On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 21:49 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sat, 2009-06-13 at 05:43 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
and no, glxgears is not a benchmark!
Indeed, glxgears really sucks as as a benchmark, Phoronix's benchmark suite
(as imperfect as it is) is definitely more useful.
I
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Gilboa Davaragilb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 21:49 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sat, 2009-06-13 at 05:43 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
and no, glxgears is not a benchmark!
Indeed, glxgears really sucks as as a benchmark, Phoronix's
On Friday 12 June 2009 09:02:39 am Daniel Lezcano wrote:
As I only need the CAP_SYS_BOOT, I will define it manually in the source
code and will remove the include, that's ugly but anyway... :/
Alternatelyas of today, libcap-ng is now in Fedora. It has a far simpler
API and you should be
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 06:05:52AM +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote:
Up until 30 minutes ago, I was unaware of the fact that they use
test-suite compiled binaries.
Though I'd imagine that in Phoronix' view, having (far) different
compile options in the distribution supplied binaries might generate
(Reposting to f-d-l from my blog post last night.
http://domsch.com/blog/?p=85 includes a couple nice graphs to help
illustrate.)
CDs are Dead. Long live CDs.
I was running some stats on the Fedora 11 release, and an interesting
thing caught my eye. Very few people are downloading the six (or in
On Sat, 2009-06-13 at 12:20 +0200, drago01 wrote:
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Gilboa Davaragilb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 21:49 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sat, 2009-06-13 at 05:43 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
and no, glxgears is not a benchmark!
Indeed,
On Sat, 2009-06-13 at 08:46 -0500, Matt Domsch wrote:
Your thoughts?
If we don't do split CDs, Fedora Unity is likely to do them. If we
don't produce and test split media as part of our beta/release cycle,
we'll likely not find bugs with their usage until after the release is
made and Fedora
On Sat, 2009-06-13 at 09:34 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Matt Domsch matt_dom...@dell.com said:
CDs had their place, back when DVD readers weren't commonplace, and
before we had LiveCD/LiveUSB medias. Now, DVDs are fairly common, the
LiveCDs work great for a lot of installs,
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 07:04:12PM +0300, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
On Sat, 2009-06-13 at 09:34 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Matt Domsch matt_dom...@dell.com said:
CDs had their place, back when DVD readers weren't commonplace, and
before we had LiveCD/LiveUSB medias. Now, DVDs
Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com writes:
On Sat, 2009-06-13 at 08:46 -0500, Matt Domsch wrote:
Your thoughts?
If we don't do split CDs, Fedora Unity is likely to do them.
Are we sure about that? The reasons not to bother would be just as
strong for Unity, no?
If we
don't produce and test
Can anyone with F11 installed look at what is in their /etc/fedora-release
and tell me which one you have, and how you installed? Also what version
of fedora-release you have.
$ cat /etc/fedora-release
Fedora release 11 (Leonidas)
Installed this morning using x86_64 DVD.
$ rpm -q
- Tom Lane t...@redhat.com wrote:
Are we sure about that? The reasons not to bother would be just as
strong for Unity, no?
I agree with that chain of reasoning, but am not convinced of the
starting premise.
OK lets remove any doubt, if Fedora Project does not produce them Fedora
On Sat, 2009-06-13 at 11:12 -0500, Matt Domsch wrote:
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 07:04:12PM +0300, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
Hmm, I'd want netboot.img back, since I normally use a USB stick to
start the network install (OK, there is the possibility of using
livecd-iso-to-disk, but that's a lot more
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 12:45 PM, Robert 'Bob'
Jensenb...@fedoraunity.org wrote:
OK lets remove any doubt, if Fedora Project does not produce them Fedora
Unity will if at all possible. The last time the CD media was dropped the
crys and screams of terror from the third world that have never
the user's still able to install using netboot.iso.
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Robert 'Bob' Jensenb...@fedoraunity.org
wrote:
- Tom Lane t...@redhat.com wrote:
Are we sure about that? The reasons not to bother would be just as
strong for Unity, no?
I agree with that chain of
Hi, as per the process at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers,
does anybody know how to contact Axel Thimm? We've been pinging him at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484855 for over two weeks
now, although the bug has sat there for much longer
Once upon a time, Robert Marcano rob...@marcanoonline.com said:
I think you are right about x86_64 probably is going to have a DVD
Rom, I only have needed the CDs when installing i386 servers isolated
from the internet.
Remember, the minimum CPU for 32-bit x86 today is i586 (Pentium), and
IIRC
- Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net wrote:
Remember, the minimum CPU for 32-bit x86 today is i586 (Pentium), and
IIRC there was discussion about rebuilding for i686 (Pentium Pro).
