On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 5:08 AM, birger wrote:
Thank you all for a very nice initiative, getting all the great audio
software working on a great linux distro. :-)
I have browsed archives a few months back, and I have looked at the
'obvious' places.
As a complete noob regarding studio work,
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 2:48 AM, Josephine Tannhäuser wrote:
2009/12/21, Josephine Tannhäuser :
2009/12/19, Simon Wesp :
griv: A GTK-Chat based on the RIV-Chat-protocol
Bugs: 0
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/bugs/griv
python-rabbyt: Sprite library for Python
Bugs: 0
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 6:37 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 06:17:26AM -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
How could I learn what 4.5 features are backported?
From gcc %changelog?
To list some of them:
- VTA
- -gdwarf-3, -gstrict-dwarf support, defaults to -gdwarf-3
- various
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Dec 21, 2009, at 4:38, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
Yeah, those comments in the patches are quite informative, like libtool
sucks.
Seriously, this comment about the patch in the specfile is a
packaging requirement, not a personal request
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 17:02:24 +
Jonathan Underwood wrote:
Hi,
I kicked off a couple of builds last night which appear stuck on koji.
I had checked they build locally with a make mockbuild before
submitting and all was fine.
The
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
The temporary work-around is to compile with
-fno-var-tracking-assignments
and that also works for lv2-c++-tools in the review queue, btw.
Thanks! Yes, with that flag I was able to finish compiling muse and
lv2-c++-tools. Will that
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
I tried to submit an update for both the fc12 and fc11 versions of
postgresql. It did not work; I had to file them as separate updates.
I'm pretty sure it used to work --- is my memory failing me, or is
this new breakage? If the latter, where
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 5:25 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
Fedora's Licensing Guidelines don't use the term effective license
anywhere. Not even in the section on dual licensing, which is the scenario
where the packager may choose to pick either license for the whole
program.
There is no
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:03 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 12/12/2009 07:24 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 5:25 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
Fedora's Licensing Guidelines don't use the term effective license
anywhere. Not even in the section on dual licensing, which
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Ville Skyttä wrote:
On Wednesday 09 December 2009, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
1) I came across another review with the same license question. The
source files have one of the
GPLv2, GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ headers each. They get compiled and produce
1 final binary
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Jon Masters wrote:
The new gnome-volume-control is so cut-down it's not useful to me. In
the quest to be more Mac-like in removing mixer controls (and not even
having any obvious advanced mode), I now have a choice of no audio or
having full volume LFE output
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 4:03 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 11:23 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
My proposal is to use alternatives for parallel installation, the
way java does. Then the user can switch between jack1 and jack2 as he
wants.
Is it okay with everyone if I write
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 11:19 PM, Braden McDaniel wrote:
I'm an emacs user who's nearly completely useless in vi. But, really...
it just doesn't matter if emacs isn't installed by default. If you want
it, you know how to get it. And let's be frank: emacs is not something
that a user who is
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Ben Williams wrote:
(yes i know the size sux, but not
everyone has highspeed internet thats why they are downloading the livecd
and not the dvd)
Another interpretation would be: The contents of the DVD does not
satisfy the needs of many people.
I am in that
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
On Monday, 23 November 2009 at 17:51, Jerry James wrote:
[...]
I want a switch that says, Yes, I know this application uses core
fonts. It isn't going to change. Shut up, please.
+1.
Nicholas, I know you love to
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 12:03 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 11:31:27 -0500, Tony wrote:
On 09-11-21 06:40:45, drago01 wrote:
...
You misunderstood me, I was not suggesting adding another epoch but
simply bump the %{epoch} for every release.
If this were really
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 4:59 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
After getting okays from a few folks I decided to fix the long
standing libsndfile bugs.
[...]
Other than that, libsndfile is updated to 1.0.20 in F-10+. Also, now
it has
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 12:57 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 12:08:15AM -0500, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 17:11 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
Actually not if done in conjunction with a release
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 10:21 PM, Stu Tomlinson wrote:
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 22:01, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 12:57 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
There's many things that need to be changed in rpm but IMHO this isn't one
of them. RPM produces predictable versioning
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 1:32 AM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
I noticed that http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora appears to be
strongly promoting i386 Fedora over x86_64. Is this intentional or an
oversight?
