2010/1/7 Zing z...@fastmail.fm:
On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 14:02:24 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 15:24:05 +0100
Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
You propose that the repo should be enabled by default if the package
is installed. I don't like this. This make it a lot easier to
2010/1/5 Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com:
I intend to give up the following packages:
libexif
I will take this one.
--
LG Thomas
Dubium sapientiae initium
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
2010/1/1 Paul p...@all-the-johnsons.co.uk:
Hi,
I'm trying to get my Intel graphics driven laptop up and running again
(see BZ 523646 for details of the problem) and am trying to rebuild the
kernel using the latest from kernel.org and the fedora srpm (install
srpm, copy the kernel, run the
2009/12/11 Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com:
For the initial testing, just giving every user a @feodraproject.org
domain would be sufficient, however we should have a discussion about
whether to use this email address or to use the user's real email
address.
Definitely @fedoraproject.org
2009/11/20 Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com:
Wouldn't it be a good idea to disallow a push to updates that has broken
deps?
If the special case is kde-plasma-smooth-tasks. It is not in updates
yet. The needed deps are in updates-testing.
--
LG Thomas
Dubium sapientiae initium
--
2009/11/15 Braden McDaniel bra...@endoframe.com:
I did:
$ make tag
and got:
cvs tag -c openvrml-0_18_3-11_fc13
cvs tag: openvrml.spec is locally modified
cvs [tag aborted]: correct the above errors first!
Whoops. And so I proceeded to commit the
2009/10/21 Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com:
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 13:28 -0400, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 06:22:04PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
IIUC, you're mis-interpreting the YUM output there. NetworkManager-gnome
doesn't have a dependancy on KDE, rather it
2009/10/19 Ismael Olea ism...@olea.org:
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Josephine Tannhäuser
josephine.tannhau...@googlemail.com wrote:
btw. I'm still missing Godwin's Law. It's a must for stupid
nonsense-discussions, but I'm not missing it!
tongue place=cheek
So, you are acting clearly
2009/10/8 Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at:
Lyos Gemini Norezel wrote:
However... have you considered trying gnome-applet-sensors?
gnome-applet-* doesn't work under KDE, that stuff only works in gnome-panel.
It seems odd to continue such a package despite upstream being defunct.
As I
2009/10/8 Jonathan Dieter jdie...@gmail.com:
A few days ago, I built deltarpm-3.4-18.fc11 which resplit off a
subpackage that had accidentally been merged into the main package in
deltarpm-3.4-17.fc11. I pushed -18 into -testing, and assumed (since it
was newer than -17) that -17 wouldn't get
2009/10/3 Ilyes Gouta ilyes.go...@gmail.com:
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 1:06 PM, David Timms dti...@iinet.net.au wrote:
On 10/03/2009 07:12 PM, Ilyes Gouta wrote:
Do we have wmii (a window manager, http://wmii.suckless.org) packaged
for Fedora?
Would you like to begin packaging it ?
Sounds
2009/9/30 Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de:
On Tue, 29.09.09 22:46, Kevin Kofler (kevin.kof...@chello.at) wrote:
Lennart Poettering wrote:
Uh. Nokia stands pretty firmly behind gst. As do most embedded folks.
Behind GStreamer, sure. Behind Phonon (and thus also Phonon-GStreamer),
2009/9/25 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com:
On Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:57:10 +0200
Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
Aloas,
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 07:01:21PM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
I want to start the non-responsive maintainer process for Krzysztof
Kurzawski, because youtube-dl was not
2009/9/5 Christopher Brown snecklif...@gmail.com:
Would be grateful for info on what this does that bz web interface doesn't.
More new BZ user friendly. Much faster than the BZ web interface.
--
LG Thomas
Dubium sapientiae initium
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
2009/9/6 Rahul Sundaram sunda...@fedoraproject.org:
On 09/05/2009 11:06 PM, Rajkarn Singh wrote:
Hi,
I am working on the development of a general Desktop Client for
Bugzilla. Currently it can access Red Hat Bugzilla database, however in
future I'd be working to make it work for other
2009/9/5 Rajkarn Singh rajkar...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I am working on the development of a general Desktop Client for Bugzilla.
Currently it can access Red Hat Bugzilla database, however in future I'd be
working to make it work for other Bugzillas. I have posted a blog having
somewhat detailed
2009/8/24 Christoph Höger choe...@cs.tu-berlin.de:
I hope somebody can confirm this:
I also had some wireless errors (iwlagn: microcode error) in my dmesg
the days before.
I can confirm: iwlagn: Microcode SW error detected. Restarting 0x200.
With 2.6.29.6-99.fc10.x86_64
04:00.0 Network
2009/8/14 Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de:
On 08/14/2009 07:32 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 05:41 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
I strongly think Fedora would be better without Rahul and Kevin, two
persons I have learned to be doing a good job on certain subjects, but
to be
2009/8/7 Thomas Moschny thomas.mosc...@gmail.com:
2009/8/5 Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com:
If we just want to dump all the latest stuff in there, why bother with
freezes and releases at all ? We could all just use rawhide...
While often repeated, I don't think that argument is true.
2009/8/5 Christopher Stone chris.st...@gmail.com:
I'm glad you are going through with it. Awesome support from the KDE SIG!
Kudos!
+1
Thanks from all us F10 users who don't want or cant upgrade to F11 for
various reasons.
--
LG Thomas
Dubium sapientiae initium
--
fedora-devel-list
2009/7/28 Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de:
snip
I'd like to ask everyone to test this new volume logic. If you don't
raise your voice now that some output port is not properly detected or
audio is too faint then later on you won't have any right to complain.
I think you do what you
2009/7/30 wde...@mikrotec.com:
I am new to this list, and I am looking forward to hearing the discussion.