If we really want to decrease the mirror foot print how about we off load some
of the 640MB+ data and docs
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 1:34 PM, Chris Adamscmad...@hiwaay.net wrote:
Remember, the minimum CPU for 32-bit x86 today is i586 (Pentium), and
IIRC there was discussion about rebuilding for i686 (Pentium Pro).
You are technically right , but I am talking about the Fedora release
Tag (that was
- Itamar Reis Peixoto ita...@ispbrasil.com.br wrote:
the user's still able to install using netboot.iso.
Yeah some guy in a mud hut with no DSL only a 56k modem, Power 4 hours a day...
NetInst FAIL.
I remember Seth talking a while back about yum's performance. As I remember,
sure
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 02:38:28PM -0300, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote:
that's true.
I am also have a bug reported for nx package waiting for a long time.
There are new nx packages in updates-testing since a week now. Which
bug are you referring to?
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Ricky
He recently responded, though he seems to be not so active now:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474017
Milos
On 13.6.2009 19:38, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote:
that's true.
I am also have a bug reported for nx package waiting for a long time.
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Ricky
On 13/06/09 19:22, Robert 'Bob' Jensen wrote:
- Itamar Reis Peixotoita...@ispbrasil.com.br wrote:
the user's still able to install using netboot.iso.
Yeah some guy in a mud hut with no DSL only a 56k modem, Power 4 hours a day...
NetInst FAIL.
Just curious.
But if a user has
On 2009-06-13 09:24:12 PM, Axel Thimm wrote:
It's correct that the bug is open a while, but technically your first
ping as on 2009-06-05 00:05:35 EDT, that's hardly two weeks.
I was waiting for 1.15.0 (out three days ago) to check whether the
patch is still neccessary. But it looks like it
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 2:02 PM, Frank Murphyfrankl...@gmail.com wrote:
Just curious.
But if a user has bandwidth problems,
how is\are mutiple CD's going to help,
or is it purely on hardware grounds, no dvd-rom.
No/slow internet is commonly followed by old hardware, it is a common
- Robert Marcano rob...@marcanoonline.com wrote:
No/slow internet is commonly followed by old hardware, it is a common
combination in my country. Recently on Fedora Venezuela mailing list
we were discussing creating a special respin just because of the
bandwidth problem here
These are
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 5:46 AM, Matt Domschmatt_dom...@dell.com wrote:
Your thoughts?
Is there a geographic regional bias in the data?
1) Are all countries/regions downloading the split cds at less than 5%
of the download activity for the given country region?
2) Is there a geographical
drago01 wrote:
There are alot of open source games[1} that are useable to for
benchmarking. glxgears is NOT a benchmark. If you don't have anything but
glxgears than you have NO benchmark.
+1
[1]: openarena, nexuiz, ...
Also etracer, torcs etc. Basically everything 3D with an FPS display
- Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote:
Just curious.
But if a user has bandwidth problems,
how is\are mutiple CD's going to help,
or is it purely on hardware grounds, no dvd-rom.
Does no one remember what happened last time the CD ball was dropped? Lets not
repeat history just
Once upon a time, Robert 'Bob' Jensen b...@fedoraunity.org said:
I remember Seth talking a while back about yum's performance. As I remember,
sure yum worked fine on his computers but try it on the OLPC. He then
understood what the bugs and complaints were about.
Uh, OLPC doesn't have a CD
Gilboa Davara wrote:
I subscribed to Phoronix' RSS feed and at least 1/3-1/2 of their news
stories are on OSS driver (mostly Intel and ATI) driver development -
far more than any other OSS new site. [1]
Too bad their hardware benchmarks do not match the development news, and too
bad they also
Jesse Keating wrote:
If we don't do split CDs, Fedora Unity is likely to do them. If we
don't produce and test split media as part of our beta/release cycle,
we'll likely not find bugs with their usage until after the release is
made and Fedora Unity attempts to make them. As long as
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 10:53 AM, Robert 'Bob'
Jensenb...@fedoraunity.org wrote:
Does no one remember what happened last time the CD ball was dropped? Lets
not repeat history just for fun. We have been down this road before, it
was ugly and only lasted one release. Torrent tracker numbers BTW
Robert 'Bob' Jensen wrote:
Yeah some guy in a mud hut with no DSL only a 56k modem, Power 4 hours a
day... NetInst FAIL.
We can't support everything. I'm sure there are some people still using a
486, we already don't support them anymore.
