. And it disrespects me by implying that I effectively do not have the

Re: Zoneminder broken after F8 - F10 upgrade

2009-01-21 Thread Kevin Kofler
Neil Bird wrote: Actually, I was more concerned by the crashes, but I took your advice and blatted the SQL d/b, set it up again, and it's all happy now, thanks. Not sure what happened, though. New version of MySQL requiring manual migration, most likely. Seems quite common in the database

Re: eth0 not working - fine in Windows

2009-01-21 Thread Chris
2009/1/20 Mikkel L. Ellertson mik...@infinity-ltd.com: You may want to use ethtool to check the status of the NIC. It sounds like the link detect is not working. I can not remember off hand how to disable link-detect, but I know there used to be a way to turn it off. (The system will not

RE: Package Manager Denies Permission to Install

2009-01-21 Thread Kevin Kofler
Richard Hughes wrote: I don't think you need to patch gnome-packagekit, just fixing PolicyKit would do it. You'll still get the nag-dialog, but that's still part of the design. You mean the PolicyKit password dialog? Indeed, the patch does not give out blanket permissions to root, it only

Re: Package Manager Denies Permission to Install

2009-01-21 Thread Richard Hughes
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 13:47 -0500, R. G. Newbury wrote: And Dick. My name is Richard. You are not being helpful. Please stop being a dickhead. I am a big boy. Then please read the documentation, rather than insulting me on mailing lists. You're not exactly showing yourself to be an adult

Re: Package Manager Denies Permission to Install

2009-01-21 Thread Kevin Kofler
Kam Leo wrote: It's the person in front of the keyboard/clicking mouse that makes the difference. Throwing in a requirement to log in as a user just delays the inevitable. The difference is malicious software running under your user account. I can't really judge how serious a threat it is,

RE: Package Manager Denies Permission to Install

2009-01-21 Thread Richard Hughes
On Wed, 2009-01-21 at 10:52 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: I'm sure you (Richard) know all this, but other readers might not, so I'm saving you the work of replying. ;-) ) Thanks! :-) Richard. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe:

Re: Package Manager Denies Permission to Install

2009-01-21 Thread Richard Hughes
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 09:53 -0800, Kam Leo wrote: Well, if you can not trust a GUI then logging in as a user won't help either. Once that user invokes superuser powers there is no difference between him/her and root. Incorrect. If the dialog stays as the user process (non-root) it can

Re: Printers

2009-01-21 Thread Kevin Kofler
Michael Comperchio wrote: What would be the best choice in inexpensive printers for use with Fedora? I'm relatively new to F10, though I've used Linux before. I'm hoping to never have to boot to the windoze side again. But printing and the inability to sync up with my Palm Lifedrive are the

Re: Ideal Swap Partition Size

2009-01-21 Thread Tim
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 20:06 -0800, Gordon Messmer wrote: maybe based on the idea that swapping will cause the system to behave badly It seems strange to think that a system will swap just because there's swap space available. Surely, it's only going to swap when it needs to, and you'd be

RE: Package Manager Denies Permission to Install

2009-01-21 Thread Kevin Kofler
Richard Hughes wrote: Please read http://www.gtk.org/setuid.html The GTK developers say do not run GUI code as root. They are the ones who write the GUI code. As for gnome-packagekit, _I_ wrote the code. That stuff affects setuid, i.e. where you're giving out blanket permission to *anyone*

Re: ATT's DSL Lite for Linux

2009-01-21 Thread Tim
On Wed, 2009-01-21 at 04:14 +, g wrote: only thing i do not like about wireless is that i have yet to find a way to do a band scan. it is selected to a fix frequency in configuration so there is no easy way to see what my neighbors are up to. ;o) You want to look for software to play with

Re: Fedora Core 6 updates ?

2009-01-21 Thread Rahul Tidke
- Original Message - From: Reg Clemens To: fedora-list@redhat.com Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 3:29 AM Subject: Fedora Core 6 updates ? Does anyone know of a set of Fedora Core 6 updates (the directory) that is still on the Web??? I know i found such a site last summer but I no

Latest Fedora (F10) release/build with all updates/bug fixes

2009-01-21 Thread Rahul Tidke
Hello, Where can I download latest fedora 10 release with all the updates and bug fixes applied till date? Is such latest release maintained by fedora project. Few days back I was trying to install F10 on IBM server with Adaptec SCSI controller card, soon after selecting the language and

Re: VMware server 2.0, /usr/src/linux?

