Ahh the beautiful simplicity...
Thanks for the responses
--- On Sat, 11/15/08, Patrick O'Callaghan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Patrick O'Callaghan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: F9 and move to Hyperthreaded processor
To: fedora-list@redhat.com
Date: Saturday, November 15, 2008, 5:41 PM
On 11/15/2008 06:03 PM, Bob Kinney wrote:
Hello--
I am running F9 on an older box that has a Pentium 4 non-hyperthreaded
processor--it works great.
I want to plop in a hyperthreaded processor--let's assume here that the
processor and mainboard are compatible and working fine together.
When
Jerry Feldman wrote:
Be wary of hyperthreading. AFAIK, Intel no longer supports this
feature in their processors. First, there are a number of applications
that actually suffer from hyperthreading. For instance, my company's
product runs significantly slower on a system with hyperthreading
Hello--
I am running F9 on an older box that has a Pentium 4 non-hyperthreaded
processor--it works great.
I want to plop in a hyperthreaded processor--let's assume here that the
processor and mainboard are compatible and working fine together.
When I fire this system back up, how will the
On Sat, 2008-11-15 at 15:03 -0800, Bob Kinney wrote:
When I fire this system back up, how will the kernel react?
I have read that SMP is built into the kernel already, so will it
simply
pick up on the extra processor and begin working in
hyperthreaded/dual
processor mode or will this be
Bob Kinney wrote:
Hello--
I am running F9 on an older box that has a Pentium 4 non-hyperthreaded
processor--it works great.
I want to plop in a hyperthreaded processor--let's assume here that the
processor and mainboard are compatible and working fine together.
When I fire this