A reasonably fast Internet connection is basically
Hello everbody,
can somebody please explain me, why we've multilib wrappers for packages
at non-multilib architectures such as arm, alpha, ia64 and sh?
- http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/devel/gmp/gmp-mparam.h?view=co
-
There will be an outage starting at 2009-06-15 23:00 UTC, which will last
approximately 1.5 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2009-06-15 23:00 UTC'
Affected Services:
Buildsystem
Websites
Once upon a time, Robert Scheck rob...@fedoraproject.org said:
can somebody please explain me, why we've multilib wrappers for packages
at non-multilib architectures such as arm, alpha, ia64 and sh?
multiarch != multilib
Just for starters, long before x86_64 came into the picture, we had
i386,
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 9:51 PM, Gilboa Davaragilb...@gmail.com wrote:
I apologize in advance, for the overly harsh language. (Not specifically
directed at you, Kevin).
I don't believe that you're being overly harsh. I've been surprised
in general in the amount of whining that I've been
On Sat, 13 Jun 2009, Chris Adams wrote:
Just for starters, long before x86_64 came into the picture, we had
i386, i486, i586, and i686. On Alpha, you have (IIRC) ev4, ev5, ev6,
ev67, etc.
You have seen, that these wrappers treat alpha as alpha and %{ix86} as i386
and that's it?! So your
On Sat, 13 Jun 2009, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Probably because it's less maintenance work in the specfile to just always
add the wrapper. (On the other hand, it means extra work (adding an #ifdef)
when adding a secondary arch.)
Well, how would it help to have a wrapper for ia64 if no non-ia64
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Robert Scheck wrote:
On Sat, 13 Jun 2009, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Probably because it's less maintenance work in the specfile to just always
add the wrapper. (On the other hand, it means extra work (adding an #ifdef)
when adding a secondary arch.)
Well, how would
- Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
If Fedora Unity wants to create them, the burden of making them work
should
be on them.
If Fedora Project will not or can not give the community what it needs that is
where the community steps up, this is exactly what we did for Fedora 7.
On 06/12/2009 04:54 PM, Adam Miller wrote:
I'm retired firestarter, I picked it up recently as it was orphaned
but as we are moving towards PolicyKit and there's no upstream to
assist with the port and after a discussion we had here on the list I
decided it was time to retire it.
Now, with that
On 06/12/2009 01:08 AM, Mani A wrote:
The GUI is well designed and is worth packaging
http://www.paehl.de/pdf/gui_pdftk.html
It is not present in the package database.
feel free to add it to
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_maintainers_wishlist (unless you
want to package, submit
On Sat, 13 Jun 2009, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
Because as a Fedora packager, neither am I responsible nor do I care
about ia64 packages. Replace ia64 by alpha (or any other secondary
arch) and rerun my answer.
Sorry, but wrong answer for a Fedora packager. If you lack knowledge, you
should try to
Good evening,
I'm still on the way to get the Zarafa Groupware into Fedora (see Fedora
Package review request https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498194)
and beside of the ongoing legal issue, I've also found a technical issue
where I need some help.
At the moment, it's a bit difficult:
Robert Scheck rob...@fedoraproject.org writes:
On Sat, 13 Jun 2009, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Probably because it's less maintenance work in the specfile to just always
add the wrapper. (On the other hand, it means extra work (adding an #ifdef)
when adding a secondary arch.)
Well, how would it
Robert Marcano rob...@marcanoonline.com writes:
I think you are right about x86_64 probably is going to have a DVD
Rom, I only have needed the CDs when installing i386 servers isolated
from the internet. I think we should start considering the option to
ship the net install ISO as a hard disk
I checked the contents of the bind-chroot package in both F10 and f11
- as I was puzzled about running bind-chroot since things seemed
rather different to previous behaviour.
In F11 the contents contain
/var/named/chroot and within this directory are
/dev containing file null, random and zero
Tom Lane wrote:
Personally I don't use multilib wrappers on arches that don't need it;
I think not needing extra cases in the wrapper header outweighs the
added complexity in the specfile. But I'm not going to tell the gmp
maintainer he's wrong for doing it the other way.
+1
-- Rex
--
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 09:04:30PM +, Robert 'Bob' Jensen wrote:
- Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
If Fedora Unity wants to create them, the burden of making them work
should
be on them.
If Fedora Project will not or can not give the community what it
needs
Don't be clouded by who is requesting it. Releng qa anaconda et al
would love to stop doing split cds. Less confusion on what to
download would be appreciated by many too. We are one of the last
distros to still do cd media outside of live media. Is this a case of
users not knowing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/06/09 09:40 AM, Mike McGrath wrote:
Can anyone with F11 installed look at what is in their /etc/fedora-release
and tell me which one you have, and how you installed? Also what version
of fedora-release you have.