2009-01-21 Thread iarly selbir
try to set the permissions below # chown root.root /boot/System.map-2.6.27.9-159.fc10.x86_64 # chmod 644 /boot/System.map-2.6.27.9-159.fc10.x86_64 Regards, - - iarly selbir ( ski0s ) :wq! On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 12:15 AM, Jamie Bohr jamieb...@gmail.com wrote: No go, # package-cleanup

RE: Package Manager Denies Permission to Install

2009-01-21 Thread Richard Hughes
On Wed, 2009-01-21 at 11:36 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: That stuff affects setuid, i.e. where you're giving out blanket permission to *anyone* to run code as root. Right. What we're talking about in this thread is somebody who knows the root password logging in as root on their own machine

Re: Printers

2009-01-21 Thread Noel James Bridge
On Wed, 2009-01-21 at 11:19 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: I'd recommend HP, because the CUPS drivers (HPLIP) are Free Software, written by HP themselves and included in Fedora (so they work out of the box). ... One drawback though is that HP is not the cheapest option out there (especially if

dhcp and NetworkManager

2009-01-21 Thread Craig White
I am presuming that what I am seeing is a result of using NetworkManager because I have never seen this before. Each restart, both the wired and wireless adaptors on my new Acer Aspire One get a different IP address from DHCP. My previous experiences with 'network' is that the same

Re: Printers

2009-01-21 Thread Anne Wilson
On Wednesday 21 January 2009 10:19:20 Kevin Kofler wrote: One drawback though is that HP is not the cheapest option out there (especially if you count the ink/toner prices - for example, HP inkjets have the print heads on the cartridge, which means they're less susceptible to defects, but

Re: Printers

2009-01-21 Thread Craig White
On Wed, 2009-01-21 at 12:43 +, Noel James Bridge wrote: On Wed, 2009-01-21 at 11:19 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: I'd recommend HP, because the CUPS drivers (HPLIP) are Free Software, written by HP themselves and included in Fedora (so they work out of the box). ... One drawback

Fedora 10, xmodmap and xinitrc

2009-01-21 Thread Craig White
Again on Acer Aspire One Looking at this page from Arch Linux page on Acer Aspire One... http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Acer_Aspire_One#Additional_function_keys which suggests that I create mappings for some of the function keys so they do things like control volume, etc. and then to add a

Re: ATT's DSL Lite for Linux

2009-01-21 Thread g
Tim wrote: You want to look for software to play with the wireless interface on your computer, not the router, so *it* scans to see what's around. of this i am aware, and if i had a wireless card, i would use it for scans. i inherited an smc smcwpci-g, which is atheros based, but i am too

Re: ATT's DSL Lite for Linux

2009-01-21 Thread Dave Ihnat
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 09:26:33PM -0600, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote: We did not have the option of picking the login name. On top of that, everything goes through Yahoo. I will point out that ATT only goes through Yahoo for domestic accounts. If you really don't like Yahoo, and really want to

Re: ATT's DSL Lite for Linux

2009-01-21 Thread Dave Ihnat
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 08:47:08PM +1030, Tim wrote: My access point is supposed to have an auto scanning feature to pick the best free channel. It doesn't, it picks the worst... Frankly, I don't like any of the DSL modem/firewall/wireless units. Remember the old Unix mantra--do one thing, do

Re: ATT's DSL Lite for Linux

2009-01-21 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 18:52:36 -0600, Mikkel L. Ellertson mik...@infinity-ltd.com wrote: In my case, with SBC, I had to run the Windows program to get them. It may depend on what the local phone company was before it was gobbled up by ATT. You've got that backwards. SBC gobbled up ATT.

Re: ATT's DSL Lite for Linux

2009-01-21 Thread Aaron Konstam
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 21:05 +, dvbc...@juno.com wrote: Is there any low cost High Speed Internet service for Linux? ATT is offering their DSL Lite for 14.95 (10/month for a year), but for Windows 2000, AT, or Vista only. Could Wine fool ATT in to thinking it is a Windows 2000?

Re: Will Fedora 9 get 2.6.28?

2009-01-21 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 18:16:56 -0500, Kevin J. Cummings cummi...@kjchome.homeip.net wrote: That's amusing because rawhide has kernel-2.6.29-0.43.rc2.git1.fc11 Are we skipping 2.6.28 entirely for 2.6.29? I'm waiting for gspca support for my ALi m5602 webcam which is supposed to be in

Re: ATT's DSL Lite for Linux

2009-01-21 Thread g
Bruno Wolff III wrote: You've got that backwards. SBC gobbled up ATT. However SBC's brand was so tarnished they kept the ATT brand. lshic. they should have started a new name, 'sobc'. -- peace out. tc,hago. g . in a free world without fences, who needs gates. ** help microsoft stamp

Re: Latest Fedora (F10) release/build with all updates/bug fixes

2009-01-21 Thread g
Rahul Tidke wrote: Where can I download latest fedora 10 release with all the updates and bug http://spins.fedoraproject.org/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Spins/10 -- peace out. tc,hago. g . in a free world without fences, who needs gates. ** help microsoft stamp out piracy -

Re: Has anyone else's mouse/keyboard gone kind of wonky in recent days ?

