tell the Fedora Project Board that we are
forming, and appoint someone to send them regular status reports. We
should also tell the Packaging Committee that we have identified some
problems with the current Lisp packaging guidelines and plan to submit
revisions to those guidelines.
--
Jerry James
guidelines, and thus used
common-lisp-controller which, as I mentioned, doesn't work for any CL
engine currently available in Fedora. I think we have to fix that
first.
Are you (or is anyone else here) interested in founding a Common Lisp SIG?
Yes, I think we need to do so. Count me in.
--
Jerry
Microsystems Inc.)
Thanks, upstream! I'll upload the new source jar.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
building again. If the other guy hasn't
fixed his package by Beta, how is dropping mine going to help?
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
] http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/cl-trivial-features/
[5] http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/cl-trivial-gray-streams/
[6] http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/cl-alexandria/
[7]
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-December/msg00801.html
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
fedora
not
support any other implementation.
Is there anything I can do to help? If nothing else, I can review the
package when you have it ready.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
anymore. If nobody tells me they want it by the
end of this week, I will put the devel branch through the EOL process
next Monday.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
You need to first prelink -u on a copy of the program, then
run it and let it dump itself, then package it up.
Ah, thanks.
FWIW, this didn't work
of the other Common Lisps.
Who approves changes to the Lisp packaging requirements page?
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
, because it somehow manages to break the rpm? Both?
And how do I build an RPM that can be installed successfully?
Thanks,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
:
--
So this is going to hit anybody who tries to package up an executable
produced by SBCL. Perhaps this should be noted on
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Lisp.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com wrote:
So this is going to hit anybody who tries to package up an executable
produced by SBCL. Perhaps this should be noted on
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Lisp.
And it's even worse than I thought: prelink -u saved
into my
application).
Even with its faults, #1 seems best to me. Does anybody see another
approach that will work better?
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Tom spot Callaway
tcall...@redhat.com wrote:
Nope. Non-free.
~spot
Dang. I hoped that having a license at all would be an improvement
over the days when there was no visible license for that tool...
Thank you for checking.
--
Jerry James
http
Is this license acceptable for Fedora (assuming a copy is provided
with the package, as required by the license)?
http://www.spinroot.com/spin/spin_license.html
Thank you,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
Fedora-legal-list mailing list
you,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
to have access to the policy without dragging
gcl itself in. So all I need to do is move the fixfiles invocation to
the main package's %post. Thank you!
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
I don't believe that would be correct. I think you need Requires(Post) or
Requires(Pre) to make sure a package is installed when pre or post scripts
are run.
OK, will do. Thanks for the help.
--
Jerry James
http
parasites (let's call things by their real name).
I believe that you just described what every package user expects of a
package maintainer. That doesn't warrant calling the package users
parasites.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list
this application uses core
fonts. It isn't going to change. Shut up, please.
--
Jerry James, who thought he was doing the Fedora community a favor
when he rescued gcl from the bit bin
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com
any of these:
/usr/bin/python
/usr/bin/python-config
/usr/bin/python2
/usr/bin/python2.6
/usr/bin/python2.6-config
Regards,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
of the python modules broke badly because
-I/usr/include/python2.6 is no longer helpful. I'll fix that one,
too, as soon as I get that Rawhide VM going.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo
I received a couple of emails last night telling me that the NEEDINFO
flag for two bugs assigned to me were cleared. Great, I though,
finally I have the information I need to proceed on those bugs.
Only there is no new information. The flag was cleared by Bug Zapper
reminding the reporter that
on the next comment by anyone if
configured to do so when the flag is initially set.
-jef
D'oh! Now that I've bothered to go find the wiki page, I see that my
mental model of the bug workflow fails to match reality in a couple of
places. Sorry for the noise.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org
by noarch?