-Mike
$ cat
On 14/06/09 04:53, Robert 'Bob' Jensen wrote:
- Frank Murphyfrankl...@gmail.com wrote:
Just curious.
But if a user has bandwidth problems, how is\are mutiple CD's going
to help, or is it purely on hardware grounds, no dvd-rom.
Does no one remember what happened last time the CD ball
On 6/14/09, Charles Butterfield charles.butterfi...@nextcentury.com wrote:
[...]
Root gdm login - gets harder every release - SHAME ON YOU root nazis!
Interesting. Godwin's law right from the start of a thread? I must buy
a lottery ticket today.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744
Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455510
--- Comment #11 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-06-13
04:39:23 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #10)
I
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455510
Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22268
Summary: [RFE] Add Phœnician support
Product: DejaVu
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: medium
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505757
Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: inconsistent opentype font label
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505758
Summary: inconsistent opentype font label
Product: Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505759
Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: file does not identify properly some pfa files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505759
Summary: file does not identify properly some pfa files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: file does not identify properly some pfa files shipped with ghostscript
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505762
Summary: file does not identify
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505759
--- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-06-13
11:49:55 EDT ---
Full list:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505762
--- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-06-13
11:49:28 EDT ---
Full list
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505757
Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: file does not identify properly some pfa files shipped with a2ps
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505764
Summary: file does not identify properly
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: file does not identify properly some pfb files shipped in
texlive-texmf-fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505765
Summary: file does not
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505765
--- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-06-13
12:03:39 EDT ---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: file does not identify properly some pfa files shipped with enscript
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505775
Summary: file does not identify
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102652
--- Additional comments from frope...@openoffice.org Sat Jun 13 20:34:06
+ 2009 ---
I reverted the name of the directory to it's old one, including underscore
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102652
User kpalagin changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote:
On 13/06/09 11:10, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Frank Murphyfrankl...@gmail.com wrote:
On 13/06/09 00:25, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Is there no RedHat lawyer in this list?
If you believe you have a case.
Hire, a lawyer.
No one is stopping
On 13/06/09 11:48, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Frank Murphyfrankl...@gmail.com wrote:
On 13/06/09 11:10, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Frank Murphyfrankl...@gmail.com wrote:
On 13/06/09 00:25, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Is there no RedHat lawyer in this list?
If you believe you have a case.
Hire,
Again, are you sure you do? OpenJDK is 100% compliant to the JCK (Java
Compatibility Kit, the official Java compliance test) and something like
99% identical to Sun Java 1.6 (it supports even several non-standard sun.*
and com.sun.* classes and other implementation details, as it's derived
On 06/13/2009 11:38 AM, David wrote:
I need 'the real stuff' for several things. And, in spite of people such
as you, that is what I am going to use. I will continue to 'try' the
Linux 'knock-offs' and when they do the job? Great. Until? I need 'the
real stuff'.
Assuming this rant is
On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 13:10 -0600, Christopher A. Williams wrote:
Don't forget that you need to set permissions and selinux context for
these.
Surely not... If you copy a file to a standard location, it should get
set the proper contexts, during the copy.
I haven't had to do this when I
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 06:45:03 +0200,
Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
I also hope we'll see LZMA payloads soon. Gzip is really bad. Other
distributions have at least been using bzip2, which compresses
significantly better, but Fedora refused it for CPU consumption reasons.
Hi Steve,
How do I do pstack *with debugging enabled*?
Simply install the debug packages for xorg, your driver and other
stuff you see in the stack-trace.
You can use debuginfo-install to get the appropriate packages.
The simply execute a few pstack pid-of-x, open a bug report and report it.
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 02:10:37PM -1000, Dave Burns wrote:
Is there some message I should be seeing in dmesg or /var/log/messages that
would tell me that what is screwed up?
if hal is able to mount removable drives automatically it logs them into
/var/log/messages. Did you get any messages
On 06/13/2009 11:43 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 06:45:03 +0200,
Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
I also hope we'll see LZMA payloads soon. Gzip is really bad. Other
distributions have at least been using bzip2, which compresses
significantly better, but
Beartooth wrote:
I have it on excellent authority that a .45 acp won't make a hole
clear through a hard drive, but that a .30-06 will.
factory .45 acp may not. custom .45 acp can.
.357 mag good for spindle motor.
rem 720 .306 can at 600 yds. .25c print @ 100 yds
--
peace out.
tc,hago.