It is intentional. This is one of the standard discussion topics of
this list. And it
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 9:00 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Josh Boyer wrote:
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 02:23:22AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Michael Schwendt wrote:
Many packagers don't know that maintaining a proper spec %changelog for
relevant spec file changes and %release bumps are considered
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
Hi folks,
After getting okays from a few folks I decided to fix the long
standing libsndfile bugs.
One of these was a request [1] to split the utilities that come with
libsndfile
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 17:11 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
Actually not if done in conjunction with a release bump, such as we do
with a mass rebuild.
Only if we make a promise to never use the same base n-v-r across the
releases
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 8:29 AM, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
Yes but you are missing one thing. The library is LGPLv2. It is not LGPLv2+.
Doesn't it make the resultant binary GPLv2, without the + ?
There is nothing in the GPL that requires you to put binaries under GPL
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
What do I need to do, to build updated chunkd and tabled packages on top of
the new cld?
You need to file a ticket to releng [1] and ask for buildroot
overrides as outlined in the guidelines somewhere I can't remember.
You need to provide
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 7:24 PM, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
On 11/16/2009 06:03 PM, Christian Krause wrote:
I'm a little bit unsure about:
- Does the fact, that the library is statically linked, affects the
compatibility or does the same rules apply as for dynamic linking?
For the purposes of
Hi folks,
After getting okays from a few folks I decided to fix the long
standing libsndfile bugs.
One of these was a request [1] to split the utilities that come with
libsndfile into a utils subpackage. I did this only for F-13.
Since libsndfile is used by so many other software, it is
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 4:48 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/bugs/libsndfile
What's up with libsndfile in Fedora and EPEL?
There are open tickets about CVEs filed in March.
There are additional
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 10:34 AM, Simon Lewis wrote:
Hello
Please advise if a multimedia spin for Fedora 11 is available (or for Fedora
12 planned)?
The standard Fedora 11 installation does not by default set the RT-PRIO for
jackuser or pulse audio etc., etc. Neither does the standard
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 4:48 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/bugs/libsndfile
What's up with libsndfile in Fedora and EPEL?
There are open tickets about CVEs filed in March.
There are additional tickets without any reply.
Yeah, things go a little
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 3:46 AM, Marcus Moeller wrote:
Hi,
is there a way to extract multiple sources in a spec files %setup section?
Something like:
for i in {1..10}; do tar xfz %(SOURCE$i}; done
Best Regards
Marcus
%setup -q -c -n %{name} -a 0 -a 1 -a 2 -a 3 -a 4 -a 5 -a 6 -a 7 -a 8
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
I don't really want to revive the thread about automake 1.11, but I do
want to point out that it did break actual buildability:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1761549name=build.log
Please, people. Don't update things in
2009/10/19 Miroslav Suchý
May be good idea for Fedora as well...
Mirek
Původní zpráva
Předmět: [opensuse-packaging] Junior Jobs
Datum: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 14:46:58 +0200
Od: Michal Hrusecky
Hi,
lately we formulated concept of openSUSE Junior Jobs[1]. Maintainers of
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 7:29 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
Am Freitag, den 09.10.2009, 18:56 -0400 schrieb Neal Becker:
Just received:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528237
yum install libotf-devel.i586 libotf-devel.x86_64
yields:
Transaction Check Error:
file
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 2:55 AM, ram s wrote:
Hello,
Hi! I see that you are new to packaging. I advise you to read a bash
tutorial first. It will help.
I am creating one rpm for my package.
WHen I try to run spec file, it shows the sub directories can't be fine.
Error:
install: cannot
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 3:17 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
I guess the line should be starting via
install -d ShellScripts/mine/derot.txt ...
*sigh*. this should be:
install -p ShellScripts/mine/derot.txt ...
or even better:
install -pm 644 ShellScripts/mine/derot.txt ...
We want to make sure
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Matthew Booth wrote:
I went over to https://translate.fedoraproject.org/ earlier with the idea of
adding my project. Firstly, there's no hint of how to do this from the front
page. After some Leisure Suit Larry style clicking on stuff at random until
something
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Mani A wrote:
http://puredata.info/
is not in the package database.