But thanks to bob and others responding to my post on fedoraforum.org
http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=227101 , I think I would
like to broach a subject. My apologies if
2009/7/29 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com:
On 07/29/2009 11:12 AM, Thomas Janssen wrote:
2009/7/29 Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com:
The link https://admin.fedoraproject.org/community doesn't seem to work with
konqueror. Just says 'loading' and nothing happens. Works in firefox
2009/7/26 Nelson Chan khcha.n...@gmail.com:
i've just read
http://blogs.computerworld.com/ubuntu_to_make_linux_application_installation_idiot_proof
he got a pretty good idea, see the 2nd last paragraph:
I may know that Amarok, Banshee, Rhythmbox, and Songbird are all noteworthy
Linux music
2009/7/20 梁穗隆 liangsuil...@gmail.com:
I download and install the latest rpm of chromium-3.0.195. But it fails to
start.
Looks like you want a chromium.repo
[chromium]
name=Chromium Test Packages
baseurl=http://spot.fedorapeople.org/chromium/F$releasever/
enabled=1
gpgcheck=0
Another things,
2009/7/17 Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com:
Thomas Janssen on 07/17/2009 10:56 AM wrote:
Patch would be welcome. Would make my life easier in #fedora helping
people with that problem.
The patch should have been attached to the original post. Did you see it?
Ah, overlooked it, sorry
2009/7/2 Rahul Sundaram sunda...@fedoraproject.org:
On 07/02/2009 06:15 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
Is there a book group?
or what search parameter?
Tried yum info Dive Into Python
# yum info diveintopython
Since we have more than one book, I guess a new group could be defined
as well. If
2009/7/2 Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 02:52:59PM +0200, Thomas Janssen wrote:
2009/7/2 Rahul Sundaram sunda...@fedoraproject.org:
On 07/02/2009 06:15 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
Is there a book group?
Since we have more than one book, I guess a new group
2009/6/30 Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at:
Seth Vidal wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, R P Herrold wrote:
umm -- trying to boot and install the x86_86 image on a i686 unit returns
basically the same under Anaconda's kernel
which is why i686 isos are the ones users get by default.
...
2009/6/29 Eric Springer erik...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 5:15 PM, Kevin Koflerkevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
This x86_64 issue is also a nasty side effect of your design policy: why are
we defaulting to reduced performance for the vast majority of new hardware
(basically only
2009/6/29 David bouncingc...@gmail.com:
Re the discussion at
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-June/msg01991.html
The below suggestion tries to satisfy all parties:
- it presents a neutral default
- it presents a simple choice for newbie who doesnt know what a desktop is
2009/6/29 Seth Vidal skvi...@fedoraproject.org:
On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, R P Herrold wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, Bill Nottingham wrote:
That's a really crappy place for that message, though. What's the user
supposed to do there... reboot and then go download another 700MB - 4GB?
umm --
2009/6/29 Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at:
Roberto Ragusa wrote:
(Funny that the order of the desktops has come out
alphabetically sorted too)
We may want to list XFCE before LXDE as its the more mature option. But I
don't have popularity stats for those, so I don't know which one is
2009/6/29 Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com:
On Monday 29 June 2009 17:02:36 Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Dariusz J. Garbowski on 06/29/2009 09:56 AM wrote:
Maybe call it Default then?
No, because that's offensive to some people apparently.
No, default is not offensive! Gnome Desktop Live
2009/6/29 Mat Booth fed...@matbooth.co.uk:
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 5:52 PM, drago01drag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 6:27 PM, Mat Boothfed...@matbooth.co.uk wrote:
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Roberto Ragusam...@robertoragusa.it
wrote:
I propose:
FEDORA LIVE CD
Fedora
2009/6/27 Jon Stanley jonstan...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 6:25 PM, Adam Millermaxamill...@gmail.com wrote:
If it is official, I think it should at least get placed on the same
web page as the gnome/default one like it used to.
+1
We're well aware that the current download page is
2009/6/28 Rahul Sundaram sunda...@fedoraproject.org:
On 06/28/2009 12:40 PM, Thomas Janssen wrote:
I might understand it wrong. But from my point of view. It's not
newbie oriented at all. If it would be newbie oriented it would offer
information and give options to choose, included with some
2009/6/28 Orcan Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com:
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Seth Vidal wrote:
On Sun, 28 Jun 2009, Christopher Stone wrote:
Whatever desktop RH employees are paid to work on to satisfy their
biggest RHEL customers needs. Or what they *think* their biggest RHEL
2009/6/28 Matthew Garrett m...@redhat.com:
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 03:09:26PM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Niels Haase wrote:
GNOME KDE - official support from fedora (first class citizen)
XFCE - spin only (second class citizen)
LXDE - remix only (third class citizen)
It's actually worse
2009/6/17 Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com:
Thomas Janssen on 06/17/2009 03:19 AM wrote:
Ubuntu Alternative Thats not a LiveCD. It's just a install CD. No Live.
So? Your point? A Fedora LiveCD is an install CD.
My point.. It is/was obviously that you dont know what an alternative
CD is. So
2009/5/29 Valent Turkovic valent.turko...@gmail.com:
http://images.howtoforge.com/images/the_perfect_desktop_linux_mint_7_gloria/15.jpg
I saw this and thought that it would also be a nice idea to have in
fedora, like a welcome screen Wellcome to Fedora or something
similar...
What are your
of any version is
permanent authorization for you to choose that version for the
Library.
This is obviously my first post to this list. So i will wait until i
get an answer.
Thanks for your time.
Thomas Janssen
--
LG Thomas
Dubium sapientiae initium
42 matches
Mail list logo