On 6/13/2009 2:11 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 06/13/2009 11:38 AM, David wrote:
I need 'the real stuff' for several things. And, in spite of people such
as you, that is what I am going to use. I will continue to 'try' the
Linux 'knock-offs' and when they do the job? Great. Until? I need
When I insert a DVD/CD, the media is detected in KDE device notifier
as expected. I'm then given suggested
actions for the device. When I select Open with Dolphin I receive
the message:
Unable to run the command specified. The file or folder
file:///mnt/source does not exist.
I then open
On Sat, 2009-06-13 at 14:55 +0930, Tim wrote:
On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 22:20 +0300, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
The Fedora infrastructure team is trying to streamline the process a
bit, but the fact remains that generating deltarpms costs a lot in CPU
time and RAM usage, and the more deltarpms you
I did installed Sun JDK, and also I added it to the alternatives, but it
looks like, that there is no way to get rid of OpenJDK: If you tries to
install maven2 with yum, it will still download the openjdk, even if
there is no need to do that (in alternatives Sun JDK is the only
possibility).
Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
Bob Goodwin wrote:
It's difficult without the ethernet connection, I would have to type it
manually. but in addition to eth0 or 1 and lo, I also have an pan0? I do
not show that on this good computer? I tried plugging in a PCI
ethernet card but the probe function
Is there any simple way to revert an upgrade from Fedora 10 to Fedora
11? I'd like to preserve /home, /usr/local and at least copies of
configuration and log files, but I'd rather not have to copy everything
onto an external drive and wipe the system.
My Intel G45/X4500 motherboard graphics
On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 01:43 +, Amadeus W.M. wrote:
I have a dual Xeon 64 bit processor, which I don't believe has hardware VM
support. Can I still run a VM machine in F11 with XP as guest OS? Which
F11 disk should I download?
Could you post the output of $ cat /proc/cpuinfo?
In
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 5:13 AM, Jonathan Dieter jdie...@gmail.com wrote:
Nobody is talking about stopping deltarpms. The real question is how
many deltarpms we will generate, and that's going to be decided once
compose times (see my other reply on this thread) go down.
Throwing hardware
Hi,
while installing Fedora 11, my HP PhotoSmart PSC 2610 (USB+Ethernet) got
automatically detected and installed as USB printer. So far so nice and
shiny. Unfortunately, any attempt to print a test page results in a
failure, stating that foomatic-rip failed. No indication in any syslog
why and
Hi
I have a Huawei device that I have been using on fc 8 and fc 10. But
now with fc 11 it does not work.
Here is the log file entries for the device.
Jun 13 15:42:25 localhost kernel: usb 3-2: USB disconnect, address 26
Jun 13 15:42:25 localhost kernel: usb 3-2: new full speed USB device
using
Bob Goodwin wrote:
Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
Bob Goodwin wrote:
It's difficult without the ethernet connection, I would have to type it
manually. but in addition to eth0 or 1 and lo, I also have an pan0?
I do
not show that on this good computer? I tried plugging in a PCI
ethernet card but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/12/2009 04:54 PM, Clemens Eisserer wrote:
I guess the following stuff would help:
- pstack traces of Xorg with debugging statements enabled, while Xorg
is at 100% cpu
- hardware used
FYI, I'll post to bugzilla, but here's the trace
top
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 08:29:34AM -0400, Bob Goodwin wrote:
I have another problem! The thumb drives are not being properly
detected. They show up in lsusb are listed under Gnome Places
but do not appear on the desktop? I believe they should show up
under /media,
I'm not missing any updates, have I? It has been a few days without
them. I'm using a Fedora 11 which was installed way back during the beta
period and kept up to date ever since. Perhaps my yum is set up wrong?
--
# yum
Yeah, I'm sure. Been there. Done that.
Bob
On 06/13/2009 12:25 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Robert L Cochran wrote:
Arduino software (from http://www.arduino.cc/ ) needs the Sun Java
version to run properly.
Have you actually tried it with OpenJDK? Projects will often say you need
Sun
On Sat, 2009-06-13 at 09:43 -0400, Robert L Cochran wrote:
I'm not missing any updates, have I? It has been a few days without
them. I'm using a Fedora 11 which was installed way back during the beta
period and kept up to date ever since. Perhaps my yum is set up wrong?
We had noticed this
On Sat, 2009-06-13 at 16:47 +0300, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
On Sat, 2009-06-13 at 09:43 -0400, Robert L Cochran wrote:
I'm not missing any updates, have I? It has been a few days without
them. I'm using a Fedora 11 which was installed way back during the beta
period and kept up to date ever
1 - 100 of 224 matches
Mail list logo
