On Tue, 2008-06-10 at 14:08 -0700, stan wrote:
Brian C. Huffman wrote:
I don't know for sure, but I think this must have been fixed by rc2 (based
on my current performance). I couldn't live with the IO thrashing in b5.
I just downloaded the binary from mozilla.org and installed it under
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Tue, 2008-06-10 at 14:08 -0700, stan wrote:
Brian C. Huffman wrote:
I don't know for sure, but I think this must have been fixed by rc2 (based on
my current performance). I couldn't live with the IO thrashing in b5.
I just downloaded the binary from
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 11:28 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I dl´ed the RC3 binary from mozilla.com and it does seem to work better.
Unfortunately it's a 32-bit binary so a lot of my plugins don't work. I
can't seem to find a 64-bit version anywhere. I seem to remember
On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 14:42 -0400, Raymond C. Rodgers wrote:
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Tue, 2008-06-10 at 14:08 -0700, stan wrote:
Brian C. Huffman wrote:
I don't know for sure, but I think this must have been fixed by rc2
(based on my current performance). I couldn't
On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 13:00 -0600, Reid Rivenburgh wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 11:28 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I dl´ed the RC3 binary from mozilla.com and it does seem to work better.
Unfortunately it's a 32-bit binary so a lot of my plugins don't work. I
can't
On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 23:03 +0100, Colin J Thomson wrote:
On Thursday 12 June 2008 20:21:18 Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 13:00 -0600, Reid Rivenburgh wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 11:28 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I dl´ed the RC3 binary
On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 10:40 -0700, David L wrote:
I wonder why f9 is still using beta after two release candidates have
been released.?
I wonder why Fedora ever bothered with using a beta. Surely users
should be doing some sort of yum install firefox-beta if they want to
use a beta release,
--- On Mon, 6/9/08, Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Firefox 3 beta on Fedora 9 uses lots of IO after start
To: For users of Fedora fedora-list@redhat.com
Date: Monday, June 9, 2008, 11:11 PM
On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 10:40 -0700, David L wrote:
I wonder
stan wrote:
I'm running Fedora 9 with the Firefox 3 beta. After start, Firefox
reads and writes heavily to the disk (99.99% in iotop) for almost a
minute. Is this known behavior and acceptable or a bug?
This is a known issue decribed here, has to do with the changed way that
firefox
performance is *much* better now.
Once they get an RPM out, I'll switch. But for now, I'm able to actually work.
-b
- Original Message -
From: stan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue, 6/10/2008 2:19pm
To: For users of Fedora fedora-list@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Firefox 3 beta on Fedora 9 uses
Brian C. Huffman wrote:
I don't know for sure, but I think this must have been fixed by rc2 (based on
my current performance). I couldn't live with the IO thrashing in b5.
I just downloaded the binary from mozilla.org and installed it under
/usr/lib/firefox-3.0rc2 and changed the references
Mike Burger wrote:
I'm running Fedora 9 with the Firefox 3 beta. After start, Firefox
reads and writes heavily to the disk (99.99% in iotop) for almost a
minute. Is this known behavior and acceptable or a bug?
Keeping in mind that Firefox is now out at 3.0 RC2 (though I can't find an
12 matches
Mail list logo