From the license POV, there are no problems.
Best
A. Mani
Hi,
Fernando at planetccrma was working on packaging a recent version of
puredata. I don't know the current status. There
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
Doug Warner wrote:
Does anyone have a Makefile target for download a SourceX file
(similar to Kevin Fenzi's recent report)? This would have the added
benefit of simplifying the update process for new versions (ex:
make source NUM=0
Hello everyone,
(If you don't own a multimedia package you can skip this thread)
This is a call for help for adjusting the .desktop files of your
multimedia applications according to the new FedoraStudio feature [1].
For those who missed the news, with F-12 we will have an optional
Hello everyone,
(If you don't own a multimedia package you can skip this thread)
This is a call for help for adjusting the .desktop files of your
multimedia applications according to the new FedoraStudio feature [1].
For those who missed the news, with F-12 we will have an optional
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 4:23 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
I was hoping that the devs who worked hard to even make it part of the
source rpm might be lurking on this mailing list and see my post :)
I don't think anything special is done to make it part of our
kernel .src.rpm, it's just in there
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 4:58 AM, drago01 wrote:
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
I maintain those drivers at RPMFusion. I will be happy beyond
imagination when the staging drivers are marked stable.
They won't ever (the rt Vendor drivers)
From my understanding
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 12:09 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Bastien Nocera writes:
On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 18:48 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
[ consults CVS... ] So XZ support in F-11's rpm is less than a week
old, there is *no* support in F-10, and we're already requiring
the capability in order to do useful
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 12:53 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 12:42 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Removing PA is far too often jumped on as the 'obvious' fix for
resolving any kind of audio problem whatsoever. Even if it had nothing
to do with PA in the first place.
And?
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 3:15 PM, oleksandr korneta wrote:
on 07/25/2009 11:46 AM Chuck Anderson wrote:
I don't even upgrade anymore. I just keep two partitions (Logical Volumes
actually)--one for Fedora N and one for Fedora N+1.
I took this one step forward. I keep 3 partitions Fedora N,
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 5:19 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi,
I have a concern with the recent delays in signing packages and how best
to handle that. I maintain Gnote in Fedora. This is very actively
maintained and has frequent releases, even weekly. It is also a rather
young project (original
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 02:39 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 11:42 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 11:23 PM, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
Is this happening with the standard Fedora kernel
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Matt Domsch wrote:
oget: calf,fluidsynth,hydrogen,jack-keyboard,lash,muse,tex-musixtex
All except the last one is due to the e2fsprogs split and I'm fixing them.
But the last one may be an rpm or mock
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Matt Domsch wrote:
oget: calf,fluidsynth,hydrogen,jack-keyboard,lash,muse,tex-musixtex
All except the last one is due to the e2fsprogs split and I'm fixing them.
But the last one may be an rpm or mock issue. I don't know what to do.
Any ideas?
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 11:42 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 11:23 PM, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
Is this happening with the standard Fedora kernel or the rt kernel?
This is Fedora kernel
2.6.29.4-167.fc11.x86_64
I'll see what happens with the rt kernel.
I tried all
Wow! 78 messages and still, no one gave solid examples of what might
go wrong unnoticed if one uses autotools in a specfile.
Using autotools in a specfile is bad started to sound like an urban
legend to me.
I'll keep reading.
Orcan
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Orcan Ogetbil writes:
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 7:22 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Orcan Ogetbil writes:
Wow! 78 messages and still, no one gave solid examples of what might
go wrong unnoticed if one uses autotools in a specfile.
I already
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
fluidsynth-1.0.9 is available in Fedora's updates-testing repository.
This release comes with many improvements and fixes outlined in [1].
The most important improvement seems to be the new native Jack MIDI
driver. fluidsynth MIDI
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 11:23 PM, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On Mon, 2009-07-06 at 23:11 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
It seems to me that the new fluidsynth is not that stable. I start
qjackctl which runs jackd (this is Fedora's jack 0.116.1-5) with
/usr/bin/jackd -R -dalsa -dhw:0 -r44100
On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 10:00 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Orcan Ogetbil writes:
On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
[cut]
Patching the configure
script is much safer than patching configure.ac, then have autoconf grok
all
.m4 macros and rebuild the whole thing, likely
fluidsynth-1.0.9 is available in Fedora's updates-testing repository.
