roland wrote:
I THANK EVERYBODY FOR THIS EXTENSIVE HELP.
And I hope next time this person-attacker will wait until after my
Holiday
Roland
Thre are a number of bot machines and others that seem to be
brute force attacking systems. Has the attack set resumed after
your holiday?
bob
--
Steve Searle wrote:
Around 02:28am on Sunday, November 23, 2008 (UK time), bob smith scrawled:
Working with 386 boxes, and getting ready to upgrade to
FC9 on alpha boxes - but I am getting perturbed with networkmanager .
Great tool for folks who want things to be simple and easy
Working with 386 boxes, and getting ready to upgrade to
FC9 on alpha boxes - but I am getting perturbed with networkmanager .
Great tool for folks who want things to be simple and easy but
it is not what I need .
Lots of issues with the way this is so smart - doing things it thinks are
I don't use a graphical frontend of any time, I use command line.
I don't seem to be able to find a named/bind tool tutorial, or command
line helper anywhere. I am trying to configure the FC9 version of named
and not Avahi. Is there a guide for command line use? Configuration?
thanks
bob
--
Alex Makhlin wrote:
Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
Alex Makhlin wrote:
Hi all,
Which one do you think is better and for what reasons. Ubuntu or Fedora
9. Personally I like Fedora 9.
Better for what? It is a matter of using the correct tool for the job.
Mikkel
The job is sir to have
Phil Meyer wrote:
Mike Chambers wrote:
Hi there,
Was thinking and wondering, if it would be good to have configuration
wizards for services that you want to configure (such as email server
(sendmail/postfix), http, and so on) that would ask basic questions and
would go certain directions (or
contact the system administrator, or company CISSO
g wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
greets,
i would like to help a colleague crack a password used on a win 2000 pro
system and have pulled from;
http://www.openwall.com/john/
http://www.loginrecovery.com/
You guys have offered some great advice, so I am going to ask a dumb
sort of question.
I have a machine with all the peripherals - CD, DVD, Frewire, SATA,
EIDE, SCSI, USB ports,
and multiple ethers. I use this as a build and test machine -
configuring a drive to be installed
in another box.
looks like the team is shooting for nov, 08, if you look at the
schedule, but
I am not sure what the GA means - might be generally available or
it might be guess again
hope this helps!
bob
Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
The wiki page:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/Schedule
is
Ed Greshko wrote:
bob smith wrote:
trying to update F9, on a 386/686 box. Failing. Thanks in advance for
any help
quick description - can't run yum. Think I have the repositories files
from (addresses don't resolve)
yes, I probably hosed them up trying to fix them. Got not response to
yum
Ed Greshko wrote:
Seems like your system can't resolve the host names into an IP address.
Network/DNS problems
What does
host mirrors.fedoraproject.org
return?
What it looks like to me is I do not have the proper copy of the
repositories.
Does some one have a working copy, and
Stuart Sears wrote:
bob smith wrote:
[...]
What it looks like to me is I do not have the proper copy of the
repositories.
Does some one have a working copy, and example, I can try for 386/686
system?
rpm -Uvh
http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/updates/9/i386.newkey
Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 05:13:36 -0400, bob smith wrote:
Stuart Sears wrote:
bob smith wrote:
[...]
What it looks like to me is I do not have the proper copy of the
repositories.
Does some one have a working copy, and example, I can try for 386/686
trying to update F9, on a 386/686 box. Failing. Thanks in advance for
any help
quick description - can't run yum. Think I have the repositories files
from (addresses don't resolve)
yes, I probably hosed them up trying to fix them. Got not response to
yum update. time out error or address did
14 matches
Mail list logo
