On Sat, 6 Sep 2008 14:03:08 -0500
Bruno Wolff III [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Replace $arch with $arch.newkey to get to the new updates and
updates-testing trees. I haven't seen an update to the release trees
show up yet.
Hi Bruno,
I'm trying to take your advice
On Sunday 07 September 2008 07:49:18 David C. Chipman wrote:
On Sat, 6 Sep 2008 14:03:08 -0500
Bruno Wolff III [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Replace $arch with $arch.newkey to get to the new updates and
updates-testing trees. I haven't seen an update to the release trees
show up yet.
On Sunday 07 September 2008, Tony Molloy wrote:
On Sunday 07 September 2008 07:49:18 David C. Chipman wrote:
On Sat, 6 Sep 2008 14:03:08 -0500
Bruno Wolff III [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Replace $arch with $arch.newkey to get to the new updates and
updates-testing trees. I haven't seen an
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 07 September 2008, Tony Molloy wrote:
On Sunday 07 September 2008 07:49:18 David C. Chipman wrote:
On Sat, 6 Sep 2008 14:03:08 -0500
Bruno Wolff III [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Replace $arch with $arch.newkey to get to the new updates and
On Sunday 07 September 2008 09:05:17 Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 07 September 2008, Tony Molloy wrote:
On Sunday 07 September 2008 07:49:18 David C. Chipman wrote:
On Sat, 6 Sep 2008 14:03:08 -0500
Bruno Wolff III [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Replace $arch with $arch.newkey to get to the
04:01:15 : Error checking package signatures:
Public key for yum-keys-1.1.15-1.fc8.noarch.rpm is not installed
Advice?
Thanks.
to avoid this you may use --nogpgcheck for yum, doubt that can be set
up in yumex
--
Regards,
Ivan Cat
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To
On Sunday 07 September 2008, Ed Greshko wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 07 September 2008, Tony Molloy wrote:
On Sunday 07 September 2008 07:49:18 David C. Chipman wrote:
On Sat, 6 Sep 2008 14:03:08 -0500
Bruno Wolff III [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Replace $arch with $arch.newkey to get to
On Sunday 07 September 2008, Tony Molloy wrote:
On Sunday 07 September 2008 09:05:17 Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 07 September 2008, Tony Molloy wrote:
On Sunday 07 September 2008 07:49:18 David C. Chipman wrote:
On Sat, 6 Sep 2008 14:03:08 -0500
Bruno Wolff III [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 07 September 2008 09:23:16 Ed Greshko wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 07 September 2008, Tony Molloy wrote:
On Sunday 07 September 2008 07:49:18 David C. Chipman wrote:
On Sat, 6 Sep 2008 14:03:08 -0500
Bruno Wolff III [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Replace $arch with
Tony Molloy wrote:
On Sunday 07 September 2008 09:23:16 Ed Greshko wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 07 September 2008, Tony Molloy wrote:
On Sunday 07 September 2008 07:49:18 David C. Chipman wrote:
On Sat, 6 Sep 2008 14:03:08 -0500
Bruno Wolff III [EMAIL
On Sunday 07 September 2008 09:39:23 Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 07 September 2008, Tony Molloy wrote:
On Sunday 07 September 2008 09:05:17 Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 07 September 2008, Tony Molloy wrote:
On Sunday 07 September 2008 07:49:18 David C. Chipman wrote:
On Sat, 6 Sep 2008
Arthur Pemberton wrote:
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 3:41 AM, Tony Molloy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 07 September 2008 09:23:16 Ed Greshko wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 07 September 2008, Tony Molloy wrote:
On Sunday 07 September 2008 07:49:18 David C.
On Sunday 07 September 2008 09:46:04 Ed Greshko wrote:
Tony Molloy wrote:
On Sunday 07 September 2008 09:23:16 Ed Greshko wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 07 September 2008, Tony Molloy wrote:
On Sunday 07 September 2008 07:49:18 David C. Chipman wrote:
On Sat, 6 Sep 2008 14:03:08
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 3:41 AM, Tony Molloy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 07 September 2008 09:23:16 Ed Greshko wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 07 September 2008, Tony Molloy wrote:
On Sunday 07 September 2008 07:49:18 David C. Chipman wrote:
On Sat, 6 Sep 2008 14:03:08 -0500
On Sunday 07 September 2008 09:53:35 Ed Greshko wrote:
Arthur Pemberton wrote:
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 3:41 AM, Tony Molloy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 07 September 2008 09:23:16 Ed Greshko wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 07 September 2008, Tony Molloy wrote:
On Sunday 07
Tony Molloy wrote:
I disabled the gpgcheck in fedora-updates-repo ( which I wouldn't recommend on
any machine , this is a TEST box ) and it's installing now.
Perhaps in
http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/updates/9/i386.newkey/fedora-release-notes-9.0.1-1.noarch.rpm
there
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 4:59 PM, Tony Molloy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 07 September 2008 11:10:25 Andrea Mastellone wrote:
Tony Molloy wrote:
I disabled the gpgcheck in fedora-updates-repo ( which I wouldn't
recommend on any machine , this is a TEST box ) and it's installing now.
On Sunday 07 September 2008 11:10:25 Andrea Mastellone wrote:
Tony Molloy wrote:
I disabled the gpgcheck in fedora-updates-repo ( which I wouldn't
recommend on any machine , this is a TEST box ) and it's installing now.