This release comes with many improvements and fixes outlined in [1].
The most important improvement seems to be the new native Jack MIDI
driver. fluidsynth MIDI connections will now appear in qjackctl's or
your favorite jack
By the way,
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Owen Taylor wrote:
I was rather surprised to see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-6661
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-6076
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-6370
Where the
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Seth Vidal wrote:
On Sun, 28 Jun 2009, Christopher Stone wrote:
Whatever desktop RH employees are paid to work on to satisfy their
biggest RHEL customers needs. Or what they *think* their biggest RHEL
customers want.
I think the question you need to ask
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 06/27/2009 09:13 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
As for integration, we offer a perfectly integrated KDE spin, thank you very
much... We're working really hard on distro integration. For example, why
do you think I wrote that KDM ConsoleKit
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 6:28 PM, drago01 wrote:
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 12:19 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 6:04 PM, drago01 wrote:
Why treat XFCE as second class citizen ...
Easy answer: because the size of its userbase is not in the same order
of magnitude with Gnome
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 8:07 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Rawhide Report wrote:
New package SevenZip
Java SDK for LZMA
Why was this approved and imported with that name when we clearly agreed on
this list that the name needs to be changed?
As far as I know, a general agreement hasn't
17:32:01 zodbot jds2001: #170 (Rename Desktop live image to
GNOME live image) - FESCo - Trac -
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/170
17:32:06 Kevin_Kofler This one is my proposal. See the ticket for
the rationale.
[cut]
17:34:03 Kevin_Kofler It stops misleading users about the contents
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Seth Vidal wrote:
I suggest everyone cut the drama. We're talking about whether or not the
live cd is labeled as 'gnome desktop' or leaving it as it currently is which
says: 'fedora 11 desktop edition: featuring the gnome desktop'.
I don't see the need for
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 9:25 AM, Fernando Nasser wrote:
Having subpackages that do not have the SRPM name as a prefix is terrible on
tools adn scripts and should be avoided.
Why not lzma-sdk-java lzma-sdk-sharp etc.?
I think that's a problem of those tools/scripts and not of this
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 8:15 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Seth Vidal wrote:
read that again? You would expect higher ver i386 to install over x86_64
ON an x86_64 box?
I'd expect that too. There's certainly a reason why the current version is
not available natively, if not, it's a bug in the
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 9:07 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 08:16:36PM -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
- Let's keep F-12 the same: ppc, ppc64, i586, x86_64
- Since ppc and ppc64 are going to be dropped from F-13, fill in the
blank spot with i686+SSE2, i.e. F-13: i586, i686+SSE2
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
ppc/ppc64 is supported in RHEL. It is no longer a primary arch in Fedora.
josh
Really? I obviously missed something.
/me will look at FESCo logs.
Orcan
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Robert Scheck wrote:
On Sat, 13 Jun 2009, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Probably because it's less maintenance work in the specfile to just always
add the wrapper. (On the other hand, it means extra work (adding an #ifdef)
when adding a secondary arch.)
Well, how would
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 1:28 PM, SmootherFrOgZ wrote:
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 11:36 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Mono-2.4 has been built for ppc64 in F11 and devel. So people should be
able to start rebuilding packages to include ppc64 as well as the other
arches. There's a few wrinkles to
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 5:11 PM, SmootherFrOgZ wrote:
I assume that no one have any mono packages to rebuilt.
then if so, i gonna request a push above packages.
Please do. This was F11-Target and I didn't even think this would not
be submitted ASAP and I had pushed gnome-guitar to updates. Now
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 11:23 AM, Fermin Molina wrote:
Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sun, 24 May 2009 15:08:23 +0200, Fermin wrote:
Hi all,
Any plan to include in fedora or in planetccrma this great app?
I think that LMMS is a great music production app:
http://lmms.sourceforge.net/
It's
Hello folks,
I updated the wiki page. Based on the feedback I got (especially
David's opinions were quite inspiring) and stealing some ideas from
planetccrma-menu package, I came up with this outline:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/FedoraStudio
Note that this is by no means the final
On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 16:24 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
I will start writing the wiki page this week and report the status
once I have enough material that can benefit from feedback.