2009-01-21 Thread Linuxguy123
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 21:34 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 9:23 PM, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu m3fr...@thesandhufamily.ca wrote: On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 18:33 -0700, Linuxguy123 wrote: Is anyone else experiencing this behavior ? Any ideas why I would be ? There's a bug

Re: Has anyone else's mouse/keyboard gone kind of wonky in recent days ?

2009-01-21 Thread Linuxguy123
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 22:23 -0500, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote: On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 18:33 -0700, Linuxguy123 wrote: Is anyone else experiencing this behavior ? Any ideas why I would be ? There's a bug somewhere. I've been having the same problem with my Logitech wireless mouse ever since

Re: Printers

2009-01-21 Thread Gene Heskett
On Wednesday 21 January 2009, Craig White wrote: On Wed, 2009-01-21 at 12:43 +, Noel James Bridge wrote: On Wed, 2009-01-21 at 11:19 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: I'd recommend HP, because the CUPS drivers (HPLIP) are Free Software, written by HP themselves and included in Fedora (so they

Re: Ideal Swap Partition Size

2009-01-21 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 20:06 -0800, Gordon Messmer wrote: Rick Stevens wrote: Reserving a swap area and its size is rather dependent on what the machine is doing. We have database servers that, on occasion, get hammered and revert to using swap for a brief time. We use a 2X swap size

Re: Ideal Swap Partition Size

2009-01-21 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Wed, 2009-01-21 at 20:55 +1030, Tim wrote: On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 20:06 -0800, Gordon Messmer wrote: maybe based on the idea that swapping will cause the system to behave badly It seems strange to think that a system will swap just because there's swap space available. Surely, it's

Re: Has anyone else's mouse/keyboard gone kind of wonky in recent days ?

2009-01-21 Thread Tom Horsley
On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 07:54:11 -0700 Linuxguy123 wrote: An additional annoyance we've both noticed on all 3 of our F10 computers is in Firefox about 20% of the time a right mouse button click on any web page element will get automatically and randomly interpreted as one of the right click

Re: Fedora 10, xmodmap and xinitrc

2009-01-21 Thread Tom Horsley
On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 06:21:35 -0700 Craig White wrote: What's the suggested method for adding xmodmap entries? There is already an /etc/X11/Xmodmap file which does seem to get fed to xmodmap at startup (at least my mouse button swaps I added in there do seem to take effect). -- fedora-list

Re: Latest Fedora (F10) release/build with all updates/bug fixes

2009-01-21 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 16:59:55 +0530, Rahul Tidke ra...@excelize.com wrote: Hello, Where can I download latest fedora 10 release with all the updates and bug fixes applied till date? Is such latest release maintained by fedora project. Few days back I was trying to install F10 on IBM

Re: Latest Fedora (F10) release/build with all updates/bug fixes

2009-01-21 Thread Paul W. Frields
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 09:25:30AM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 16:59:55 +0530, Rahul Tidke ra...@excelize.com wrote: Hello, Where can I download latest fedora 10 release with all the updates and bug fixes applied till date? Is such latest release maintained by

Re: Fedora 10, xmodmap and xinitrc

2009-01-21 Thread Craig White
On Wed, 2009-01-21 at 10:18 -0500, Tom Horsley wrote: On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 06:21:35 -0700 Craig White wrote: What's the suggested method for adding xmodmap entries? There is already an /etc/X11/Xmodmap file which does seem to get fed to xmodmap at startup (at least my mouse button swaps

Re: Fedora 10, xmodmap and xinitrc

2009-01-21 Thread Steven W. Orr
On Wednesday, Jan 21st 2009 at 08:21 -, quoth Craig White: =Again on Acer Aspire One = =Looking at this page from Arch Linux page on Acer Aspire One... = =http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Acer_Aspire_One#Additional_function_keys = =which suggests that I create mappings for some of the

Re: Printers

2009-01-21 Thread Tim
On Wed, 2009-01-21 at 12:41 +, Anne Wilson wrote: It's worth bearing in mind, too, that the 6 cartridge models are cheaper to run that the 2-3 cartridge ones, purely because you only replace a colour as it runs out, rather than a multi-colour cartridge. That depends on the costs. I had an