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
) $(REF_GL_OBJS)
$(REF_GL_GLX_OBJS) $(GLXLDFLAGS) $(VORBISLDFLAGS) $(CURLLDFLAGS)
$(JPEGLDFLAGS)
$(BUILDDIR)/client/cl_ents.o :$(CLIENT_DIR)/cl_ents.c
$(DO_CC)
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com
getting it wrong?
My wife got that on her Windows machine that already had the latest
version of Adobe Flash installed. I got that on my Fedora machine
with no version of Adobe Flash at all (although I do have swfdec
installed). Perhaps Firefox is showing that page to everybody.
--
Jerry James
on
arrival, of course.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
. Otherwise, like Andy, I plan to blow the whole
thing away and reinstall from scratch. (Mine's a virtual machine,
rather than a partition, by the way.)
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 9:35 AM, Warren Togamiwtog...@redhat.com wrote:
What is the correct behavior? Is this a bug that it changed?
Read up on the --follow-symlinks option to sed.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https
can submit info from the CD to get them in?
Thanks,
Mike Chambers
According to this:
http://www.openprinting.org/show_printer.cgi?recnum=Canon-Pixma_MP190
Canon supplies a driver that works. I don't know what license their
driver has, though.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org
with a big execution slowdown, I run the code with valgrind
--db-attach=yes. That doesn't always reveal the cause, but it does
quite often.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Would someone who has editing rights to
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Emacs please do a global
search and replace:
%{_datadir}/xemacs/site-packages to %{_datadir}/xemacs/site-packages/lisp
In particular, be sure that
%{_datadir}/xemacs/site-packages/site-start.d gets changed to
to that, it used site-lisp like Emacs
anyway
Thanks,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
it wrong. So forget the global search
and replace. Could someone just do the search and replace on the spec
file samples?
Thanks,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
that everything is correct.
Yes, it looks correct now. Thanks, Jason!
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
/usr/lib64, twice, which is unnecessary.)
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
, this is a common problem.
The commonest cause is a missing JAR.
This is not a bug; it is a configuration problem
---8---8---8---8---8---8---8---8---8---
You need to BuildRequires ant-junit to get the necessary jar (namely,
%{_javadir}/ant/ant-junit.jar).
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org
and more of the opinion that xdg-open is simply the wrong
tool for viewing/editing temporary files. It wasn't built for that
use case, and the tools it invokes were not either. I think we need
something different altogether. Should we go back to invoking
$EDITOR, $VISUAL, etc.?
--
Jerry James
http
would like to fix this upstream. We
may have users on systems with xdg-open but without tmpreaper. I'll
take that discussion to the upstream list, however. Thanks for the
suggestion.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https
, xxx,xxx, and
#xxx,#xxx, but no joy.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
. We also need to
figure out which tools it invokes that operate in mode 1 and find mode
2 equivalents for them. What do you think?
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
to upgrade several of those by hand due to this bug on my
shiny new F-11 install.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Bill Nottinghamnott...@redhat.com wrote:
Not that it matters for Fedora, but I doubt many people are paying
$whatever_the_price_of_RHEL_is to run on a 6, 7, 10-year old machine. And
RHEL 5 only supports (base) i686 or greater already.
You know, I haven't seen
is also in
Fedora, is a fork of CMUCL. SBCL does work on 64-bit systems. The
two are not entirely compatible, though.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
AS TO ANY MATTER WHATSOEVER, INCLUDING
MERCHANTABILITY, OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Incidentally, there's yet another of those broken AS IS clauses here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/MIT#Old_Style_with_legal_disclaimer_3
Regards,
--
Jerry James
http://loganjerry.googlepages.com
?
--
Jerry James
http://loganjerry.googlepages.com/
___
Fedora-legal-list mailing list
Fedora-legal-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list
, then use it. If not, don't use it!
[Conversation then goes in circles for the next 5 minutes until me gives up.]
--
Jerry James
http://loganjerry.googlepages.com/
http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/
___
Fedora-legal-list mailing list
Fedora-legal-list
49 matches
Mail list logo