I did start writing the wiki page [1] last week but I got stuck at one point.
It is not easy to make a good
2009/5/12 Christoph Höger:
Hi,
I've just read
http://blog.pierlux.com/2009/05/12/pythons-hidden-poissoned-apple-for-gpl-applications/en/
and it seems to me that this applys to offlineimap (which i am
maintaining), as that tool uses sslsock from python and is licensed
under gpl. I
On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On Sat, 2009-05-02 at 18:39 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
- What desktop file category(ies) shall we use? The standard
categories we can use are Midi, Mixer, Sequencer, Tuner,
AudioVideoEditing. We can also use some artificial
I had posted on fedora-devel mailing list about this idea a while ago,
but the discussion didn't last long:
http://www.linux-archive.org/fedora-development/266281-adding-new-group-desktop-menu-fedora-studio.html
In short, currently all our audio/video players/editors are cluttering
the Multimedia
While I was packaging frinika [1], I realized that one of its
dependencies, mrjadapter [2], comes with some Artistic License [3].
I can't tell what version of Artistic License this is. Can you tell
me if this is free or not; and if not, can you tell me what makes it
nonfree so I can inform
Recently I took over the orphaned package libzzub in F-10 and devel. I
found that the upstream renamed the package to armstrong, so I opened
a review request for armstrong and it just got approved.
But whenever I was packaging armstrong, I found that the source
tarball contains some MS
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
On 03/05/2009 02:36 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
Recently I took over the orphaned package libzzub in F-10 and devel. I
found that the upstream renamed the package to armstrong, so I opened
a review request for armstrong and it just got
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 3:57 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
On list this time
2009/3/4 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com:
Anyone have any thoughts about doing this update in F10?
+1
If a font can no longer be built for some reason then we should
contact the FF devs :)
Unfortunately they are not
Author: oget
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/serafettin-cartoon-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv8479
Modified Files:
.cvsignore serafettin-cartoon-fonts.spec sources
Log Message:
* Sat Feb 28 2009 Orcan Ogetbil oget [DOT] fedora [AT] gmail [DOT] com -
0.5.1-1
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 10:35 PM, Jens Petersen wrote:
- In case that I want to push updates: Can I use the
common/cvs-import script again?
Yes, that should work - if not please file a bug.
Well, I did that once and weird things happened. I had to learn cvs to
clean the mess. It was good
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Paul Lange wrote:
Hey,
after my two packages has been approved (thank you Nicolas). I'm going
to start to integrate them into the Fedora CVS system.
That's nice
Now I have some question for creating the New Package CVS Request:
Actually the font lifecycle
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 11:09 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
Before sending this email, I did some work on the wiki, mainly created
some tables to ease the categorization of sound applications. I will
work on it more, but it will make things a lot easier for me if
everybody adds his/her audio
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 5:57 PM, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 14:55 -0500, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 11:09 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
Before sending this email, I did some work on the wiki, mainly created
some tables to ease the categorization
Hi, I made an SRPM with a recent hydrogen svn checkout. Hydrogen is
now ported to qt4 and has quite nice new features. Here you can find
the SRPM if you want to try it out:
http://oget.fedorapeople.org/hydrogen/
I am still working on this together with the upstream. Since the
application looks
Author: oget
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/serafettin-cartoon-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv15264/devel
Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources
Added Files:
import.log serafettin-cartoon-fonts.spec
Log Message:
* Tue Jan 13 2009 oget [DOT] fedora [AT]
Author: oget
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/serafettin-cartoon-fonts/F-9
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv15650/F-9
Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources
Added Files:
import.log serafettin-cartoon-fonts.spec
Log Message:
* Tue Jan 13 2009 oget [DOT] fedora [AT] gmail
Author: oget
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/serafettin-cartoon-fonts/F-10
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv15968/F-10
Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources
Added Files:
import.log serafettin-cartoon-fonts.spec
Log Message:
* Tue Jan 13 2009 oget [DOT] fedora [AT]
pdftk had been removed from Fedora because it contained itext code which had
licensing issues. Please see:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=236310
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?component=pdftkproduct=Fedora
But since the itext's license issue is resolved, (see
91 matches
Mail list logo