Perhaps in
On Sun, Sep 07, 2008 at 12:29:01 +0100,
Tony Molloy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 07 September 2008 11:10:25 Andrea Mastellone wrote:
Tony Molloy wrote:
I disabled the gpgcheck in fedora-updates-repo ( which I wouldn't
recommend on any machine , this is a TEST box ) and it's
On Sun, Sep 07, 2008 at 17:09:53 +0530,
Steve Repo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you confirm if the updates you downloaded (~1.2GB) are newer since
Aug 12 (since the incident) or are they just the same updates released
after F9 release but signed with a new key?
I'm just worried that I'll
On Sun, Sep 07, 2008 at 02:49:18 -0400,
David C. Chipman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 6 Sep 2008 14:03:08 -0500
Bruno Wolff III [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Replace $arch with $arch.newkey to get to the new updates and
updates-testing trees. I haven't seen an update to the release
On Sun, 2008-09-07 at 08:36 +0100, Tony Molloy wrote:
On Sunday 07 September 2008 07:49:18 David C. Chipman wrote:
On Sat, 6 Sep 2008 14:03:08 -0500
Bruno Wolff III [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Replace $arch with $arch.newkey to get to the new updates and
updates-testing trees. I haven't
Aaron Konstam wrote:
There was a mistake in my post the miwssing dependency was:
Error: Missing Dependency: xine-lib(plugin-abi) = 1.21 is needed by
package xine-lib-extras-nonfree-1.1.12-1.lvn9.i386 (installed)
It is still missing and xine-lib-extras-nonfree-1.1.12 cannot be
installed because
On Sunday 07 September 2008 12:39:53 Steve Repo wrote:
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 4:59 PM, Tony Molloy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 07 September 2008 11:10:25 Andrea Mastellone wrote:
Tony Molloy wrote:
I disabled the gpgcheck in fedora-updates-repo ( which I wouldn't
recommend on any
On Sunday 07 September 2008 13:27:03 Aaron Konstam wrote:
On Sun, 2008-09-07 at 08:36 +0100, Tony Molloy wrote:
On Sunday 07 September 2008 07:49:18 David C. Chipman wrote:
On Sat, 6 Sep 2008 14:03:08 -0500
Bruno Wolff III [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Replace $arch with $arch.newkey to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul W. Frields wrote:
snip
As a reminder, the fedora-announce-list is *extremely* low traffic and
it's highly recommended that if you bother with any of our lists at all,
you should subscribe to it too:
Vis-a-vis Jesse Keating's forwarded note of 2008-09-05 10:08:
...
Today we've reached a major milestone in this progress. We have done a
successful compose of all the existing and as of yesterday pending
updates for Fedora 8 and Fedora 9, all signed with our new keys. These
updates will
Vis-a-vis my note of 2008-09-06 07:53:
...
A little knowledge is a dangerous thing. Please save us from our
ignorance. Let's not be so busy making easy things trivial that we make
hard things an ordeal.
...
This is a joke.
I'm perfectly content to wait until the
On Sat, Sep 06, 2008 at 07:53:49 -0700,
Joe Christy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vis-a-vis Jesse Keating's forwarded note of 2008-09-05 10:08:
What, pray tell, are the new locations? I have local mirrors of the
F{8,9} updates, since it takes less time to rsync the trees than to do
why not create a fedora 8.1 and 9.1 release with new key's ?
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Sat, Sep 06, 2008 at 07:53:49 -0700,
Joe Christy[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vis-a-vis Jesse Keating's forwarded note of 2008-09-05 10:08:
What, pray tell, are the new locations? I have
For those not subscribed to the list and haven't heard, thought I would
pass this along.
Thanks,
Mike Chambers
Fedora Project - Ambassador, Bug Zapper, Tester, User, etc..
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Forwarded Message
From: Jesse Keating [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-to:
On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 12:08 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote:
For those not subscribed to the list and haven't heard, thought I would
pass this along.
Thanks for doing that Mike.
As a reminder, the fedora-announce-list is *extremely* low traffic and
it's highly recommended that if you bother with
On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 17:52 +, Paul W. Frields wrote:
snip
As a reminder, the fedora-announce-list is *extremely* low traffic and
it's highly recommended that if you bother with any of our lists at all,
you should subscribe to it too:
http://redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
I
On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 20:10 +0100, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 17:52 +, Paul W. Frields wrote:
snip
As a reminder, the fedora-announce-list is *extremely* low traffic and
it's highly recommended that if you bother with any of our lists at all,
you should subscribe to
On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 17:52 +, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 12:08 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote:
For those not subscribed to the list and haven't heard, thought I would
pass this along.
Thanks for doing that Mike.
As a reminder, the fedora-announce-list is *extremely*
Aaron Konstam wrote:
It ius low traffic but the messages are long and combined with their
links complex. It will take you probably of the order of hours to read
the whole message.
That seems a gross exaggeration to me. I can hardly think of any single
message that would take more than 10
On Sat, 2008-09-06 at 03:06 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Aaron Konstam wrote:
It ius low traffic but the messages are long and combined with their
links complex. It will take you probably of the order of hours to read
the whole message.
That seems a gross exaggeration to me. I can
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 1:42 PM, Paul W. Frields [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought he was joking about my getting the list URL wrong! :-)
I'm sure he is.. I don't post to annouce-list.
-jef
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe:
38 matches
Mail list logo