Re: Announcing the Fedora Geo Spin

2009-01-21 Thread Beartooth
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 18:18:16 -0500, Yaakov Nemoy wrote: [...] Let's begin with an apology, shall we? Sorry for cross posting, but this does concern people on multiple mailing lists. I would like to announce the formation of a Fedora Geo Spin with tools for integration into Open

Re: Ideal Swap Partition Size

2009-01-21 Thread Tim
Tim: It seems strange to think that a system will swap just because there's swap space available. Surely, it's only going to swap when it needs to, and you'd be faced with operating and swapping, or being unable to swap and unable to operate once you reach that stage. Patrick O'Callaghan:

Re: ATT's DSL Lite for Linux

2009-01-21 Thread Tim
Tim: My access point is supposed to have an auto scanning feature to pick the best free channel. It doesn't, it picks the worst... g: what are you using? A Dlink DIR-300. I'm none-too-impressed with it, for more than just that reason. -- [...@localhost ~]$ uname -r 2.6.27.9-73.fc9.i686

Re: ATT's DSL Lite for Linux

2009-01-21 Thread Tim
Tim: My access point is supposed to have an auto scanning feature to pick the best free channel. It doesn't, it picks the worst... Dave Ihnat: Frankly, I don't like any of the DSL modem/firewall/wireless units. Remember the old Unix mantra--do one thing, do it well. Me either. My DSL modem

Re: Printers

2009-01-21 Thread Steve
Tim ignored_mail...@yahoo.com.au wrote: On Wed, 2009-01-21 at 09:57 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: I put in a request for amanda to use the colors too, and was told patches welcome which is as it should be, but I have NDI how to tell a printer to print this line in black, that one in

Re: Fedora 10, xmodmap and xinitrc

2009-01-21 Thread Craig White
On Wed, 2009-01-21 at 11:20 -0500, Steven W. Orr wrote: On Wednesday, Jan 21st 2009 at 08:21 -, quoth Craig White: =Again on Acer Aspire One = =Looking at this page from Arch Linux page on Acer Aspire One... =

xorg.conf

2009-01-21 Thread James Harrison
Hello, I am new to the list (I joined today). Can someone tell me why Fedora 10 does not create an /etc/X11/xorg.conf as standard? Thanks James Harrison -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines:

Re: Announcing the Fedora Geo Spin

2009-01-21 Thread Yaakov Nemoy
2009/1/21 Beartooth bearto...@swva.net: On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 18:18:16 -0500, Yaakov Nemoy wrote: I would like to announce the formation of a Fedora Geo Spin with tools for integration into Open Street Map. For more information, please see the following link:

Re: ATT's DSL Lite for Linux

2009-01-21 Thread Dave Ihnat
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 03:12:10AM +1030, Tim wrote: Me either. My DSL modem is a modem/router. I prefer that to having a plethora of boxes, and I'd rather have it log on, than have to have some other device authenticate and then route/switch. This is a matter of personal preference,

Re: xorg.conf

2009-01-21 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 16:49:18 +, James Harrison jamesaharriso...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: Hello, I am new to the list (I joined today). Can someone tell me why Fedora 10 does not create an /etc/X11/xorg.conf as standard? Because in theory it doesn't need to. -- fedora-list mailing

Re: How to update from rpm 4.4 to rpm 5.0

2009-01-21 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Sorry for the late reply... got busy. ;( On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 19:38:09 -0800 JD jd1...@gmail.com wrote: I found the 5.0 version of rpm at: ftp://ftp.pbone.net/mirror/dries.studentenweb.org/apt/fedora.risky/fc7/x86_64/RPMS.dries/rpm-5.0-0.2.0.fc7.rf.x86_64.rpm ...snip... Personally I would

Re: xorg.conf

2009-01-21 Thread Craig White
On Wed, 2009-01-21 at 16:49 +, James Harrison wrote: Hello, I am new to the list (I joined today). Can someone tell me why Fedora 10 does not create an /etc/X11/xorg.conf as standard? I think that the general concept is: - The build on the fly works for most hardware - The build

Re: xorg.conf

2009-01-21 Thread Marcelo Magno T. Sales
Em Qua 21 Jan 2009, James Harrison escreveu: Hello, I am new to the list (I joined today). Can someone tell me why Fedora 10 does not create an /etc/X11/xorg.conf as standard? Because the current version of xorg is supposed to detect automatically the hardware and get all the necessary

  1   2   >